Overhead in Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools: Evaluation and Analysis
Current Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools (ABET) insert into the network probing packets to perform a single estimation. The utilization of these packets makes ABET intrusive and prone to errors since they consume part of the available bandwidth they are measuring. This paper presents a comparati...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of communication networks and information security 2017-12, Vol.9 (3), p.393-404 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 404 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 393 |
| container_title | International journal of communication networks and information security |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | Salcedo, Dixon Guerrero, Julián Guerrero, Cesar D |
| description | Current Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools (ABET) insert into the network probing packets to perform a single estimation. The utilization of these packets makes ABET intrusive and prone to errors since they consume part of the available bandwidth they are measuring. This paper presents a comparative of Overhead Estimation Tools (OET) analysis of representative ABET: Abing, Diettopp, Pathload, PathChirp, Traceband, IGI, PTR, Assolo, and Wbest. By using Internet traffic, the study shows that the insertion of probing packets is a factor that affects two metrics associated to the estimation. First, it is shown that the accuracy is affected proportionally to the amount of probing traffic. Secondly, the Estimation Time (ET) is increased in high congested end-to-end links when auto-induced congestion tools are used. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2006809906</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2006809906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-8e4545f163330314a66315de08075e426f26af66229e85e4b9aefa21cbffd6143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0FLxDAUhIMouK7-h4DnwmvSvibe6lJ1YWEvPXhbXk3CZonN2rQV_73F9TTDxzDMXLGVgAoz0BKu_7zMEKr3W3aX0gkAEUCv2HY_2-FoyXDf83omH6gLlj9Tb769GY-8SaP_pNHHnrcxhvTEm5nCdCFLitc9hZ_k0z27cRSSffjXNWtfmnbzlu32r9tNvcvOWo2ZskVZlC5HKSXIvCBEmZfGgoKqtIVAJ5AcohDaqgV0mqwjkX90zhnMC7lmj5fa8xC_JpvGwylOw7IhHcTySoHWgPIXSY1Iqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2006809906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overhead in Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools: Evaluation and Analysis</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Salcedo, Dixon ; Guerrero, Julián ; Guerrero, Cesar D</creator><creatorcontrib>Salcedo, Dixon ; Guerrero, Julián ; Guerrero, Cesar D</creatorcontrib><description>Current Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools (ABET) insert into the network probing packets to perform a single estimation. The utilization of these packets makes ABET intrusive and prone to errors since they consume part of the available bandwidth they are measuring. This paper presents a comparative of Overhead Estimation Tools (OET) analysis of representative ABET: Abing, Diettopp, Pathload, PathChirp, Traceband, IGI, PTR, Assolo, and Wbest. By using Internet traffic, the study shows that the insertion of probing packets is a factor that affects two metrics associated to the estimation. First, it is shown that the accuracy is affected proportionally to the amount of probing traffic. Secondly, the Estimation Time (ET) is increased in high congested end-to-end links when auto-induced congestion tools are used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-607X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-0930</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kohat: Kohat University of Science and Technology (KUST)</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Bandwidths ; Communication ; Communications networks ; Computer networks ; International conferences ; Internet service providers ; Measurement techniques ; Researchers ; Studies ; Traffic congestion ; Wireless networks</subject><ispartof>International journal of communication networks and information security, 2017-12, Vol.9 (3), p.393-404</ispartof><rights>Copyright Kohat University of Science and Technology (KUST) Dec 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salcedo, Dixon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Julián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Cesar D</creatorcontrib><title>Overhead in Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools: Evaluation and Analysis</title><title>International journal of communication networks and information security</title><description>Current Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools (ABET) insert into the network probing packets to perform a single estimation. The utilization of these packets makes ABET intrusive and prone to errors since they consume part of the available bandwidth they are measuring. This paper presents a comparative of Overhead Estimation Tools (OET) analysis of representative ABET: Abing, Diettopp, Pathload, PathChirp, Traceband, IGI, PTR, Assolo, and Wbest. By using Internet traffic, the study shows that the insertion of probing packets is a factor that affects two metrics associated to the estimation. First, it is shown that the accuracy is affected proportionally to the amount of probing traffic. Secondly, the Estimation Time (ET) is increased in high congested end-to-end links when auto-induced congestion tools are used.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Bandwidths</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communications networks</subject><subject>Computer networks</subject><subject>International conferences</subject><subject>Internet service providers</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Traffic congestion</subject><subject>Wireless networks</subject><issn>2073-607X</issn><issn>2076-0930</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotj0FLxDAUhIMouK7-h4DnwmvSvibe6lJ1YWEvPXhbXk3CZonN2rQV_73F9TTDxzDMXLGVgAoz0BKu_7zMEKr3W3aX0gkAEUCv2HY_2-FoyXDf83omH6gLlj9Tb769GY-8SaP_pNHHnrcxhvTEm5nCdCFLitc9hZ_k0z27cRSSffjXNWtfmnbzlu32r9tNvcvOWo2ZskVZlC5HKSXIvCBEmZfGgoKqtIVAJ5AcohDaqgV0mqwjkX90zhnMC7lmj5fa8xC_JpvGwylOw7IhHcTySoHWgPIXSY1Iqg</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Salcedo, Dixon</creator><creator>Guerrero, Julián</creator><creator>Guerrero, Cesar D</creator><general>Kohat University of Science and Technology (KUST)</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88K</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2T</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Overhead in Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools: Evaluation and Analysis</title><author>Salcedo, Dixon ; Guerrero, Julián ; Guerrero, Cesar D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-8e4545f163330314a66315de08075e426f26af66229e85e4b9aefa21cbffd6143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Bandwidths</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communications networks</topic><topic>Computer networks</topic><topic>International conferences</topic><topic>Internet service providers</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Traffic congestion</topic><topic>Wireless networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salcedo, Dixon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Julián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Cesar D</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Telecommunications (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Telecommunications Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of communication networks and information security</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salcedo, Dixon</au><au>Guerrero, Julián</au><au>Guerrero, Cesar D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overhead in Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools: Evaluation and Analysis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of communication networks and information security</jtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>393</spage><epage>404</epage><pages>393-404</pages><issn>2073-607X</issn><eissn>2076-0930</eissn><abstract>Current Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools (ABET) insert into the network probing packets to perform a single estimation. The utilization of these packets makes ABET intrusive and prone to errors since they consume part of the available bandwidth they are measuring. This paper presents a comparative of Overhead Estimation Tools (OET) analysis of representative ABET: Abing, Diettopp, Pathload, PathChirp, Traceband, IGI, PTR, Assolo, and Wbest. By using Internet traffic, the study shows that the insertion of probing packets is a factor that affects two metrics associated to the estimation. First, it is shown that the accuracy is affected proportionally to the amount of probing traffic. Secondly, the Estimation Time (ET) is increased in high congested end-to-end links when auto-induced congestion tools are used.</abstract><cop>Kohat</cop><pub>Kohat University of Science and Technology (KUST)</pub><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2073-607X |
| ispartof | International journal of communication networks and information security, 2017-12, Vol.9 (3), p.393-404 |
| issn | 2073-607X 2076-0930 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2006809906 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Accuracy Bandwidths Communication Communications networks Computer networks International conferences Internet service providers Measurement techniques Researchers Studies Traffic congestion Wireless networks |
| title | Overhead in Available Bandwidth Estimation Tools: Evaluation and Analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A31%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overhead%20in%20Available%20Bandwidth%20Estimation%20Tools:%20Evaluation%20and%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20communication%20networks%20and%20information%20security&rft.au=Salcedo,%20Dixon&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=393&rft.epage=404&rft.pages=393-404&rft.issn=2073-607X&rft.eissn=2076-0930&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2006809906%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2006809906&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |