Commentary: Ethical dilemmas and publishing constraints of client-based applied practitioners
Client-based practitioners of anthropology face the legal and ethical dilemma of owing a responsibility to their discipline to share their findings and contribute to scientific knowledge, but they don't own the data. Possible solutions to the problem are offered.
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human organization 1993-12, Vol.52 (4), p.432 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 432 |
container_title | Human organization |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Greider, Thomas |
description | Client-based practitioners of anthropology face the legal and ethical dilemma of owing a responsibility to their discipline to share their findings and contribute to scientific knowledge, but they don't own the data. Possible solutions to the problem are offered. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_201145734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>6023880</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2011457343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi0sOgjAURRujifjZQ-O8SfkFcEowLsCpIQ8oUlLa2lcG7t4OXICjm3vPuRsSxVVasjRP8i2JOI9LViR5tScHxJlznoUlIs_aLIvQHtznShs_yR4UHaQSywJIQQ_Urp2SOEn9or3R6B1I7ZGakfZKhifrAMVAwdpQg-6g99JLo4XDE9mNoFCcf3kkl1vzqO_MOvNeBfp2NqvTAbUJj-MsL9Is_Uv6AgjVRXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201145734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Commentary: Ethical dilemmas and publishing constraints of client-based applied practitioners</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Greider, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Greider, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Client-based practitioners of anthropology face the legal and ethical dilemma of owing a responsibility to their discipline to share their findings and contribute to scientific knowledge, but they don't own the data. Possible solutions to the problem are offered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7259</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3525</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUORAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oklahoma City: Taylor & Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Anthropology ; Ethics ; Professional ethics ; Publishing ; Scientific knowledge</subject><ispartof>Human organization, 1993-12, Vol.52 (4), p.432</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of Applied Anthropology Winter 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,33753</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greider, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Commentary: Ethical dilemmas and publishing constraints of client-based applied practitioners</title><title>Human organization</title><description>Client-based practitioners of anthropology face the legal and ethical dilemma of owing a responsibility to their discipline to share their findings and contribute to scientific knowledge, but they don't own the data. Possible solutions to the problem are offered.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Publishing</subject><subject>Scientific knowledge</subject><issn>0018-7259</issn><issn>1938-3525</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi0sOgjAURRujifjZQ-O8SfkFcEowLsCpIQ8oUlLa2lcG7t4OXICjm3vPuRsSxVVasjRP8i2JOI9LViR5tScHxJlznoUlIs_aLIvQHtznShs_yR4UHaQSywJIQQ_Urp2SOEn9or3R6B1I7ZGakfZKhifrAMVAwdpQg-6g99JLo4XDE9mNoFCcf3kkl1vzqO_MOvNeBfp2NqvTAbUJj-MsL9Is_Uv6AgjVRXw</recordid><startdate>19931201</startdate><enddate>19931201</enddate><creator>Greider, Thomas</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19931201</creationdate><title>Commentary: Ethical dilemmas and publishing constraints of client-based applied practitioners</title><author>Greider, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2011457343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Publishing</topic><topic>Scientific knowledge</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greider, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Human organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greider, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Commentary: Ethical dilemmas and publishing constraints of client-based applied practitioners</atitle><jtitle>Human organization</jtitle><date>1993-12-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>432</spage><pages>432-</pages><issn>0018-7259</issn><eissn>1938-3525</eissn><coden>HUORAY</coden><abstract>Client-based practitioners of anthropology face the legal and ethical dilemma of owing a responsibility to their discipline to share their findings and contribute to scientific knowledge, but they don't own the data. Possible solutions to the problem are offered.</abstract><cop>Oklahoma City</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Ltd</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-7259 |
ispartof | Human organization, 1993-12, Vol.52 (4), p.432 |
issn | 0018-7259 1938-3525 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_201145734 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Academic disciplines Anthropology Ethics Professional ethics Publishing Scientific knowledge |
title | Commentary: Ethical dilemmas and publishing constraints of client-based applied practitioners |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T18%3A36%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commentary:%20Ethical%20dilemmas%20and%20publishing%20constraints%20of%20client-based%20applied%20practitioners&rft.jtitle=Human%20organization&rft.au=Greider,%20Thomas&rft.date=1993-12-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=432&rft.pages=432-&rft.issn=0018-7259&rft.eissn=1938-3525&rft.coden=HUORAY&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E6023880%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201145734&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |