The substantive and symbolic consequences of a district's standards-based curriculum
This study examines a "critical case" of one school district's efforts to develop and implement a standards-based curriculum. The study was conducted from two competing perspectives that dominated organizational analysis in education: the rational and the institutional. The findings d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American educational research journal 2003, Vol.40 (1), p.147-176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 176 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 147 |
container_title | American educational research journal |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Ogawa, Rodney T u.a |
description | This study examines a "critical case" of one school district's efforts to develop and implement a standards-based curriculum. The study was conducted from two competing perspectives that dominated organizational analysis in education: the rational and the institutional. The findings demonstrate that the district took an expressly rationalistic approach by using standards and a corresponding criterion-referenced test to focus teachers' instruction on common sets of outcomes. However, the findings suggest that, lacking a clear instructional philosophy, the district also took an institutional approach, in part. Its approach to development and implementation of the standards-based curriculum resulted in district standards that fell below state standards, a narrowing of curriculum and instructional strategies, and professional development and instructional supervision that lacked an instructional focus. (DIPF/Orig.). |
doi_str_mv | 10.3102/00028312040001147 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_200367244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ677675</ericid><jstor_id>3699428</jstor_id><sage_id>10.3102_00028312040001147</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3699428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c9e958eb749c94b01950bb7eeed269b8ce757755ef01c59bce912d35e103087c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AMVDEMRTNR9N0hxl8RPBy3ouSTrVLrvtmmkF_71ZurgHwVMmvM-8884QcsrZteRM3DDGRCG5YHmqOM_NHplwK1XG02-fTDZ6tgEOyRHiIjHCFnxC5vMPoDh47F3bN19AXVtR_F75btkEGroW4XOANgDSrqaOVg32sQn9FdJNS-VihZl3CBUNQ0zKsBxWx-SgdkuEk-07JW_3d_PZY_by-vA0u33JQkrZZ8GCVQV4k9tgc8-4Vcx7AwCV0NYXAYwyRimoGQ_K-gCWi0oq4EyywgQ5JRej7zp2KSX25aIbYptGloIxqY3I8wTxEQqxQ4xQl-vYrFz8LjkrN7cr_9wu9VxujR0Gt6yja0ODu8bcGmE1T9z5yEHa_Fe-e9bGaKOSfD3K6N5hl-2_uVu_BfZd_DWU2to8oVNyNspVs96tobUQSssfDxKWKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200367244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The substantive and symbolic consequences of a district's standards-based curriculum</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Ogawa, Rodney T ; u.a</creator><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Rodney T ; u.a</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines a "critical case" of one school district's efforts to develop and implement a standards-based curriculum. The study was conducted from two competing perspectives that dominated organizational analysis in education: the rational and the institutional. The findings demonstrate that the district took an expressly rationalistic approach by using standards and a corresponding criterion-referenced test to focus teachers' instruction on common sets of outcomes. However, the findings suggest that, lacking a clear instructional philosophy, the district also took an institutional approach, in part. Its approach to development and implementation of the standards-based curriculum resulted in district standards that fell below state standards, a narrowing of curriculum and instructional strategies, and professional development and instructional supervision that lacked an instructional focus. (DIPF/Orig.).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8312</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-1011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3102/00028312040001147</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AECJAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Bildungsstandards ; Core curriculum ; Criterion-referenced tests ; Curricula ; Curriculum ; Curriculum standards ; Durchführung ; Education reform ; Educational administration ; Educational Change ; Educational Philosophy ; Educational Policy ; Educational reform ; Educational sciences ; Educational standards ; Educational Strategies ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Empirische Untersuchung ; Learning ; Literaturbericht ; Mathematics ; North America ; Policy, reform, legislation ; Professional development ; Professional standards ; Program Implementation ; School Districts ; Schulorganisation ; Schulreform ; Secondary school curricula ; Social and Institutional Analysis ; Students ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; United States ; Unterrichtsgestaltung ; Unterrichtsmethode ; Unterrichtstechnologie ; USA</subject><ispartof>American educational research journal, 2003, Vol.40 (1), p.147-176</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 American Educational Research Association</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Educational Research Association Spring 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c9e958eb749c94b01950bb7eeed269b8ce757755ef01c59bce912d35e103087c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c9e958eb749c94b01950bb7eeed269b8ce757755ef01c59bce912d35e103087c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3699428$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3699428$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4009,21799,27902,27903,27904,43600,43601,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=662256$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ677675$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14972961$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Rodney T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>u.a</creatorcontrib><title>The substantive and symbolic consequences of a district's standards-based curriculum</title><title>American educational research journal</title><description>This study examines a "critical case" of one school district's efforts to develop and implement a standards-based curriculum. The study was conducted from two competing perspectives that dominated organizational analysis in education: the rational and the institutional. The findings demonstrate that the district took an expressly rationalistic approach by using standards and a corresponding criterion-referenced test to focus teachers' instruction on common sets of outcomes. However, the findings suggest that, lacking a clear instructional philosophy, the district also took an institutional approach, in part. Its approach to development and implementation of the standards-based curriculum resulted in district standards that fell below state standards, a narrowing of curriculum and instructional strategies, and professional development and instructional supervision that lacked an instructional focus. (DIPF/Orig.).</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Bildungsstandards</subject><subject>Core curriculum</subject><subject>Criterion-referenced tests</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Curriculum standards</subject><subject>Durchführung</subject><subject>Education reform</subject><subject>Educational administration</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Philosophy</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Educational reform</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Educational standards</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Empirische Untersuchung</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literaturbericht</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Policy, reform, legislation</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Professional standards</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>Schulorganisation</subject><subject>Schulreform</subject><subject>Secondary school curricula</subject><subject>Social and Institutional Analysis</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Unterrichtsgestaltung</subject><subject>Unterrichtsmethode</subject><subject>Unterrichtstechnologie</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0002-8312</issn><issn>1935-1011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AMVDEMRTNR9N0hxl8RPBy3ouSTrVLrvtmmkF_71ZurgHwVMmvM-8884QcsrZteRM3DDGRCG5YHmqOM_NHplwK1XG02-fTDZ6tgEOyRHiIjHCFnxC5vMPoDh47F3bN19AXVtR_F75btkEGroW4XOANgDSrqaOVg32sQn9FdJNS-VihZl3CBUNQ0zKsBxWx-SgdkuEk-07JW_3d_PZY_by-vA0u33JQkrZZ8GCVQV4k9tgc8-4Vcx7AwCV0NYXAYwyRimoGQ_K-gCWi0oq4EyywgQ5JRej7zp2KSX25aIbYptGloIxqY3I8wTxEQqxQ4xQl-vYrFz8LjkrN7cr_9wu9VxujR0Gt6yja0ODu8bcGmE1T9z5yEHa_Fe-e9bGaKOSfD3K6N5hl-2_uVu_BfZd_DWU2to8oVNyNspVs96tobUQSssfDxKWKw</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Ogawa, Rodney T</creator><creator>u.a</creator><general>American Educational Research Association</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>The substantive and symbolic consequences of a district's standards-based curriculum</title><author>Ogawa, Rodney T ; u.a</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c9e958eb749c94b01950bb7eeed269b8ce757755ef01c59bce912d35e103087c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Bildungsstandards</topic><topic>Core curriculum</topic><topic>Criterion-referenced tests</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Curriculum standards</topic><topic>Durchführung</topic><topic>Education reform</topic><topic>Educational administration</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Philosophy</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Educational reform</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Educational standards</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Empirische Untersuchung</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literaturbericht</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Policy, reform, legislation</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Professional standards</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>Schulorganisation</topic><topic>Schulreform</topic><topic>Secondary school curricula</topic><topic>Social and Institutional Analysis</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Unterrichtsgestaltung</topic><topic>Unterrichtsmethode</topic><topic>Unterrichtstechnologie</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Rodney T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>u.a</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>American educational research journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ogawa, Rodney T</au><au>u.a</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ677675</ericid><atitle>The substantive and symbolic consequences of a district's standards-based curriculum</atitle><jtitle>American educational research journal</jtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>147-176</pages><issn>0002-8312</issn><eissn>1935-1011</eissn><coden>AECJAX</coden><abstract>This study examines a "critical case" of one school district's efforts to develop and implement a standards-based curriculum. The study was conducted from two competing perspectives that dominated organizational analysis in education: the rational and the institutional. The findings demonstrate that the district took an expressly rationalistic approach by using standards and a corresponding criterion-referenced test to focus teachers' instruction on common sets of outcomes. However, the findings suggest that, lacking a clear instructional philosophy, the district also took an institutional approach, in part. Its approach to development and implementation of the standards-based curriculum resulted in district standards that fell below state standards, a narrowing of curriculum and instructional strategies, and professional development and instructional supervision that lacked an instructional focus. (DIPF/Orig.).</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Educational Research Association</pub><doi>10.3102/00028312040001147</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8312 |
ispartof | American educational research journal, 2003, Vol.40 (1), p.147-176 |
issn | 0002-8312 1935-1011 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_200367244 |
source | SAGE Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Academic achievement Bildungsstandards Core curriculum Criterion-referenced tests Curricula Curriculum Curriculum standards Durchführung Education reform Educational administration Educational Change Educational Philosophy Educational Policy Educational reform Educational sciences Educational standards Educational Strategies Elementary Secondary Education Empirische Untersuchung Learning Literaturbericht Mathematics North America Policy, reform, legislation Professional development Professional standards Program Implementation School Districts Schulorganisation Schulreform Secondary school curricula Social and Institutional Analysis Students Teachers Teaching Methods United States Unterrichtsgestaltung Unterrichtsmethode Unterrichtstechnologie USA |
title | The substantive and symbolic consequences of a district's standards-based curriculum |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T23%3A51%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20substantive%20and%20symbolic%20consequences%20of%20a%20district's%20standards-based%20curriculum&rft.jtitle=American%20educational%20research%20journal&rft.au=Ogawa,%20Rodney%20T&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=147-176&rft.issn=0002-8312&rft.eissn=1935-1011&rft.coden=AECJAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.3102/00028312040001147&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3699428%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200367244&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ677675&rft_jstor_id=3699428&rft_sage_id=10.3102_00028312040001147&rfr_iscdi=true |