Soil Gas Sampling for 1,4‐Dioxane during Heated Soil Vapor Extraction
Soil gas sampling for 1,4‐dioxane at elevated soil temperatures, such as those experienced during in‐situ thermal treatment, has the potential to yield low results due to condensation of water vapor in the ambient temperature sampling vessel and the partitioning of 1,4‐dioxane into that condensate....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ground water monitoring & remediation 2018, Vol.38 (1), p.85-89 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 89 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | Ground water monitoring & remediation |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Burris, David R. Dahlen, Paul R. Hinchee, Robert E. |
description | Soil gas sampling for 1,4‐dioxane at elevated soil temperatures, such as those experienced during in‐situ thermal treatment, has the potential to yield low results due to condensation of water vapor in the ambient temperature sampling vessel and the partitioning of 1,4‐dioxane into that condensate. A simple vapor/condensate sampling apparatus was developed to collect both condensate and vapor samples to allow for determination of a reconstituted effective soil gas concentration for 1,4‐dioxane. Results using the vapor/condensate sampling apparatus during a heated air injection SVE field demonstration are presented, along with those of a comparable laboratory system. Substantial 1,4‐dioxane mass was found in the condensate in both the lab and field (as high as ~50% in field). As soil temperatures increased, less 1,4‐dioxane mass was detected in field condensate samples than expected based on laboratory experiments. Extraction well effluent sampling at the wellhead by direct vapor canister sampling provided erratic results (several biased low by a factor of 5 or more) compared to those of the vapor/condensate apparatus. Direct vapor canister sampling of extraction well effluent after the air‐water separator, however, provided results reasonably comparable (within 35%) to those using the vapor/condensate apparatus at the wellhead. Soil gas sampling at elevated temperatures using the vapor/condensate apparatus alleviates potential low sampling bias due to condensation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/gwmr.12255 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2001205811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2001205811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3615-c0ba66646a9a304974a02190c74c10c1a55761385f413205ffc68c58c887678f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFYvPkHAm5i6s5vdbI5S21SoCNY_x2XcJiUlzcZNStubj-Az-iRuG8_OZQbm-83AR8gl0AH4ul1sVm4AjAlxRHoQRyKUImHHfqYyCblkySk5a5olpVwKJXokndmiDFJsghmu6rKoFkFuXQA30c_X931ht1hlwXzt9otJhm02Dw6JN6w9Ntq2Dk1b2OqcnORYNtnFX--T1_HoZTgJp0_pw_BuGiKXIEJDP1BKGUlMkNMoiSOkDBJq4sgANYBCxBK4EnkEnFGR50YqI5RRKpaxynmfXHV3a2c_11nT6qVdu8q_1IxS8BEF4KnrjjLONo3Lcl27YoVup4HqvSi9F6UPojwMHbwpymz3D6nT98fnLvMLa8No-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001205811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soil Gas Sampling for 1,4‐Dioxane during Heated Soil Vapor Extraction</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Burris, David R. ; Dahlen, Paul R. ; Hinchee, Robert E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burris, David R. ; Dahlen, Paul R. ; Hinchee, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><description>Soil gas sampling for 1,4‐dioxane at elevated soil temperatures, such as those experienced during in‐situ thermal treatment, has the potential to yield low results due to condensation of water vapor in the ambient temperature sampling vessel and the partitioning of 1,4‐dioxane into that condensate. A simple vapor/condensate sampling apparatus was developed to collect both condensate and vapor samples to allow for determination of a reconstituted effective soil gas concentration for 1,4‐dioxane. Results using the vapor/condensate sampling apparatus during a heated air injection SVE field demonstration are presented, along with those of a comparable laboratory system. Substantial 1,4‐dioxane mass was found in the condensate in both the lab and field (as high as ~50% in field). As soil temperatures increased, less 1,4‐dioxane mass was detected in field condensate samples than expected based on laboratory experiments. Extraction well effluent sampling at the wellhead by direct vapor canister sampling provided erratic results (several biased low by a factor of 5 or more) compared to those of the vapor/condensate apparatus. Direct vapor canister sampling of extraction well effluent after the air‐water separator, however, provided results reasonably comparable (within 35%) to those using the vapor/condensate apparatus at the wellhead. Soil gas sampling at elevated temperatures using the vapor/condensate apparatus alleviates potential low sampling bias due to condensation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-3629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6592</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Air injection ; Ambient temperature ; Condensates ; Condensation ; Effluents ; Gas sampling ; Heat treatment ; High temperature ; Laboratories ; Sampling ; Soil ; Soil gas ; Soil gases ; Soil temperature ; Soils ; Vapors ; Water vapor ; Water vapour ; Wellheads ; Yields</subject><ispartof>Ground water monitoring & remediation, 2018, Vol.38 (1), p.85-89</ispartof><rights>2018, National Ground Water Association</rights><rights>Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation © 2018, National Ground Water Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3615-c0ba66646a9a304974a02190c74c10c1a55761385f413205ffc68c58c887678f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3615-c0ba66646a9a304974a02190c74c10c1a55761385f413205ffc68c58c887678f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgwmr.12255$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgwmr.12255$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burris, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlen, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinchee, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><title>Soil Gas Sampling for 1,4‐Dioxane during Heated Soil Vapor Extraction</title><title>Ground water monitoring & remediation</title><description>Soil gas sampling for 1,4‐dioxane at elevated soil temperatures, such as those experienced during in‐situ thermal treatment, has the potential to yield low results due to condensation of water vapor in the ambient temperature sampling vessel and the partitioning of 1,4‐dioxane into that condensate. A simple vapor/condensate sampling apparatus was developed to collect both condensate and vapor samples to allow for determination of a reconstituted effective soil gas concentration for 1,4‐dioxane. Results using the vapor/condensate sampling apparatus during a heated air injection SVE field demonstration are presented, along with those of a comparable laboratory system. Substantial 1,4‐dioxane mass was found in the condensate in both the lab and field (as high as ~50% in field). As soil temperatures increased, less 1,4‐dioxane mass was detected in field condensate samples than expected based on laboratory experiments. Extraction well effluent sampling at the wellhead by direct vapor canister sampling provided erratic results (several biased low by a factor of 5 or more) compared to those of the vapor/condensate apparatus. Direct vapor canister sampling of extraction well effluent after the air‐water separator, however, provided results reasonably comparable (within 35%) to those using the vapor/condensate apparatus at the wellhead. Soil gas sampling at elevated temperatures using the vapor/condensate apparatus alleviates potential low sampling bias due to condensation.</description><subject>Air injection</subject><subject>Ambient temperature</subject><subject>Condensates</subject><subject>Condensation</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Gas sampling</subject><subject>Heat treatment</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil gas</subject><subject>Soil gases</subject><subject>Soil temperature</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Vapors</subject><subject>Water vapor</subject><subject>Water vapour</subject><subject>Wellheads</subject><subject>Yields</subject><issn>1069-3629</issn><issn>1745-6592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFYvPkHAm5i6s5vdbI5S21SoCNY_x2XcJiUlzcZNStubj-Az-iRuG8_OZQbm-83AR8gl0AH4ul1sVm4AjAlxRHoQRyKUImHHfqYyCblkySk5a5olpVwKJXokndmiDFJsghmu6rKoFkFuXQA30c_X931ht1hlwXzt9otJhm02Dw6JN6w9Ntq2Dk1b2OqcnORYNtnFX--T1_HoZTgJp0_pw_BuGiKXIEJDP1BKGUlMkNMoiSOkDBJq4sgANYBCxBK4EnkEnFGR50YqI5RRKpaxynmfXHV3a2c_11nT6qVdu8q_1IxS8BEF4KnrjjLONo3Lcl27YoVup4HqvSi9F6UPojwMHbwpymz3D6nT98fnLvMLa8No-w</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Burris, David R.</creator><creator>Dahlen, Paul R.</creator><creator>Hinchee, Robert E.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Soil Gas Sampling for 1,4‐Dioxane during Heated Soil Vapor Extraction</title><author>Burris, David R. ; Dahlen, Paul R. ; Hinchee, Robert E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3615-c0ba66646a9a304974a02190c74c10c1a55761385f413205ffc68c58c887678f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Air injection</topic><topic>Ambient temperature</topic><topic>Condensates</topic><topic>Condensation</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Gas sampling</topic><topic>Heat treatment</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil gas</topic><topic>Soil gases</topic><topic>Soil temperature</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Vapors</topic><topic>Water vapor</topic><topic>Water vapour</topic><topic>Wellheads</topic><topic>Yields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burris, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlen, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinchee, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ground water monitoring & remediation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burris, David R.</au><au>Dahlen, Paul R.</au><au>Hinchee, Robert E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soil Gas Sampling for 1,4‐Dioxane during Heated Soil Vapor Extraction</atitle><jtitle>Ground water monitoring & remediation</jtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>85-89</pages><issn>1069-3629</issn><eissn>1745-6592</eissn><abstract>Soil gas sampling for 1,4‐dioxane at elevated soil temperatures, such as those experienced during in‐situ thermal treatment, has the potential to yield low results due to condensation of water vapor in the ambient temperature sampling vessel and the partitioning of 1,4‐dioxane into that condensate. A simple vapor/condensate sampling apparatus was developed to collect both condensate and vapor samples to allow for determination of a reconstituted effective soil gas concentration for 1,4‐dioxane. Results using the vapor/condensate sampling apparatus during a heated air injection SVE field demonstration are presented, along with those of a comparable laboratory system. Substantial 1,4‐dioxane mass was found in the condensate in both the lab and field (as high as ~50% in field). As soil temperatures increased, less 1,4‐dioxane mass was detected in field condensate samples than expected based on laboratory experiments. Extraction well effluent sampling at the wellhead by direct vapor canister sampling provided erratic results (several biased low by a factor of 5 or more) compared to those of the vapor/condensate apparatus. Direct vapor canister sampling of extraction well effluent after the air‐water separator, however, provided results reasonably comparable (within 35%) to those using the vapor/condensate apparatus at the wellhead. Soil gas sampling at elevated temperatures using the vapor/condensate apparatus alleviates potential low sampling bias due to condensation.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/gwmr.12255</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1069-3629 |
ispartof | Ground water monitoring & remediation, 2018, Vol.38 (1), p.85-89 |
issn | 1069-3629 1745-6592 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2001205811 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | Air injection Ambient temperature Condensates Condensation Effluents Gas sampling Heat treatment High temperature Laboratories Sampling Soil Soil gas Soil gases Soil temperature Soils Vapors Water vapor Water vapour Wellheads Yields |
title | Soil Gas Sampling for 1,4‐Dioxane during Heated Soil Vapor Extraction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A33%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soil%20Gas%20Sampling%20for%201,4%E2%80%90Dioxane%20during%20Heated%20Soil%20Vapor%20Extraction&rft.jtitle=Ground%20water%20monitoring%20&%20remediation&rft.au=Burris,%20David%20R.&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=85-89&rft.issn=1069-3629&rft.eissn=1745-6592&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gwmr.12255&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2001205811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001205811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |