The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province
Why do Chinese farmers continually utilize high-quality yet scarce cultivated land and extensively construct residences? Why is the Chinese government unable to control the continuous expansion of rural residential land after implementing strict economical and intensive land policies? To answer thes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Land use policy 2018-02, Vol.71, p.602-611 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 611 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 602 |
container_title | Land use policy |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Yu, Zhenning Wu, Cifang Tan, Yongzhong Zhang, Xiaobin |
description | Why do Chinese farmers continually utilize high-quality yet scarce cultivated land and extensively construct residences? Why is the Chinese government unable to control the continuous expansion of rural residential land after implementing strict economical and intensive land policies? To answer these questions, we launched a comparative study of three townships in Zhejiang Province. Based on a survey of 576 households and 72 rural government officials, this paper identified the determinants of rural house-building, explored different models of government intervention and provided recommendations for future government efforts. Results showed that (1) children, environment, investment, “mianzi”, and “feng shui” factors were the main driving forces that influence farmers to construct residential structures, although primary and secondary differences in the various townships existed; (2) three problems in the specific governance emerged: the lack of farmers’ unified action, failure to protect the rights of farmers, and the problem of meeting the funds demand of homestead replacement; (3) Actively exploring effective village planning, establishing linkages among stakeholders, effectively promoting farmers’ participation, creating a service-oriented government, and introducing a Public-Private Partnership mechanism may effectively address the problems related to rural residential expansion and governance. The results indicated a need to pay more attention to the motivations of rural house-building, the interests of stakeholders and the funding arrangements of the project in future government intervention. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.054 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2012059571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837717304908</els_id><sourcerecordid>2012059571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-f7cd20a787d76ff344acf467cf3afaa774a7f78c19f83dfd6ed62c311e897a2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2L1TAUhoMoeB39DwHXrUm_TutuvOgoDMwsxo2bcExOpim9SU3aq7Pxt5tyBZeuDgfe54X3YYxLUUohu3dTOaM3W6IlzGUlJJRiKEXbPGMH2UNdtNA2z9lBVF1T9DXAS_YqpUkI0Q2yOrDfDyNx42Y6nZAHy_cyTr8W9MkFz_fvMZwpevSauPM8bhFnfhydx_f8mutwWjDi6s7E07qZJ_4dExme2XWMRHwNP30a3ZJ2-NtIk0P_yO9jOLvc-Jq9sDgnevP3XrGvnz4-HD8Xt3c3X47Xt4Wum24tLGhTCYQeDHTW1k2D2jYdaFujRQRoECz0Wg62r401HZmu0rWU1A-AFdZX7O2ld4nhx0ZpVVPY8qg5qeysEu3Qgsyp_pLSMaQUyaoluhPGJyWF2m2rSf2zvZOgxKCy7Yx-uKCUV5wdRZW0o7zQuEh6VSa4_5f8AfBbkJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2012059571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yu, Zhenning ; Wu, Cifang ; Tan, Yongzhong ; Zhang, Xiaobin</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhenning ; Wu, Cifang ; Tan, Yongzhong ; Zhang, Xiaobin</creatorcontrib><description>Why do Chinese farmers continually utilize high-quality yet scarce cultivated land and extensively construct residences? Why is the Chinese government unable to control the continuous expansion of rural residential land after implementing strict economical and intensive land policies? To answer these questions, we launched a comparative study of three townships in Zhejiang Province. Based on a survey of 576 households and 72 rural government officials, this paper identified the determinants of rural house-building, explored different models of government intervention and provided recommendations for future government efforts. Results showed that (1) children, environment, investment, “mianzi”, and “feng shui” factors were the main driving forces that influence farmers to construct residential structures, although primary and secondary differences in the various townships existed; (2) three problems in the specific governance emerged: the lack of farmers’ unified action, failure to protect the rights of farmers, and the problem of meeting the funds demand of homestead replacement; (3) Actively exploring effective village planning, establishing linkages among stakeholders, effectively promoting farmers’ participation, creating a service-oriented government, and introducing a Public-Private Partnership mechanism may effectively address the problems related to rural residential expansion and governance. The results indicated a need to pay more attention to the motivations of rural house-building, the interests of stakeholders and the funding arrangements of the project in future government intervention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.054</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Children ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative research ; Comparative studies ; Construction ; Cultivated lands ; Expansion ; Farmers ; Feng shui ; Governance ; Government ; Households ; Housing ; Interest groups ; Intervention ; Investments ; Land ; Land use planning ; Participation ; Planning ; Public officials ; Public participation ; Public private partnerships ; Residential buildings ; Rural areas ; Rural China ; Rural residential land ; State intervention ; The governance dilemma ; The homestead replacement ; The rural house-building craze</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2018-02, Vol.71, p.602-611</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-f7cd20a787d76ff344acf467cf3afaa774a7f78c19f83dfd6ed62c311e897a2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-f7cd20a787d76ff344acf467cf3afaa774a7f78c19f83dfd6ed62c311e897a2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.054$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27847,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhenning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Cifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yongzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiaobin</creatorcontrib><title>The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>Why do Chinese farmers continually utilize high-quality yet scarce cultivated land and extensively construct residences? Why is the Chinese government unable to control the continuous expansion of rural residential land after implementing strict economical and intensive land policies? To answer these questions, we launched a comparative study of three townships in Zhejiang Province. Based on a survey of 576 households and 72 rural government officials, this paper identified the determinants of rural house-building, explored different models of government intervention and provided recommendations for future government efforts. Results showed that (1) children, environment, investment, “mianzi”, and “feng shui” factors were the main driving forces that influence farmers to construct residential structures, although primary and secondary differences in the various townships existed; (2) three problems in the specific governance emerged: the lack of farmers’ unified action, failure to protect the rights of farmers, and the problem of meeting the funds demand of homestead replacement; (3) Actively exploring effective village planning, establishing linkages among stakeholders, effectively promoting farmers’ participation, creating a service-oriented government, and introducing a Public-Private Partnership mechanism may effectively address the problems related to rural residential expansion and governance. The results indicated a need to pay more attention to the motivations of rural house-building, the interests of stakeholders and the funding arrangements of the project in future government intervention.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative research</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Cultivated lands</subject><subject>Expansion</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Feng shui</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Public private partnerships</subject><subject>Residential buildings</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural China</subject><subject>Rural residential land</subject><subject>State intervention</subject><subject>The governance dilemma</subject><subject>The homestead replacement</subject><subject>The rural house-building craze</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE2L1TAUhoMoeB39DwHXrUm_TutuvOgoDMwsxo2bcExOpim9SU3aq7Pxt5tyBZeuDgfe54X3YYxLUUohu3dTOaM3W6IlzGUlJJRiKEXbPGMH2UNdtNA2z9lBVF1T9DXAS_YqpUkI0Q2yOrDfDyNx42Y6nZAHy_cyTr8W9MkFz_fvMZwpevSauPM8bhFnfhydx_f8mutwWjDi6s7E07qZJ_4dExme2XWMRHwNP30a3ZJ2-NtIk0P_yO9jOLvc-Jq9sDgnevP3XrGvnz4-HD8Xt3c3X47Xt4Wum24tLGhTCYQeDHTW1k2D2jYdaFujRQRoECz0Wg62r401HZmu0rWU1A-AFdZX7O2ld4nhx0ZpVVPY8qg5qeysEu3Qgsyp_pLSMaQUyaoluhPGJyWF2m2rSf2zvZOgxKCy7Yx-uKCUV5wdRZW0o7zQuEh6VSa4_5f8AfBbkJA</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Yu, Zhenning</creator><creator>Wu, Cifang</creator><creator>Tan, Yongzhong</creator><creator>Zhang, Xiaobin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province</title><author>Yu, Zhenning ; Wu, Cifang ; Tan, Yongzhong ; Zhang, Xiaobin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-f7cd20a787d76ff344acf467cf3afaa774a7f78c19f83dfd6ed62c311e897a2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative research</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Cultivated lands</topic><topic>Expansion</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Feng shui</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Public private partnerships</topic><topic>Residential buildings</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural China</topic><topic>Rural residential land</topic><topic>State intervention</topic><topic>The governance dilemma</topic><topic>The homestead replacement</topic><topic>The rural house-building craze</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhenning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Cifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yongzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiaobin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Zhenning</au><au>Wu, Cifang</au><au>Tan, Yongzhong</au><au>Zhang, Xiaobin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>602</spage><epage>611</epage><pages>602-611</pages><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>Why do Chinese farmers continually utilize high-quality yet scarce cultivated land and extensively construct residences? Why is the Chinese government unable to control the continuous expansion of rural residential land after implementing strict economical and intensive land policies? To answer these questions, we launched a comparative study of three townships in Zhejiang Province. Based on a survey of 576 households and 72 rural government officials, this paper identified the determinants of rural house-building, explored different models of government intervention and provided recommendations for future government efforts. Results showed that (1) children, environment, investment, “mianzi”, and “feng shui” factors were the main driving forces that influence farmers to construct residential structures, although primary and secondary differences in the various townships existed; (2) three problems in the specific governance emerged: the lack of farmers’ unified action, failure to protect the rights of farmers, and the problem of meeting the funds demand of homestead replacement; (3) Actively exploring effective village planning, establishing linkages among stakeholders, effectively promoting farmers’ participation, creating a service-oriented government, and introducing a Public-Private Partnership mechanism may effectively address the problems related to rural residential expansion and governance. The results indicated a need to pay more attention to the motivations of rural house-building, the interests of stakeholders and the funding arrangements of the project in future government intervention.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.054</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-8377 |
ispartof | Land use policy, 2018-02, Vol.71, p.602-611 |
issn | 0264-8377 1873-5754 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2012059571 |
source | PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Children Comparative analysis Comparative research Comparative studies Construction Cultivated lands Expansion Farmers Feng shui Governance Government Households Housing Interest groups Intervention Investments Land Land use planning Participation Planning Public officials Public participation Public private partnerships Residential buildings Rural areas Rural China Rural residential land State intervention The governance dilemma The homestead replacement The rural house-building craze |
title | The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T05%3A03%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20dilemma%20of%20land%20expansion%20and%20governance%20in%20rural%20China:%20A%20comparative%20study%20based%20on%20three%20townships%20in%20Zhejiang%20Province&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Yu,%20Zhenning&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=602&rft.epage=611&rft.pages=602-611&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2012059571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2012059571&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837717304908&rfr_iscdi=true |