Spatial–temporal variations in the composition of two Zostera species in a seagrass bed: implications for population management of a commercially exploited grass shrimp

We examined spatial and temporal variations in the species composition of two seagrass species, Zostera marina and Z. caespitosa , in a lagoon facing the Sea of Okhotsk. We also considered how those variations affected habitat quality for motile epifauna, especially for a commercial shrimp. A long-i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fisheries science 2018-03, Vol.84 (2), p.261-273
Hauptverfasser: Yusa, Takashi, Shoji, Jun, Chiba, Susumu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 273
container_issue 2
container_start_page 261
container_title Fisheries science
container_volume 84
creator Yusa, Takashi
Shoji, Jun
Chiba, Susumu
description We examined spatial and temporal variations in the species composition of two seagrass species, Zostera marina and Z. caespitosa , in a lagoon facing the Sea of Okhotsk. We also considered how those variations affected habitat quality for motile epifauna, especially for a commercial shrimp. A long-interval comparison between 1996 and 2013 showed that seagrass species composition in the lagoon did not vary, while their relative abundances did. A survey in 2012 revealed that the abundance of Z. caespitosa was affected by the abundance of Z. marina , water depth, and location in the lagoon. Although these seagrass species have similar aboveground morphology, differences in their fine structures were detected. Diversities of motile animals inhabiting the seagrass species were the same. Differences in seagrass utilization were observed when we focused on a commercial shrimp, Pandalus latirostris. This shrimp always preferred higher densities of shoots irrespective of the species and seasonally changed their preference for the number of leaves per shoot. They were therefore more abundant in Z. caespitosa , which had those structural characteristics. The results suggest that the management of shrimp resources could be improved by flexibly changing protected areas in accordance with the dynamics of seagrass distribution in the lagoon.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12562-018-1182-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2002037902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2002037902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-7c6c8273412e1f87ca24ddd3084143cbaf047b440525d64164a70b4e3a3189a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctO3TAQhq2qlXoKPEB3lrpOGV9y6w4hepGQWLRs2FhznMkhKIld24fLjnfgLfpYPEkdgtRVV6OZ-f9vRvoZ-yjgswCoj6OQZSULEE0hRCOL9g3bCK11IVuo3rINtKItWlk179mHGG8AoCqh2bA_Pz2mAcfnx6dEk3cBR36LYchDN0c-zDxdE7cur-KwzLjrebpz_MrFRAF59GQHelHmhnAXMEa-pe4LHyY_DvaV1LvAvfP78aXnE864o4nmtABxuTBRsPmT8YHTvR_dkKjjKy1eh8w6ZO96HCMdvdYDdvn17Nfp9-L84tuP05PzwiqtUlHbyjayVlpIEn1TW5S66zoFjRZa2S32oOut1lDKsqu0qDTWsNWkUImmxVIdsE8r1wf3e08xmRu3D3M-aSSABFW3ILNKrCobXIyBeuPzkxgejACzRGLWSEyOxCyRmDZ75OqJWTvvKPwj_9_0F7Jckzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002037902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial–temporal variations in the composition of two Zostera species in a seagrass bed: implications for population management of a commercially exploited grass shrimp</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yusa, Takashi ; Shoji, Jun ; Chiba, Susumu</creator><creatorcontrib>Yusa, Takashi ; Shoji, Jun ; Chiba, Susumu</creatorcontrib><description>We examined spatial and temporal variations in the species composition of two seagrass species, Zostera marina and Z. caespitosa , in a lagoon facing the Sea of Okhotsk. We also considered how those variations affected habitat quality for motile epifauna, especially for a commercial shrimp. A long-interval comparison between 1996 and 2013 showed that seagrass species composition in the lagoon did not vary, while their relative abundances did. A survey in 2012 revealed that the abundance of Z. caespitosa was affected by the abundance of Z. marina , water depth, and location in the lagoon. Although these seagrass species have similar aboveground morphology, differences in their fine structures were detected. Diversities of motile animals inhabiting the seagrass species were the same. Differences in seagrass utilization were observed when we focused on a commercial shrimp, Pandalus latirostris. This shrimp always preferred higher densities of shoots irrespective of the species and seasonally changed their preference for the number of leaves per shoot. They were therefore more abundant in Z. caespitosa , which had those structural characteristics. The results suggest that the management of shrimp resources could be improved by flexibly changing protected areas in accordance with the dynamics of seagrass distribution in the lagoon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0919-9268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1444-2906</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12562-018-1182-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Brackishwater crustaceans ; Dynamics ; Environmental quality ; Epifauna ; Exploitation ; Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management ; Food Science ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Grasses ; Lagoons ; Life Sciences ; Pandalus latirostris ; Protected areas ; Resource management ; Sea grasses ; Shoots ; Spatial distribution ; Special Feature: Original Article ; Species ; Species composition ; Surveying ; Temporal variations ; Variation ; Water depth ; Zostera caespitosa ; Zostera marina</subject><ispartof>Fisheries science, 2018-03, Vol.84 (2), p.261-273</ispartof><rights>Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2018</rights><rights>Fisheries Science is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-7c6c8273412e1f87ca24ddd3084143cbaf047b440525d64164a70b4e3a3189a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-7c6c8273412e1f87ca24ddd3084143cbaf047b440525d64164a70b4e3a3189a53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1545-1552</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12562-018-1182-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12562-018-1182-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yusa, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoji, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Susumu</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial–temporal variations in the composition of two Zostera species in a seagrass bed: implications for population management of a commercially exploited grass shrimp</title><title>Fisheries science</title><addtitle>Fish Sci</addtitle><description>We examined spatial and temporal variations in the species composition of two seagrass species, Zostera marina and Z. caespitosa , in a lagoon facing the Sea of Okhotsk. We also considered how those variations affected habitat quality for motile epifauna, especially for a commercial shrimp. A long-interval comparison between 1996 and 2013 showed that seagrass species composition in the lagoon did not vary, while their relative abundances did. A survey in 2012 revealed that the abundance of Z. caespitosa was affected by the abundance of Z. marina , water depth, and location in the lagoon. Although these seagrass species have similar aboveground morphology, differences in their fine structures were detected. Diversities of motile animals inhabiting the seagrass species were the same. Differences in seagrass utilization were observed when we focused on a commercial shrimp, Pandalus latirostris. This shrimp always preferred higher densities of shoots irrespective of the species and seasonally changed their preference for the number of leaves per shoot. They were therefore more abundant in Z. caespitosa , which had those structural characteristics. The results suggest that the management of shrimp resources could be improved by flexibly changing protected areas in accordance with the dynamics of seagrass distribution in the lagoon.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brackishwater crustaceans</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Epifauna</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Lagoons</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Pandalus latirostris</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Sea grasses</subject><subject>Shoots</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Special Feature: Original Article</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>Water depth</subject><subject>Zostera caespitosa</subject><subject>Zostera marina</subject><issn>0919-9268</issn><issn>1444-2906</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctO3TAQhq2qlXoKPEB3lrpOGV9y6w4hepGQWLRs2FhznMkhKIld24fLjnfgLfpYPEkdgtRVV6OZ-f9vRvoZ-yjgswCoj6OQZSULEE0hRCOL9g3bCK11IVuo3rINtKItWlk179mHGG8AoCqh2bA_Pz2mAcfnx6dEk3cBR36LYchDN0c-zDxdE7cur-KwzLjrebpz_MrFRAF59GQHelHmhnAXMEa-pe4LHyY_DvaV1LvAvfP78aXnE864o4nmtABxuTBRsPmT8YHTvR_dkKjjKy1eh8w6ZO96HCMdvdYDdvn17Nfp9-L84tuP05PzwiqtUlHbyjayVlpIEn1TW5S66zoFjRZa2S32oOut1lDKsqu0qDTWsNWkUImmxVIdsE8r1wf3e08xmRu3D3M-aSSABFW3ILNKrCobXIyBeuPzkxgejACzRGLWSEyOxCyRmDZ75OqJWTvvKPwj_9_0F7Jckzg</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Yusa, Takashi</creator><creator>Shoji, Jun</creator><creator>Chiba, Susumu</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1545-1552</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Spatial–temporal variations in the composition of two Zostera species in a seagrass bed: implications for population management of a commercially exploited grass shrimp</title><author>Yusa, Takashi ; Shoji, Jun ; Chiba, Susumu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-7c6c8273412e1f87ca24ddd3084143cbaf047b440525d64164a70b4e3a3189a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brackishwater crustaceans</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Epifauna</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Lagoons</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Pandalus latirostris</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Sea grasses</topic><topic>Shoots</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Special Feature: Original Article</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>Water depth</topic><topic>Zostera caespitosa</topic><topic>Zostera marina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yusa, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoji, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiba, Susumu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Fisheries science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yusa, Takashi</au><au>Shoji, Jun</au><au>Chiba, Susumu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial–temporal variations in the composition of two Zostera species in a seagrass bed: implications for population management of a commercially exploited grass shrimp</atitle><jtitle>Fisheries science</jtitle><stitle>Fish Sci</stitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>261-273</pages><issn>0919-9268</issn><eissn>1444-2906</eissn><abstract>We examined spatial and temporal variations in the species composition of two seagrass species, Zostera marina and Z. caespitosa , in a lagoon facing the Sea of Okhotsk. We also considered how those variations affected habitat quality for motile epifauna, especially for a commercial shrimp. A long-interval comparison between 1996 and 2013 showed that seagrass species composition in the lagoon did not vary, while their relative abundances did. A survey in 2012 revealed that the abundance of Z. caespitosa was affected by the abundance of Z. marina , water depth, and location in the lagoon. Although these seagrass species have similar aboveground morphology, differences in their fine structures were detected. Diversities of motile animals inhabiting the seagrass species were the same. Differences in seagrass utilization were observed when we focused on a commercial shrimp, Pandalus latirostris. This shrimp always preferred higher densities of shoots irrespective of the species and seasonally changed their preference for the number of leaves per shoot. They were therefore more abundant in Z. caespitosa , which had those structural characteristics. The results suggest that the management of shrimp resources could be improved by flexibly changing protected areas in accordance with the dynamics of seagrass distribution in the lagoon.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><doi>10.1007/s12562-018-1182-9</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1545-1552</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0919-9268
ispartof Fisheries science, 2018-03, Vol.84 (2), p.261-273
issn 0919-9268
1444-2906
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2002037902
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Abundance
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Brackishwater crustaceans
Dynamics
Environmental quality
Epifauna
Exploitation
Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management
Food Science
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Grasses
Lagoons
Life Sciences
Pandalus latirostris
Protected areas
Resource management
Sea grasses
Shoots
Spatial distribution
Special Feature: Original Article
Species
Species composition
Surveying
Temporal variations
Variation
Water depth
Zostera caespitosa
Zostera marina
title Spatial–temporal variations in the composition of two Zostera species in a seagrass bed: implications for population management of a commercially exploited grass shrimp
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T16%3A44%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%E2%80%93temporal%20variations%20in%20the%20composition%20of%20two%20Zostera%20species%20in%20a%20seagrass%20bed:%20implications%20for%20population%20management%20of%20a%20commercially%20exploited%20grass%20shrimp&rft.jtitle=Fisheries%20science&rft.au=Yusa,%20Takashi&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=261-273&rft.issn=0919-9268&rft.eissn=1444-2906&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12562-018-1182-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2002037902%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002037902&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true