Nutrient fluxes in pure and mixed stands of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica)
Studies on the combined effects of beech-spruce mixtures are very rare. Hence, forest nutrition (soil, foliage) and nutrient fluxes via litterfall, throughfall (+ stemflow) and soil solution were measured in adjacent stands of pure spruce, mixed spruce-beech and pure beech on a nutrient rich site at...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 2009-09, Vol.322 (1-2), p.317-342 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 342 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 317 |
| container_title | Plant and soil |
| container_volume | 322 |
| creator | Berger, Torsten W Untersteiner, Hubert Toplitzer, Martin Neubauer, Christian |
| description | Studies on the combined effects of beech-spruce mixtures are very rare. Hence, forest nutrition (soil, foliage) and nutrient fluxes via litterfall, throughfall (+ stemflow) and soil solution were measured in adjacent stands of pure spruce, mixed spruce-beech and pure beech on a nutrient rich site at Kreisbach, as well as in adjacent spruce and mixed stands on a nutrient poor site at Frauschereck to evaluate the impact of tree species composition (spruce versus beech) on these parameters. The highest recorded throughfall (+ stemflow) fluxes were 22.4 kg N ha⁻¹ and 9.6 kg S ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ and increased from beech over the mixed to the spruce stand at Kreisbach, but were similar for both stands at Frauschereck. At Frauschereck, atmospheric inputs were more or less reflected in element outputs, slightly modified by tree species composition. At Kreisbach, there was hardly any linkage between nutrient inputs and outputs. Our overall conclusion is that tree species composition affects forest nutrition, atmospheric input and consequently soil solution chemistry and input-output budgets of nutrients. However, these effects are site specific and dependent on the studied chemical element and process. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11104-009-9918-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_200598510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24130100</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24130100</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-985bbf4d1f6fb68ddb6e7065a36bac313b945aedbad304bdeb6aff5690b0c4b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLHTEQhYO04K31B_ggDYWCPqxONrvZzWOR2hZEhSr4UAiTbHKby3X3mtkt6q9vblfqW58mwznnm3AYOxBwIgCaUxJCQFUA6EJr0RbPO2wh6kYWNUj1hi0AZFlAo-922TuiFWx3oRbs5-U0puj7kYf19OiJx55vpuQ59h2_j4--4zTmN_EhcNqkyXl-dB2dR442ejr-a7Teu1_86ByXE3F6Wv_GMTo8fs_eBlyT33-Ze-z2_MvN2bfi4urr97PPF4WTWoyFbmtrQ9WJoIJVbddZ5RtQNUpl0Ukhra5q9J3FTkJlO28VhlArDRZcZVu5xz7O3E0aHiZPo1kNU-rzSVMC1JkvIJvEbHJpIEo-mE2K95iejACz7dDMHZrcodl2aJ5z5tMLGMnhOiTsXaR_wVK0tS6bKvvK2Zcbiv3Sp9cP_A9-OIdWNA7pFVoJCTmS9Q-zHnAwuEz58O2PEraqUrqSjfwDiEqUxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200598510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutrient fluxes in pure and mixed stands of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica)</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Berger, Torsten W ; Untersteiner, Hubert ; Toplitzer, Martin ; Neubauer, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Berger, Torsten W ; Untersteiner, Hubert ; Toplitzer, Martin ; Neubauer, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Studies on the combined effects of beech-spruce mixtures are very rare. Hence, forest nutrition (soil, foliage) and nutrient fluxes via litterfall, throughfall (+ stemflow) and soil solution were measured in adjacent stands of pure spruce, mixed spruce-beech and pure beech on a nutrient rich site at Kreisbach, as well as in adjacent spruce and mixed stands on a nutrient poor site at Frauschereck to evaluate the impact of tree species composition (spruce versus beech) on these parameters. The highest recorded throughfall (+ stemflow) fluxes were 22.4 kg N ha⁻¹ and 9.6 kg S ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ and increased from beech over the mixed to the spruce stand at Kreisbach, but were similar for both stands at Frauschereck. At Frauschereck, atmospheric inputs were more or less reflected in element outputs, slightly modified by tree species composition. At Kreisbach, there was hardly any linkage between nutrient inputs and outputs. Our overall conclusion is that tree species composition affects forest nutrition, atmospheric input and consequently soil solution chemistry and input-output budgets of nutrients. However, these effects are site specific and dependent on the studied chemical element and process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-009-9918-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLSOA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acid soils ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; biogeochemical cycles ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecology ; Fagus sylvatica ; Foliage ; Forest litter ; Forest soils ; Forest stands ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Geochemistry ; Input-output budget ; Leaching ; Life Sciences ; Mineral soils ; Mixed stands ; Nitrates ; Nutrients ; Picea abies ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant species ; Regular Article ; Soil chemistry ; Soil depth ; Soil nutrients ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Soil solution ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; Species composition ; Throughfall ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2009-09, Vol.322 (1-2), p.317-342</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-985bbf4d1f6fb68ddb6e7065a36bac313b945aedbad304bdeb6aff5690b0c4b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-985bbf4d1f6fb68ddb6e7065a36bac313b945aedbad304bdeb6aff5690b0c4b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24130100$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24130100$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21859274$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berger, Torsten W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Untersteiner, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toplitzer, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubauer, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Nutrient fluxes in pure and mixed stands of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica)</title><title>Plant and soil</title><addtitle>Plant Soil</addtitle><description>Studies on the combined effects of beech-spruce mixtures are very rare. Hence, forest nutrition (soil, foliage) and nutrient fluxes via litterfall, throughfall (+ stemflow) and soil solution were measured in adjacent stands of pure spruce, mixed spruce-beech and pure beech on a nutrient rich site at Kreisbach, as well as in adjacent spruce and mixed stands on a nutrient poor site at Frauschereck to evaluate the impact of tree species composition (spruce versus beech) on these parameters. The highest recorded throughfall (+ stemflow) fluxes were 22.4 kg N ha⁻¹ and 9.6 kg S ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ and increased from beech over the mixed to the spruce stand at Kreisbach, but were similar for both stands at Frauschereck. At Frauschereck, atmospheric inputs were more or less reflected in element outputs, slightly modified by tree species composition. At Kreisbach, there was hardly any linkage between nutrient inputs and outputs. Our overall conclusion is that tree species composition affects forest nutrition, atmospheric input and consequently soil solution chemistry and input-output budgets of nutrients. However, these effects are site specific and dependent on the studied chemical element and process.</description><subject>Acid soils</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>biogeochemical cycles</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fagus sylvatica</subject><subject>Foliage</subject><subject>Forest litter</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Forest stands</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Input-output budget</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mineral soils</subject><subject>Mixed stands</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Picea abies</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>Soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soil depth</subject><subject>Soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Soil solution</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Throughfall</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFFLHTEQhYO04K31B_ggDYWCPqxONrvZzWOR2hZEhSr4UAiTbHKby3X3mtkt6q9vblfqW58mwznnm3AYOxBwIgCaUxJCQFUA6EJr0RbPO2wh6kYWNUj1hi0AZFlAo-922TuiFWx3oRbs5-U0puj7kYf19OiJx55vpuQ59h2_j4--4zTmN_EhcNqkyXl-dB2dR442ejr-a7Teu1_86ByXE3F6Wv_GMTo8fs_eBlyT33-Ze-z2_MvN2bfi4urr97PPF4WTWoyFbmtrQ9WJoIJVbddZ5RtQNUpl0Ukhra5q9J3FTkJlO28VhlArDRZcZVu5xz7O3E0aHiZPo1kNU-rzSVMC1JkvIJvEbHJpIEo-mE2K95iejACz7dDMHZrcodl2aJ5z5tMLGMnhOiTsXaR_wVK0tS6bKvvK2Zcbiv3Sp9cP_A9-OIdWNA7pFVoJCTmS9Q-zHnAwuEz58O2PEraqUrqSjfwDiEqUxQ</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Berger, Torsten W</creator><creator>Untersteiner, Hubert</creator><creator>Toplitzer, Martin</creator><creator>Neubauer, Christian</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Nutrient fluxes in pure and mixed stands of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica)</title><author>Berger, Torsten W ; Untersteiner, Hubert ; Toplitzer, Martin ; Neubauer, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-985bbf4d1f6fb68ddb6e7065a36bac313b945aedbad304bdeb6aff5690b0c4b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Acid soils</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>biogeochemical cycles</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fagus sylvatica</topic><topic>Foliage</topic><topic>Forest litter</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Forest stands</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Input-output budget</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mineral soils</topic><topic>Mixed stands</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Picea abies</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>Soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soil depth</topic><topic>Soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Soil solution</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Throughfall</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berger, Torsten W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Untersteiner, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toplitzer, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubauer, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berger, Torsten W</au><au>Untersteiner, Hubert</au><au>Toplitzer, Martin</au><au>Neubauer, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutrient fluxes in pure and mixed stands of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica)</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><stitle>Plant Soil</stitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>322</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>317-342</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><coden>PLSOA2</coden><abstract>Studies on the combined effects of beech-spruce mixtures are very rare. Hence, forest nutrition (soil, foliage) and nutrient fluxes via litterfall, throughfall (+ stemflow) and soil solution were measured in adjacent stands of pure spruce, mixed spruce-beech and pure beech on a nutrient rich site at Kreisbach, as well as in adjacent spruce and mixed stands on a nutrient poor site at Frauschereck to evaluate the impact of tree species composition (spruce versus beech) on these parameters. The highest recorded throughfall (+ stemflow) fluxes were 22.4 kg N ha⁻¹ and 9.6 kg S ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ and increased from beech over the mixed to the spruce stand at Kreisbach, but were similar for both stands at Frauschereck. At Frauschereck, atmospheric inputs were more or less reflected in element outputs, slightly modified by tree species composition. At Kreisbach, there was hardly any linkage between nutrient inputs and outputs. Our overall conclusion is that tree species composition affects forest nutrition, atmospheric input and consequently soil solution chemistry and input-output budgets of nutrients. However, these effects are site specific and dependent on the studied chemical element and process.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-009-9918-z</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0032-079X |
| ispartof | Plant and soil, 2009-09, Vol.322 (1-2), p.317-342 |
| issn | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_200598510 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Acid soils Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animal, plant and microbial ecology biogeochemical cycles Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Ecology Fagus sylvatica Foliage Forest litter Forest soils Forest stands Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production Geochemistry Input-output budget Leaching Life Sciences Mineral soils Mixed stands Nitrates Nutrients Picea abies Plant Physiology Plant Sciences Plant species Regular Article Soil chemistry Soil depth Soil nutrients Soil Science & Conservation Soil solution Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments Species composition Throughfall Trees |
| title | Nutrient fluxes in pure and mixed stands of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T16%3A00%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutrient%20fluxes%20in%20pure%20and%20mixed%20stands%20of%20spruce%20(Picea%20abies)%20and%20beech%20(Fagus%20sylvatica)&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Berger,%20Torsten%20W&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=322&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=317-342&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft.coden=PLSOA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-009-9918-z&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24130100%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200598510&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24130100&rfr_iscdi=true |