Campaign finance reform

In a roundtable discussion, Scott Harshbarger, Frank Clemente, Charles Lewis, Nick Nyhart, and E. Joshua Rosenkranz discuss campaign finance reform. According to Harshbarger, as the Senate engages in a discussion of the McCain-Feingold bill, the discussion sometimes rises to Jeffersonian levels, but...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The San Diego law review 2003-01, Vol.40 (1), p.19
Hauptverfasser: Harshbarger, Scott, Clemente, Frank, Lewis, Charles, Nyhart, Nick
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title The San Diego law review
container_volume 40
creator Harshbarger, Scott
Clemente, Frank
Lewis, Charles
Nyhart, Nick
description In a roundtable discussion, Scott Harshbarger, Frank Clemente, Charles Lewis, Nick Nyhart, and E. Joshua Rosenkranz discuss campaign finance reform. According to Harshbarger, as the Senate engages in a discussion of the McCain-Feingold bill, the discussion sometimes rises to Jeffersonian levels, but more often leaves people wondering whether representatives are protecting their own offices and their own campaign and funding advantage, rather than advancing the public interest. According to Lewis, one of the problems in the entire discussion is disingenuousness by politicians. No one ever acknowledges the effect of money on policy, and so journalists and the public are caught in a cat-and-mouse game of trying to catch them, and it gets beside the point. According to Rosenkranz, The Federal Election Campaign Act limits contributions that candidates raise for their own campaigns. Soft money is a complete end run around those limits.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_200351427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>320934561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2003514273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDA20zUxMDbnYOAqLs4yMDA0NLI05GQQd07MLUjMTM9TSMvMS8xLTlUoSk3LL8rlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4I6DZpoYmRubGRCkCAH_gKIY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200351427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Campaign finance reform</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Harshbarger, Scott ; Clemente, Frank ; Lewis, Charles ; Nyhart, Nick</creator><creatorcontrib>Harshbarger, Scott ; Clemente, Frank ; Lewis, Charles ; Nyhart, Nick</creatorcontrib><description>In a roundtable discussion, Scott Harshbarger, Frank Clemente, Charles Lewis, Nick Nyhart, and E. Joshua Rosenkranz discuss campaign finance reform. According to Harshbarger, as the Senate engages in a discussion of the McCain-Feingold bill, the discussion sometimes rises to Jeffersonian levels, but more often leaves people wondering whether representatives are protecting their own offices and their own campaign and funding advantage, rather than advancing the public interest. According to Lewis, one of the problems in the entire discussion is disingenuousness by politicians. No one ever acknowledges the effect of money on policy, and so journalists and the public are caught in a cat-and-mouse game of trying to catch them, and it gets beside the point. According to Rosenkranz, The Federal Election Campaign Act limits contributions that candidates raise for their own campaigns. Soft money is a complete end run around those limits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-4037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego: University of San Diego, School of Law</publisher><subject>Bills ; Campaign contributions ; Campaign expenditures ; Legal reform ; Political campaigns ; Political finance</subject><ispartof>The San Diego law review, 2003-01, Vol.40 (1), p.19</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of San Diego, School of Law Winter 2003</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harshbarger, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyhart, Nick</creatorcontrib><title>Campaign finance reform</title><title>The San Diego law review</title><description>In a roundtable discussion, Scott Harshbarger, Frank Clemente, Charles Lewis, Nick Nyhart, and E. Joshua Rosenkranz discuss campaign finance reform. According to Harshbarger, as the Senate engages in a discussion of the McCain-Feingold bill, the discussion sometimes rises to Jeffersonian levels, but more often leaves people wondering whether representatives are protecting their own offices and their own campaign and funding advantage, rather than advancing the public interest. According to Lewis, one of the problems in the entire discussion is disingenuousness by politicians. No one ever acknowledges the effect of money on policy, and so journalists and the public are caught in a cat-and-mouse game of trying to catch them, and it gets beside the point. According to Rosenkranz, The Federal Election Campaign Act limits contributions that candidates raise for their own campaigns. Soft money is a complete end run around those limits.</description><subject>Bills</subject><subject>Campaign contributions</subject><subject>Campaign expenditures</subject><subject>Legal reform</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political finance</subject><issn>0036-4037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDA20zUxMDbnYOAqLs4yMDA0NLI05GQQd07MLUjMTM9TSMvMS8xLTlUoSk3LL8rlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4I6DZpoYmRubGRCkCAH_gKIY</recordid><startdate>20030101</startdate><enddate>20030101</enddate><creator>Harshbarger, Scott</creator><creator>Clemente, Frank</creator><creator>Lewis, Charles</creator><creator>Nyhart, Nick</creator><general>University of San Diego, School of Law</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20030101</creationdate><title>Campaign finance reform</title><author>Harshbarger, Scott ; Clemente, Frank ; Lewis, Charles ; Nyhart, Nick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2003514273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Bills</topic><topic>Campaign contributions</topic><topic>Campaign expenditures</topic><topic>Legal reform</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political finance</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harshbarger, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyhart, Nick</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The San Diego law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harshbarger, Scott</au><au>Clemente, Frank</au><au>Lewis, Charles</au><au>Nyhart, Nick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Campaign finance reform</atitle><jtitle>The San Diego law review</jtitle><date>2003-01-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><pages>19-</pages><issn>0036-4037</issn><abstract>In a roundtable discussion, Scott Harshbarger, Frank Clemente, Charles Lewis, Nick Nyhart, and E. Joshua Rosenkranz discuss campaign finance reform. According to Harshbarger, as the Senate engages in a discussion of the McCain-Feingold bill, the discussion sometimes rises to Jeffersonian levels, but more often leaves people wondering whether representatives are protecting their own offices and their own campaign and funding advantage, rather than advancing the public interest. According to Lewis, one of the problems in the entire discussion is disingenuousness by politicians. No one ever acknowledges the effect of money on policy, and so journalists and the public are caught in a cat-and-mouse game of trying to catch them, and it gets beside the point. According to Rosenkranz, The Federal Election Campaign Act limits contributions that candidates raise for their own campaigns. Soft money is a complete end run around those limits.</abstract><cop>San Diego</cop><pub>University of San Diego, School of Law</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-4037
ispartof The San Diego law review, 2003-01, Vol.40 (1), p.19
issn 0036-4037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_200351427
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Bills
Campaign contributions
Campaign expenditures
Legal reform
Political campaigns
Political finance
title Campaign finance reform
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A32%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Campaign%20finance%20reform&rft.jtitle=The%20San%20Diego%20law%20review&rft.au=Harshbarger,%20Scott&rft.date=2003-01-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.pages=19-&rft.issn=0036-4037&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E320934561%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200351427&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true