Interminimum foF1 Differences and Their Physical Interpretation

Interminimum changes of June noontime monthly median foF1 were analyzed for European and Japanese ionosonde stations over the period of five (Moscow six) solar cycles. The magnitude of these changes is different at different stations and depends on the solar minima considered. In particular, both Eu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2018-01, Vol.123 (1), p.768-780
Hauptverfasser: Mikhailov, A. V., Perrone, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 780
container_issue 1
container_start_page 768
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Space physics
container_volume 123
creator Mikhailov, A. V.
Perrone, L.
description Interminimum changes of June noontime monthly median foF1 were analyzed for European and Japanese ionosonde stations over the period of five (Moscow six) solar cycles. The magnitude of these changes is different at different stations and depends on the solar minima considered. In particular, both European and Japanese stations manifest a pronounced foF1 change between 1996/1997 and 2008/2009 solar minima, the latter being the deepest one. For the first time, the total EUV solar flux with λ ≤ 1,050 Å has been retrieved for the 1946–2015 period using observed June monthly median foF1. The deep solar minimum in 2008/2009 was the lowest one among the last six solar cycles comparing the retrieved EUV. The change from 1996/1997 to 2008/2009 in the retrieved EUV is ~2.0%, and this is much less than the difference of ~10–12% being discussed in the literature. A 10% interminimum change in the total EUV flux results in neutral temperature and gas density, which are larger in 2008 than in 1996, and this contradicts the satellite drag neutral gas density observations. The mechanism of foF1 interminimum changes is based on an interplay between molecular (NO+ and O2+) and O+ ions. The main contribution (>72%) to the interminimum NmF1 change provides [M+] ions via the total ion production rate variation, the rest is provided via O+ ions. The absence (or inversed) difference in foF1 between 1996 and 2008 minima implies that neutral temperature and density are larger in 2008 than in 1996, and this contradicts the satellite drag observations. Key Points Interminimum foF1 changes do exist at middle latitudes The 1997/2008 interminimum change in foF1 corresponds to a 39% decrease in ρ at 300 km Solar EUV change from 1997 to 2008 is less than 10%
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2017JA024831
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2006626161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2006626161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1421-2b8f0c350921f15783cca5d49c393f972b5e048ea690589adb9d7922856f98463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFtLAzEQhYMoWGrf_AELPq_O5LbJk5Rqa0tBkfoc0t2EpnQvZrfI_vuuVsHzMofDNzNwCLlFuEcA-kABs9UUKFcML8iIotSp5kAv_zxTcE0mbbuHQWqIUIzI47LqXCxDFcpjmfh6jslT8N5FV-WuTWxVJJudCzF52_VtyO0h-VlooutsF-rqhlx5e2jd5HeOycf8eTN7Sdevi-Vsuk4b5BRTulUeciZAU_QoMsXy3IqC65xp5nVGt8IBV85KDUJpW2x1kWlKlZBeKy7ZmNyd7zax_jy6tjP7-hir4aWhAFJSiRIHip2pr3BwvWliKG3sDYL5rsj8r8isFu9TwQGQnQAyGVhZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2006626161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interminimum foF1 Differences and Their Physical Interpretation</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mikhailov, A. V. ; Perrone, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mikhailov, A. V. ; Perrone, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Interminimum changes of June noontime monthly median foF1 were analyzed for European and Japanese ionosonde stations over the period of five (Moscow six) solar cycles. The magnitude of these changes is different at different stations and depends on the solar minima considered. In particular, both European and Japanese stations manifest a pronounced foF1 change between 1996/1997 and 2008/2009 solar minima, the latter being the deepest one. For the first time, the total EUV solar flux with λ ≤ 1,050 Å has been retrieved for the 1946–2015 period using observed June monthly median foF1. The deep solar minimum in 2008/2009 was the lowest one among the last six solar cycles comparing the retrieved EUV. The change from 1996/1997 to 2008/2009 in the retrieved EUV is ~2.0%, and this is much less than the difference of ~10–12% being discussed in the literature. A 10% interminimum change in the total EUV flux results in neutral temperature and gas density, which are larger in 2008 than in 1996, and this contradicts the satellite drag neutral gas density observations. The mechanism of foF1 interminimum changes is based on an interplay between molecular (NO+ and O2+) and O+ ions. The main contribution (&gt;72%) to the interminimum NmF1 change provides [M+] ions via the total ion production rate variation, the rest is provided via O+ ions. The absence (or inversed) difference in foF1 between 1996 and 2008 minima implies that neutral temperature and density are larger in 2008 than in 1996, and this contradicts the satellite drag observations. Key Points Interminimum foF1 changes do exist at middle latitudes The 1997/2008 interminimum change in foF1 corresponds to a 39% decrease in ρ at 300 km Solar EUV change from 1997 to 2008 is less than 10%</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2017JA024831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Drag ; Gas density ; ionosphere ; Ions ; Minima ; Neutral gas density ; Satellite drag ; Satellite observation ; Solar cycle ; Solar flux ; Solar minimum ; Stations ; thermosphere</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2018-01, Vol.123 (1), p.768-780</ispartof><rights>2017. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-4335-0345</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2017JA024831$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2017JA024831$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mikhailov, A. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrone, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Interminimum foF1 Differences and Their Physical Interpretation</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><description>Interminimum changes of June noontime monthly median foF1 were analyzed for European and Japanese ionosonde stations over the period of five (Moscow six) solar cycles. The magnitude of these changes is different at different stations and depends on the solar minima considered. In particular, both European and Japanese stations manifest a pronounced foF1 change between 1996/1997 and 2008/2009 solar minima, the latter being the deepest one. For the first time, the total EUV solar flux with λ ≤ 1,050 Å has been retrieved for the 1946–2015 period using observed June monthly median foF1. The deep solar minimum in 2008/2009 was the lowest one among the last six solar cycles comparing the retrieved EUV. The change from 1996/1997 to 2008/2009 in the retrieved EUV is ~2.0%, and this is much less than the difference of ~10–12% being discussed in the literature. A 10% interminimum change in the total EUV flux results in neutral temperature and gas density, which are larger in 2008 than in 1996, and this contradicts the satellite drag neutral gas density observations. The mechanism of foF1 interminimum changes is based on an interplay between molecular (NO+ and O2+) and O+ ions. The main contribution (&gt;72%) to the interminimum NmF1 change provides [M+] ions via the total ion production rate variation, the rest is provided via O+ ions. The absence (or inversed) difference in foF1 between 1996 and 2008 minima implies that neutral temperature and density are larger in 2008 than in 1996, and this contradicts the satellite drag observations. Key Points Interminimum foF1 changes do exist at middle latitudes The 1997/2008 interminimum change in foF1 corresponds to a 39% decrease in ρ at 300 km Solar EUV change from 1997 to 2008 is less than 10%</description><subject>Drag</subject><subject>Gas density</subject><subject>ionosphere</subject><subject>Ions</subject><subject>Minima</subject><subject>Neutral gas density</subject><subject>Satellite drag</subject><subject>Satellite observation</subject><subject>Solar cycle</subject><subject>Solar flux</subject><subject>Solar minimum</subject><subject>Stations</subject><subject>thermosphere</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkFtLAzEQhYMoWGrf_AELPq_O5LbJk5Rqa0tBkfoc0t2EpnQvZrfI_vuuVsHzMofDNzNwCLlFuEcA-kABs9UUKFcML8iIotSp5kAv_zxTcE0mbbuHQWqIUIzI47LqXCxDFcpjmfh6jslT8N5FV-WuTWxVJJudCzF52_VtyO0h-VlooutsF-rqhlx5e2jd5HeOycf8eTN7Sdevi-Vsuk4b5BRTulUeciZAU_QoMsXy3IqC65xp5nVGt8IBV85KDUJpW2x1kWlKlZBeKy7ZmNyd7zax_jy6tjP7-hir4aWhAFJSiRIHip2pr3BwvWliKG3sDYL5rsj8r8isFu9TwQGQnQAyGVhZ</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Mikhailov, A. V.</creator><creator>Perrone, L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-0345</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Interminimum foF1 Differences and Their Physical Interpretation</title><author>Mikhailov, A. V. ; Perrone, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1421-2b8f0c350921f15783cca5d49c393f972b5e048ea690589adb9d7922856f98463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Drag</topic><topic>Gas density</topic><topic>ionosphere</topic><topic>Ions</topic><topic>Minima</topic><topic>Neutral gas density</topic><topic>Satellite drag</topic><topic>Satellite observation</topic><topic>Solar cycle</topic><topic>Solar flux</topic><topic>Solar minimum</topic><topic>Stations</topic><topic>thermosphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mikhailov, A. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrone, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mikhailov, A. V.</au><au>Perrone, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interminimum foF1 Differences and Their Physical Interpretation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>768</spage><epage>780</epage><pages>768-780</pages><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>Interminimum changes of June noontime monthly median foF1 were analyzed for European and Japanese ionosonde stations over the period of five (Moscow six) solar cycles. The magnitude of these changes is different at different stations and depends on the solar minima considered. In particular, both European and Japanese stations manifest a pronounced foF1 change between 1996/1997 and 2008/2009 solar minima, the latter being the deepest one. For the first time, the total EUV solar flux with λ ≤ 1,050 Å has been retrieved for the 1946–2015 period using observed June monthly median foF1. The deep solar minimum in 2008/2009 was the lowest one among the last six solar cycles comparing the retrieved EUV. The change from 1996/1997 to 2008/2009 in the retrieved EUV is ~2.0%, and this is much less than the difference of ~10–12% being discussed in the literature. A 10% interminimum change in the total EUV flux results in neutral temperature and gas density, which are larger in 2008 than in 1996, and this contradicts the satellite drag neutral gas density observations. The mechanism of foF1 interminimum changes is based on an interplay between molecular (NO+ and O2+) and O+ ions. The main contribution (&gt;72%) to the interminimum NmF1 change provides [M+] ions via the total ion production rate variation, the rest is provided via O+ ions. The absence (or inversed) difference in foF1 between 1996 and 2008 minima implies that neutral temperature and density are larger in 2008 than in 1996, and this contradicts the satellite drag observations. Key Points Interminimum foF1 changes do exist at middle latitudes The 1997/2008 interminimum change in foF1 corresponds to a 39% decrease in ρ at 300 km Solar EUV change from 1997 to 2008 is less than 10%</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2017JA024831</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-0345</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9380
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2018-01, Vol.123 (1), p.768-780
issn 2169-9380
2169-9402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2006626161
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Drag
Gas density
ionosphere
Ions
Minima
Neutral gas density
Satellite drag
Satellite observation
Solar cycle
Solar flux
Solar minimum
Stations
thermosphere
title Interminimum foF1 Differences and Their Physical Interpretation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T15%3A01%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interminimum%20foF1%20Differences%20and%20Their%20Physical%20Interpretation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Mikhailov,%20A.%20V.&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=768&rft.epage=780&rft.pages=768-780&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2017JA024831&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2006626161%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2006626161&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true