Dose Verification for Tumor Motion with Different Treatment Planning Systems: A Dynamic Thorax Phantom Study
During radiation therapy for lung cancer, the respiratory motion of the target increases error and affects the treatment outcome. A four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) technology developed recently can be used to obtain snapshot thoracic CT images during the entire respiratory cycle, which...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical and biological engineering 2018-02, Vol.38 (1), p.46-54 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 54 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 46 |
container_title | Journal of medical and biological engineering |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Yang, Shih-Neng Lin, Chun-Wei Chang, Mu-Bai Zhang, Geoffrey G. Chou, Kuei-Ting Chiou, Yu-Rou Sun, Shung-Shung Lui, Louis Ho, Tsung-Jung Huang, Tzung-Chi |
description | During radiation therapy for lung cancer, the respiratory motion of the target increases error and affects the treatment outcome. A four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) technology developed recently can be used to obtain snapshot thoracic CT images during the entire respiratory cycle, which can be helpful in visualization of the tumor displacement in respiratory motion. This study employed a dynamic phantom to simulate tumor respiratory motion, with motion amplitudes of 2, 5 and 10 mm in the superior-inferior direction and motion periods of 4 and 6 s. 4D-CT imaging was applied to record the movement of the target, and maximum-intensity projection (MIP) imaging was used to define the internal target volume (ITV). Treatment plans were generated using three different treatment techniques—tomotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In addition, using interchangeable insert modules (an ionization chamber for point dose measurement and Gafchromic EBT3 film for planar dose distribution) in the dynamic phantom, the dose received by the target was measured. The dose received with motion was compared with that received under stationary conditions for dose errors due to respiratory motion. The point dose differences between moving and stationary conditions for tomotherapy, IMRT and VMAT were 0.48 ± 0.51%, 0.17 ± 0.45%, and 0.68 ± 0.70%, respectively; and at motion amplitudes of 2, 5, and 10 mm, the mean dose differences were 0.27 ± 0.38%, 0.37 ± 0.55% and 0.68 ± 0.74%, respectively. Based on planar dose analysis, at motion amplitudes of 2 and 5 mm, the dose distribution differences between moving and stationary conditions using the three treatment methods were all very small, and all passed the gamma index test with a criterion of 3%/3 mm, while at an amplitude of 10 mm, the edge of the ITV was associated with significantly greater dose errors. As studies have shown that in only approximately 10% of pulmonary tumors move with an amplitude >10 mm, 4D-CT MIP imaging in combination with delineation of the ITV may resolve the issue of dose error in most cases. For tumors with large motion amplitudes due to respiration, respiratory gating method may be used to reduce healthy lung tissues inside treatment field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40846-017-0367-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2012171357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2012171357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-78c03b763da1482e2f6a5f3075e6f84b694027f14bbab3ddb992516543b4f7323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWLQ_wFvA82q-s-uttH5BxUKr15DdJu2WblKTLLr_3q0reHIOM8Pwvu_AA8AVRjcYIXkbGcqZyBCWGaJCZvwEjAguioxJLk_BCAtUZKjI-TkYx7hDfdFCCJyPwH7mo4HvJtS2rnSqvYPWB7hqm76_-J_DZ522cFZba4JxCa6C0ak5bou9dq52G7jsYjJNvIMTOOucbuoKrrY-6C-42GqXfAOXqV13l-DM6n004995Ad4e7lfTp2z--vg8ncyzinKaMplXiJZS0LXGLCeGWKG5pUhyI2zOSlEwRKTFrCx1SdfrsigIx4IzWjIrKaEX4HrIPQT_0ZqY1M63wfUvFUGYYIkpl70KD6oq-BiDseoQ6kaHTmGkjlzVwFX1XNWRq-K9hwye2GvdxoS_5P9N33L-en8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2012171357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose Verification for Tumor Motion with Different Treatment Planning Systems: A Dynamic Thorax Phantom Study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Yang, Shih-Neng ; Lin, Chun-Wei ; Chang, Mu-Bai ; Zhang, Geoffrey G. ; Chou, Kuei-Ting ; Chiou, Yu-Rou ; Sun, Shung-Shung ; Lui, Louis ; Ho, Tsung-Jung ; Huang, Tzung-Chi</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shih-Neng ; Lin, Chun-Wei ; Chang, Mu-Bai ; Zhang, Geoffrey G. ; Chou, Kuei-Ting ; Chiou, Yu-Rou ; Sun, Shung-Shung ; Lui, Louis ; Ho, Tsung-Jung ; Huang, Tzung-Chi</creatorcontrib><description>During radiation therapy for lung cancer, the respiratory motion of the target increases error and affects the treatment outcome. A four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) technology developed recently can be used to obtain snapshot thoracic CT images during the entire respiratory cycle, which can be helpful in visualization of the tumor displacement in respiratory motion. This study employed a dynamic phantom to simulate tumor respiratory motion, with motion amplitudes of 2, 5 and 10 mm in the superior-inferior direction and motion periods of 4 and 6 s. 4D-CT imaging was applied to record the movement of the target, and maximum-intensity projection (MIP) imaging was used to define the internal target volume (ITV). Treatment plans were generated using three different treatment techniques—tomotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In addition, using interchangeable insert modules (an ionization chamber for point dose measurement and Gafchromic EBT3 film for planar dose distribution) in the dynamic phantom, the dose received by the target was measured. The dose received with motion was compared with that received under stationary conditions for dose errors due to respiratory motion. The point dose differences between moving and stationary conditions for tomotherapy, IMRT and VMAT were 0.48 ± 0.51%, 0.17 ± 0.45%, and 0.68 ± 0.70%, respectively; and at motion amplitudes of 2, 5, and 10 mm, the mean dose differences were 0.27 ± 0.38%, 0.37 ± 0.55% and 0.68 ± 0.74%, respectively. Based on planar dose analysis, at motion amplitudes of 2 and 5 mm, the dose distribution differences between moving and stationary conditions using the three treatment methods were all very small, and all passed the gamma index test with a criterion of 3%/3 mm, while at an amplitude of 10 mm, the edge of the ITV was associated with significantly greater dose errors. As studies have shown that in only approximately 10% of pulmonary tumors move with an amplitude >10 mm, 4D-CT MIP imaging in combination with delineation of the ITV may resolve the issue of dose error in most cases. For tumors with large motion amplitudes due to respiration, respiratory gating method may be used to reduce healthy lung tissues inside treatment field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1609-0985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2199-4757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40846-017-0367-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Amplitudes ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Cell Biology ; Computed tomography ; Computer simulation ; Engineering ; Gating ; Imaging ; Ionization ; Ionization chambers ; Lung cancer ; Medical imaging ; Original Article ; Radiation therapy ; Radiology ; Thorax ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical and biological engineering, 2018-02, Vol.38 (1), p.46-54</ispartof><rights>Taiwanese Society of Biomedical Engineering 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2018</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-78c03b763da1482e2f6a5f3075e6f84b694027f14bbab3ddb992516543b4f7323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-78c03b763da1482e2f6a5f3075e6f84b694027f14bbab3ddb992516543b4f7323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40846-017-0367-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40846-017-0367-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shih-Neng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chun-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Mu-Bai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Geoffrey G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Kuei-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiou, Yu-Rou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Shung-Shung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lui, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Tsung-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tzung-Chi</creatorcontrib><title>Dose Verification for Tumor Motion with Different Treatment Planning Systems: A Dynamic Thorax Phantom Study</title><title>Journal of medical and biological engineering</title><addtitle>J. Med. Biol. Eng</addtitle><description>During radiation therapy for lung cancer, the respiratory motion of the target increases error and affects the treatment outcome. A four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) technology developed recently can be used to obtain snapshot thoracic CT images during the entire respiratory cycle, which can be helpful in visualization of the tumor displacement in respiratory motion. This study employed a dynamic phantom to simulate tumor respiratory motion, with motion amplitudes of 2, 5 and 10 mm in the superior-inferior direction and motion periods of 4 and 6 s. 4D-CT imaging was applied to record the movement of the target, and maximum-intensity projection (MIP) imaging was used to define the internal target volume (ITV). Treatment plans were generated using three different treatment techniques—tomotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In addition, using interchangeable insert modules (an ionization chamber for point dose measurement and Gafchromic EBT3 film for planar dose distribution) in the dynamic phantom, the dose received by the target was measured. The dose received with motion was compared with that received under stationary conditions for dose errors due to respiratory motion. The point dose differences between moving and stationary conditions for tomotherapy, IMRT and VMAT were 0.48 ± 0.51%, 0.17 ± 0.45%, and 0.68 ± 0.70%, respectively; and at motion amplitudes of 2, 5, and 10 mm, the mean dose differences were 0.27 ± 0.38%, 0.37 ± 0.55% and 0.68 ± 0.74%, respectively. Based on planar dose analysis, at motion amplitudes of 2 and 5 mm, the dose distribution differences between moving and stationary conditions using the three treatment methods were all very small, and all passed the gamma index test with a criterion of 3%/3 mm, while at an amplitude of 10 mm, the edge of the ITV was associated with significantly greater dose errors. As studies have shown that in only approximately 10% of pulmonary tumors move with an amplitude >10 mm, 4D-CT MIP imaging in combination with delineation of the ITV may resolve the issue of dose error in most cases. For tumors with large motion amplitudes due to respiration, respiratory gating method may be used to reduce healthy lung tissues inside treatment field.</description><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Gating</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>Ionization chambers</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Thorax</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1609-0985</issn><issn>2199-4757</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWLQ_wFvA82q-s-uttH5BxUKr15DdJu2WblKTLLr_3q0reHIOM8Pwvu_AA8AVRjcYIXkbGcqZyBCWGaJCZvwEjAguioxJLk_BCAtUZKjI-TkYx7hDfdFCCJyPwH7mo4HvJtS2rnSqvYPWB7hqm76_-J_DZ522cFZba4JxCa6C0ak5bou9dq52G7jsYjJNvIMTOOucbuoKrrY-6C-42GqXfAOXqV13l-DM6n004995Ad4e7lfTp2z--vg8ncyzinKaMplXiJZS0LXGLCeGWKG5pUhyI2zOSlEwRKTFrCx1SdfrsigIx4IzWjIrKaEX4HrIPQT_0ZqY1M63wfUvFUGYYIkpl70KD6oq-BiDseoQ6kaHTmGkjlzVwFX1XNWRq-K9hwye2GvdxoS_5P9N33L-en8</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Yang, Shih-Neng</creator><creator>Lin, Chun-Wei</creator><creator>Chang, Mu-Bai</creator><creator>Zhang, Geoffrey G.</creator><creator>Chou, Kuei-Ting</creator><creator>Chiou, Yu-Rou</creator><creator>Sun, Shung-Shung</creator><creator>Lui, Louis</creator><creator>Ho, Tsung-Jung</creator><creator>Huang, Tzung-Chi</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Dose Verification for Tumor Motion with Different Treatment Planning Systems: A Dynamic Thorax Phantom Study</title><author>Yang, Shih-Neng ; Lin, Chun-Wei ; Chang, Mu-Bai ; Zhang, Geoffrey G. ; Chou, Kuei-Ting ; Chiou, Yu-Rou ; Sun, Shung-Shung ; Lui, Louis ; Ho, Tsung-Jung ; Huang, Tzung-Chi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-78c03b763da1482e2f6a5f3075e6f84b694027f14bbab3ddb992516543b4f7323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Gating</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>Ionization chambers</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Thorax</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shih-Neng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chun-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Mu-Bai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Geoffrey G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Kuei-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiou, Yu-Rou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Shung-Shung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lui, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Tsung-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tzung-Chi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical and biological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Shih-Neng</au><au>Lin, Chun-Wei</au><au>Chang, Mu-Bai</au><au>Zhang, Geoffrey G.</au><au>Chou, Kuei-Ting</au><au>Chiou, Yu-Rou</au><au>Sun, Shung-Shung</au><au>Lui, Louis</au><au>Ho, Tsung-Jung</au><au>Huang, Tzung-Chi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose Verification for Tumor Motion with Different Treatment Planning Systems: A Dynamic Thorax Phantom Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical and biological engineering</jtitle><stitle>J. Med. Biol. Eng</stitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>46-54</pages><issn>1609-0985</issn><eissn>2199-4757</eissn><abstract>During radiation therapy for lung cancer, the respiratory motion of the target increases error and affects the treatment outcome. A four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) technology developed recently can be used to obtain snapshot thoracic CT images during the entire respiratory cycle, which can be helpful in visualization of the tumor displacement in respiratory motion. This study employed a dynamic phantom to simulate tumor respiratory motion, with motion amplitudes of 2, 5 and 10 mm in the superior-inferior direction and motion periods of 4 and 6 s. 4D-CT imaging was applied to record the movement of the target, and maximum-intensity projection (MIP) imaging was used to define the internal target volume (ITV). Treatment plans were generated using three different treatment techniques—tomotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In addition, using interchangeable insert modules (an ionization chamber for point dose measurement and Gafchromic EBT3 film for planar dose distribution) in the dynamic phantom, the dose received by the target was measured. The dose received with motion was compared with that received under stationary conditions for dose errors due to respiratory motion. The point dose differences between moving and stationary conditions for tomotherapy, IMRT and VMAT were 0.48 ± 0.51%, 0.17 ± 0.45%, and 0.68 ± 0.70%, respectively; and at motion amplitudes of 2, 5, and 10 mm, the mean dose differences were 0.27 ± 0.38%, 0.37 ± 0.55% and 0.68 ± 0.74%, respectively. Based on planar dose analysis, at motion amplitudes of 2 and 5 mm, the dose distribution differences between moving and stationary conditions using the three treatment methods were all very small, and all passed the gamma index test with a criterion of 3%/3 mm, while at an amplitude of 10 mm, the edge of the ITV was associated with significantly greater dose errors. As studies have shown that in only approximately 10% of pulmonary tumors move with an amplitude >10 mm, 4D-CT MIP imaging in combination with delineation of the ITV may resolve the issue of dose error in most cases. For tumors with large motion amplitudes due to respiration, respiratory gating method may be used to reduce healthy lung tissues inside treatment field.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s40846-017-0367-5</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1609-0985 |
ispartof | Journal of medical and biological engineering, 2018-02, Vol.38 (1), p.46-54 |
issn | 1609-0985 2199-4757 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2012171357 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Amplitudes Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Cell Biology Computed tomography Computer simulation Engineering Gating Imaging Ionization Ionization chambers Lung cancer Medical imaging Original Article Radiation therapy Radiology Thorax Tumors |
title | Dose Verification for Tumor Motion with Different Treatment Planning Systems: A Dynamic Thorax Phantom Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T01%3A43%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose%20Verification%20for%20Tumor%20Motion%20with%20Different%20Treatment%20Planning%20Systems:%20A%20Dynamic%20Thorax%20Phantom%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20and%20biological%20engineering&rft.au=Yang,%20Shih-Neng&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=46-54&rft.issn=1609-0985&rft.eissn=2199-4757&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40846-017-0367-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2012171357%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2012171357&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |