Beneath Sovereignty: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Internationalism in Nineteenth-Century Egypt

The rise of extraterritoriality in the nineteenth-century has been described as a transitional phase that laid the ground for the construction of territorial sovereignty. Yet in Egypt, where a particularly extensive extraterritorial regime emerged in the mid-century, the expansion of European jurisd...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Law and history review 2018-02, Vol.36 (1), p.105-137
1. Verfasser: Todd, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 137
container_issue 1
container_start_page 105
container_title Law and history review
container_volume 36
creator Todd, David
description The rise of extraterritoriality in the nineteenth-century has been described as a transitional phase that laid the ground for the construction of territorial sovereignty. Yet in Egypt, where a particularly extensive extraterritorial regime emerged in the mid-century, the expansion of European jurisdiction underneath national sovereignty became entrenched with the creation of international mixed courts in the 1870s. This outcome, the article argues, was the product of a complex compromise between European empires, which upheld different conceptions of extraterritoriality, and the government of Egypt. While Britain refashioned its own extraterritorial judicial system as a means of promoting legal reforms in the Ottoman world, France aggressively pursued the expansion of extraterritorial rights as an instrument of informal domination and economic exploitation. The creation of an international type of jurisdiction, less susceptible to French political pressures but applying a French system of law, proved acceptable to all parties, although it severely constrained Egyptian sovereignty from within, even after Britain took over the reins of government in 1882. Extraterritoriality was not merely a transition, but an original feature of the global legal order, arising out of modern imperialism and imperial rivalry and yet conducive to the forging of new instruments of international law and governance.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0738248017000530
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2010094930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0738248017000530</cupid><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20230815093185</informt_id><jstor_id>26564569</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26564569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f6a480b8a4e2101c38c4c9083c2cc869fc7b6a11c4489b7019ad452da2f6f4b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU2P0zAUtBBIlIUfwAEpEicOWZ4_ktrclqpsK1VwWDhbjuOkrho72O5q8-9xyLIcEBd_vJk3nnlG6C2Gawx4_fEO1pQTxvMZACoKz9AKCypKAYQ8R6sZLmf8JXoV4wkAY-BshZrPxhmVjsWdvzfB2N6l6VOxfUhBJROCTT5YdbZpKpRri_0wmvle7F1GnUrWu4zGobCu-GqdSca4dCw3eb2Eqdj205heoxedOkfz5nG_Qj--bL9vduXh2-1-c3MoNeM4lV2tsr2GK2ZIjqQp10wL4FQTrXktOr1uaoWxZoyLZg1YqJZVpFWkqzvWYHqFPiy6R3WWY7CDCpP0ysrdzUHONaAVJXkO9zP3_cIdg_95MTHJk7_kQOcoCWAAwQSFzMILSwcfYzDdkywGOY9d_jP23LNbesJgk1S9jWOS0aigj9K6zv8u-9DL1ttZhlJc_6ERIBQ4rkBQzKss9W6ROsX8DU9vk7qqWVWLjNNHe2pogm178zfF_w3-AsXFppk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2010094930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beneath Sovereignty: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Internationalism in Nineteenth-Century Egypt</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Todd, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Todd, David</creatorcontrib><description>The rise of extraterritoriality in the nineteenth-century has been described as a transitional phase that laid the ground for the construction of territorial sovereignty. Yet in Egypt, where a particularly extensive extraterritorial regime emerged in the mid-century, the expansion of European jurisdiction underneath national sovereignty became entrenched with the creation of international mixed courts in the 1870s. This outcome, the article argues, was the product of a complex compromise between European empires, which upheld different conceptions of extraterritoriality, and the government of Egypt. While Britain refashioned its own extraterritorial judicial system as a means of promoting legal reforms in the Ottoman world, France aggressively pursued the expansion of extraterritorial rights as an instrument of informal domination and economic exploitation. The creation of an international type of jurisdiction, less susceptible to French political pressures but applying a French system of law, proved acceptable to all parties, although it severely constrained Egyptian sovereignty from within, even after Britain took over the reins of government in 1882. Extraterritoriality was not merely a transition, but an original feature of the global legal order, arising out of modern imperialism and imperial rivalry and yet conducive to the forging of new instruments of international law and governance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-2480</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0738248017000530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>19th century ; Administration ; Colonies ; Diplomatic &amp; consular services ; Exterritoriality ; Extraterritoriality ; Foreign residents ; History ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Imperialism ; Jurisdiction ; Legal reform ; Middle Eastern history ; Nineteenth century ; Original Article ; Politics ; Sovereignty ; Treaties</subject><ispartof>Law and history review, 2018-02, Vol.36 (1), p.105-137</ispartof><rights>Copyright © the American Society for Legal History, Inc. 2018</rights><rights>the American Society for Legal History, Inc. 2018</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f6a480b8a4e2101c38c4c9083c2cc869fc7b6a11c4489b7019ad452da2f6f4b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f6a480b8a4e2101c38c4c9083c2cc869fc7b6a11c4489b7019ad452da2f6f4b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1515-6089</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26564569$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0738248017000530/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03532738$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Todd, David</creatorcontrib><title>Beneath Sovereignty: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Internationalism in Nineteenth-Century Egypt</title><title>Law and history review</title><addtitle>Law hist. rev</addtitle><description>The rise of extraterritoriality in the nineteenth-century has been described as a transitional phase that laid the ground for the construction of territorial sovereignty. Yet in Egypt, where a particularly extensive extraterritorial regime emerged in the mid-century, the expansion of European jurisdiction underneath national sovereignty became entrenched with the creation of international mixed courts in the 1870s. This outcome, the article argues, was the product of a complex compromise between European empires, which upheld different conceptions of extraterritoriality, and the government of Egypt. While Britain refashioned its own extraterritorial judicial system as a means of promoting legal reforms in the Ottoman world, France aggressively pursued the expansion of extraterritorial rights as an instrument of informal domination and economic exploitation. The creation of an international type of jurisdiction, less susceptible to French political pressures but applying a French system of law, proved acceptable to all parties, although it severely constrained Egyptian sovereignty from within, even after Britain took over the reins of government in 1882. Extraterritoriality was not merely a transition, but an original feature of the global legal order, arising out of modern imperialism and imperial rivalry and yet conducive to the forging of new instruments of international law and governance.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>Administration</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Diplomatic &amp; consular services</subject><subject>Exterritoriality</subject><subject>Extraterritoriality</subject><subject>Foreign residents</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Imperialism</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Legal reform</subject><subject>Middle Eastern history</subject><subject>Nineteenth century</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><issn>0738-2480</issn><issn>1939-9022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU2P0zAUtBBIlIUfwAEpEicOWZ4_ktrclqpsK1VwWDhbjuOkrho72O5q8-9xyLIcEBd_vJk3nnlG6C2Gawx4_fEO1pQTxvMZACoKz9AKCypKAYQ8R6sZLmf8JXoV4wkAY-BshZrPxhmVjsWdvzfB2N6l6VOxfUhBJROCTT5YdbZpKpRri_0wmvle7F1GnUrWu4zGobCu-GqdSca4dCw3eb2Eqdj205heoxedOkfz5nG_Qj--bL9vduXh2-1-c3MoNeM4lV2tsr2GK2ZIjqQp10wL4FQTrXktOr1uaoWxZoyLZg1YqJZVpFWkqzvWYHqFPiy6R3WWY7CDCpP0ysrdzUHONaAVJXkO9zP3_cIdg_95MTHJk7_kQOcoCWAAwQSFzMILSwcfYzDdkywGOY9d_jP23LNbesJgk1S9jWOS0aigj9K6zv8u-9DL1ttZhlJc_6ERIBQ4rkBQzKss9W6ROsX8DU9vk7qqWVWLjNNHe2pogm178zfF_w3-AsXFppk</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Todd, David</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Cambridge University Press (CUP)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1515-6089</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Beneath Sovereignty: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Internationalism in Nineteenth-Century Egypt</title><author>Todd, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-f6a480b8a4e2101c38c4c9083c2cc869fc7b6a11c4489b7019ad452da2f6f4b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>Administration</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Diplomatic &amp; consular services</topic><topic>Exterritoriality</topic><topic>Extraterritoriality</topic><topic>Foreign residents</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Imperialism</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Legal reform</topic><topic>Middle Eastern history</topic><topic>Nineteenth century</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Todd, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Law and history review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Todd, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beneath Sovereignty: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Internationalism in Nineteenth-Century Egypt</atitle><jtitle>Law and history review</jtitle><addtitle>Law hist. rev</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>105-137</pages><issn>0738-2480</issn><eissn>1939-9022</eissn><abstract>The rise of extraterritoriality in the nineteenth-century has been described as a transitional phase that laid the ground for the construction of territorial sovereignty. Yet in Egypt, where a particularly extensive extraterritorial regime emerged in the mid-century, the expansion of European jurisdiction underneath national sovereignty became entrenched with the creation of international mixed courts in the 1870s. This outcome, the article argues, was the product of a complex compromise between European empires, which upheld different conceptions of extraterritoriality, and the government of Egypt. While Britain refashioned its own extraterritorial judicial system as a means of promoting legal reforms in the Ottoman world, France aggressively pursued the expansion of extraterritorial rights as an instrument of informal domination and economic exploitation. The creation of an international type of jurisdiction, less susceptible to French political pressures but applying a French system of law, proved acceptable to all parties, although it severely constrained Egyptian sovereignty from within, even after Britain took over the reins of government in 1882. Extraterritoriality was not merely a transition, but an original feature of the global legal order, arising out of modern imperialism and imperial rivalry and yet conducive to the forging of new instruments of international law and governance.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0738248017000530</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1515-6089</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0738-2480
ispartof Law and history review, 2018-02, Vol.36 (1), p.105-137
issn 0738-2480
1939-9022
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2010094930
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects 19th century
Administration
Colonies
Diplomatic & consular services
Exterritoriality
Extraterritoriality
Foreign residents
History
Humanities and Social Sciences
Imperialism
Jurisdiction
Legal reform
Middle Eastern history
Nineteenth century
Original Article
Politics
Sovereignty
Treaties
title Beneath Sovereignty: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Internationalism in Nineteenth-Century Egypt
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A07%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beneath%20Sovereignty:%20Extraterritoriality%20and%20Imperial%20Internationalism%20in%20Nineteenth-Century%20Egypt&rft.jtitle=Law%20and%20history%20review&rft.au=Todd,%20David&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=105-137&rft.issn=0738-2480&rft.eissn=1939-9022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0738248017000530&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26564569%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2010094930&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0738248017000530&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20230815093185&rft_jstor_id=26564569&rfr_iscdi=true