"TAP-IN" to strategic and tactical intelligence in the sales and marketing functions

This article describes the results of a benchmarking study of mechanisms used in corporate CI operations to coordinate strategic and tactical intelligence for sales and marketing. The American Productivity and Quality Center (APQC) sponsored the study, for which the authors served as subject‐matter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Competitive intelligence review 2000-01, Vol.11 (1), p.4-16
Hauptverfasser: Miree, Cynthia E., Prescott, John E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue 1
container_start_page 4
container_title Competitive intelligence review
container_volume 11
creator Miree, Cynthia E.
Prescott, John E.
description This article describes the results of a benchmarking study of mechanisms used in corporate CI operations to coordinate strategic and tactical intelligence for sales and marketing. The American Productivity and Quality Center (APQC) sponsored the study, for which the authors served as subject‐matter experts. The objective was to identify a set of mechanisms that establish a conceptual and operational integration of strategic and tactical intelligence. In‐depth case studies of five best‐practice companies (Amoco, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dow Chemical, Met Life, and SBC), supplemented with quantitative surveys from an additional nine firms, provided the study data. The findings show that best‐practice firms use a set of five coordinating mechanisms that the authors label TAP‐IN™: (1) Teams, (2) CI human‐resource job design and Allocation, (3) the Planning process, (4) Interaction (dialogue), and (5) human intelligence Networks. The use of these five mechanisms in tandem provides a sophisticated means of coordinating strategic and tactical intelligence in the sales and marketing functions and throughout the firm. All of the companies in the sample used the TAP‐IN mechanisms to some degree. The data reveal a relationship between the number of mechanisms used by a company and the overall effectiveness of the coordination process. For instance, Dow Chemical and Amoco used all five mechanisms. These two companies also reported they were able to achieve coordination between strategic and tactical intelligence to a very high degree. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6386(200031)11:1<4::AID-CIR3>3.0.CO;2-I
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_200437901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>50874579</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2153-2b8930914b6550074113a48dea13bf0743c813864a086657dbca18aa4bd98e083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kG1L8zAUhoso-Pofyj7ph8xzmrRN94gw61tBnMzJPh7SLttTra02Geq_N3WiHxQhkNxwnyuHy_MGCH0ECA73b7M0O8AwABZxGe0HAMDxAHGAR2IwGGanLM3G_Jj3oZ-O_gUsW_O2vurr7g2hZBCIeNPbNubejScRj7a8SW8yvGHZdc-3jW9sq6xelIWv6plvVWHLQlV-WVtdVeVC14V2wbf_tW9Upc1H7VG1D9qW9cKfL2s30dRm19uYq8rovc97x7s7P5ukl-xqdJGlwytWBBhyFuQy4ZCgyKMwBIgFIldCzrRCns9d5oVEt75QIKMojGd5oVAqJfJZIjVIvuP1VtyntnleamPpvlm2tfuSnCDB4wTQlcarUtE2xrR6Tk9t6ZZ-IwTq5BJ1cqmzRZ0tWskldIcEkZNLnVziBJSOKKDsG_pSVvrtB_FP4C-8j-ygbAUtjdWvX1Dnl6KYxyFNry9omk45nsoTGvN3kgiXwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200437901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"TAP-IN" to strategic and tactical intelligence in the sales and marketing functions</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Miree, Cynthia E. ; Prescott, John E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Miree, Cynthia E. ; Prescott, John E.</creatorcontrib><description>This article describes the results of a benchmarking study of mechanisms used in corporate CI operations to coordinate strategic and tactical intelligence for sales and marketing. The American Productivity and Quality Center (APQC) sponsored the study, for which the authors served as subject‐matter experts. The objective was to identify a set of mechanisms that establish a conceptual and operational integration of strategic and tactical intelligence. In‐depth case studies of five best‐practice companies (Amoco, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dow Chemical, Met Life, and SBC), supplemented with quantitative surveys from an additional nine firms, provided the study data. The findings show that best‐practice firms use a set of five coordinating mechanisms that the authors label TAP‐IN™: (1) Teams, (2) CI human‐resource job design and Allocation, (3) the Planning process, (4) Interaction (dialogue), and (5) human intelligence Networks. The use of these five mechanisms in tandem provides a sophisticated means of coordinating strategic and tactical intelligence in the sales and marketing functions and throughout the firm. All of the companies in the sample used the TAP‐IN mechanisms to some degree. The data reveal a relationship between the number of mechanisms used by a company and the overall effectiveness of the coordination process. For instance, Dow Chemical and Amoco used all five mechanisms. These two companies also reported they were able to achieve coordination between strategic and tactical intelligence to a very high degree. © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6386(200031)11:1&lt;4::AID-CIR3&gt;3.0.CO;2-I</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CINREU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Benchmarks ; Best practice ; Competitive intelligence ; Marketing ; Sales ; Strategic management ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Competitive intelligence review, 2000-01, Vol.11 (1), p.4-16</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals First Quarter 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2153-2b8930914b6550074113a48dea13bf0743c813864a086657dbca18aa4bd98e083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291520-6386%28200031%2911%3A1%3C4%3A%3AAID-CIR3%3E3.0.CO%3B2-I$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291520-6386%28200031%2911%3A1%3C4%3A%3AAID-CIR3%3E3.0.CO%3B2-I$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miree, Cynthia E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prescott, John E.</creatorcontrib><title>"TAP-IN" to strategic and tactical intelligence in the sales and marketing functions</title><title>Competitive intelligence review</title><addtitle>Comp. Int. Rev</addtitle><description>This article describes the results of a benchmarking study of mechanisms used in corporate CI operations to coordinate strategic and tactical intelligence for sales and marketing. The American Productivity and Quality Center (APQC) sponsored the study, for which the authors served as subject‐matter experts. The objective was to identify a set of mechanisms that establish a conceptual and operational integration of strategic and tactical intelligence. In‐depth case studies of five best‐practice companies (Amoco, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dow Chemical, Met Life, and SBC), supplemented with quantitative surveys from an additional nine firms, provided the study data. The findings show that best‐practice firms use a set of five coordinating mechanisms that the authors label TAP‐IN™: (1) Teams, (2) CI human‐resource job design and Allocation, (3) the Planning process, (4) Interaction (dialogue), and (5) human intelligence Networks. The use of these five mechanisms in tandem provides a sophisticated means of coordinating strategic and tactical intelligence in the sales and marketing functions and throughout the firm. All of the companies in the sample used the TAP‐IN mechanisms to some degree. The data reveal a relationship between the number of mechanisms used by a company and the overall effectiveness of the coordination process. For instance, Dow Chemical and Amoco used all five mechanisms. These two companies also reported they were able to achieve coordination between strategic and tactical intelligence to a very high degree. © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</description><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Competitive intelligence</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1058-0247</issn><issn>1520-6386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kG1L8zAUhoso-Pofyj7ph8xzmrRN94gw61tBnMzJPh7SLttTra02Geq_N3WiHxQhkNxwnyuHy_MGCH0ECA73b7M0O8AwABZxGe0HAMDxAHGAR2IwGGanLM3G_Jj3oZ-O_gUsW_O2vurr7g2hZBCIeNPbNubejScRj7a8SW8yvGHZdc-3jW9sq6xelIWv6plvVWHLQlV-WVtdVeVC14V2wbf_tW9Upc1H7VG1D9qW9cKfL2s30dRm19uYq8rovc97x7s7P5ukl-xqdJGlwytWBBhyFuQy4ZCgyKMwBIgFIldCzrRCns9d5oVEt75QIKMojGd5oVAqJfJZIjVIvuP1VtyntnleamPpvlm2tfuSnCDB4wTQlcarUtE2xrR6Tk9t6ZZ-IwTq5BJ1cqmzRZ0tWskldIcEkZNLnVziBJSOKKDsG_pSVvrtB_FP4C-8j-ygbAUtjdWvX1Dnl6KYxyFNry9omk45nsoTGvN3kgiXwA</recordid><startdate>200001</startdate><enddate>200001</enddate><creator>Miree, Cynthia E.</creator><creator>Prescott, John E.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200001</creationdate><title>"TAP-IN" to strategic and tactical intelligence in the sales and marketing functions</title><author>Miree, Cynthia E. ; Prescott, John E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2153-2b8930914b6550074113a48dea13bf0743c813864a086657dbca18aa4bd98e083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Competitive intelligence</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miree, Cynthia E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prescott, John E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Competitive intelligence review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miree, Cynthia E.</au><au>Prescott, John E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"TAP-IN" to strategic and tactical intelligence in the sales and marketing functions</atitle><jtitle>Competitive intelligence review</jtitle><addtitle>Comp. Int. Rev</addtitle><date>2000-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>4</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>4-16</pages><issn>1058-0247</issn><eissn>1520-6386</eissn><coden>CINREU</coden><abstract>This article describes the results of a benchmarking study of mechanisms used in corporate CI operations to coordinate strategic and tactical intelligence for sales and marketing. The American Productivity and Quality Center (APQC) sponsored the study, for which the authors served as subject‐matter experts. The objective was to identify a set of mechanisms that establish a conceptual and operational integration of strategic and tactical intelligence. In‐depth case studies of five best‐practice companies (Amoco, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dow Chemical, Met Life, and SBC), supplemented with quantitative surveys from an additional nine firms, provided the study data. The findings show that best‐practice firms use a set of five coordinating mechanisms that the authors label TAP‐IN™: (1) Teams, (2) CI human‐resource job design and Allocation, (3) the Planning process, (4) Interaction (dialogue), and (5) human intelligence Networks. The use of these five mechanisms in tandem provides a sophisticated means of coordinating strategic and tactical intelligence in the sales and marketing functions and throughout the firm. All of the companies in the sample used the TAP‐IN mechanisms to some degree. The data reveal a relationship between the number of mechanisms used by a company and the overall effectiveness of the coordination process. For instance, Dow Chemical and Amoco used all five mechanisms. These two companies also reported they were able to achieve coordination between strategic and tactical intelligence to a very high degree. © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1520-6386(200031)11:1&lt;4::AID-CIR3&gt;3.0.CO;2-I</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-0247
ispartof Competitive intelligence review, 2000-01, Vol.11 (1), p.4-16
issn 1058-0247
1520-6386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_200437901
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Benchmarks
Best practice
Competitive intelligence
Marketing
Sales
Strategic management
Studies
title "TAP-IN" to strategic and tactical intelligence in the sales and marketing functions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T06%3A47%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22TAP-IN%22%20to%20strategic%20and%20tactical%20intelligence%20in%20the%20sales%20and%20marketing%20functions&rft.jtitle=Competitive%20intelligence%20review&rft.au=Miree,%20Cynthia%20E.&rft.date=2000-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=4&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=4-16&rft.issn=1058-0247&rft.eissn=1520-6386&rft.coden=CINREU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6386(200031)11:1%3C4::AID-CIR3%3E3.0.CO;2-I&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E50874579%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200437901&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true