Bargaining and the dynamics of divisional norms
Recently, philosophers have investigated the emergence and evolution of the social contract. Yet extant work is limited as it focuses on the use of simple behavioral norms in rather rigid strategic settings. Drawing on axiomatic bargaining theory, we explore the dynamics of more sophisticated norms...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Synthese (Dordrecht) 2020, Vol.197 (1), p.407-425 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 425 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 407 |
| container_title | Synthese (Dordrecht) |
| container_volume | 197 |
| creator | Bruner, Justin P. |
| description | Recently, philosophers have investigated the emergence and evolution of the social contract. Yet extant work is limited as it focuses on the use of simple behavioral norms in rather rigid strategic settings. Drawing on axiomatic bargaining theory, we explore the dynamics of more sophisticated norms capable of guiding behavior in a wide range of scenarios. Overall, our investigation suggests the utilitarian bargaining solution has a privileged status as it has certain stability properties other social arrangements lack. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11229-018-1729-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2003254081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2003254081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3cf060f60110df41f78c8d6c6c6ee86d14a22fb5c72bc570f12860a5e0b7cdff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwNuC59iZbDZJj1q0CgUveg5p_tSUNluTVui3N2UFTzKHmcN7b2Z-hNwi3COAnBRExqYUUFGUdeBnZISdbClMBT8nI4B2SqXq5CW5KmUNgCg4jMjk0eSViSmmVWOSa_afvnHHZLbRlqYPjYvfscQ-mU2T-rwt1-QimE3xN799TD6en95nL3TxNn-dPSyobVHsaWsDCAiirgEXOAaprHLC1vJeCYfcMBaWnZVsaTsJAZkSYDoPS2ldCO2Y3A25u9x_HXzZ63V_yPWMoln9hXUcFFYVDiqb-1KyD3qX49bko0bQJy564KIrF33ionn1sMFTqjatfP5L_t_0A4qlZGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2003254081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bargaining and the dynamics of divisional norms</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bruner, Justin P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bruner, Justin P.</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, philosophers have investigated the emergence and evolution of the social contract. Yet extant work is limited as it focuses on the use of simple behavioral norms in rather rigid strategic settings. Drawing on axiomatic bargaining theory, we explore the dynamics of more sophisticated norms capable of guiding behavior in a wide range of scenarios. Overall, our investigation suggests the utilitarian bargaining solution has a privileged status as it has certain stability properties other social arrangements lack.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11229-018-1729-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bargaining ; Behavior ; Divisions ; Education ; Epistemology ; Game theory ; Logic ; Metaphysics ; Norms ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Language ; Philosophy of Science ; Social construction ; Social philosophy ; Theory ; Utilitarianism</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 2020, Vol.197 (1), p.407-425</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>Synthese is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3cf060f60110df41f78c8d6c6c6ee86d14a22fb5c72bc570f12860a5e0b7cdff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3cf060f60110df41f78c8d6c6c6ee86d14a22fb5c72bc570f12860a5e0b7cdff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11229-018-1729-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11229-018-1729-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,27901,27902,33751,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bruner, Justin P.</creatorcontrib><title>Bargaining and the dynamics of divisional norms</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Synthese</addtitle><description>Recently, philosophers have investigated the emergence and evolution of the social contract. Yet extant work is limited as it focuses on the use of simple behavioral norms in rather rigid strategic settings. Drawing on axiomatic bargaining theory, we explore the dynamics of more sophisticated norms capable of guiding behavior in a wide range of scenarios. Overall, our investigation suggests the utilitarian bargaining solution has a privileged status as it has certain stability properties other social arrangements lack.</description><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Divisions</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Language</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Social construction</subject><subject>Social philosophy</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Utilitarianism</subject><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwNuC59iZbDZJj1q0CgUveg5p_tSUNluTVui3N2UFTzKHmcN7b2Z-hNwi3COAnBRExqYUUFGUdeBnZISdbClMBT8nI4B2SqXq5CW5KmUNgCg4jMjk0eSViSmmVWOSa_afvnHHZLbRlqYPjYvfscQ-mU2T-rwt1-QimE3xN799TD6en95nL3TxNn-dPSyobVHsaWsDCAiirgEXOAaprHLC1vJeCYfcMBaWnZVsaTsJAZkSYDoPS2ldCO2Y3A25u9x_HXzZ63V_yPWMoln9hXUcFFYVDiqb-1KyD3qX49bko0bQJy564KIrF33ionn1sMFTqjatfP5L_t_0A4qlZGk</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Bruner, Justin P.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Bargaining and the dynamics of divisional norms</title><author>Bruner, Justin P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-3cf060f60110df41f78c8d6c6c6ee86d14a22fb5c72bc570f12860a5e0b7cdff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Divisions</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Language</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Social construction</topic><topic>Social philosophy</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Utilitarianism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bruner, Justin P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bruner, Justin P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bargaining and the dynamics of divisional norms</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Synthese</stitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>197</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>407-425</pages><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><abstract>Recently, philosophers have investigated the emergence and evolution of the social contract. Yet extant work is limited as it focuses on the use of simple behavioral norms in rather rigid strategic settings. Drawing on axiomatic bargaining theory, we explore the dynamics of more sophisticated norms capable of guiding behavior in a wide range of scenarios. Overall, our investigation suggests the utilitarian bargaining solution has a privileged status as it has certain stability properties other social arrangements lack.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11229-018-1729-4</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0039-7857 |
| ispartof | Synthese (Dordrecht), 2020, Vol.197 (1), p.407-425 |
| issn | 0039-7857 1573-0964 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2003254081 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Bargaining Behavior Divisions Education Epistemology Game theory Logic Metaphysics Norms Philosophy Philosophy of Language Philosophy of Science Social construction Social philosophy Theory Utilitarianism |
| title | Bargaining and the dynamics of divisional norms |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T22%3A47%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bargaining%20and%20the%20dynamics%20of%20divisional%20norms&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Bruner,%20Justin%20P.&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=197&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=407-425&rft.issn=0039-7857&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11229-018-1729-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2003254081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2003254081&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |