The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province

Why do Chinese farmers continually utilize high-quality yet scarce cultivated land and extensively construct residences? Why is the Chinese government unable to control the continuous expansion of rural residential land after implementing strict economical and intensive land policies? To answer thes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2018-02, Vol.71, p.602-611
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Zhenning, Wu, Cifang, Tan, Yongzhong, Zhang, Xiaobin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 611
container_issue
container_start_page 602
container_title Land use policy
container_volume 71
creator Yu, Zhenning
Wu, Cifang
Tan, Yongzhong
Zhang, Xiaobin
description Why do Chinese farmers continually utilize high-quality yet scarce cultivated land and extensively construct residences? Why is the Chinese government unable to control the continuous expansion of rural residential land after implementing strict economical and intensive land policies? To answer these questions, we launched a comparative study of three townships in Zhejiang Province. Based on a survey of 576 households and 72 rural government officials, this paper identified the determinants of rural house-building, explored different models of government intervention and provided recommendations for future government efforts. Results showed that (1) children, environment, investment, “mianzi”, and “feng shui” factors were the main driving forces that influence farmers to construct residential structures, although primary and secondary differences in the various townships existed; (2) three problems in the specific governance emerged: the lack of farmers’ unified action, failure to protect the rights of farmers, and the problem of meeting the funds demand of homestead replacement; (3) Actively exploring effective village planning, establishing linkages among stakeholders, effectively promoting farmers’ participation, creating a service-oriented government, and introducing a Public-Private Partnership mechanism may effectively address the problems related to rural residential expansion and governance. The results indicated a need to pay more attention to the motivations of rural house-building, the interests of stakeholders and the funding arrangements of the project in future government intervention.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.054
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2012059571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837717304908</els_id><sourcerecordid>2012059571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-f7cd20a787d76ff344acf467cf3afaa774a7f78c19f83dfd6ed62c311e897a2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2L1TAUhoMoeB39DwHXrUm_TutuvOgoDMwsxo2bcExOpim9SU3aq7Pxt5tyBZeuDgfe54X3YYxLUUohu3dTOaM3W6IlzGUlJJRiKEXbPGMH2UNdtNA2z9lBVF1T9DXAS_YqpUkI0Q2yOrDfDyNx42Y6nZAHy_cyTr8W9MkFz_fvMZwpevSauPM8bhFnfhydx_f8mutwWjDi6s7E07qZJ_4dExme2XWMRHwNP30a3ZJ2-NtIk0P_yO9jOLvc-Jq9sDgnevP3XrGvnz4-HD8Xt3c3X47Xt4Wum24tLGhTCYQeDHTW1k2D2jYdaFujRQRoECz0Wg62r401HZmu0rWU1A-AFdZX7O2ld4nhx0ZpVVPY8qg5qeysEu3Qgsyp_pLSMaQUyaoluhPGJyWF2m2rSf2zvZOgxKCy7Yx-uKCUV5wdRZW0o7zQuEh6VSa4_5f8AfBbkJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2012059571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yu, Zhenning ; Wu, Cifang ; Tan, Yongzhong ; Zhang, Xiaobin</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhenning ; Wu, Cifang ; Tan, Yongzhong ; Zhang, Xiaobin</creatorcontrib><description>Why do Chinese farmers continually utilize high-quality yet scarce cultivated land and extensively construct residences? Why is the Chinese government unable to control the continuous expansion of rural residential land after implementing strict economical and intensive land policies? To answer these questions, we launched a comparative study of three townships in Zhejiang Province. Based on a survey of 576 households and 72 rural government officials, this paper identified the determinants of rural house-building, explored different models of government intervention and provided recommendations for future government efforts. Results showed that (1) children, environment, investment, “mianzi”, and “feng shui” factors were the main driving forces that influence farmers to construct residential structures, although primary and secondary differences in the various townships existed; (2) three problems in the specific governance emerged: the lack of farmers’ unified action, failure to protect the rights of farmers, and the problem of meeting the funds demand of homestead replacement; (3) Actively exploring effective village planning, establishing linkages among stakeholders, effectively promoting farmers’ participation, creating a service-oriented government, and introducing a Public-Private Partnership mechanism may effectively address the problems related to rural residential expansion and governance. The results indicated a need to pay more attention to the motivations of rural house-building, the interests of stakeholders and the funding arrangements of the project in future government intervention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Children ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative research ; Comparative studies ; Construction ; Cultivated lands ; Expansion ; Farmers ; Feng shui ; Governance ; Government ; Households ; Housing ; Interest groups ; Intervention ; Investments ; Land ; Land use planning ; Participation ; Planning ; Public officials ; Public participation ; Public private partnerships ; Residential buildings ; Rural areas ; Rural China ; Rural residential land ; State intervention ; The governance dilemma ; The homestead replacement ; The rural house-building craze</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2018-02, Vol.71, p.602-611</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-f7cd20a787d76ff344acf467cf3afaa774a7f78c19f83dfd6ed62c311e897a2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-f7cd20a787d76ff344acf467cf3afaa774a7f78c19f83dfd6ed62c311e897a2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.054$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27847,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhenning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Cifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yongzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiaobin</creatorcontrib><title>The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>Why do Chinese farmers continually utilize high-quality yet scarce cultivated land and extensively construct residences? Why is the Chinese government unable to control the continuous expansion of rural residential land after implementing strict economical and intensive land policies? To answer these questions, we launched a comparative study of three townships in Zhejiang Province. Based on a survey of 576 households and 72 rural government officials, this paper identified the determinants of rural house-building, explored different models of government intervention and provided recommendations for future government efforts. Results showed that (1) children, environment, investment, “mianzi”, and “feng shui” factors were the main driving forces that influence farmers to construct residential structures, although primary and secondary differences in the various townships existed; (2) three problems in the specific governance emerged: the lack of farmers’ unified action, failure to protect the rights of farmers, and the problem of meeting the funds demand of homestead replacement; (3) Actively exploring effective village planning, establishing linkages among stakeholders, effectively promoting farmers’ participation, creating a service-oriented government, and introducing a Public-Private Partnership mechanism may effectively address the problems related to rural residential expansion and governance. The results indicated a need to pay more attention to the motivations of rural house-building, the interests of stakeholders and the funding arrangements of the project in future government intervention.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative research</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Cultivated lands</subject><subject>Expansion</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Feng shui</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Public private partnerships</subject><subject>Residential buildings</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural China</subject><subject>Rural residential land</subject><subject>State intervention</subject><subject>The governance dilemma</subject><subject>The homestead replacement</subject><subject>The rural house-building craze</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE2L1TAUhoMoeB39DwHXrUm_TutuvOgoDMwsxo2bcExOpim9SU3aq7Pxt5tyBZeuDgfe54X3YYxLUUohu3dTOaM3W6IlzGUlJJRiKEXbPGMH2UNdtNA2z9lBVF1T9DXAS_YqpUkI0Q2yOrDfDyNx42Y6nZAHy_cyTr8W9MkFz_fvMZwpevSauPM8bhFnfhydx_f8mutwWjDi6s7E07qZJ_4dExme2XWMRHwNP30a3ZJ2-NtIk0P_yO9jOLvc-Jq9sDgnevP3XrGvnz4-HD8Xt3c3X47Xt4Wum24tLGhTCYQeDHTW1k2D2jYdaFujRQRoECz0Wg62r401HZmu0rWU1A-AFdZX7O2ld4nhx0ZpVVPY8qg5qeysEu3Qgsyp_pLSMaQUyaoluhPGJyWF2m2rSf2zvZOgxKCy7Yx-uKCUV5wdRZW0o7zQuEh6VSa4_5f8AfBbkJA</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Yu, Zhenning</creator><creator>Wu, Cifang</creator><creator>Tan, Yongzhong</creator><creator>Zhang, Xiaobin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province</title><author>Yu, Zhenning ; Wu, Cifang ; Tan, Yongzhong ; Zhang, Xiaobin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-f7cd20a787d76ff344acf467cf3afaa774a7f78c19f83dfd6ed62c311e897a2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative research</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Cultivated lands</topic><topic>Expansion</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Feng shui</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Public private partnerships</topic><topic>Residential buildings</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural China</topic><topic>Rural residential land</topic><topic>State intervention</topic><topic>The governance dilemma</topic><topic>The homestead replacement</topic><topic>The rural house-building craze</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhenning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Cifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yongzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiaobin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Zhenning</au><au>Wu, Cifang</au><au>Tan, Yongzhong</au><au>Zhang, Xiaobin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>602</spage><epage>611</epage><pages>602-611</pages><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>Why do Chinese farmers continually utilize high-quality yet scarce cultivated land and extensively construct residences? Why is the Chinese government unable to control the continuous expansion of rural residential land after implementing strict economical and intensive land policies? To answer these questions, we launched a comparative study of three townships in Zhejiang Province. Based on a survey of 576 households and 72 rural government officials, this paper identified the determinants of rural house-building, explored different models of government intervention and provided recommendations for future government efforts. Results showed that (1) children, environment, investment, “mianzi”, and “feng shui” factors were the main driving forces that influence farmers to construct residential structures, although primary and secondary differences in the various townships existed; (2) three problems in the specific governance emerged: the lack of farmers’ unified action, failure to protect the rights of farmers, and the problem of meeting the funds demand of homestead replacement; (3) Actively exploring effective village planning, establishing linkages among stakeholders, effectively promoting farmers’ participation, creating a service-oriented government, and introducing a Public-Private Partnership mechanism may effectively address the problems related to rural residential expansion and governance. The results indicated a need to pay more attention to the motivations of rural house-building, the interests of stakeholders and the funding arrangements of the project in future government intervention.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.054</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8377
ispartof Land use policy, 2018-02, Vol.71, p.602-611
issn 0264-8377
1873-5754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2012059571
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Children
Comparative analysis
Comparative research
Comparative studies
Construction
Cultivated lands
Expansion
Farmers
Feng shui
Governance
Government
Households
Housing
Interest groups
Intervention
Investments
Land
Land use planning
Participation
Planning
Public officials
Public participation
Public private partnerships
Residential buildings
Rural areas
Rural China
Rural residential land
State intervention
The governance dilemma
The homestead replacement
The rural house-building craze
title The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T05%3A03%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20dilemma%20of%20land%20expansion%20and%20governance%20in%20rural%20China:%20A%20comparative%20study%20based%20on%20three%20townships%20in%20Zhejiang%20Province&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Yu,%20Zhenning&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=602&rft.epage=611&rft.pages=602-611&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2012059571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2012059571&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837717304908&rfr_iscdi=true