Single‐tube library preparation for degraded DNA
In recent years, massive parallel sequencing has revolutionised the study of degraded DNA, thus enabling the field of ancient DNA to evolve into that of paleogenomics. Despite these advances, the recovery and sequencing of degraded DNA remains challenging due to limitations in the manipulation of ch...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Methods in ecology and evolution 2018-02, Vol.9 (2), p.410-419 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 419 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 410 |
container_title | Methods in ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Carøe, Christian Gopalakrishnan, Shyam Vinner, Lasse Mak, Sarah S. T. Sinding, Mikkel Holger S. Samaniego, José A. Wales, Nathan Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas Gilbert, M. Thomas P. Johnston, Susan |
description | In recent years, massive parallel sequencing has revolutionised the study of degraded DNA, thus enabling the field of ancient DNA to evolve into that of paleogenomics. Despite these advances, the recovery and sequencing of degraded DNA remains challenging due to limitations in the manipulation of chemically damaged and highly fragmented DNA molecules. In particular, the enzymatic reactions and DNA purification steps during library preparation can result in DNA template loss and sequencing biases, affecting downstream analyses. The development of library preparation methods that circumvent these obstacles and enable higher throughput are therefore of interest to researchers working with degraded DNA.
In this study, we compare four Illumina library preparation protocols, including two “single‐tube” methods developed for this study with the explicit aim of improving data quality and reducing preparation time and expenses. The methods are tested on grey wolf (Canis lupus) museum specimens.
We found single‐tube protocols increase library complexity, yield more reads that map uniquely to the reference genome, reduce processing time, and may decrease laboratory costs by 90%.
Given the advantages of single‐tube library preparations, we anticipate these methods will be of considerable interest to the growing field of paleogenomics and other applications investigating degraded DNA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/2041-210X.12871 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2001284187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2001284187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4691-2b0daecc9d8e4d48923f2928ca2f3fbe8e344817b32fb987d455221084aa385a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1Lw0AQXUTBUnv2GvCcdr_S7B5LjVaoelDB27KbnS0pMYmbBOnNn-Bv9Je4MSLenMsMw3vz5j2Ezgmek1ALijmJKcHPc0JFSo7Q5Hdz_Gc-RbO23eNQTEhM-QTRh6LalfD5_tH1BqKyMF77Q9R4aLTXXVFXkat9ZGHntQUbXd6tztCJ02ULs58-RU9X2eN6E2_vr2_Wq22c86UMegZbDXkurQBuuZCUOSqpyDV1zBkQwDgXJDWMOiNFanmS0PCk4FozkWg2RRfj3cbXrz20ndrXva-CpKIYB5-ciDSgFiMq93XbenCq8cVL8KAIVkM2anCvBvfqO5vAWI6Mt6KEw39wdZtlbCR-AWH5ZQE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001284187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single‐tube library preparation for degraded DNA</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Carøe, Christian ; Gopalakrishnan, Shyam ; Vinner, Lasse ; Mak, Sarah S. T. ; Sinding, Mikkel Holger S. ; Samaniego, José A. ; Wales, Nathan ; Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas ; Gilbert, M. Thomas P. ; Johnston, Susan</creator><contributor>Johnston, Susan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Carøe, Christian ; Gopalakrishnan, Shyam ; Vinner, Lasse ; Mak, Sarah S. T. ; Sinding, Mikkel Holger S. ; Samaniego, José A. ; Wales, Nathan ; Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas ; Gilbert, M. Thomas P. ; Johnston, Susan ; Johnston, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, massive parallel sequencing has revolutionised the study of degraded DNA, thus enabling the field of ancient DNA to evolve into that of paleogenomics. Despite these advances, the recovery and sequencing of degraded DNA remains challenging due to limitations in the manipulation of chemically damaged and highly fragmented DNA molecules. In particular, the enzymatic reactions and DNA purification steps during library preparation can result in DNA template loss and sequencing biases, affecting downstream analyses. The development of library preparation methods that circumvent these obstacles and enable higher throughput are therefore of interest to researchers working with degraded DNA.
In this study, we compare four Illumina library preparation protocols, including two “single‐tube” methods developed for this study with the explicit aim of improving data quality and reducing preparation time and expenses. The methods are tested on grey wolf (Canis lupus) museum specimens.
We found single‐tube protocols increase library complexity, yield more reads that map uniquely to the reference genome, reduce processing time, and may decrease laboratory costs by 90%.
Given the advantages of single‐tube library preparations, we anticipate these methods will be of considerable interest to the growing field of paleogenomics and other applications investigating degraded DNA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological evolution ; Chemical damage ; Costs ; Degradation ; degraded DNA ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA sequencing ; Downstream effects ; Genomes ; illumina sequencing ; Libraries ; library preparation ; museomics ; paleogenomics ; Purification ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Methods in ecology and evolution, 2018-02, Vol.9 (2), p.410-419</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2017 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2018 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4691-2b0daecc9d8e4d48923f2928ca2f3fbe8e344817b32fb987d455221084aa385a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4691-2b0daecc9d8e4d48923f2928ca2f3fbe8e344817b32fb987d455221084aa385a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9601-6768</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F2041-210X.12871$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F2041-210X.12871$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Johnston, Susan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Carøe, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopalakrishnan, Shyam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinner, Lasse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mak, Sarah S. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinding, Mikkel Holger S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaniego, José A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, M. Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Susan</creatorcontrib><title>Single‐tube library preparation for degraded DNA</title><title>Methods in ecology and evolution</title><description>In recent years, massive parallel sequencing has revolutionised the study of degraded DNA, thus enabling the field of ancient DNA to evolve into that of paleogenomics. Despite these advances, the recovery and sequencing of degraded DNA remains challenging due to limitations in the manipulation of chemically damaged and highly fragmented DNA molecules. In particular, the enzymatic reactions and DNA purification steps during library preparation can result in DNA template loss and sequencing biases, affecting downstream analyses. The development of library preparation methods that circumvent these obstacles and enable higher throughput are therefore of interest to researchers working with degraded DNA.
In this study, we compare four Illumina library preparation protocols, including two “single‐tube” methods developed for this study with the explicit aim of improving data quality and reducing preparation time and expenses. The methods are tested on grey wolf (Canis lupus) museum specimens.
We found single‐tube protocols increase library complexity, yield more reads that map uniquely to the reference genome, reduce processing time, and may decrease laboratory costs by 90%.
Given the advantages of single‐tube library preparations, we anticipate these methods will be of considerable interest to the growing field of paleogenomics and other applications investigating degraded DNA.</description><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>Chemical damage</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>degraded DNA</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>Downstream effects</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>illumina sequencing</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>library preparation</subject><subject>museomics</subject><subject>paleogenomics</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>2041-210X</issn><issn>2041-210X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1Lw0AQXUTBUnv2GvCcdr_S7B5LjVaoelDB27KbnS0pMYmbBOnNn-Bv9Je4MSLenMsMw3vz5j2Ezgmek1ALijmJKcHPc0JFSo7Q5Hdz_Gc-RbO23eNQTEhM-QTRh6LalfD5_tH1BqKyMF77Q9R4aLTXXVFXkat9ZGHntQUbXd6tztCJ02ULs58-RU9X2eN6E2_vr2_Wq22c86UMegZbDXkurQBuuZCUOSqpyDV1zBkQwDgXJDWMOiNFanmS0PCk4FozkWg2RRfj3cbXrz20ndrXva-CpKIYB5-ciDSgFiMq93XbenCq8cVL8KAIVkM2anCvBvfqO5vAWI6Mt6KEw39wdZtlbCR-AWH5ZQE</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Carøe, Christian</creator><creator>Gopalakrishnan, Shyam</creator><creator>Vinner, Lasse</creator><creator>Mak, Sarah S. T.</creator><creator>Sinding, Mikkel Holger S.</creator><creator>Samaniego, José A.</creator><creator>Wales, Nathan</creator><creator>Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas</creator><creator>Gilbert, M. Thomas P.</creator><creator>Johnston, Susan</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-6768</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Single‐tube library preparation for degraded DNA</title><author>Carøe, Christian ; Gopalakrishnan, Shyam ; Vinner, Lasse ; Mak, Sarah S. T. ; Sinding, Mikkel Holger S. ; Samaniego, José A. ; Wales, Nathan ; Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas ; Gilbert, M. Thomas P. ; Johnston, Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4691-2b0daecc9d8e4d48923f2928ca2f3fbe8e344817b32fb987d455221084aa385a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>Chemical damage</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>degraded DNA</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>Downstream effects</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>illumina sequencing</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>library preparation</topic><topic>museomics</topic><topic>paleogenomics</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carøe, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopalakrishnan, Shyam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinner, Lasse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mak, Sarah S. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinding, Mikkel Holger S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaniego, José A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, M. Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carøe, Christian</au><au>Gopalakrishnan, Shyam</au><au>Vinner, Lasse</au><au>Mak, Sarah S. T.</au><au>Sinding, Mikkel Holger S.</au><au>Samaniego, José A.</au><au>Wales, Nathan</au><au>Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas</au><au>Gilbert, M. Thomas P.</au><au>Johnston, Susan</au><au>Johnston, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single‐tube library preparation for degraded DNA</atitle><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>410</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>410-419</pages><issn>2041-210X</issn><eissn>2041-210X</eissn><abstract>In recent years, massive parallel sequencing has revolutionised the study of degraded DNA, thus enabling the field of ancient DNA to evolve into that of paleogenomics. Despite these advances, the recovery and sequencing of degraded DNA remains challenging due to limitations in the manipulation of chemically damaged and highly fragmented DNA molecules. In particular, the enzymatic reactions and DNA purification steps during library preparation can result in DNA template loss and sequencing biases, affecting downstream analyses. The development of library preparation methods that circumvent these obstacles and enable higher throughput are therefore of interest to researchers working with degraded DNA.
In this study, we compare four Illumina library preparation protocols, including two “single‐tube” methods developed for this study with the explicit aim of improving data quality and reducing preparation time and expenses. The methods are tested on grey wolf (Canis lupus) museum specimens.
We found single‐tube protocols increase library complexity, yield more reads that map uniquely to the reference genome, reduce processing time, and may decrease laboratory costs by 90%.
Given the advantages of single‐tube library preparations, we anticipate these methods will be of considerable interest to the growing field of paleogenomics and other applications investigating degraded DNA.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/2041-210X.12871</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-6768</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2041-210X |
ispartof | Methods in ecology and evolution, 2018-02, Vol.9 (2), p.410-419 |
issn | 2041-210X 2041-210X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2001284187 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biological evolution Chemical damage Costs Degradation degraded DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA sequencing Downstream effects Genomes illumina sequencing Libraries library preparation museomics paleogenomics Purification Studies |
title | Single‐tube library preparation for degraded DNA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T11%3A22%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single%E2%80%90tube%20library%20preparation%20for%20degraded%20DNA&rft.jtitle=Methods%20in%20ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Car%C3%B8e,%20Christian&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=410&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=410-419&rft.issn=2041-210X&rft.eissn=2041-210X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/2041-210X.12871&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2001284187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001284187&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |