An Analysis of Secondary Child Care Arrangements

This paper analyzes the secondary child care arrangements used by working mothers. All of the previous work examining child care has concentrated on just the principal or primary mode of child care that the family uses. For many families, however, there are additional arrangements which are made for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American Economist (New York, N.Y. 1960) N.Y. 1960), 1994-03, Vol.38 (1), p.82-91
1. Verfasser: Steen, Todd P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 91
container_issue 1
container_start_page 82
container_title The American Economist (New York, N.Y. 1960)
container_volume 38
creator Steen, Todd P.
description This paper analyzes the secondary child care arrangements used by working mothers. All of the previous work examining child care has concentrated on just the principal or primary mode of child care that the family uses. For many families, however, there are additional arrangements which are made for child care, and little is known about the extent of these arrangements and their economic and demographic determinants. An important question is whether this secondary care is used primarily to enhance the quality of care that the child receives, or is required because of the lack of adequate primary sources of child care. In order to fully examine the use of secondary child care, this paper analyzes a variety of different data sources: the National Longitudinal Survey Youth Cohort (1986 and 1988), the June 1982 Current Population Survey, and the 1984-85 Survey of Income and Program Participation. The paper concludes that economic factors such as the mother's wage and her hours worked, along with marital status and the age of the child, are the major factors in determining whether a mother will use a supplementary arrangement for child care, factors which are similar to those important in the choice of the primary mode of care to be used. The paper also finds that the use of secondary care does not seem to be a mechanism to cope with the lack of supply of adequate and flexible child care, but may be a choice that a family makes to better tailor the care used in order to benefit both the parents and the child.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/056943459403800111
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_200727890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A15524447</galeid><jstor_id>25603995</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_056943459403800111</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A15524447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-2c3644349f5997ce45b12cbd917874b04f9b6769a73ada7d98faa66ccaf3c9fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0k1LwzAYB_AgCs6XLyAIxZMHq3ltmmMtOoXhDtNzSNOkdnSNJh3otzejIgyHSA6B8Ps_T3gSAM4QvEaI8xvIMkEJZYJCkkOIENoDE0xwniJM2D6YbEC6EYfgKITlhgiaTQAs-qToVfcZ2pA4myyMdn2t_GdSvrZdnZTKm6TwXvWNWZl-CCfgwKoumNPv_Ri83N89lw_pbD59LItZqilnQ4o1yWjsJywTgmtDWYWwrmqBeM5pBakVVcYzoThRteK1yK1SWaa1skQLW5FjcDHWffPufW3CIJdu7eNNg8QQcsxzASO6GlGjOiPb3rrBK92Y3njVud7YNh4XiDFMKeWRpzt4XLVZtXqXv9zykQzmY2jUOgT5uHj6N72d_pfm09kWvdpFtes60xgZB17OtzgeufYuBG-sfPPtKj6mRFBu_on8_U9i6GYMBRVL_gz5z8T5mFiGwfmfHphlkAjByBdF0sCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200727890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Analysis of Secondary Child Care Arrangements</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Steen, Todd P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Steen, Todd P.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyzes the secondary child care arrangements used by working mothers. All of the previous work examining child care has concentrated on just the principal or primary mode of child care that the family uses. For many families, however, there are additional arrangements which are made for child care, and little is known about the extent of these arrangements and their economic and demographic determinants. An important question is whether this secondary care is used primarily to enhance the quality of care that the child receives, or is required because of the lack of adequate primary sources of child care. In order to fully examine the use of secondary child care, this paper analyzes a variety of different data sources: the National Longitudinal Survey Youth Cohort (1986 and 1988), the June 1982 Current Population Survey, and the 1984-85 Survey of Income and Program Participation. The paper concludes that economic factors such as the mother's wage and her hours worked, along with marital status and the age of the child, are the major factors in determining whether a mother will use a supplementary arrangement for child care, factors which are similar to those important in the choice of the primary mode of care to be used. The paper also finds that the use of secondary care does not seem to be a mechanism to cope with the lack of supply of adequate and flexible child care, but may be a choice that a family makes to better tailor the care used in order to benefit both the parents and the child.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0569-4345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-1235</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/056943459403800111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Omicron Delta Epsilon</publisher><subject>Child care ; Child care services ; Children &amp; youth ; Demographic aspects ; Economic aspects ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Educational attainment ; Families &amp; family life ; Family income ; Households ; Longitudinal studies ; Mothers ; Parents ; Preschool children ; Preschool education ; Primary care ; Primary health care ; School age children ; Studies ; Wages ; Wages &amp; salaries ; Working mothers</subject><ispartof>The American Economist (New York, N.Y. 1960), 1994-03, Vol.38 (1), p.82-91</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994 Omicron Delta Epsilon</rights><rights>1994 Omicron Delta Epsilon</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1994 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1994 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Omicron Delta Epsilon Fraternity Spring 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-2c3644349f5997ce45b12cbd917874b04f9b6769a73ada7d98faa66ccaf3c9fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25603995$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25603995$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steen, Todd P.</creatorcontrib><title>An Analysis of Secondary Child Care Arrangements</title><title>The American Economist (New York, N.Y. 1960)</title><addtitle>American Economist</addtitle><description>This paper analyzes the secondary child care arrangements used by working mothers. All of the previous work examining child care has concentrated on just the principal or primary mode of child care that the family uses. For many families, however, there are additional arrangements which are made for child care, and little is known about the extent of these arrangements and their economic and demographic determinants. An important question is whether this secondary care is used primarily to enhance the quality of care that the child receives, or is required because of the lack of adequate primary sources of child care. In order to fully examine the use of secondary child care, this paper analyzes a variety of different data sources: the National Longitudinal Survey Youth Cohort (1986 and 1988), the June 1982 Current Population Survey, and the 1984-85 Survey of Income and Program Participation. The paper concludes that economic factors such as the mother's wage and her hours worked, along with marital status and the age of the child, are the major factors in determining whether a mother will use a supplementary arrangement for child care, factors which are similar to those important in the choice of the primary mode of care to be used. The paper also finds that the use of secondary care does not seem to be a mechanism to cope with the lack of supply of adequate and flexible child care, but may be a choice that a family makes to better tailor the care used in order to benefit both the parents and the child.</description><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Child care services</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Preschool children</subject><subject>Preschool education</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>School age children</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wages</subject><subject>Wages &amp; salaries</subject><subject>Working mothers</subject><issn>0569-4345</issn><issn>2328-1235</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0k1LwzAYB_AgCs6XLyAIxZMHq3ltmmMtOoXhDtNzSNOkdnSNJh3otzejIgyHSA6B8Ps_T3gSAM4QvEaI8xvIMkEJZYJCkkOIENoDE0xwniJM2D6YbEC6EYfgKITlhgiaTQAs-qToVfcZ2pA4myyMdn2t_GdSvrZdnZTKm6TwXvWNWZl-CCfgwKoumNPv_Ri83N89lw_pbD59LItZqilnQ4o1yWjsJywTgmtDWYWwrmqBeM5pBakVVcYzoThRteK1yK1SWaa1skQLW5FjcDHWffPufW3CIJdu7eNNg8QQcsxzASO6GlGjOiPb3rrBK92Y3njVud7YNh4XiDFMKeWRpzt4XLVZtXqXv9zykQzmY2jUOgT5uHj6N72d_pfm09kWvdpFtes60xgZB17OtzgeufYuBG-sfPPtKj6mRFBu_on8_U9i6GYMBRVL_gz5z8T5mFiGwfmfHphlkAjByBdF0sCg</recordid><startdate>19940322</startdate><enddate>19940322</enddate><creator>Steen, Todd P.</creator><general>Omicron Delta Epsilon</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940322</creationdate><title>An Analysis of Secondary Child Care Arrangements</title><author>Steen, Todd P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-2c3644349f5997ce45b12cbd917874b04f9b6769a73ada7d98faa66ccaf3c9fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Child care services</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Preschool children</topic><topic>Preschool education</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>School age children</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wages</topic><topic>Wages &amp; salaries</topic><topic>Working mothers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steen, Todd P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The American Economist (New York, N.Y. 1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steen, Todd P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Analysis of Secondary Child Care Arrangements</atitle><jtitle>The American Economist (New York, N.Y. 1960)</jtitle><addtitle>American Economist</addtitle><date>1994-03-22</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>82-91</pages><issn>0569-4345</issn><eissn>2328-1235</eissn><abstract>This paper analyzes the secondary child care arrangements used by working mothers. All of the previous work examining child care has concentrated on just the principal or primary mode of child care that the family uses. For many families, however, there are additional arrangements which are made for child care, and little is known about the extent of these arrangements and their economic and demographic determinants. An important question is whether this secondary care is used primarily to enhance the quality of care that the child receives, or is required because of the lack of adequate primary sources of child care. In order to fully examine the use of secondary child care, this paper analyzes a variety of different data sources: the National Longitudinal Survey Youth Cohort (1986 and 1988), the June 1982 Current Population Survey, and the 1984-85 Survey of Income and Program Participation. The paper concludes that economic factors such as the mother's wage and her hours worked, along with marital status and the age of the child, are the major factors in determining whether a mother will use a supplementary arrangement for child care, factors which are similar to those important in the choice of the primary mode of care to be used. The paper also finds that the use of secondary care does not seem to be a mechanism to cope with the lack of supply of adequate and flexible child care, but may be a choice that a family makes to better tailor the care used in order to benefit both the parents and the child.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Omicron Delta Epsilon</pub><doi>10.1177/056943459403800111</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0569-4345
ispartof The American Economist (New York, N.Y. 1960), 1994-03, Vol.38 (1), p.82-91
issn 0569-4345
2328-1235
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_200727890
source Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Child care
Child care services
Children & youth
Demographic aspects
Economic aspects
Economic theory
Economics
Educational attainment
Families & family life
Family income
Households
Longitudinal studies
Mothers
Parents
Preschool children
Preschool education
Primary care
Primary health care
School age children
Studies
Wages
Wages & salaries
Working mothers
title An Analysis of Secondary Child Care Arrangements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A19%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Analysis%20of%20Secondary%20Child%20Care%20Arrangements&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20Economist%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201960)&rft.au=Steen,%20Todd%20P.&rft.date=1994-03-22&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=82-91&rft.issn=0569-4345&rft.eissn=2328-1235&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/056943459403800111&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA15524447%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200727890&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A15524447&rft_jstor_id=25603995&rft_sage_id=10.1177_056943459403800111&rfr_iscdi=true