Sequestered Alkaloid Defenses in the Dendrobatid Poison Frog Oophaga pumilio Provide Variable Protection from Microbial Pathogens
Most amphibians produce their own defensive chemicals; however, poison frogs sequester their alkaloid-based defenses from dietary arthropods. Alkaloids function as a defense against predators, and certain types appear to inhibit microbial growth. Alkaloid defenses vary considerably among populations...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemical ecology 2018-03, Vol.44 (3), p.312-325 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 325 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 312 |
container_title | Journal of chemical ecology |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Hovey, Kyle J. Seiter, Emily M. Johnson, Erin E. Saporito, Ralph A. |
description | Most amphibians produce their own defensive chemicals; however, poison frogs sequester their alkaloid-based defenses from dietary arthropods. Alkaloids function as a defense against predators, and certain types appear to inhibit microbial growth. Alkaloid defenses vary considerably among populations of poison frogs, reflecting geographic differences in availability of dietary arthropods. Consequently, environmentally driven differences in frog defenses may have significant implications regarding their protection against pathogens. While natural alkaloid mixtures in dendrobatid poison frogs have recently been shown to inhibit growth of non-pathogenic microbes, no studies have examined the effectiveness of alkaloids against microbes that infect these frogs. Herein, we examined how alkaloid defenses in the dendrobatid poison frog,
Oophaga pumilio
, affect growth of the known anuran pathogens
Aeromonas hydrophila
and
Klebsiella pneumoniae
. Frogs were collected from five locations throughout Costa Rica that are known to vary in their alkaloid profiles. Alkaloids were isolated from individual skins, and extracts were assayed against both pathogens. Microbe subcultures were inoculated with extracted alkaloids to create dose-response curves. Subsequent spectrophotometry and cell counting assays were used to assess growth inhibition. GC-MS was used to characterize and quantify alkaloids in frog extracts, and our results suggest that variation in alkaloid defenses lead to differences in inhibition of these pathogens. The present study provides the first evidence that alkaloid variation in a dendrobatid poison frog is associated with differences in inhibition of anuran pathogens, and offers further support that alkaloid defenses in poison frogs confer protection against both pathogens and predators. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10886-018-0930-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1999864945</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1999864945</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-9e6f5eb822d2936cb5240b656420d6e4a0fed4207285b339f5cf991c856f28133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UElPAyEUJkajdfkBXgyJ51GWgcKxqWuisYnLlTAzjxadDhWmJh7951KrxosnHnwb70PokJITSsjwNFGilCwIVQXRnBRqAw2oGPKCCkk30YAQnRHO6Q7aTemZEMKkEttoh-mSDammA_RxD69LSD1EaPCofbFt8A0-AwddgoR9h_sZ5HvXxFDZPmOT4FPo8EUMU3wXFjM7tXixnPvWBzyJ4c03gJ9s9LZqYfXQQ937LHAxzPGtr7OPty2e2H4WpjllH2052yY4-D730OPF-cP4qri5u7wej26KuqSiLzRIJ6BSjDVMc1lXgpWkkkKWjDQSSkscNHkeMiUqzrUTtdOa1kpIxxTlfA8dr30XMXytbJ7DMnY50lCttZKlLkVm0TUr_zOlCM4sop_b-G4oMavSzbp0k0s3q9KNypqjb-dlNYfmV_HTciawNSFlqJtC_BP9r-snlK2NjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1999864945</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sequestered Alkaloid Defenses in the Dendrobatid Poison Frog Oophaga pumilio Provide Variable Protection from Microbial Pathogens</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Hovey, Kyle J. ; Seiter, Emily M. ; Johnson, Erin E. ; Saporito, Ralph A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hovey, Kyle J. ; Seiter, Emily M. ; Johnson, Erin E. ; Saporito, Ralph A.</creatorcontrib><description>Most amphibians produce their own defensive chemicals; however, poison frogs sequester their alkaloid-based defenses from dietary arthropods. Alkaloids function as a defense against predators, and certain types appear to inhibit microbial growth. Alkaloid defenses vary considerably among populations of poison frogs, reflecting geographic differences in availability of dietary arthropods. Consequently, environmentally driven differences in frog defenses may have significant implications regarding their protection against pathogens. While natural alkaloid mixtures in dendrobatid poison frogs have recently been shown to inhibit growth of non-pathogenic microbes, no studies have examined the effectiveness of alkaloids against microbes that infect these frogs. Herein, we examined how alkaloid defenses in the dendrobatid poison frog,
Oophaga pumilio
, affect growth of the known anuran pathogens
Aeromonas hydrophila
and
Klebsiella pneumoniae
. Frogs were collected from five locations throughout Costa Rica that are known to vary in their alkaloid profiles. Alkaloids were isolated from individual skins, and extracts were assayed against both pathogens. Microbe subcultures were inoculated with extracted alkaloids to create dose-response curves. Subsequent spectrophotometry and cell counting assays were used to assess growth inhibition. GC-MS was used to characterize and quantify alkaloids in frog extracts, and our results suggest that variation in alkaloid defenses lead to differences in inhibition of these pathogens. The present study provides the first evidence that alkaloid variation in a dendrobatid poison frog is associated with differences in inhibition of anuran pathogens, and offers further support that alkaloid defenses in poison frogs confer protection against both pathogens and predators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-0331</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10886-018-0930-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29427191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Alkaloids ; Amphibians ; Arthropoda ; Arthropods ; Biochemistry ; Biological Microscopy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chemical ecology ; Ecology ; Entomology ; Frogs ; Klebsiella ; Life Sciences ; Microorganisms ; Pathogens ; Predators ; Skin ; Spectrophotometry</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical ecology, 2018-03, Vol.44 (3), p.312-325</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Journal of Chemical Ecology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-9e6f5eb822d2936cb5240b656420d6e4a0fed4207285b339f5cf991c856f28133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-9e6f5eb822d2936cb5240b656420d6e4a0fed4207285b339f5cf991c856f28133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10886-018-0930-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10886-018-0930-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29427191$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hovey, Kyle J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seiter, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Erin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saporito, Ralph A.</creatorcontrib><title>Sequestered Alkaloid Defenses in the Dendrobatid Poison Frog Oophaga pumilio Provide Variable Protection from Microbial Pathogens</title><title>Journal of chemical ecology</title><addtitle>J Chem Ecol</addtitle><addtitle>J Chem Ecol</addtitle><description>Most amphibians produce their own defensive chemicals; however, poison frogs sequester their alkaloid-based defenses from dietary arthropods. Alkaloids function as a defense against predators, and certain types appear to inhibit microbial growth. Alkaloid defenses vary considerably among populations of poison frogs, reflecting geographic differences in availability of dietary arthropods. Consequently, environmentally driven differences in frog defenses may have significant implications regarding their protection against pathogens. While natural alkaloid mixtures in dendrobatid poison frogs have recently been shown to inhibit growth of non-pathogenic microbes, no studies have examined the effectiveness of alkaloids against microbes that infect these frogs. Herein, we examined how alkaloid defenses in the dendrobatid poison frog,
Oophaga pumilio
, affect growth of the known anuran pathogens
Aeromonas hydrophila
and
Klebsiella pneumoniae
. Frogs were collected from five locations throughout Costa Rica that are known to vary in their alkaloid profiles. Alkaloids were isolated from individual skins, and extracts were assayed against both pathogens. Microbe subcultures were inoculated with extracted alkaloids to create dose-response curves. Subsequent spectrophotometry and cell counting assays were used to assess growth inhibition. GC-MS was used to characterize and quantify alkaloids in frog extracts, and our results suggest that variation in alkaloid defenses lead to differences in inhibition of these pathogens. The present study provides the first evidence that alkaloid variation in a dendrobatid poison frog is associated with differences in inhibition of anuran pathogens, and offers further support that alkaloid defenses in poison frogs confer protection against both pathogens and predators.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Alkaloids</subject><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological Microscopy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chemical ecology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Klebsiella</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Spectrophotometry</subject><issn>0098-0331</issn><issn>1573-1561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UElPAyEUJkajdfkBXgyJ51GWgcKxqWuisYnLlTAzjxadDhWmJh7951KrxosnHnwb70PokJITSsjwNFGilCwIVQXRnBRqAw2oGPKCCkk30YAQnRHO6Q7aTemZEMKkEttoh-mSDammA_RxD69LSD1EaPCofbFt8A0-AwddgoR9h_sZ5HvXxFDZPmOT4FPo8EUMU3wXFjM7tXixnPvWBzyJ4c03gJ9s9LZqYfXQQ937LHAxzPGtr7OPty2e2H4WpjllH2052yY4-D730OPF-cP4qri5u7wej26KuqSiLzRIJ6BSjDVMc1lXgpWkkkKWjDQSSkscNHkeMiUqzrUTtdOa1kpIxxTlfA8dr30XMXytbJ7DMnY50lCttZKlLkVm0TUr_zOlCM4sop_b-G4oMavSzbp0k0s3q9KNypqjb-dlNYfmV_HTciawNSFlqJtC_BP9r-snlK2NjA</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Hovey, Kyle J.</creator><creator>Seiter, Emily M.</creator><creator>Johnson, Erin E.</creator><creator>Saporito, Ralph A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Sequestered Alkaloid Defenses in the Dendrobatid Poison Frog Oophaga pumilio Provide Variable Protection from Microbial Pathogens</title><author>Hovey, Kyle J. ; Seiter, Emily M. ; Johnson, Erin E. ; Saporito, Ralph A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-9e6f5eb822d2936cb5240b656420d6e4a0fed4207285b339f5cf991c856f28133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Alkaloids</topic><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological Microscopy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chemical ecology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Klebsiella</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Spectrophotometry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hovey, Kyle J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seiter, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Erin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saporito, Ralph A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hovey, Kyle J.</au><au>Seiter, Emily M.</au><au>Johnson, Erin E.</au><au>Saporito, Ralph A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sequestered Alkaloid Defenses in the Dendrobatid Poison Frog Oophaga pumilio Provide Variable Protection from Microbial Pathogens</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical ecology</jtitle><stitle>J Chem Ecol</stitle><addtitle>J Chem Ecol</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>312</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>312-325</pages><issn>0098-0331</issn><eissn>1573-1561</eissn><abstract>Most amphibians produce their own defensive chemicals; however, poison frogs sequester their alkaloid-based defenses from dietary arthropods. Alkaloids function as a defense against predators, and certain types appear to inhibit microbial growth. Alkaloid defenses vary considerably among populations of poison frogs, reflecting geographic differences in availability of dietary arthropods. Consequently, environmentally driven differences in frog defenses may have significant implications regarding their protection against pathogens. While natural alkaloid mixtures in dendrobatid poison frogs have recently been shown to inhibit growth of non-pathogenic microbes, no studies have examined the effectiveness of alkaloids against microbes that infect these frogs. Herein, we examined how alkaloid defenses in the dendrobatid poison frog,
Oophaga pumilio
, affect growth of the known anuran pathogens
Aeromonas hydrophila
and
Klebsiella pneumoniae
. Frogs were collected from five locations throughout Costa Rica that are known to vary in their alkaloid profiles. Alkaloids were isolated from individual skins, and extracts were assayed against both pathogens. Microbe subcultures were inoculated with extracted alkaloids to create dose-response curves. Subsequent spectrophotometry and cell counting assays were used to assess growth inhibition. GC-MS was used to characterize and quantify alkaloids in frog extracts, and our results suggest that variation in alkaloid defenses lead to differences in inhibition of these pathogens. The present study provides the first evidence that alkaloid variation in a dendrobatid poison frog is associated with differences in inhibition of anuran pathogens, and offers further support that alkaloid defenses in poison frogs confer protection against both pathogens and predators.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>29427191</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10886-018-0930-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-0331 |
ispartof | Journal of chemical ecology, 2018-03, Vol.44 (3), p.312-325 |
issn | 0098-0331 1573-1561 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1999864945 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Agriculture Alkaloids Amphibians Arthropoda Arthropods Biochemistry Biological Microscopy Biomedical and Life Sciences Chemical ecology Ecology Entomology Frogs Klebsiella Life Sciences Microorganisms Pathogens Predators Skin Spectrophotometry |
title | Sequestered Alkaloid Defenses in the Dendrobatid Poison Frog Oophaga pumilio Provide Variable Protection from Microbial Pathogens |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T01%3A57%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sequestered%20Alkaloid%20Defenses%20in%20the%20Dendrobatid%20Poison%20Frog%20Oophaga%20pumilio%20Provide%20Variable%20Protection%20from%20Microbial%20Pathogens&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20ecology&rft.au=Hovey,%20Kyle%20J.&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=312&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=312-325&rft.issn=0098-0331&rft.eissn=1573-1561&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10886-018-0930-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1999864945%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1999864945&rft_id=info:pmid/29427191&rfr_iscdi=true |