Cross channel effects of search engine advertising on brick & mortar retail sales: Meta analysis of large scale field experiments on Google.com

We investigate the cross channel effects of search engine advertising on Google.com on sales in brick and mortar retail stores. Obtaining causal and actionable estimates in this context is challenging: Brick and mortar store sales vary widely on a weekly basis; offline media dominate the marketing b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quantitative marketing and economics 2018-03, Vol.16 (1), p.1-42
Hauptverfasser: Kalyanam, Kirthi, McAteer, John, Marek, Jonathan, Hodges, James, Lin, Lifeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Quantitative marketing and economics
container_volume 16
creator Kalyanam, Kirthi
McAteer, John
Marek, Jonathan
Hodges, James
Lin, Lifeng
description We investigate the cross channel effects of search engine advertising on Google.com on sales in brick and mortar retail stores. Obtaining causal and actionable estimates in this context is challenging: Brick and mortar store sales vary widely on a weekly basis; offline media dominate the marketing budget; search advertising and demand are contemporaneously correlated; and estimates have to be credible to overcome agency issues between the online and offline marketing groups. We report on a meta-analysis of a population of 15 independent field experiments, in which 13 well-known U.S. multi-channel retailers spent over $4 Million in incremental search advertising. In test markets category keywords were maintained in positions 1-3 for 76 product categories with no search advertising on these keywords in the control markets. Outcomes measured include sales in the advertised categories, total store sales and Return on Ad Spending. We estimate the average effect of each outcome for this population of experiments using a Hierarchical Bayesian (HB) model. The estimates from the HB model provide causal evidence that increasing search engine advertising on broad keywords on Google.com had a positive effect on sales in brick and mortar stores for the advertised categories for this population of retailers. There also was a positive effect on total store sales. Hence the increase in sales in the advertised categories was incremental to the retailer net of any sales borrowed from non-advertised categories. The total store sales increase was a meaningful improvement compared to the baseline sales growth rates. The average Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) is positive, but does not breakeven on average although several retailers achieved or exceeded break-even based only on brick and mortar sales. We examine the robustness of our findings to alternative assumptions about the data specific to this set of experiments. Our estimates suggest online and offline are linked markets, that media planners should account for the offline effects in the planning and execution of search advertising campaigns, and that these effects should be adjusted by category and retailer. Extensive replication and a unique research protocol ensure that our results are general and credible.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11129-017-9188-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2000992966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2000992966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-e5f56fdf29ee6a785b66f573c14e8918d55350267d654063ff576fbe5521e8d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAHYjIbFLsZPYSdihCgpSERuQ2FmuM05TUrvYKaKn4Mo4FIkVK481__-ZeYScMzphlBZXgTGWVgllRVKxskyKAzJivMiSgrHXw5-axpqLY3ISworSNOe5GJGvqXchgF4qa7EDNAZ1H8AZCKi8XgLaprUIqv5A37ehtQ04Cwvf6je4hLXzvfLgsVdtB0F1GK7hMf5AWdXtQvsT1SnfIAQd22Ba7GrAzw36do12mGVh5lzT4US79Sk5MqoLePb7jsnL3e3z9D6ZP80epjfzRGd52SfIDRemNmmFKFRR8oUQJp6rWY5lBFBznnGaiqIWPKciM7EpzAI5TxmWNcvG5GKfu_HufYuhlyu39XHnIFNKaVWllRBRxfYqPVDyaOQmbq38TjIqB-5yz11G7nLgLovoSfeeELW2Qf-X_L_pG_7Mhuc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2000992966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross channel effects of search engine advertising on brick &amp; mortar retail sales: Meta analysis of large scale field experiments on Google.com</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Kalyanam, Kirthi ; McAteer, John ; Marek, Jonathan ; Hodges, James ; Lin, Lifeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalyanam, Kirthi ; McAteer, John ; Marek, Jonathan ; Hodges, James ; Lin, Lifeng</creatorcontrib><description>We investigate the cross channel effects of search engine advertising on Google.com on sales in brick and mortar retail stores. Obtaining causal and actionable estimates in this context is challenging: Brick and mortar store sales vary widely on a weekly basis; offline media dominate the marketing budget; search advertising and demand are contemporaneously correlated; and estimates have to be credible to overcome agency issues between the online and offline marketing groups. We report on a meta-analysis of a population of 15 independent field experiments, in which 13 well-known U.S. multi-channel retailers spent over $4 Million in incremental search advertising. In test markets category keywords were maintained in positions 1-3 for 76 product categories with no search advertising on these keywords in the control markets. Outcomes measured include sales in the advertised categories, total store sales and Return on Ad Spending. We estimate the average effect of each outcome for this population of experiments using a Hierarchical Bayesian (HB) model. The estimates from the HB model provide causal evidence that increasing search engine advertising on broad keywords on Google.com had a positive effect on sales in brick and mortar stores for the advertised categories for this population of retailers. There also was a positive effect on total store sales. Hence the increase in sales in the advertised categories was incremental to the retailer net of any sales borrowed from non-advertised categories. The total store sales increase was a meaningful improvement compared to the baseline sales growth rates. The average Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) is positive, but does not breakeven on average although several retailers achieved or exceeded break-even based only on brick and mortar sales. We examine the robustness of our findings to alternative assumptions about the data specific to this set of experiments. Our estimates suggest online and offline are linked markets, that media planners should account for the offline effects in the planning and execution of search advertising campaigns, and that these effects should be adjusted by category and retailer. Extensive replication and a unique research protocol ensure that our results are general and credible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-7156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-711X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11129-017-9188-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Advertising ; Advertising expenditures ; Business and Management ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Estimates ; Experiments ; Finance ; Insurance ; Keywords ; Management ; Marketing ; Meta-analysis ; Retail sales ; Retail stores ; Search engines ; Statistics for Business</subject><ispartof>Quantitative marketing and economics, 2018-03, Vol.16 (1), p.1-42</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017</rights><rights>Quantitative Marketing and Economics is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-e5f56fdf29ee6a785b66f573c14e8918d55350267d654063ff576fbe5521e8d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-e5f56fdf29ee6a785b66f573c14e8918d55350267d654063ff576fbe5521e8d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11129-017-9188-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11129-017-9188-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalyanam, Kirthi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAteer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marek, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Lifeng</creatorcontrib><title>Cross channel effects of search engine advertising on brick &amp; mortar retail sales: Meta analysis of large scale field experiments on Google.com</title><title>Quantitative marketing and economics</title><addtitle>Quant Mark Econ</addtitle><description>We investigate the cross channel effects of search engine advertising on Google.com on sales in brick and mortar retail stores. Obtaining causal and actionable estimates in this context is challenging: Brick and mortar store sales vary widely on a weekly basis; offline media dominate the marketing budget; search advertising and demand are contemporaneously correlated; and estimates have to be credible to overcome agency issues between the online and offline marketing groups. We report on a meta-analysis of a population of 15 independent field experiments, in which 13 well-known U.S. multi-channel retailers spent over $4 Million in incremental search advertising. In test markets category keywords were maintained in positions 1-3 for 76 product categories with no search advertising on these keywords in the control markets. Outcomes measured include sales in the advertised categories, total store sales and Return on Ad Spending. We estimate the average effect of each outcome for this population of experiments using a Hierarchical Bayesian (HB) model. The estimates from the HB model provide causal evidence that increasing search engine advertising on broad keywords on Google.com had a positive effect on sales in brick and mortar stores for the advertised categories for this population of retailers. There also was a positive effect on total store sales. Hence the increase in sales in the advertised categories was incremental to the retailer net of any sales borrowed from non-advertised categories. The total store sales increase was a meaningful improvement compared to the baseline sales growth rates. The average Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) is positive, but does not breakeven on average although several retailers achieved or exceeded break-even based only on brick and mortar sales. We examine the robustness of our findings to alternative assumptions about the data specific to this set of experiments. Our estimates suggest online and offline are linked markets, that media planners should account for the offline effects in the planning and execution of search advertising campaigns, and that these effects should be adjusted by category and retailer. Extensive replication and a unique research protocol ensure that our results are general and credible.</description><subject>Advertising</subject><subject>Advertising expenditures</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Keywords</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Retail sales</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Statistics for Business</subject><issn>1570-7156</issn><issn>1573-711X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAHYjIbFLsZPYSdihCgpSERuQ2FmuM05TUrvYKaKn4Mo4FIkVK481__-ZeYScMzphlBZXgTGWVgllRVKxskyKAzJivMiSgrHXw5-axpqLY3ISworSNOe5GJGvqXchgF4qa7EDNAZ1H8AZCKi8XgLaprUIqv5A37ehtQ04Cwvf6je4hLXzvfLgsVdtB0F1GK7hMf5AWdXtQvsT1SnfIAQd22Ba7GrAzw36do12mGVh5lzT4US79Sk5MqoLePb7jsnL3e3z9D6ZP80epjfzRGd52SfIDRemNmmFKFRR8oUQJp6rWY5lBFBznnGaiqIWPKciM7EpzAI5TxmWNcvG5GKfu_HufYuhlyu39XHnIFNKaVWllRBRxfYqPVDyaOQmbq38TjIqB-5yz11G7nLgLovoSfeeELW2Qf-X_L_pG_7Mhuc</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Kalyanam, Kirthi</creator><creator>McAteer, John</creator><creator>Marek, Jonathan</creator><creator>Hodges, James</creator><creator>Lin, Lifeng</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Cross channel effects of search engine advertising on brick &amp; mortar retail sales: Meta analysis of large scale field experiments on Google.com</title><author>Kalyanam, Kirthi ; McAteer, John ; Marek, Jonathan ; Hodges, James ; Lin, Lifeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-e5f56fdf29ee6a785b66f573c14e8918d55350267d654063ff576fbe5521e8d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Advertising</topic><topic>Advertising expenditures</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Keywords</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Retail sales</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Statistics for Business</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalyanam, Kirthi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAteer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marek, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Lifeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Quantitative marketing and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalyanam, Kirthi</au><au>McAteer, John</au><au>Marek, Jonathan</au><au>Hodges, James</au><au>Lin, Lifeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross channel effects of search engine advertising on brick &amp; mortar retail sales: Meta analysis of large scale field experiments on Google.com</atitle><jtitle>Quantitative marketing and economics</jtitle><stitle>Quant Mark Econ</stitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>1-42</pages><issn>1570-7156</issn><eissn>1573-711X</eissn><abstract>We investigate the cross channel effects of search engine advertising on Google.com on sales in brick and mortar retail stores. Obtaining causal and actionable estimates in this context is challenging: Brick and mortar store sales vary widely on a weekly basis; offline media dominate the marketing budget; search advertising and demand are contemporaneously correlated; and estimates have to be credible to overcome agency issues between the online and offline marketing groups. We report on a meta-analysis of a population of 15 independent field experiments, in which 13 well-known U.S. multi-channel retailers spent over $4 Million in incremental search advertising. In test markets category keywords were maintained in positions 1-3 for 76 product categories with no search advertising on these keywords in the control markets. Outcomes measured include sales in the advertised categories, total store sales and Return on Ad Spending. We estimate the average effect of each outcome for this population of experiments using a Hierarchical Bayesian (HB) model. The estimates from the HB model provide causal evidence that increasing search engine advertising on broad keywords on Google.com had a positive effect on sales in brick and mortar stores for the advertised categories for this population of retailers. There also was a positive effect on total store sales. Hence the increase in sales in the advertised categories was incremental to the retailer net of any sales borrowed from non-advertised categories. The total store sales increase was a meaningful improvement compared to the baseline sales growth rates. The average Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) is positive, but does not breakeven on average although several retailers achieved or exceeded break-even based only on brick and mortar sales. We examine the robustness of our findings to alternative assumptions about the data specific to this set of experiments. Our estimates suggest online and offline are linked markets, that media planners should account for the offline effects in the planning and execution of search advertising campaigns, and that these effects should be adjusted by category and retailer. Extensive replication and a unique research protocol ensure that our results are general and credible.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11129-017-9188-7</doi><tpages>42</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1570-7156
ispartof Quantitative marketing and economics, 2018-03, Vol.16 (1), p.1-42
issn 1570-7156
1573-711X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2000992966
source SpringerNature Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Advertising
Advertising expenditures
Business and Management
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Estimates
Experiments
Finance
Insurance
Keywords
Management
Marketing
Meta-analysis
Retail sales
Retail stores
Search engines
Statistics for Business
title Cross channel effects of search engine advertising on brick & mortar retail sales: Meta analysis of large scale field experiments on Google.com
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T00%3A49%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross%20channel%20effects%20of%20search%20engine%20advertising%20on%20brick%20&%20mortar%20retail%20sales:%20Meta%20analysis%20of%20large%20scale%20field%20experiments%20on%20Google.com&rft.jtitle=Quantitative%20marketing%20and%20economics&rft.au=Kalyanam,%20Kirthi&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=1-42&rft.issn=1570-7156&rft.eissn=1573-711X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11129-017-9188-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2000992966%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2000992966&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true