Campaign finance reform
In a roundtable discussion, Scott Harshbarger, Frank Clemente, Charles Lewis, Nick Nyhart, and E. Joshua Rosenkranz discuss campaign finance reform. According to Harshbarger, as the Senate engages in a discussion of the McCain-Feingold bill, the discussion sometimes rises to Jeffersonian levels, but...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The San Diego law review 2003-01, Vol.40 (1), p.19 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | The San Diego law review |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Harshbarger, Scott Clemente, Frank Lewis, Charles Nyhart, Nick |
description | In a roundtable discussion, Scott Harshbarger, Frank Clemente, Charles Lewis, Nick Nyhart, and E. Joshua Rosenkranz discuss campaign finance reform. According to Harshbarger, as the Senate engages in a discussion of the McCain-Feingold bill, the discussion sometimes rises to Jeffersonian levels, but more often leaves people wondering whether representatives are protecting their own offices and their own campaign and funding advantage, rather than advancing the public interest. According to Lewis, one of the problems in the entire discussion is disingenuousness by politicians. No one ever acknowledges the effect of money on policy, and so journalists and the public are caught in a cat-and-mouse game of trying to catch them, and it gets beside the point. According to Rosenkranz, The Federal Election Campaign Act limits contributions that candidates raise for their own campaigns. Soft money is a complete end run around those limits. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_200351427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>320934561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2003514273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDA20zUxMDbnYOAqLs4yMDA0NLI05GQQd07MLUjMTM9TSMvMS8xLTlUoSk3LL8rlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4I6DZpoYmRubGRCkCAH_gKIY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200351427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Campaign finance reform</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Harshbarger, Scott ; Clemente, Frank ; Lewis, Charles ; Nyhart, Nick</creator><creatorcontrib>Harshbarger, Scott ; Clemente, Frank ; Lewis, Charles ; Nyhart, Nick</creatorcontrib><description>In a roundtable discussion, Scott Harshbarger, Frank Clemente, Charles Lewis, Nick Nyhart, and E. Joshua Rosenkranz discuss campaign finance reform. According to Harshbarger, as the Senate engages in a discussion of the McCain-Feingold bill, the discussion sometimes rises to Jeffersonian levels, but more often leaves people wondering whether representatives are protecting their own offices and their own campaign and funding advantage, rather than advancing the public interest. According to Lewis, one of the problems in the entire discussion is disingenuousness by politicians. No one ever acknowledges the effect of money on policy, and so journalists and the public are caught in a cat-and-mouse game of trying to catch them, and it gets beside the point. According to Rosenkranz, The Federal Election Campaign Act limits contributions that candidates raise for their own campaigns. Soft money is a complete end run around those limits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-4037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego: University of San Diego, School of Law</publisher><subject>Bills ; Campaign contributions ; Campaign expenditures ; Legal reform ; Political campaigns ; Political finance</subject><ispartof>The San Diego law review, 2003-01, Vol.40 (1), p.19</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of San Diego, School of Law Winter 2003</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harshbarger, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyhart, Nick</creatorcontrib><title>Campaign finance reform</title><title>The San Diego law review</title><description>In a roundtable discussion, Scott Harshbarger, Frank Clemente, Charles Lewis, Nick Nyhart, and E. Joshua Rosenkranz discuss campaign finance reform. According to Harshbarger, as the Senate engages in a discussion of the McCain-Feingold bill, the discussion sometimes rises to Jeffersonian levels, but more often leaves people wondering whether representatives are protecting their own offices and their own campaign and funding advantage, rather than advancing the public interest. According to Lewis, one of the problems in the entire discussion is disingenuousness by politicians. No one ever acknowledges the effect of money on policy, and so journalists and the public are caught in a cat-and-mouse game of trying to catch them, and it gets beside the point. According to Rosenkranz, The Federal Election Campaign Act limits contributions that candidates raise for their own campaigns. Soft money is a complete end run around those limits.</description><subject>Bills</subject><subject>Campaign contributions</subject><subject>Campaign expenditures</subject><subject>Legal reform</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political finance</subject><issn>0036-4037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDA20zUxMDbnYOAqLs4yMDA0NLI05GQQd07MLUjMTM9TSMvMS8xLTlUoSk3LL8rlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4I6DZpoYmRubGRCkCAH_gKIY</recordid><startdate>20030101</startdate><enddate>20030101</enddate><creator>Harshbarger, Scott</creator><creator>Clemente, Frank</creator><creator>Lewis, Charles</creator><creator>Nyhart, Nick</creator><general>University of San Diego, School of Law</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20030101</creationdate><title>Campaign finance reform</title><author>Harshbarger, Scott ; Clemente, Frank ; Lewis, Charles ; Nyhart, Nick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2003514273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Bills</topic><topic>Campaign contributions</topic><topic>Campaign expenditures</topic><topic>Legal reform</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political finance</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harshbarger, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyhart, Nick</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The San Diego law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harshbarger, Scott</au><au>Clemente, Frank</au><au>Lewis, Charles</au><au>Nyhart, Nick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Campaign finance reform</atitle><jtitle>The San Diego law review</jtitle><date>2003-01-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><pages>19-</pages><issn>0036-4037</issn><abstract>In a roundtable discussion, Scott Harshbarger, Frank Clemente, Charles Lewis, Nick Nyhart, and E. Joshua Rosenkranz discuss campaign finance reform. According to Harshbarger, as the Senate engages in a discussion of the McCain-Feingold bill, the discussion sometimes rises to Jeffersonian levels, but more often leaves people wondering whether representatives are protecting their own offices and their own campaign and funding advantage, rather than advancing the public interest. According to Lewis, one of the problems in the entire discussion is disingenuousness by politicians. No one ever acknowledges the effect of money on policy, and so journalists and the public are caught in a cat-and-mouse game of trying to catch them, and it gets beside the point. According to Rosenkranz, The Federal Election Campaign Act limits contributions that candidates raise for their own campaigns. Soft money is a complete end run around those limits.</abstract><cop>San Diego</cop><pub>University of San Diego, School of Law</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-4037 |
ispartof | The San Diego law review, 2003-01, Vol.40 (1), p.19 |
issn | 0036-4037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_200351427 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Bills Campaign contributions Campaign expenditures Legal reform Political campaigns Political finance |
title | Campaign finance reform |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A32%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Campaign%20finance%20reform&rft.jtitle=The%20San%20Diego%20law%20review&rft.au=Harshbarger,%20Scott&rft.date=2003-01-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.pages=19-&rft.issn=0036-4037&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E320934561%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200351427&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |