Linking International Markets and Global Justice
The U.S. government is the planet's largest purchaser of goods and services; worldwide, states spend trillions of dollars on procurement each year. Yet legal scholarship has devoted relatively limited attention to the conceptual and normative issues that arise when states enter the market. Shou...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Michigan Law Review 2009-04, Vol.107 (6), p.1039-1058 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1058 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1039 |
| container_title | Michigan Law Review |
| container_volume | 107 |
| creator | Dunoff, Jeffrey L. |
| description | The U.S. government is the planet's largest purchaser of goods and services; worldwide, states spend trillions of dollars on procurement each year. Yet legal scholarship has devoted relatively limited attention to the conceptual and normative issues that arise when states enter the market. Should states as purchasers be permitted to "discriminate" to advance social objectives-say, racial justice-in ways that would be unlawful when they act as regulators? Is each country free to strike its own balance between the pursuit of economic and social objectives through procurement, or do international trade norms limit state discretion in the name of economic efficiency? Should states be permitted to use procurement to advance social objectives, like environmental protection or worker rights, in other states? |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_201135046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20191219021860</informt_id><jstor_id>40379850</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40379850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j215t-ccec4e272e6ce95bd0d85308864b27c475497af75ffdd0d808b5385ae3714f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1jktLAzEYRYMoWKs_QRjcD3x5TZKlFO2DipvuQyaTqZlOk5qkC_-9o9XVhXsPh3uFZlhRVUvOxTWaAZCmJoSyW3SX8wAAmFM8Q7D14eDDvlqH4lIwxcdgxurNpIMruTKhq5ZjbKdqc87FW3ePbnozZvfwl3O0e33ZLVb19n25Xjxv64FgXmprnWWOCOIa6xRvO-gkpyBlw1oiLBOcKWF6wfu--9lAtpxKbhwVmPWYztHTRXtK8fPsctFDPE__xqwJYEw5sGaCVhcoHX3RZu_zqejsTLIf2oc-_tYx7XUXvcagKcXNPzZZFCZYAcGygUn1eFENucSkT8kfTfrSDKhQkgP9BnmRYcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201135046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linking International Markets and Global Justice</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Dunoff, Jeffrey L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunoff, Jeffrey L.</creatorcontrib><description>The U.S. government is the planet's largest purchaser of goods and services; worldwide, states spend trillions of dollars on procurement each year. Yet legal scholarship has devoted relatively limited attention to the conceptual and normative issues that arise when states enter the market. Should states as purchasers be permitted to "discriminate" to advance social objectives-say, racial justice-in ways that would be unlawful when they act as regulators? Is each country free to strike its own balance between the pursuit of economic and social objectives through procurement, or do international trade norms limit state discretion in the name of economic efficiency? Should states be permitted to use procurement to advance social objectives, like environmental protection or worker rights, in other states?</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-2234</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ann Arbor: Michigan Law Review Association</publisher><subject>Contractors ; Debates ; Economic impact ; Employee rights ; Environmental protection ; Equal rights ; Equality ; Export marketing ; Government purchasing ; Human rights ; Industrial procurement ; International law ; International trade ; Justice ; Law ; Objectives ; Reviews ; Social aspects ; Social goals ; Social justice ; Social responsibility</subject><ispartof>Michigan Law Review, 2009-04, Vol.107 (6), p.1039-1058</ispartof><rights>Copyright Michigan Law Review Association Apr 2009</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40379850$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40379850$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunoff, Jeffrey L.</creatorcontrib><title>Linking International Markets and Global Justice</title><title>Michigan Law Review</title><description>The U.S. government is the planet's largest purchaser of goods and services; worldwide, states spend trillions of dollars on procurement each year. Yet legal scholarship has devoted relatively limited attention to the conceptual and normative issues that arise when states enter the market. Should states as purchasers be permitted to "discriminate" to advance social objectives-say, racial justice-in ways that would be unlawful when they act as regulators? Is each country free to strike its own balance between the pursuit of economic and social objectives through procurement, or do international trade norms limit state discretion in the name of economic efficiency? Should states be permitted to use procurement to advance social objectives, like environmental protection or worker rights, in other states?</description><subject>Contractors</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Employee rights</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Equal rights</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Export marketing</subject><subject>Government purchasing</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Industrial procurement</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social goals</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><issn>0026-2234</issn><issn>1939-8557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo1jktLAzEYRYMoWKs_QRjcD3x5TZKlFO2DipvuQyaTqZlOk5qkC_-9o9XVhXsPh3uFZlhRVUvOxTWaAZCmJoSyW3SX8wAAmFM8Q7D14eDDvlqH4lIwxcdgxurNpIMruTKhq5ZjbKdqc87FW3ePbnozZvfwl3O0e33ZLVb19n25Xjxv64FgXmprnWWOCOIa6xRvO-gkpyBlw1oiLBOcKWF6wfu--9lAtpxKbhwVmPWYztHTRXtK8fPsctFDPE__xqwJYEw5sGaCVhcoHX3RZu_zqejsTLIf2oc-_tYx7XUXvcagKcXNPzZZFCZYAcGygUn1eFENucSkT8kfTfrSDKhQkgP9BnmRYcQ</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Dunoff, Jeffrey L.</creator><general>Michigan Law Review Association</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Linking International Markets and Global Justice</title><author>Dunoff, Jeffrey L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j215t-ccec4e272e6ce95bd0d85308864b27c475497af75ffdd0d808b5385ae3714f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Contractors</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Employee rights</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Equal rights</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Export marketing</topic><topic>Government purchasing</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Industrial procurement</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social goals</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunoff, Jeffrey L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Michigan Law Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunoff, Jeffrey L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Linking International Markets and Global Justice</atitle><jtitle>Michigan Law Review</jtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1039</spage><epage>1058</epage><pages>1039-1058</pages><issn>0026-2234</issn><eissn>1939-8557</eissn><abstract>The U.S. government is the planet's largest purchaser of goods and services; worldwide, states spend trillions of dollars on procurement each year. Yet legal scholarship has devoted relatively limited attention to the conceptual and normative issues that arise when states enter the market. Should states as purchasers be permitted to "discriminate" to advance social objectives-say, racial justice-in ways that would be unlawful when they act as regulators? Is each country free to strike its own balance between the pursuit of economic and social objectives through procurement, or do international trade norms limit state discretion in the name of economic efficiency? Should states be permitted to use procurement to advance social objectives, like environmental protection or worker rights, in other states?</abstract><cop>Ann Arbor</cop><pub>Michigan Law Review Association</pub><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0026-2234 |
| ispartof | Michigan Law Review, 2009-04, Vol.107 (6), p.1039-1058 |
| issn | 0026-2234 1939-8557 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_201135046 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Contractors Debates Economic impact Employee rights Environmental protection Equal rights Equality Export marketing Government purchasing Human rights Industrial procurement International law International trade Justice Law Objectives Reviews Social aspects Social goals Social justice Social responsibility |
| title | Linking International Markets and Global Justice |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A41%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linking%20International%20Markets%20and%20Global%20Justice&rft.jtitle=Michigan%20Law%20Review&rft.au=Dunoff,%20Jeffrey%20L.&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1039&rft.epage=1058&rft.pages=1039-1058&rft.issn=0026-2234&rft.eissn=1939-8557&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40379850%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201135046&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20191219021860&rft_jstor_id=40379850&rfr_iscdi=true |