State courts, state territory, state power: reflections on the extraterritoriality principle in choice of law and legislation
Florey surveys current notions of extraterritoriality as they have evolved in choice-of-law principles and in legislation. She examines various models of how people might regard extraterritorial legislative jurisdiction. Then she considers the two frameworks articulated by the Supreme Court for anal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Notre Dame law review 2009-03, Vol.84 (3), p.1057 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1057 |
container_title | The Notre Dame law review |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Florey, Katherine |
description | Florey surveys current notions of extraterritoriality as they have evolved in choice-of-law principles and in legislation. She examines various models of how people might regard extraterritorial legislative jurisdiction. Then she considers the two frameworks articulated by the Supreme Court for analyzing the issue of state power over out-of-state conduct: one grounded in the Due Process Clause and imposing limits on choice-of-law decisions; the other ostensibly rooted in the dormant Commerce Clause and aimed at extraterritorial legislation. Moreover, she examines how the apparent discrepancies between choice-of-law limits and the legislative extraterritoriality principle can be reconciled. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_199938681</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A199537353</galeid><sourcerecordid>A199537353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g324t-5a4e85e6007513f465ae42a609f906f54808d9ce1c900a75f9a16d88e7a000633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj01LAzEQhvegYK3-h6DXrmSbzX54K8UvKHhQz8uYnWxT0mRNstQe_O-maqFCGZhhXp55h_ckGdEy5ynjGT9Lzr1fUUqLaZaPkq-XAAGJsIMLfkL8zxbQORWs2-6F3m7Q3RKHUqMIyhpPrCFhiQQ_g4M9r0CrsCW9U0aoXiNRhoilVQKJlUTDhoBpicZOeQ07m4vkVIL2ePk3x8nb_d3r_DFdPD88zWeLtGPTPKQccqw4FpSWPGMyLzhgPoWC1rKmheR5Rau2FpiJmlIouawhK9qqwhJ2QRkbJ1e_vr2zHwP60KxiYBNfNlld16wqqixC179QBxobZaSN0cRaedHMIsVZyfjOKj1CdWjQgbYGpYryP_7mCB-rxbUSRw8mBwfvg1cGfWxedcvgOxi8P8S_Abm7lR8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199938681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>State courts, state territory, state power: reflections on the extraterritoriality principle in choice of law and legislation</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Florey, Katherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Florey, Katherine</creatorcontrib><description>Florey surveys current notions of extraterritoriality as they have evolved in choice-of-law principles and in legislation. She examines various models of how people might regard extraterritorial legislative jurisdiction. Then she considers the two frameworks articulated by the Supreme Court for analyzing the issue of state power over out-of-state conduct: one grounded in the Due Process Clause and imposing limits on choice-of-law decisions; the other ostensibly rooted in the dormant Commerce Clause and aimed at extraterritorial legislation. Moreover, she examines how the apparent discrepancies between choice-of-law limits and the legislative extraterritoriality principle can be reconciled.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0745-3515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Law School</publisher><subject>Choice of law ; Conflict of laws ; Due process of law ; Evaluation ; Exterritoriality ; Extraterritoriality ; Federal legislation ; Interstate commerce ; Jurisdiction ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legal studies ; Political power ; State courts</subject><ispartof>The Notre Dame law review, 2009-03, Vol.84 (3), p.1057</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 University of Notre Dame Law School</rights><rights>Copyright Notre Dame Law Review Mar 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Florey, Katherine</creatorcontrib><title>State courts, state territory, state power: reflections on the extraterritoriality principle in choice of law and legislation</title><title>The Notre Dame law review</title><description>Florey surveys current notions of extraterritoriality as they have evolved in choice-of-law principles and in legislation. She examines various models of how people might regard extraterritorial legislative jurisdiction. Then she considers the two frameworks articulated by the Supreme Court for analyzing the issue of state power over out-of-state conduct: one grounded in the Due Process Clause and imposing limits on choice-of-law decisions; the other ostensibly rooted in the dormant Commerce Clause and aimed at extraterritorial legislation. Moreover, she examines how the apparent discrepancies between choice-of-law limits and the legislative extraterritoriality principle can be reconciled.</description><subject>Choice of law</subject><subject>Conflict of laws</subject><subject>Due process of law</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exterritoriality</subject><subject>Extraterritoriality</subject><subject>Federal legislation</subject><subject>Interstate commerce</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legal studies</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>State courts</subject><issn>0745-3515</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNptj01LAzEQhvegYK3-h6DXrmSbzX54K8UvKHhQz8uYnWxT0mRNstQe_O-maqFCGZhhXp55h_ckGdEy5ynjGT9Lzr1fUUqLaZaPkq-XAAGJsIMLfkL8zxbQORWs2-6F3m7Q3RKHUqMIyhpPrCFhiQQ_g4M9r0CrsCW9U0aoXiNRhoilVQKJlUTDhoBpicZOeQ07m4vkVIL2ePk3x8nb_d3r_DFdPD88zWeLtGPTPKQccqw4FpSWPGMyLzhgPoWC1rKmheR5Rau2FpiJmlIouawhK9qqwhJ2QRkbJ1e_vr2zHwP60KxiYBNfNlld16wqqixC179QBxobZaSN0cRaedHMIsVZyfjOKj1CdWjQgbYGpYryP_7mCB-rxbUSRw8mBwfvg1cGfWxedcvgOxi8P8S_Abm7lR8</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Florey, Katherine</creator><general>University of Notre Dame Law School</general><general>Notre Dame Law Review</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>State courts, state territory, state power: reflections on the extraterritoriality principle in choice of law and legislation</title><author>Florey, Katherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g324t-5a4e85e6007513f465ae42a609f906f54808d9ce1c900a75f9a16d88e7a000633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Choice of law</topic><topic>Conflict of laws</topic><topic>Due process of law</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exterritoriality</topic><topic>Extraterritoriality</topic><topic>Federal legislation</topic><topic>Interstate commerce</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legal studies</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>State courts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Florey, Katherine</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Notre Dame law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Florey, Katherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State courts, state territory, state power: reflections on the extraterritoriality principle in choice of law and legislation</atitle><jtitle>The Notre Dame law review</jtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1057</spage><pages>1057-</pages><issn>0745-3515</issn><abstract>Florey surveys current notions of extraterritoriality as they have evolved in choice-of-law principles and in legislation. She examines various models of how people might regard extraterritorial legislative jurisdiction. Then she considers the two frameworks articulated by the Supreme Court for analyzing the issue of state power over out-of-state conduct: one grounded in the Due Process Clause and imposing limits on choice-of-law decisions; the other ostensibly rooted in the dormant Commerce Clause and aimed at extraterritorial legislation. Moreover, she examines how the apparent discrepancies between choice-of-law limits and the legislative extraterritoriality principle can be reconciled.</abstract><cop>Notre Dame</cop><pub>University of Notre Dame Law School</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0745-3515 |
ispartof | The Notre Dame law review, 2009-03, Vol.84 (3), p.1057 |
issn | 0745-3515 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_199938681 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Choice of law Conflict of laws Due process of law Evaluation Exterritoriality Extraterritoriality Federal legislation Interstate commerce Jurisdiction Laws, regulations and rules Legal studies Political power State courts |
title | State courts, state territory, state power: reflections on the extraterritoriality principle in choice of law and legislation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T20%3A09%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State%20courts,%20state%20territory,%20state%20power:%20reflections%20on%20the%20extraterritoriality%20principle%20in%20choice%20of%20law%20and%20legislation&rft.jtitle=The%20Notre%20Dame%20law%20review&rft.au=Florey,%20Katherine&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1057&rft.pages=1057-&rft.issn=0745-3515&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA199537353%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199938681&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A199537353&rfr_iscdi=true |