Harbour seals avoid tidal turbine noise: Implications for collision risk

1. Tidal stream energy converters (turbines) are currently being installed in tidally energetic coastal sites. However, there is currently a high level of uncertainty surrounding the potential environmental impacts on marine mammals. This is a key consenting risk to commercial introduction of tidal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of applied ecology 2018-03, Vol.55 (2), p.684-693
Hauptverfasser: Hastie, Gordon D., Russell, Debbie J. F., Lepper, Paul, Elliott, Jim, Wilson, Ben, Benjamins, Steven, Thompson, Dave
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 693
container_issue 2
container_start_page 684
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 55
creator Hastie, Gordon D.
Russell, Debbie J. F.
Lepper, Paul
Elliott, Jim
Wilson, Ben
Benjamins, Steven
Thompson, Dave
description 1. Tidal stream energy converters (turbines) are currently being installed in tidally energetic coastal sites. However, there is currently a high level of uncertainty surrounding the potential environmental impacts on marine mammals. This is a key consenting risk to commercial introduction of tidal energy technology. Concerns derive primarily from the potential for injury to marine mammals through collisions with moving components of turbines. To understand the nature of this risk, information on how animals respond to tidal turbines is urgently required. 2. We measured the behaviour of harbour seals in response to acoustic playbacks of simulated tidal turbine sound within a narrow coastal channel subject to strong, tidally induced currents. This was carried out using data from animal-borne GPS tags and shore-based observations, which were analysed to quantify behavioural responses to the turbine sound. 3. Results showed that the playback state (silent control or turbine signal) was not a significant predictor of the overall number of seals sighted within the channel. 4. However, there was a localised impact of the turbine signal; tagged harbour seals exhibited significant spatial avoidance of the sound which resulted in a reduction in the usage by seals of between 11% and 41% at the playback location. The significant decline in usage extended to 500 m from the playback location at which usage decreased by between 1% and 9% during playback. 5. Synthesis and applications. This study provides important information for policy makers looking to assess the potential impacts of tidal turbines and advise on development of the tidal energy industry. Results showing that seals avoid tidal turbine sound suggest that a proportion of seals encountering tidal turbines will exhibit behavioural responses resulting in avoidance of physical injury; in practice, the empirical changes in usage can be used directly as avoidance rates when using collision risk models to predict the effects of tidal turbines on seals. There is now a clear need to measure how marine mammals behave in response to actual operating tidal turbines in the long term to learn whether marine mammals and tidal turbines can coexist safely at the scales currently envisaged for the industry.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2664.12981
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2000968064</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45024749</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45024749</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-349a445eaa3e9d619e93b4d64ea71a745a0562e1073c6a13d9d5d6badafe54543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqUwMyFZYk5rxx-J2VBVaFElGGC2LrEjuaRxsFNQ_z0Jga7ccrrT-9zHi9A1JTPax5wyKZJUSj6jqcrpCZocO6doQkhKk1wReo4uYtwSQpRgbIJWKwiF3wccLdQRw6d3BnfOQI27fShcY3HjXbR3eL1ra1dC53wTceUDLn1du9iXOLj4fonOqn6CvfrNU_T2sHxdrJLN8-N6cb9JSpblNGFcAefCAjCrjKTKKlZwI7mFjELGBRAhU0tJxkoJlBllhJEFGKis4IKzKbod57bBf-xt7PS2P7_pV-p0-ErmRA6q-agqg48x2Eq3we0gHDQlerBLD-bowRz9Y1dPiJH4crU9_CfXTy_LP-5m5Lax8-HIcUFSnnHFvgEtq3VT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2000968064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Harbour seals avoid tidal turbine noise: Implications for collision risk</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Hastie, Gordon D. ; Russell, Debbie J. F. ; Lepper, Paul ; Elliott, Jim ; Wilson, Ben ; Benjamins, Steven ; Thompson, Dave</creator><creatorcontrib>Hastie, Gordon D. ; Russell, Debbie J. F. ; Lepper, Paul ; Elliott, Jim ; Wilson, Ben ; Benjamins, Steven ; Thompson, Dave</creatorcontrib><description>1. Tidal stream energy converters (turbines) are currently being installed in tidally energetic coastal sites. However, there is currently a high level of uncertainty surrounding the potential environmental impacts on marine mammals. This is a key consenting risk to commercial introduction of tidal energy technology. Concerns derive primarily from the potential for injury to marine mammals through collisions with moving components of turbines. To understand the nature of this risk, information on how animals respond to tidal turbines is urgently required. 2. We measured the behaviour of harbour seals in response to acoustic playbacks of simulated tidal turbine sound within a narrow coastal channel subject to strong, tidally induced currents. This was carried out using data from animal-borne GPS tags and shore-based observations, which were analysed to quantify behavioural responses to the turbine sound. 3. Results showed that the playback state (silent control or turbine signal) was not a significant predictor of the overall number of seals sighted within the channel. 4. However, there was a localised impact of the turbine signal; tagged harbour seals exhibited significant spatial avoidance of the sound which resulted in a reduction in the usage by seals of between 11% and 41% at the playback location. The significant decline in usage extended to 500 m from the playback location at which usage decreased by between 1% and 9% during playback. 5. Synthesis and applications. This study provides important information for policy makers looking to assess the potential impacts of tidal turbines and advise on development of the tidal energy industry. Results showing that seals avoid tidal turbine sound suggest that a proportion of seals encountering tidal turbines will exhibit behavioural responses resulting in avoidance of physical injury; in practice, the empirical changes in usage can be used directly as avoidance rates when using collision risk models to predict the effects of tidal turbines on seals. There is now a clear need to measure how marine mammals behave in response to actual operating tidal turbines in the long term to learn whether marine mammals and tidal turbines can coexist safely at the scales currently envisaged for the industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12981</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Acoustic noise ; avoidance ; behavioural responses ; Coastal currents ; Collision avoidance ; Collision dynamics ; collision risk ; Computer simulation ; Converters ; Empirical analysis ; Energy ; Energy industry ; Energy technology ; Environmental impact ; Harbors ; Human-wildlife interaction ; Injury prevention ; Marine mammals ; marine spatial planning ; Marine technology ; pinnipeds ; Playback ; Playbacks ; renewable energy ; Risk ; Seals ; Sound ; Tidal currents ; Tidal effects ; Tidal energy ; Tidal power ; tidal turbines ; Turbines ; underwater noise</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2018-03, Vol.55 (2), p.684-693</ispartof><rights>2018 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2017 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>Journal of Applied Ecology © 2018 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-349a445eaa3e9d619e93b4d64ea71a745a0562e1073c6a13d9d5d6badafe54543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-349a445eaa3e9d619e93b4d64ea71a745a0562e1073c6a13d9d5d6badafe54543</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9773-2755</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45024749$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45024749$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hastie, Gordon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Debbie J. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepper, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjamins, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Dave</creatorcontrib><title>Harbour seals avoid tidal turbine noise: Implications for collision risk</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. Tidal stream energy converters (turbines) are currently being installed in tidally energetic coastal sites. However, there is currently a high level of uncertainty surrounding the potential environmental impacts on marine mammals. This is a key consenting risk to commercial introduction of tidal energy technology. Concerns derive primarily from the potential for injury to marine mammals through collisions with moving components of turbines. To understand the nature of this risk, information on how animals respond to tidal turbines is urgently required. 2. We measured the behaviour of harbour seals in response to acoustic playbacks of simulated tidal turbine sound within a narrow coastal channel subject to strong, tidally induced currents. This was carried out using data from animal-borne GPS tags and shore-based observations, which were analysed to quantify behavioural responses to the turbine sound. 3. Results showed that the playback state (silent control or turbine signal) was not a significant predictor of the overall number of seals sighted within the channel. 4. However, there was a localised impact of the turbine signal; tagged harbour seals exhibited significant spatial avoidance of the sound which resulted in a reduction in the usage by seals of between 11% and 41% at the playback location. The significant decline in usage extended to 500 m from the playback location at which usage decreased by between 1% and 9% during playback. 5. Synthesis and applications. This study provides important information for policy makers looking to assess the potential impacts of tidal turbines and advise on development of the tidal energy industry. Results showing that seals avoid tidal turbine sound suggest that a proportion of seals encountering tidal turbines will exhibit behavioural responses resulting in avoidance of physical injury; in practice, the empirical changes in usage can be used directly as avoidance rates when using collision risk models to predict the effects of tidal turbines on seals. There is now a clear need to measure how marine mammals behave in response to actual operating tidal turbines in the long term to learn whether marine mammals and tidal turbines can coexist safely at the scales currently envisaged for the industry.</description><subject>Acoustic noise</subject><subject>avoidance</subject><subject>behavioural responses</subject><subject>Coastal currents</subject><subject>Collision avoidance</subject><subject>Collision dynamics</subject><subject>collision risk</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Converters</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy technology</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Harbors</subject><subject>Human-wildlife interaction</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>marine spatial planning</subject><subject>Marine technology</subject><subject>pinnipeds</subject><subject>Playback</subject><subject>Playbacks</subject><subject>renewable energy</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Seals</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Tidal currents</subject><subject>Tidal effects</subject><subject>Tidal energy</subject><subject>Tidal power</subject><subject>tidal turbines</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>underwater noise</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqUwMyFZYk5rxx-J2VBVaFElGGC2LrEjuaRxsFNQ_z0Jga7ccrrT-9zHi9A1JTPax5wyKZJUSj6jqcrpCZocO6doQkhKk1wReo4uYtwSQpRgbIJWKwiF3wccLdQRw6d3BnfOQI27fShcY3HjXbR3eL1ra1dC53wTceUDLn1du9iXOLj4fonOqn6CvfrNU_T2sHxdrJLN8-N6cb9JSpblNGFcAefCAjCrjKTKKlZwI7mFjELGBRAhU0tJxkoJlBllhJEFGKis4IKzKbod57bBf-xt7PS2P7_pV-p0-ErmRA6q-agqg48x2Eq3we0gHDQlerBLD-bowRz9Y1dPiJH4crU9_CfXTy_LP-5m5Lax8-HIcUFSnnHFvgEtq3VT</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Hastie, Gordon D.</creator><creator>Russell, Debbie J. F.</creator><creator>Lepper, Paul</creator><creator>Elliott, Jim</creator><creator>Wilson, Ben</creator><creator>Benjamins, Steven</creator><creator>Thompson, Dave</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-2755</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Harbour seals avoid tidal turbine noise: Implications for collision risk</title><author>Hastie, Gordon D. ; Russell, Debbie J. F. ; Lepper, Paul ; Elliott, Jim ; Wilson, Ben ; Benjamins, Steven ; Thompson, Dave</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3781-349a445eaa3e9d619e93b4d64ea71a745a0562e1073c6a13d9d5d6badafe54543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acoustic noise</topic><topic>avoidance</topic><topic>behavioural responses</topic><topic>Coastal currents</topic><topic>Collision avoidance</topic><topic>Collision dynamics</topic><topic>collision risk</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Converters</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy technology</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Harbors</topic><topic>Human-wildlife interaction</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>marine spatial planning</topic><topic>Marine technology</topic><topic>pinnipeds</topic><topic>Playback</topic><topic>Playbacks</topic><topic>renewable energy</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Seals</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Tidal currents</topic><topic>Tidal effects</topic><topic>Tidal energy</topic><topic>Tidal power</topic><topic>tidal turbines</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>underwater noise</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hastie, Gordon D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Debbie J. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepper, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benjamins, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Dave</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hastie, Gordon D.</au><au>Russell, Debbie J. F.</au><au>Lepper, Paul</au><au>Elliott, Jim</au><au>Wilson, Ben</au><au>Benjamins, Steven</au><au>Thompson, Dave</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Harbour seals avoid tidal turbine noise: Implications for collision risk</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>684</spage><epage>693</epage><pages>684-693</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><abstract>1. Tidal stream energy converters (turbines) are currently being installed in tidally energetic coastal sites. However, there is currently a high level of uncertainty surrounding the potential environmental impacts on marine mammals. This is a key consenting risk to commercial introduction of tidal energy technology. Concerns derive primarily from the potential for injury to marine mammals through collisions with moving components of turbines. To understand the nature of this risk, information on how animals respond to tidal turbines is urgently required. 2. We measured the behaviour of harbour seals in response to acoustic playbacks of simulated tidal turbine sound within a narrow coastal channel subject to strong, tidally induced currents. This was carried out using data from animal-borne GPS tags and shore-based observations, which were analysed to quantify behavioural responses to the turbine sound. 3. Results showed that the playback state (silent control or turbine signal) was not a significant predictor of the overall number of seals sighted within the channel. 4. However, there was a localised impact of the turbine signal; tagged harbour seals exhibited significant spatial avoidance of the sound which resulted in a reduction in the usage by seals of between 11% and 41% at the playback location. The significant decline in usage extended to 500 m from the playback location at which usage decreased by between 1% and 9% during playback. 5. Synthesis and applications. This study provides important information for policy makers looking to assess the potential impacts of tidal turbines and advise on development of the tidal energy industry. Results showing that seals avoid tidal turbine sound suggest that a proportion of seals encountering tidal turbines will exhibit behavioural responses resulting in avoidance of physical injury; in practice, the empirical changes in usage can be used directly as avoidance rates when using collision risk models to predict the effects of tidal turbines on seals. There is now a clear need to measure how marine mammals behave in response to actual operating tidal turbines in the long term to learn whether marine mammals and tidal turbines can coexist safely at the scales currently envisaged for the industry.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.12981</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9773-2755</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2018-03, Vol.55 (2), p.684-693
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2000968064
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Acoustic noise
avoidance
behavioural responses
Coastal currents
Collision avoidance
Collision dynamics
collision risk
Computer simulation
Converters
Empirical analysis
Energy
Energy industry
Energy technology
Environmental impact
Harbors
Human-wildlife interaction
Injury prevention
Marine mammals
marine spatial planning
Marine technology
pinnipeds
Playback
Playbacks
renewable energy
Risk
Seals
Sound
Tidal currents
Tidal effects
Tidal energy
Tidal power
tidal turbines
Turbines
underwater noise
title Harbour seals avoid tidal turbine noise: Implications for collision risk
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T07%3A47%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Harbour%20seals%20avoid%20tidal%20turbine%20noise:%20Implications%20for%20collision%20risk&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Hastie,%20Gordon%20D.&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=684&rft.epage=693&rft.pages=684-693&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.12981&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45024749%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2000968064&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45024749&rfr_iscdi=true