Ecological complexity buffers the impacts of future climate on marine consumers
Ecological complexity represents a network of interacting components that either propagate or counter the effects of environmental change on individuals and communities 1 – 3 . Yet, our understanding of the ecological imprint of ocean acidification (elevated CO 2 ) and climate change (elevated tempe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature climate change 2018-03, Vol.8 (3), p.229-233 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 233 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 229 |
container_title | Nature climate change |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Goldenberg, Silvan U. Nagelkerken, Ivan Marangon, Emma Bonnet, Angélique Ferreira, Camilo M. Connell, Sean D. |
description | Ecological complexity represents a network of interacting components that either propagate or counter the effects of environmental change on individuals and communities
1
–
3
. Yet, our understanding of the ecological imprint of ocean acidification (elevated CO
2
) and climate change (elevated temperature) is largely based on reports of negative effects on single species in simplified laboratory systems
4
,
5
. By combining a large mesocosm experiment with a global meta-analysis, we reveal the capacity of consumers (fish and crustaceans) to resist the impacts of elevated CO
2
. While individual behaviours were impaired by elevated CO
2
, consumers could restore their performances in more complex environments that allowed for compensatory processes. Consequently, consumers maintained key traits such as foraging, habitat selection and predator avoidance despite elevated CO
2
and sustained their populations. Our observed increase in risk-taking under elevated temperature, however, predicts greater vulnerability of consumers to predation. Yet, CO
2
as a resource boosted the biomass of consumers through species interactions and may stabilize communities by countering the negative effects of elevated temperature. We conclude that compensatory dynamics inherent in the complexity of nature can buffer the impacts of future climate on species and their communities.
The complexity of ecosystems could influence how warmer waters and acidification affect marine biota. In this study, whilst individual behaviours were affected by increased CO
2
, community dynamics buffered the impacts on fish and crustaceans. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41558-018-0086-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2009582606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2009582606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-3be6b503d44a16fdd74c6499c53e3617beba0a063320c2bfe5aba1c01169acad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOOY-gG8Bn6uXpk3TRxlTB4O9KPgWkjSZHW1TkxTctzejok8eHHcc9_vf8UfolsA9AcofQkHKkmdAUgJnGVygBanShFU1v_zt-fs1WoVwhBQVYZTVC7TfaNe5Q6tlh7Xrx858tfGE1WSt8QHHD4PbfpQ6BuwstlOcvMG6a3sZDXYD7qVvhzRxQ5j6RNygKyu7YFY_dYnenjav65dst3_erh93maY8jxlVhqkSaFMUkjDbNFWhWVHXuqSGMlIpoyRIYJTmoHNlTSmVJBoIYbXUsqFLdDfrjt59TiZEcXSTH9JJkQPUJc9ZopeIzFvauxC8sWL06XV_EgTE2ToxWyeSdeJsnYDE5DMT0u5wMP5P-X_oG6_wcgY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2009582606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological complexity buffers the impacts of future climate on marine consumers</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Goldenberg, Silvan U. ; Nagelkerken, Ivan ; Marangon, Emma ; Bonnet, Angélique ; Ferreira, Camilo M. ; Connell, Sean D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldenberg, Silvan U. ; Nagelkerken, Ivan ; Marangon, Emma ; Bonnet, Angélique ; Ferreira, Camilo M. ; Connell, Sean D.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecological complexity represents a network of interacting components that either propagate or counter the effects of environmental change on individuals and communities
1
–
3
. Yet, our understanding of the ecological imprint of ocean acidification (elevated CO
2
) and climate change (elevated temperature) is largely based on reports of negative effects on single species in simplified laboratory systems
4
,
5
. By combining a large mesocosm experiment with a global meta-analysis, we reveal the capacity of consumers (fish and crustaceans) to resist the impacts of elevated CO
2
. While individual behaviours were impaired by elevated CO
2
, consumers could restore their performances in more complex environments that allowed for compensatory processes. Consequently, consumers maintained key traits such as foraging, habitat selection and predator avoidance despite elevated CO
2
and sustained their populations. Our observed increase in risk-taking under elevated temperature, however, predicts greater vulnerability of consumers to predation. Yet, CO
2
as a resource boosted the biomass of consumers through species interactions and may stabilize communities by countering the negative effects of elevated temperature. We conclude that compensatory dynamics inherent in the complexity of nature can buffer the impacts of future climate on species and their communities.
The complexity of ecosystems could influence how warmer waters and acidification affect marine biota. In this study, whilst individual behaviours were affected by increased CO
2
, community dynamics buffered the impacts on fish and crustaceans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-678X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6798</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0086-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/158/2165 ; 631/158/853 ; 704/158/2446 ; 704/829/826 ; Acidification ; Aquatic crustaceans ; Buffers ; Capacity ; Carbon dioxide ; Climate ; Climate Change ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Communities ; Complexity ; Consumers ; Crustaceans ; Dynamics ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental changes ; Environmental effects ; Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice ; Fish ; Foraging ; Foraging habitats ; Future climates ; Habitat selection ; High temperature ; Interactions ; Interspecific relationships ; Letter ; Marine ecology ; Mesocosms ; Ocean acidification ; Predation ; Predators ; Risk taking ; Shellfish ; Species ; Temperature ; Temperature effects ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Nature climate change, 2018-03, Vol.8 (3), p.229-233</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Mar 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-3be6b503d44a16fdd74c6499c53e3617beba0a063320c2bfe5aba1c01169acad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-3be6b503d44a16fdd74c6499c53e3617beba0a063320c2bfe5aba1c01169acad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4499-3940 ; 0000-0001-9022-1963 ; 0000-0002-5350-6852</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41558-018-0086-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41558-018-0086-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldenberg, Silvan U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagelkerken, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marangon, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, Angélique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Camilo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connell, Sean D.</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological complexity buffers the impacts of future climate on marine consumers</title><title>Nature climate change</title><addtitle>Nature Clim Change</addtitle><description>Ecological complexity represents a network of interacting components that either propagate or counter the effects of environmental change on individuals and communities
1
–
3
. Yet, our understanding of the ecological imprint of ocean acidification (elevated CO
2
) and climate change (elevated temperature) is largely based on reports of negative effects on single species in simplified laboratory systems
4
,
5
. By combining a large mesocosm experiment with a global meta-analysis, we reveal the capacity of consumers (fish and crustaceans) to resist the impacts of elevated CO
2
. While individual behaviours were impaired by elevated CO
2
, consumers could restore their performances in more complex environments that allowed for compensatory processes. Consequently, consumers maintained key traits such as foraging, habitat selection and predator avoidance despite elevated CO
2
and sustained their populations. Our observed increase in risk-taking under elevated temperature, however, predicts greater vulnerability of consumers to predation. Yet, CO
2
as a resource boosted the biomass of consumers through species interactions and may stabilize communities by countering the negative effects of elevated temperature. We conclude that compensatory dynamics inherent in the complexity of nature can buffer the impacts of future climate on species and their communities.
The complexity of ecosystems could influence how warmer waters and acidification affect marine biota. In this study, whilst individual behaviours were affected by increased CO
2
, community dynamics buffered the impacts on fish and crustaceans.</description><subject>631/158/2165</subject><subject>631/158/853</subject><subject>704/158/2446</subject><subject>704/829/826</subject><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Aquatic crustaceans</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Capacity</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Future climates</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>Interactions</subject><subject>Interspecific relationships</subject><subject>Letter</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Mesocosms</subject><subject>Ocean acidification</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>1758-678X</issn><issn>1758-6798</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOOY-gG8Bn6uXpk3TRxlTB4O9KPgWkjSZHW1TkxTctzejok8eHHcc9_vf8UfolsA9AcofQkHKkmdAUgJnGVygBanShFU1v_zt-fs1WoVwhBQVYZTVC7TfaNe5Q6tlh7Xrx858tfGE1WSt8QHHD4PbfpQ6BuwstlOcvMG6a3sZDXYD7qVvhzRxQ5j6RNygKyu7YFY_dYnenjav65dst3_erh93maY8jxlVhqkSaFMUkjDbNFWhWVHXuqSGMlIpoyRIYJTmoHNlTSmVJBoIYbXUsqFLdDfrjt59TiZEcXSTH9JJkQPUJc9ZopeIzFvauxC8sWL06XV_EgTE2ToxWyeSdeJsnYDE5DMT0u5wMP5P-X_oG6_wcgY</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Goldenberg, Silvan U.</creator><creator>Nagelkerken, Ivan</creator><creator>Marangon, Emma</creator><creator>Bonnet, Angélique</creator><creator>Ferreira, Camilo M.</creator><creator>Connell, Sean D.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4499-3940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-1963</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5350-6852</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Ecological complexity buffers the impacts of future climate on marine consumers</title><author>Goldenberg, Silvan U. ; Nagelkerken, Ivan ; Marangon, Emma ; Bonnet, Angélique ; Ferreira, Camilo M. ; Connell, Sean D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-3be6b503d44a16fdd74c6499c53e3617beba0a063320c2bfe5aba1c01169acad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>631/158/2165</topic><topic>631/158/853</topic><topic>704/158/2446</topic><topic>704/829/826</topic><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Aquatic crustaceans</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Capacity</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Future climates</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>Interactions</topic><topic>Interspecific relationships</topic><topic>Letter</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Mesocosms</topic><topic>Ocean acidification</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldenberg, Silvan U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagelkerken, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marangon, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, Angélique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Camilo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connell, Sean D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nature climate change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldenberg, Silvan U.</au><au>Nagelkerken, Ivan</au><au>Marangon, Emma</au><au>Bonnet, Angélique</au><au>Ferreira, Camilo M.</au><au>Connell, Sean D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological complexity buffers the impacts of future climate on marine consumers</atitle><jtitle>Nature climate change</jtitle><stitle>Nature Clim Change</stitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>229-233</pages><issn>1758-678X</issn><eissn>1758-6798</eissn><abstract>Ecological complexity represents a network of interacting components that either propagate or counter the effects of environmental change on individuals and communities
1
–
3
. Yet, our understanding of the ecological imprint of ocean acidification (elevated CO
2
) and climate change (elevated temperature) is largely based on reports of negative effects on single species in simplified laboratory systems
4
,
5
. By combining a large mesocosm experiment with a global meta-analysis, we reveal the capacity of consumers (fish and crustaceans) to resist the impacts of elevated CO
2
. While individual behaviours were impaired by elevated CO
2
, consumers could restore their performances in more complex environments that allowed for compensatory processes. Consequently, consumers maintained key traits such as foraging, habitat selection and predator avoidance despite elevated CO
2
and sustained their populations. Our observed increase in risk-taking under elevated temperature, however, predicts greater vulnerability of consumers to predation. Yet, CO
2
as a resource boosted the biomass of consumers through species interactions and may stabilize communities by countering the negative effects of elevated temperature. We conclude that compensatory dynamics inherent in the complexity of nature can buffer the impacts of future climate on species and their communities.
The complexity of ecosystems could influence how warmer waters and acidification affect marine biota. In this study, whilst individual behaviours were affected by increased CO
2
, community dynamics buffered the impacts on fish and crustaceans.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><doi>10.1038/s41558-018-0086-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4499-3940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-1963</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5350-6852</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1758-678X |
ispartof | Nature climate change, 2018-03, Vol.8 (3), p.229-233 |
issn | 1758-678X 1758-6798 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2009582606 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | 631/158/2165 631/158/853 704/158/2446 704/829/826 Acidification Aquatic crustaceans Buffers Capacity Carbon dioxide Climate Climate Change Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Communities Complexity Consumers Crustaceans Dynamics Earth and Environmental Science Environment Environmental changes Environmental effects Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice Fish Foraging Foraging habitats Future climates Habitat selection High temperature Interactions Interspecific relationships Letter Marine ecology Mesocosms Ocean acidification Predation Predators Risk taking Shellfish Species Temperature Temperature effects Vulnerability |
title | Ecological complexity buffers the impacts of future climate on marine consumers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T13%3A34%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological%20complexity%20buffers%20the%20impacts%20of%20future%20climate%20on%20marine%20consumers&rft.jtitle=Nature%20climate%20change&rft.au=Goldenberg,%20Silvan%20U.&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=229-233&rft.issn=1758-678X&rft.eissn=1758-6798&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41558-018-0086-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2009582606%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2009582606&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |