Capitalism, Jacobinism and International Relations: Re-interpreting the Ottoman path to modernity
Debates over ‘modernity’ have been central to the development of historical-sociological approaches to International Relations (IR). Within the bourgeoning subfield of International Historical Sociology (IHS), much work has been done to formulate a historically dynamic conception of international re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Review of international studies 2018-04, Vol.44 (2), p.252-278 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 278 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 252 |
container_title | Review of international studies |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Duzgun, Eren |
description | Debates over ‘modernity’ have been central to the development of historical-sociological approaches to International Relations (IR). Within the bourgeoning subfield of International Historical Sociology (IHS), much work has been done to formulate a historically dynamic conception of international relations, which is then used to undermine unilinear conceptions of global modernity. Nevertheless, this article argues that IHS has not proceeded far enough in successfully remedying the problem of unilinearism. The problem remains that historical narratives, informed by IHS, tend to transhistoricise capitalism, which, in turn, obscures the generative nature of international relations, as well as the fundamental heterogeneity of diverging paths to modernity both within and beyond western Europe. Based on the theory of Uneven and Combined Development, Political Marxism, and Robbie Shilliam’s discussion of ‘Jacobinism’, this article first reinterprets the radical multilinearity of modernity within western Europe, and then utilises this reinterpretation to provide a new reading of the Ottoman path to modernity (1839–1918). Such a historical critique and reconstruction will highlight the significance of Jacobinism for a more accurate theorisation of the origin and development of the modern international order, hence contributing to a deeper understanding of the international relations of modernity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0260210517000468 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2011305815</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0260210517000468</cupid><jstor_id>26619346</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26619346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c178ec2c5a813dbc209789f6c596d8b177631d1d5373a947dafcf943801c72593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-ABdCwK3V3CZNGncy-GRgwMe6pGk6k6FtapJZzL-3dQZdiKt74Jzv3MtF6BzINRAQN28k5SQFkoEghDCeH6AJMC4TSRg7RJPRTkb_GJ2EsB4yecbYBKmZ6m1UjQ3tFX5R2pW2GzRWXYWfu2h8p6J1nWrwq2m-ZbgdZGJHr_cm2m6J48rgRYyuVR3uVVzh6HDrqgG2cXuKjmrVBHO2n1P08XD_PntK5ovH59ndPNFUpDHRIHKjU52pHGhV6pRIkcua60zyKi9BCE6hgiqjgirJRKVqXUtGcwJapJmkU3S56-29-9yYEIu12wznN6FICQAlWQ7ZkIJdSnsXgjd10XvbKr8tgBTjJ4s_nxyYix2zDtH5HyDlHCRlfPDpvlO1pbfV0vyu_r_1C1JDfpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2011305815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Capitalism, Jacobinism and International Relations: Re-interpreting the Ottoman path to modernity</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Duzgun, Eren</creator><creatorcontrib>Duzgun, Eren</creatorcontrib><description>Debates over ‘modernity’ have been central to the development of historical-sociological approaches to International Relations (IR). Within the bourgeoning subfield of International Historical Sociology (IHS), much work has been done to formulate a historically dynamic conception of international relations, which is then used to undermine unilinear conceptions of global modernity. Nevertheless, this article argues that IHS has not proceeded far enough in successfully remedying the problem of unilinearism. The problem remains that historical narratives, informed by IHS, tend to transhistoricise capitalism, which, in turn, obscures the generative nature of international relations, as well as the fundamental heterogeneity of diverging paths to modernity both within and beyond western Europe. Based on the theory of Uneven and Combined Development, Political Marxism, and Robbie Shilliam’s discussion of ‘Jacobinism’, this article first reinterprets the radical multilinearity of modernity within western Europe, and then utilises this reinterpretation to provide a new reading of the Ottoman path to modernity (1839–1918). Such a historical critique and reconstruction will highlight the significance of Jacobinism for a more accurate theorisation of the origin and development of the modern international order, hence contributing to a deeper understanding of the international relations of modernity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-2105</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0260210517000468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>British history ; Capitalism ; Colonialism ; Empires ; Eurocentrism ; European history ; Genocide ; Globalization ; Heterogeneity ; Historical sociology ; International relations ; Marxism ; Modernity ; Narratives ; Nationalism ; Postcolonialism ; Radicalism ; Sociology ; World history</subject><ispartof>Review of international studies, 2018-04, Vol.44 (2), p.252-278</ispartof><rights>British International Studies Association 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c178ec2c5a813dbc209789f6c596d8b177631d1d5373a947dafcf943801c72593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c178ec2c5a813dbc209789f6c596d8b177631d1d5373a947dafcf943801c72593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26619346$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0260210517000468/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,12824,27321,27901,27902,33751,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duzgun, Eren</creatorcontrib><title>Capitalism, Jacobinism and International Relations: Re-interpreting the Ottoman path to modernity</title><title>Review of international studies</title><addtitle>Rev. Int. Stud</addtitle><description>Debates over ‘modernity’ have been central to the development of historical-sociological approaches to International Relations (IR). Within the bourgeoning subfield of International Historical Sociology (IHS), much work has been done to formulate a historically dynamic conception of international relations, which is then used to undermine unilinear conceptions of global modernity. Nevertheless, this article argues that IHS has not proceeded far enough in successfully remedying the problem of unilinearism. The problem remains that historical narratives, informed by IHS, tend to transhistoricise capitalism, which, in turn, obscures the generative nature of international relations, as well as the fundamental heterogeneity of diverging paths to modernity both within and beyond western Europe. Based on the theory of Uneven and Combined Development, Political Marxism, and Robbie Shilliam’s discussion of ‘Jacobinism’, this article first reinterprets the radical multilinearity of modernity within western Europe, and then utilises this reinterpretation to provide a new reading of the Ottoman path to modernity (1839–1918). Such a historical critique and reconstruction will highlight the significance of Jacobinism for a more accurate theorisation of the origin and development of the modern international order, hence contributing to a deeper understanding of the international relations of modernity.</description><subject>British history</subject><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Empires</subject><subject>Eurocentrism</subject><subject>European history</subject><subject>Genocide</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Historical sociology</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Marxism</subject><subject>Modernity</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Postcolonialism</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>World history</subject><issn>0260-2105</issn><issn>1469-9044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-ABdCwK3V3CZNGncy-GRgwMe6pGk6k6FtapJZzL-3dQZdiKt74Jzv3MtF6BzINRAQN28k5SQFkoEghDCeH6AJMC4TSRg7RJPRTkb_GJ2EsB4yecbYBKmZ6m1UjQ3tFX5R2pW2GzRWXYWfu2h8p6J1nWrwq2m-ZbgdZGJHr_cm2m6J48rgRYyuVR3uVVzh6HDrqgG2cXuKjmrVBHO2n1P08XD_PntK5ovH59ndPNFUpDHRIHKjU52pHGhV6pRIkcua60zyKi9BCE6hgiqjgirJRKVqXUtGcwJapJmkU3S56-29-9yYEIu12wznN6FICQAlWQ7ZkIJdSnsXgjd10XvbKr8tgBTjJ4s_nxyYix2zDtH5HyDlHCRlfPDpvlO1pbfV0vyu_r_1C1JDfpw</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Duzgun, Eren</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Capitalism, Jacobinism and International Relations: Re-interpreting the Ottoman path to modernity</title><author>Duzgun, Eren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c178ec2c5a813dbc209789f6c596d8b177631d1d5373a947dafcf943801c72593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>British history</topic><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Empires</topic><topic>Eurocentrism</topic><topic>European history</topic><topic>Genocide</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Historical sociology</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Marxism</topic><topic>Modernity</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Postcolonialism</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>World history</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duzgun, Eren</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Review of international studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duzgun, Eren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Capitalism, Jacobinism and International Relations: Re-interpreting the Ottoman path to modernity</atitle><jtitle>Review of international studies</jtitle><addtitle>Rev. Int. Stud</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>252</spage><epage>278</epage><pages>252-278</pages><issn>0260-2105</issn><eissn>1469-9044</eissn><abstract>Debates over ‘modernity’ have been central to the development of historical-sociological approaches to International Relations (IR). Within the bourgeoning subfield of International Historical Sociology (IHS), much work has been done to formulate a historically dynamic conception of international relations, which is then used to undermine unilinear conceptions of global modernity. Nevertheless, this article argues that IHS has not proceeded far enough in successfully remedying the problem of unilinearism. The problem remains that historical narratives, informed by IHS, tend to transhistoricise capitalism, which, in turn, obscures the generative nature of international relations, as well as the fundamental heterogeneity of diverging paths to modernity both within and beyond western Europe. Based on the theory of Uneven and Combined Development, Political Marxism, and Robbie Shilliam’s discussion of ‘Jacobinism’, this article first reinterprets the radical multilinearity of modernity within western Europe, and then utilises this reinterpretation to provide a new reading of the Ottoman path to modernity (1839–1918). Such a historical critique and reconstruction will highlight the significance of Jacobinism for a more accurate theorisation of the origin and development of the modern international order, hence contributing to a deeper understanding of the international relations of modernity.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0260210517000468</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0260-2105 |
ispartof | Review of international studies, 2018-04, Vol.44 (2), p.252-278 |
issn | 0260-2105 1469-9044 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2011305815 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | British history Capitalism Colonialism Empires Eurocentrism European history Genocide Globalization Heterogeneity Historical sociology International relations Marxism Modernity Narratives Nationalism Postcolonialism Radicalism Sociology World history |
title | Capitalism, Jacobinism and International Relations: Re-interpreting the Ottoman path to modernity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T15%3A04%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Capitalism,%20Jacobinism%20and%20International%20Relations:%20Re-interpreting%20the%20Ottoman%20path%20to%20modernity&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20international%20studies&rft.au=Duzgun,%20Eren&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=252&rft.epage=278&rft.pages=252-278&rft.issn=0260-2105&rft.eissn=1469-9044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0260210517000468&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26619346%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2011305815&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0260210517000468&rft_jstor_id=26619346&rfr_iscdi=true |