Integrating Strategic Behavior into Competition Analysis
Particularly in markets that are oligopolistic, strategic behavior may shape, or reshape, the competitive environment. It may cause structural change, or it may alter conduct without directly altering the structure of the market. Despite recognition of the significance of strategic behavior for comp...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Antitrust bulletin 2007-09, Vol.52 (3-4), p.633-660 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 660 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3-4 |
| container_start_page | 633 |
| container_title | Antitrust bulletin |
| container_volume | 52 |
| creator | Smith, Rhonda L. Round, David K. Trindade, Rachel |
| description | Particularly in markets that are oligopolistic, strategic behavior may shape, or reshape, the competitive environment. It may cause structural change, or it may alter conduct without directly altering the structure of the market. Despite recognition of the significance of strategic behavior for competition analysis, the framework used to analyze competition issues is still essentially that of the structure-conduct-performance model (SCP). The traditional SCP paradigm today appears to have less relevance for analyzing market conduct than it did two or three decades ago. The sophistication of firms' competitive strategies, and their working environments, are now significantly more complex than before. Compared with the SCP approach, the Porter framework focuses attention on the many relationships between all the participants in a market. It demands much more careful and thorough analysis than is required under the linear and narrow SCP approach. It emphasizes the need for a changed mindset that incorporates feedback and dynamic effects. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0003603X0705200311 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_201092489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A174972069</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_0003603X0705200311</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A174972069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6c2074b3c22c5226a21ffc62215df6177af7c7afa782c4115b7002980cd808bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9LwzAQx4MoOKf_gE9Fn7td0jZpHufwFwx8UMG3kGZpzWiTmXTC_ntTJqi4EbjcHZ_vcV8OoUsME4wZmwJARiF7AwYFiTnGR2iEeQYp45Qfo9EApANxis5CWMUSAy1HqHy0vW687I1tkuc-JroxKrnR7_LTOJ8Y27tk7rq17k1vnE1mVrbbYMI5OqllG_TF9z9Gr3e3L_OHdPF0_zifLVKVk7xPqSLA8ipThKiCECoJrmtFCcHFsqZxdVkzFYNkJVE5xkXFAAgvQS1LKKsqG6Or3dy1dx8bHXqxchsflwiCRA-c5CWP0PUhCHPIKaVZUfxQjWy1MLZ20a_qTFBihlnOGQE6zEr3UI222svWWV2b2P7DT_bw8S11Z9ReAdkJlHcheF2LtTed9FuBQQzXFP-vGUXTnSjIRv9yd1jxBaz4mwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1904666355</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating Strategic Behavior into Competition Analysis</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Smith, Rhonda L. ; Round, David K. ; Trindade, Rachel</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Rhonda L. ; Round, David K. ; Trindade, Rachel</creatorcontrib><description>Particularly in markets that are oligopolistic, strategic behavior may shape, or reshape, the competitive environment. It may cause structural change, or it may alter conduct without directly altering the structure of the market. Despite recognition of the significance of strategic behavior for competition analysis, the framework used to analyze competition issues is still essentially that of the structure-conduct-performance model (SCP). The traditional SCP paradigm today appears to have less relevance for analyzing market conduct than it did two or three decades ago. The sophistication of firms' competitive strategies, and their working environments, are now significantly more complex than before. Compared with the SCP approach, the Porter framework focuses attention on the many relationships between all the participants in a market. It demands much more careful and thorough analysis than is required under the linear and narrow SCP approach. It emphasizes the need for a changed mindset that incorporates feedback and dynamic effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-603X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-7969</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0003603X0705200311</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ATBUAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Competition ; Competition (Economics) ; Integration ; Market share ; Strategic management</subject><ispartof>Antitrust bulletin, 2007-09, Vol.52 (3-4), p.633-660</ispartof><rights>2007 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Federal Legal Publications, Inc. Fall 2007</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6c2074b3c22c5226a21ffc62215df6177af7c7afa782c4115b7002980cd808bb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0003603X0705200311$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003603X0705200311$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21802,27907,27908,43604,43605</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Rhonda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Round, David K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trindade, Rachel</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating Strategic Behavior into Competition Analysis</title><title>Antitrust bulletin</title><description>Particularly in markets that are oligopolistic, strategic behavior may shape, or reshape, the competitive environment. It may cause structural change, or it may alter conduct without directly altering the structure of the market. Despite recognition of the significance of strategic behavior for competition analysis, the framework used to analyze competition issues is still essentially that of the structure-conduct-performance model (SCP). The traditional SCP paradigm today appears to have less relevance for analyzing market conduct than it did two or three decades ago. The sophistication of firms' competitive strategies, and their working environments, are now significantly more complex than before. Compared with the SCP approach, the Porter framework focuses attention on the many relationships between all the participants in a market. It demands much more careful and thorough analysis than is required under the linear and narrow SCP approach. It emphasizes the need for a changed mindset that incorporates feedback and dynamic effects.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competition (Economics)</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Market share</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><issn>0003-603X</issn><issn>1930-7969</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd9LwzAQx4MoOKf_gE9Fn7td0jZpHufwFwx8UMG3kGZpzWiTmXTC_ntTJqi4EbjcHZ_vcV8OoUsME4wZmwJARiF7AwYFiTnGR2iEeQYp45Qfo9EApANxis5CWMUSAy1HqHy0vW687I1tkuc-JroxKrnR7_LTOJ8Y27tk7rq17k1vnE1mVrbbYMI5OqllG_TF9z9Gr3e3L_OHdPF0_zifLVKVk7xPqSLA8ipThKiCECoJrmtFCcHFsqZxdVkzFYNkJVE5xkXFAAgvQS1LKKsqG6Or3dy1dx8bHXqxchsflwiCRA-c5CWP0PUhCHPIKaVZUfxQjWy1MLZ20a_qTFBihlnOGQE6zEr3UI222svWWV2b2P7DT_bw8S11Z9ReAdkJlHcheF2LtTed9FuBQQzXFP-vGUXTnSjIRv9yd1jxBaz4mwA</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>Smith, Rhonda L.</creator><creator>Round, David K.</creator><creator>Trindade, Rachel</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>Integrating Strategic Behavior into Competition Analysis</title><author>Smith, Rhonda L. ; Round, David K. ; Trindade, Rachel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-6c2074b3c22c5226a21ffc62215df6177af7c7afa782c4115b7002980cd808bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competition (Economics)</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Market share</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Rhonda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Round, David K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trindade, Rachel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Antitrust bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Rhonda L.</au><au>Round, David K.</au><au>Trindade, Rachel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating Strategic Behavior into Competition Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Antitrust bulletin</jtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>633</spage><epage>660</epage><pages>633-660</pages><issn>0003-603X</issn><eissn>1930-7969</eissn><coden>ATBUAU</coden><abstract>Particularly in markets that are oligopolistic, strategic behavior may shape, or reshape, the competitive environment. It may cause structural change, or it may alter conduct without directly altering the structure of the market. Despite recognition of the significance of strategic behavior for competition analysis, the framework used to analyze competition issues is still essentially that of the structure-conduct-performance model (SCP). The traditional SCP paradigm today appears to have less relevance for analyzing market conduct than it did two or three decades ago. The sophistication of firms' competitive strategies, and their working environments, are now significantly more complex than before. Compared with the SCP approach, the Porter framework focuses attention on the many relationships between all the participants in a market. It demands much more careful and thorough analysis than is required under the linear and narrow SCP approach. It emphasizes the need for a changed mindset that incorporates feedback and dynamic effects.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0003603X0705200311</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-603X |
| ispartof | Antitrust bulletin, 2007-09, Vol.52 (3-4), p.633-660 |
| issn | 0003-603X 1930-7969 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_201092489 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SAGE Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Analysis Competition Competition (Economics) Integration Market share Strategic management |
| title | Integrating Strategic Behavior into Competition Analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A42%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20Strategic%20Behavior%20into%20Competition%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Antitrust%20bulletin&rft.au=Smith,%20Rhonda%20L.&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=633&rft.epage=660&rft.pages=633-660&rft.issn=0003-603X&rft.eissn=1930-7969&rft.coden=ATBUAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0003603X0705200311&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA174972069%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1904666355&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A174972069&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0003603X0705200311&rfr_iscdi=true |