Electronic identification systems for reducing diagnostic workloads after disease outbreak

Diagnostic tests for grapevine viruses subjected to phytosanitary rules involve a heavy workload for plant protection services and laboratories. Propagation schemes enable nurseries, where mother plants (MPs) are cultivated, to be linked to batches of certified plants (CPs). This approach entails po...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant pathology 2018-04, Vol.67 (3), p.750-756
Hauptverfasser: Panattoni, A., Rinaldelli, E., Materazzi, A., Bandinelli, R., De Bellis, L., Luvisi, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 756
container_issue 3
container_start_page 750
container_title Plant pathology
container_volume 67
creator Panattoni, A.
Rinaldelli, E.
Materazzi, A.
Bandinelli, R.
De Bellis, L.
Luvisi, A.
description Diagnostic tests for grapevine viruses subjected to phytosanitary rules involve a heavy workload for plant protection services and laboratories. Propagation schemes enable nurseries, where mother plants (MPs) are cultivated, to be linked to batches of certified plants (CPs). This approach entails post‐production checks of MPs once infection occurs in CPs. However, this traceability system is not tight and follow ups are demanding. This study assessed radio frequency identification (RFID) tagging of plants in terms of its ability to reduce laboratory workloads for nursery health checks. RFID‐tagged plants (RFID‐CPs) were produced from individually tagged MPs (RFID‐MPs) or row‐tagged MPs (RFID‐ROW, a less expensive approach). In a 10‐year case study, the health status of CPs and RFID‐CPs were assessed and the occurrence of infections then led to health checks in MPs, RFID‐MPs or RFID‐ROWs. Laboratory workloads were evaluated by considering two sampling methods (single or pool sampling). Using single sampling, the workload was reduced by 93–98% in RFID‐ROW or RFID‐MP checks compared to the conventional approach. Considerable reductions in workload due to the tagging system (93–96%) were also observed using pool sampling. Traceability of CPs and MPs using RFID reduces laboratory workloads, and supports emergency measures that can be taken to stop any unsafe sales of plants after a virus outbreak.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ppa.12783
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2010274954</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2010274954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3323-78bd4cb1db48c50c41649ebeb562a60047731d7cba5fbcf483de20f7f3e4595b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10DtPwzAQB3ALgUQpDHyDSEwMaf3MY6yq8pAq0QEWFst2zpXbNA62o6rfnkBZueWG-92d9EfonuAZGWve92pGaFmxCzQhrBA5w6K-RBOMGc1xVdBrdBPjDmMi6rqaoM9VCyYF3zmTuQa65KwzKjnfZfEUExxiZn3IAjSDcd02a5zadj6mkR992LdeNTFTNkEYRxFUhMwPSQdQ-1t0ZVUb4e6vT9HH0-p9-ZKv355fl4t1bhijLC8r3XCjSaN5ZQQ2nBS8Bg1aFFQVGPOyZKQpjVbCamN5xRqg2JaWARe10GyKHs53--C_BohJ7vwQuvGlpJhgWvJa8FE9npUJPsYAVvbBHVQ4SYLlT3RyjE7-Rjfa-dkeXQun_6HcbBbnjW8flHHa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2010274954</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electronic identification systems for reducing diagnostic workloads after disease outbreak</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Panattoni, A. ; Rinaldelli, E. ; Materazzi, A. ; Bandinelli, R. ; De Bellis, L. ; Luvisi, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Panattoni, A. ; Rinaldelli, E. ; Materazzi, A. ; Bandinelli, R. ; De Bellis, L. ; Luvisi, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Diagnostic tests for grapevine viruses subjected to phytosanitary rules involve a heavy workload for plant protection services and laboratories. Propagation schemes enable nurseries, where mother plants (MPs) are cultivated, to be linked to batches of certified plants (CPs). This approach entails post‐production checks of MPs once infection occurs in CPs. However, this traceability system is not tight and follow ups are demanding. This study assessed radio frequency identification (RFID) tagging of plants in terms of its ability to reduce laboratory workloads for nursery health checks. RFID‐tagged plants (RFID‐CPs) were produced from individually tagged MPs (RFID‐MPs) or row‐tagged MPs (RFID‐ROW, a less expensive approach). In a 10‐year case study, the health status of CPs and RFID‐CPs were assessed and the occurrence of infections then led to health checks in MPs, RFID‐MPs or RFID‐ROWs. Laboratory workloads were evaluated by considering two sampling methods (single or pool sampling). Using single sampling, the workload was reduced by 93–98% in RFID‐ROW or RFID‐MP checks compared to the conventional approach. Considerable reductions in workload due to the tagging system (93–96%) were also observed using pool sampling. Traceability of CPs and MPs using RFID reduces laboratory workloads, and supports emergency measures that can be taken to stop any unsafe sales of plants after a virus outbreak.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ppa.12783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Diagnostic systems ; grapevine ; Health ; Laboratories ; Marking ; MolU ; Outbreaks ; Plant protection ; Plant viruses ; Propagation ; Radio frequency identification ; Radio-tagging ; Sampling ; Sampling methods ; virus ; Viruses ; Workload ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Plant pathology, 2018-04, Vol.67 (3), p.750-756</ispartof><rights>2017 British Society for Plant Pathology</rights><rights>Plant Pathology © 2018 British Society for Plant Pathology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3323-78bd4cb1db48c50c41649ebeb562a60047731d7cba5fbcf483de20f7f3e4595b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3323-78bd4cb1db48c50c41649ebeb562a60047731d7cba5fbcf483de20f7f3e4595b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2207-7493</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fppa.12783$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fppa.12783$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46812</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panattoni, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldelli, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Materazzi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandinelli, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bellis, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luvisi, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Electronic identification systems for reducing diagnostic workloads after disease outbreak</title><title>Plant pathology</title><description>Diagnostic tests for grapevine viruses subjected to phytosanitary rules involve a heavy workload for plant protection services and laboratories. Propagation schemes enable nurseries, where mother plants (MPs) are cultivated, to be linked to batches of certified plants (CPs). This approach entails post‐production checks of MPs once infection occurs in CPs. However, this traceability system is not tight and follow ups are demanding. This study assessed radio frequency identification (RFID) tagging of plants in terms of its ability to reduce laboratory workloads for nursery health checks. RFID‐tagged plants (RFID‐CPs) were produced from individually tagged MPs (RFID‐MPs) or row‐tagged MPs (RFID‐ROW, a less expensive approach). In a 10‐year case study, the health status of CPs and RFID‐CPs were assessed and the occurrence of infections then led to health checks in MPs, RFID‐MPs or RFID‐ROWs. Laboratory workloads were evaluated by considering two sampling methods (single or pool sampling). Using single sampling, the workload was reduced by 93–98% in RFID‐ROW or RFID‐MP checks compared to the conventional approach. Considerable reductions in workload due to the tagging system (93–96%) were also observed using pool sampling. Traceability of CPs and MPs using RFID reduces laboratory workloads, and supports emergency measures that can be taken to stop any unsafe sales of plants after a virus outbreak.</description><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>grapevine</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Marking</subject><subject>MolU</subject><subject>Outbreaks</subject><subject>Plant protection</subject><subject>Plant viruses</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Radio frequency identification</subject><subject>Radio-tagging</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>virus</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Workload</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>0032-0862</issn><issn>1365-3059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10DtPwzAQB3ALgUQpDHyDSEwMaf3MY6yq8pAq0QEWFst2zpXbNA62o6rfnkBZueWG-92d9EfonuAZGWve92pGaFmxCzQhrBA5w6K-RBOMGc1xVdBrdBPjDmMi6rqaoM9VCyYF3zmTuQa65KwzKjnfZfEUExxiZn3IAjSDcd02a5zadj6mkR992LdeNTFTNkEYRxFUhMwPSQdQ-1t0ZVUb4e6vT9HH0-p9-ZKv355fl4t1bhijLC8r3XCjSaN5ZQQ2nBS8Bg1aFFQVGPOyZKQpjVbCamN5xRqg2JaWARe10GyKHs53--C_BohJ7vwQuvGlpJhgWvJa8FE9npUJPsYAVvbBHVQ4SYLlT3RyjE7-Rjfa-dkeXQun_6HcbBbnjW8flHHa</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Panattoni, A.</creator><creator>Rinaldelli, E.</creator><creator>Materazzi, A.</creator><creator>Bandinelli, R.</creator><creator>De Bellis, L.</creator><creator>Luvisi, A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2207-7493</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Electronic identification systems for reducing diagnostic workloads after disease outbreak</title><author>Panattoni, A. ; Rinaldelli, E. ; Materazzi, A. ; Bandinelli, R. ; De Bellis, L. ; Luvisi, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3323-78bd4cb1db48c50c41649ebeb562a60047731d7cba5fbcf483de20f7f3e4595b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>grapevine</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Marking</topic><topic>MolU</topic><topic>Outbreaks</topic><topic>Plant protection</topic><topic>Plant viruses</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Radio frequency identification</topic><topic>Radio-tagging</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>virus</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Workload</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panattoni, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldelli, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Materazzi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandinelli, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bellis, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luvisi, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panattoni, A.</au><au>Rinaldelli, E.</au><au>Materazzi, A.</au><au>Bandinelli, R.</au><au>De Bellis, L.</au><au>Luvisi, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electronic identification systems for reducing diagnostic workloads after disease outbreak</atitle><jtitle>Plant pathology</jtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>750</spage><epage>756</epage><pages>750-756</pages><issn>0032-0862</issn><eissn>1365-3059</eissn><abstract>Diagnostic tests for grapevine viruses subjected to phytosanitary rules involve a heavy workload for plant protection services and laboratories. Propagation schemes enable nurseries, where mother plants (MPs) are cultivated, to be linked to batches of certified plants (CPs). This approach entails post‐production checks of MPs once infection occurs in CPs. However, this traceability system is not tight and follow ups are demanding. This study assessed radio frequency identification (RFID) tagging of plants in terms of its ability to reduce laboratory workloads for nursery health checks. RFID‐tagged plants (RFID‐CPs) were produced from individually tagged MPs (RFID‐MPs) or row‐tagged MPs (RFID‐ROW, a less expensive approach). In a 10‐year case study, the health status of CPs and RFID‐CPs were assessed and the occurrence of infections then led to health checks in MPs, RFID‐MPs or RFID‐ROWs. Laboratory workloads were evaluated by considering two sampling methods (single or pool sampling). Using single sampling, the workload was reduced by 93–98% in RFID‐ROW or RFID‐MP checks compared to the conventional approach. Considerable reductions in workload due to the tagging system (93–96%) were also observed using pool sampling. Traceability of CPs and MPs using RFID reduces laboratory workloads, and supports emergency measures that can be taken to stop any unsafe sales of plants after a virus outbreak.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ppa.12783</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2207-7493</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-0862
ispartof Plant pathology, 2018-04, Vol.67 (3), p.750-756
issn 0032-0862
1365-3059
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2010274954
source Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Diagnostic systems
grapevine
Health
Laboratories
Marking
MolU
Outbreaks
Plant protection
Plant viruses
Propagation
Radio frequency identification
Radio-tagging
Sampling
Sampling methods
virus
Viruses
Workload
Workloads
title Electronic identification systems for reducing diagnostic workloads after disease outbreak
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T20%3A51%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electronic%20identification%20systems%20for%20reducing%20diagnostic%20workloads%20after%20disease%20outbreak&rft.jtitle=Plant%20pathology&rft.au=Panattoni,%20A.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=750&rft.epage=756&rft.pages=750-756&rft.issn=0032-0862&rft.eissn=1365-3059&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ppa.12783&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2010274954%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2010274954&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true