A Comparative Study of the VRA Core, CDWA and Archaeodata

This article compares three metadata standards in the industry: Archaeodata developed by the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, VRA Core Categories by Visual Resources Association, and Categories for the Description of Works of Art. The author discusses the backgrounds, definitions...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tʻu shu kuan hsüeh yü tzŭ hsün kʻo hsüeh 2005-10, Vol.31 (2)
1. Verfasser: Yu-Yun, Lin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Tʻu shu kuan hsüeh yü tzŭ hsün kʻo hsüeh
container_volume 31
creator Yu-Yun, Lin
description This article compares three metadata standards in the industry: Archaeodata developed by the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, VRA Core Categories by Visual Resources Association, and Categories for the Description of Works of Art. The author discusses the backgrounds, definitions, and structures of the three metadata standards, and points out that significant differences exist among these standards in terms of object description, semantics, and structures. These differences may introduce incompatibilities for the museum community in providing cross-databases searching. Results presented in this article can be used as guidelines for future metadata structuring. Some suggestions for “Union Catalog Project of National Digital Archives Program” are also included.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2001084190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2001084190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20010841903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyssKgkAUgOEhCrLLOxxom3DmoulSrGhdUUs55IhJOTYzBr19BT1Aq3_x_QMWCCFUyKOVGrIAZSxDGSscs4lzDWIUIyYBSzPIzb0jS_761HDwffkCU4GvNZz2X7R6Cfn6nAG1JWT2UpM2JXmasVFFN6fnv07ZYrs55ruws-bRa-eLxvS2_VAhEDkmiqco_7veZPM1bw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001084190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Study of the VRA Core, CDWA and Archaeodata</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Yu-Yun, Lin</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu-Yun, Lin</creatorcontrib><description>This article compares three metadata standards in the industry: Archaeodata developed by the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, VRA Core Categories by Visual Resources Association, and Categories for the Description of Works of Art. The author discusses the backgrounds, definitions, and structures of the three metadata standards, and points out that significant differences exist among these standards in terms of object description, semantics, and structures. These differences may introduce incompatibilities for the museum community in providing cross-databases searching. Results presented in this article can be used as guidelines for future metadata structuring. Some suggestions for “Union Catalog Project of National Digital Archives Program” are also included.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-3640</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2224-1574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University, Graduate Institute of Library &amp; Information Studies</publisher><subject>Digital archives ; Metadata</subject><ispartof>Tʻu shu kuan hsüeh yü tzŭ hsün kʻo hsüeh, 2005-10, Vol.31 (2)</ispartof><rights>2005 林玉雲 Yu-Yun Lin. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the License). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu-Yun, Lin</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Study of the VRA Core, CDWA and Archaeodata</title><title>Tʻu shu kuan hsüeh yü tzŭ hsün kʻo hsüeh</title><description>This article compares three metadata standards in the industry: Archaeodata developed by the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, VRA Core Categories by Visual Resources Association, and Categories for the Description of Works of Art. The author discusses the backgrounds, definitions, and structures of the three metadata standards, and points out that significant differences exist among these standards in terms of object description, semantics, and structures. These differences may introduce incompatibilities for the museum community in providing cross-databases searching. Results presented in this article can be used as guidelines for future metadata structuring. Some suggestions for “Union Catalog Project of National Digital Archives Program” are also included.</description><subject>Digital archives</subject><subject>Metadata</subject><issn>0363-3640</issn><issn>2224-1574</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyssKgkAUgOEhCrLLOxxom3DmoulSrGhdUUs55IhJOTYzBr19BT1Aq3_x_QMWCCFUyKOVGrIAZSxDGSscs4lzDWIUIyYBSzPIzb0jS_761HDwffkCU4GvNZz2X7R6Cfn6nAG1JWT2UpM2JXmasVFFN6fnv07ZYrs55ruws-bRa-eLxvS2_VAhEDkmiqco_7veZPM1bw</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Yu-Yun, Lin</creator><general>National Taiwan Normal University, Graduate Institute of Library &amp; Information Studies</general><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>A Comparative Study of the VRA Core, CDWA and Archaeodata</title><author>Yu-Yun, Lin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20010841903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Digital archives</topic><topic>Metadata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu-Yun, Lin</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East &amp; South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Tʻu shu kuan hsüeh yü tzŭ hsün kʻo hsüeh</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu-Yun, Lin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Study of the VRA Core, CDWA and Archaeodata</atitle><jtitle>Tʻu shu kuan hsüeh yü tzŭ hsün kʻo hsüeh</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>0363-3640</issn><eissn>2224-1574</eissn><abstract>This article compares three metadata standards in the industry: Archaeodata developed by the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, VRA Core Categories by Visual Resources Association, and Categories for the Description of Works of Art. The author discusses the backgrounds, definitions, and structures of the three metadata standards, and points out that significant differences exist among these standards in terms of object description, semantics, and structures. These differences may introduce incompatibilities for the museum community in providing cross-databases searching. Results presented in this article can be used as guidelines for future metadata structuring. Some suggestions for “Union Catalog Project of National Digital Archives Program” are also included.</abstract><cop>Taipei</cop><pub>National Taiwan Normal University, Graduate Institute of Library &amp; Information Studies</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-3640
ispartof Tʻu shu kuan hsüeh yü tzŭ hsün kʻo hsüeh, 2005-10, Vol.31 (2)
issn 0363-3640
2224-1574
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2001084190
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Digital archives
Metadata
title A Comparative Study of the VRA Core, CDWA and Archaeodata
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A35%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Study%20of%20the%20VRA%20Core,%20CDWA%20and%20Archaeodata&rft.jtitle=T%CA%BBu%20shu%20kuan%20hsu%CC%88eh%20yu%CC%88%20tzu%CC%86%20hsu%CC%88n%20k%CA%BBo%20hsu%CC%88eh&rft.au=Yu-Yun,%20Lin&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=0363-3640&rft.eissn=2224-1574&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2001084190%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001084190&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true