Single‐tube library preparation for degraded DNA

In recent years, massive parallel sequencing has revolutionised the study of degraded DNA, thus enabling the field of ancient DNA to evolve into that of paleogenomics. Despite these advances, the recovery and sequencing of degraded DNA remains challenging due to limitations in the manipulation of ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Methods in ecology and evolution 2018-02, Vol.9 (2), p.410-419
Hauptverfasser: Carøe, Christian, Gopalakrishnan, Shyam, Vinner, Lasse, Mak, Sarah S. T., Sinding, Mikkel Holger S., Samaniego, José A., Wales, Nathan, Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas, Gilbert, M. Thomas P., Johnston, Susan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 419
container_issue 2
container_start_page 410
container_title Methods in ecology and evolution
container_volume 9
creator Carøe, Christian
Gopalakrishnan, Shyam
Vinner, Lasse
Mak, Sarah S. T.
Sinding, Mikkel Holger S.
Samaniego, José A.
Wales, Nathan
Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas
Gilbert, M. Thomas P.
Johnston, Susan
description In recent years, massive parallel sequencing has revolutionised the study of degraded DNA, thus enabling the field of ancient DNA to evolve into that of paleogenomics. Despite these advances, the recovery and sequencing of degraded DNA remains challenging due to limitations in the manipulation of chemically damaged and highly fragmented DNA molecules. In particular, the enzymatic reactions and DNA purification steps during library preparation can result in DNA template loss and sequencing biases, affecting downstream analyses. The development of library preparation methods that circumvent these obstacles and enable higher throughput are therefore of interest to researchers working with degraded DNA. In this study, we compare four Illumina library preparation protocols, including two “single‐tube” methods developed for this study with the explicit aim of improving data quality and reducing preparation time and expenses. The methods are tested on grey wolf (Canis lupus) museum specimens. We found single‐tube protocols increase library complexity, yield more reads that map uniquely to the reference genome, reduce processing time, and may decrease laboratory costs by 90%. Given the advantages of single‐tube library preparations, we anticipate these methods will be of considerable interest to the growing field of paleogenomics and other applications investigating degraded DNA.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/2041-210X.12871
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2001284187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2001284187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4691-2b0daecc9d8e4d48923f2928ca2f3fbe8e344817b32fb987d455221084aa385a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1Lw0AQXUTBUnv2GvCcdr_S7B5LjVaoelDB27KbnS0pMYmbBOnNn-Bv9Je4MSLenMsMw3vz5j2Ezgmek1ALijmJKcHPc0JFSo7Q5Hdz_Gc-RbO23eNQTEhM-QTRh6LalfD5_tH1BqKyMF77Q9R4aLTXXVFXkat9ZGHntQUbXd6tztCJ02ULs58-RU9X2eN6E2_vr2_Wq22c86UMegZbDXkurQBuuZCUOSqpyDV1zBkQwDgXJDWMOiNFanmS0PCk4FozkWg2RRfj3cbXrz20ndrXva-CpKIYB5-ciDSgFiMq93XbenCq8cVL8KAIVkM2anCvBvfqO5vAWI6Mt6KEw39wdZtlbCR-AWH5ZQE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001284187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single‐tube library preparation for degraded DNA</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Carøe, Christian ; Gopalakrishnan, Shyam ; Vinner, Lasse ; Mak, Sarah S. T. ; Sinding, Mikkel Holger S. ; Samaniego, José A. ; Wales, Nathan ; Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas ; Gilbert, M. Thomas P. ; Johnston, Susan</creator><contributor>Johnston, Susan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Carøe, Christian ; Gopalakrishnan, Shyam ; Vinner, Lasse ; Mak, Sarah S. T. ; Sinding, Mikkel Holger S. ; Samaniego, José A. ; Wales, Nathan ; Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas ; Gilbert, M. Thomas P. ; Johnston, Susan ; Johnston, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, massive parallel sequencing has revolutionised the study of degraded DNA, thus enabling the field of ancient DNA to evolve into that of paleogenomics. Despite these advances, the recovery and sequencing of degraded DNA remains challenging due to limitations in the manipulation of chemically damaged and highly fragmented DNA molecules. In particular, the enzymatic reactions and DNA purification steps during library preparation can result in DNA template loss and sequencing biases, affecting downstream analyses. The development of library preparation methods that circumvent these obstacles and enable higher throughput are therefore of interest to researchers working with degraded DNA. In this study, we compare four Illumina library preparation protocols, including two “single‐tube” methods developed for this study with the explicit aim of improving data quality and reducing preparation time and expenses. The methods are tested on grey wolf (Canis lupus) museum specimens. We found single‐tube protocols increase library complexity, yield more reads that map uniquely to the reference genome, reduce processing time, and may decrease laboratory costs by 90%. Given the advantages of single‐tube library preparations, we anticipate these methods will be of considerable interest to the growing field of paleogenomics and other applications investigating degraded DNA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-210X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological evolution ; Chemical damage ; Costs ; Degradation ; degraded DNA ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA sequencing ; Downstream effects ; Genomes ; illumina sequencing ; Libraries ; library preparation ; museomics ; paleogenomics ; Purification ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Methods in ecology and evolution, 2018-02, Vol.9 (2), p.410-419</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2017 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2018 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4691-2b0daecc9d8e4d48923f2928ca2f3fbe8e344817b32fb987d455221084aa385a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4691-2b0daecc9d8e4d48923f2928ca2f3fbe8e344817b32fb987d455221084aa385a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9601-6768</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F2041-210X.12871$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F2041-210X.12871$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Johnston, Susan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Carøe, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopalakrishnan, Shyam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinner, Lasse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mak, Sarah S. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinding, Mikkel Holger S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaniego, José A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, M. Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Susan</creatorcontrib><title>Single‐tube library preparation for degraded DNA</title><title>Methods in ecology and evolution</title><description>In recent years, massive parallel sequencing has revolutionised the study of degraded DNA, thus enabling the field of ancient DNA to evolve into that of paleogenomics. Despite these advances, the recovery and sequencing of degraded DNA remains challenging due to limitations in the manipulation of chemically damaged and highly fragmented DNA molecules. In particular, the enzymatic reactions and DNA purification steps during library preparation can result in DNA template loss and sequencing biases, affecting downstream analyses. The development of library preparation methods that circumvent these obstacles and enable higher throughput are therefore of interest to researchers working with degraded DNA. In this study, we compare four Illumina library preparation protocols, including two “single‐tube” methods developed for this study with the explicit aim of improving data quality and reducing preparation time and expenses. The methods are tested on grey wolf (Canis lupus) museum specimens. We found single‐tube protocols increase library complexity, yield more reads that map uniquely to the reference genome, reduce processing time, and may decrease laboratory costs by 90%. Given the advantages of single‐tube library preparations, we anticipate these methods will be of considerable interest to the growing field of paleogenomics and other applications investigating degraded DNA.</description><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>Chemical damage</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>degraded DNA</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>Downstream effects</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>illumina sequencing</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>library preparation</subject><subject>museomics</subject><subject>paleogenomics</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>2041-210X</issn><issn>2041-210X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1Lw0AQXUTBUnv2GvCcdr_S7B5LjVaoelDB27KbnS0pMYmbBOnNn-Bv9Je4MSLenMsMw3vz5j2Ezgmek1ALijmJKcHPc0JFSo7Q5Hdz_Gc-RbO23eNQTEhM-QTRh6LalfD5_tH1BqKyMF77Q9R4aLTXXVFXkat9ZGHntQUbXd6tztCJ02ULs58-RU9X2eN6E2_vr2_Wq22c86UMegZbDXkurQBuuZCUOSqpyDV1zBkQwDgXJDWMOiNFanmS0PCk4FozkWg2RRfj3cbXrz20ndrXva-CpKIYB5-ciDSgFiMq93XbenCq8cVL8KAIVkM2anCvBvfqO5vAWI6Mt6KEw39wdZtlbCR-AWH5ZQE</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Carøe, Christian</creator><creator>Gopalakrishnan, Shyam</creator><creator>Vinner, Lasse</creator><creator>Mak, Sarah S. T.</creator><creator>Sinding, Mikkel Holger S.</creator><creator>Samaniego, José A.</creator><creator>Wales, Nathan</creator><creator>Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas</creator><creator>Gilbert, M. Thomas P.</creator><creator>Johnston, Susan</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-6768</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Single‐tube library preparation for degraded DNA</title><author>Carøe, Christian ; Gopalakrishnan, Shyam ; Vinner, Lasse ; Mak, Sarah S. T. ; Sinding, Mikkel Holger S. ; Samaniego, José A. ; Wales, Nathan ; Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas ; Gilbert, M. Thomas P. ; Johnston, Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4691-2b0daecc9d8e4d48923f2928ca2f3fbe8e344817b32fb987d455221084aa385a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>Chemical damage</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>degraded DNA</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>Downstream effects</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>illumina sequencing</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>library preparation</topic><topic>museomics</topic><topic>paleogenomics</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carøe, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopalakrishnan, Shyam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinner, Lasse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mak, Sarah S. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinding, Mikkel Holger S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaniego, José A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, M. Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carøe, Christian</au><au>Gopalakrishnan, Shyam</au><au>Vinner, Lasse</au><au>Mak, Sarah S. T.</au><au>Sinding, Mikkel Holger S.</au><au>Samaniego, José A.</au><au>Wales, Nathan</au><au>Sicheritz‐Pontén, Thomas</au><au>Gilbert, M. Thomas P.</au><au>Johnston, Susan</au><au>Johnston, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single‐tube library preparation for degraded DNA</atitle><jtitle>Methods in ecology and evolution</jtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>410</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>410-419</pages><issn>2041-210X</issn><eissn>2041-210X</eissn><abstract>In recent years, massive parallel sequencing has revolutionised the study of degraded DNA, thus enabling the field of ancient DNA to evolve into that of paleogenomics. Despite these advances, the recovery and sequencing of degraded DNA remains challenging due to limitations in the manipulation of chemically damaged and highly fragmented DNA molecules. In particular, the enzymatic reactions and DNA purification steps during library preparation can result in DNA template loss and sequencing biases, affecting downstream analyses. The development of library preparation methods that circumvent these obstacles and enable higher throughput are therefore of interest to researchers working with degraded DNA. In this study, we compare four Illumina library preparation protocols, including two “single‐tube” methods developed for this study with the explicit aim of improving data quality and reducing preparation time and expenses. The methods are tested on grey wolf (Canis lupus) museum specimens. We found single‐tube protocols increase library complexity, yield more reads that map uniquely to the reference genome, reduce processing time, and may decrease laboratory costs by 90%. Given the advantages of single‐tube library preparations, we anticipate these methods will be of considerable interest to the growing field of paleogenomics and other applications investigating degraded DNA.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/2041-210X.12871</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-6768</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2041-210X
ispartof Methods in ecology and evolution, 2018-02, Vol.9 (2), p.410-419
issn 2041-210X
2041-210X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2001284187
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological evolution
Chemical damage
Costs
Degradation
degraded DNA
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA sequencing
Downstream effects
Genomes
illumina sequencing
Libraries
library preparation
museomics
paleogenomics
Purification
Studies
title Single‐tube library preparation for degraded DNA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T11%3A22%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single%E2%80%90tube%20library%20preparation%20for%20degraded%20DNA&rft.jtitle=Methods%20in%20ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Car%C3%B8e,%20Christian&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=410&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=410-419&rft.issn=2041-210X&rft.eissn=2041-210X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/2041-210X.12871&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2001284187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001284187&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true