Adjusting policy implementation frameworks for non‐pluralist conditions: A case study of Ukraine's single tax for small business
Summary Traditional frameworks for assessing policy implementation have been developed almost exclusively in the context of market‐based, pluralist democracies. This research explores policy processes in more diverse contexts, testing the applicability of existing implementation measurement models i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Public administration and development 2018-02, Vol.38 (1), p.26-38 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 38 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 26 |
container_title | Public administration and development |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Fischer‐Smith, Ruth |
description | Summary
Traditional frameworks for assessing policy implementation have been developed almost exclusively in the context of market‐based, pluralist democracies. This research explores policy processes in more diverse contexts, testing the applicability of existing implementation measurement models in the socio‐political context of a post‐Soviet country. Fieldwork conducted in Ukraine examines the factors affecting implementation of the Simplified Single Tax policy and considers the impact of formal and informal institutions on policy processes and small business conditions. Results include an expanded model for assessing policy implementation in non‐pluralist conditions, an original contribution to the fields of policy, small business, and development studies. The research further contributes to the literature concerning policy transfer, policy advocacy, and tax reform in developing nations. For theoreticians, this research may inform design considerations when conducting policy research outside of a pluralist democracy. For practitioners, it may inform efforts to mitigate implementation obstacles in diverse socio‐political contexts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pad.1818 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1994340856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1994340856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-fa2a6b363308e927c64775f2ba43e29b870e15811f46a568decbfca4e72e1db73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1Kw0AUBeBBFKxV8BEGXOgmdWbyM4m7Un-hoAsL7sIkuSPTTjJxbkLtTnwCn9EnMbVuXV24fJwDh5BTziacMXHZqmrCU57ukRFnWRbwRLzskxETkgeCyfiQHCEuGRtwJkfkc1ote-xM80pbZ025oaZuLdTQdKozrqHaqxrWzq-Qaudp45rvj6_W9l5Zgx0tXVOZLcQrOqWlQqDY9dWGOk0XK69MA-dIcci3QDv1_huCtbKWFv3wBsRjcqCVRTj5u2OyuL15nt0H88e7h9l0HpQiC9NAK6GSIkzCkKWQCVkmkZSxFoWKQhBZkUoGPE4511Gi4iStoCx0qSKQAnhVyHBMzna5rXdvPWCXL13vm6Ey51kWhRFL42RQFztVeofoQeetN7Xym5yzfLtwPiycbxceaLCja2Nh86_Ln6bXv_4H6xuAFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1994340856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adjusting policy implementation frameworks for non‐pluralist conditions: A case study of Ukraine's single tax for small business</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</creator><creatorcontrib>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Traditional frameworks for assessing policy implementation have been developed almost exclusively in the context of market‐based, pluralist democracies. This research explores policy processes in more diverse contexts, testing the applicability of existing implementation measurement models in the socio‐political context of a post‐Soviet country. Fieldwork conducted in Ukraine examines the factors affecting implementation of the Simplified Single Tax policy and considers the impact of formal and informal institutions on policy processes and small business conditions. Results include an expanded model for assessing policy implementation in non‐pluralist conditions, an original contribution to the fields of policy, small business, and development studies. The research further contributes to the literature concerning policy transfer, policy advocacy, and tax reform in developing nations. For theoreticians, this research may inform design considerations when conducting policy research outside of a pluralist democracy. For practitioners, it may inform efforts to mitigate implementation obstacles in diverse socio‐political contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-2075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-162X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pad.1818</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Case studies ; Democracy ; Developing countries ; developing nations ; Development policy ; Development studies ; Fieldwork ; implementation frameworks ; informal institutions ; LDCs ; Measurement ; policy advocacy ; Policy analysis ; Policy implementation ; Policy making ; Policy transfer ; Postcommunist societies ; post‐Soviet transition nations ; Research design ; Small business ; small business conditions ; small business policy ; Sociopolitical factors ; tax policy reforms ; Tax reform ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>Public administration and development, 2018-02, Vol.38 (1), p.26-38</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-fa2a6b363308e927c64775f2ba43e29b870e15811f46a568decbfca4e72e1db73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-fa2a6b363308e927c64775f2ba43e29b870e15811f46a568decbfca4e72e1db73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0381-888X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpad.1818$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpad.1818$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27865,27923,27924,30998,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</creatorcontrib><title>Adjusting policy implementation frameworks for non‐pluralist conditions: A case study of Ukraine's single tax for small business</title><title>Public administration and development</title><description>Summary
Traditional frameworks for assessing policy implementation have been developed almost exclusively in the context of market‐based, pluralist democracies. This research explores policy processes in more diverse contexts, testing the applicability of existing implementation measurement models in the socio‐political context of a post‐Soviet country. Fieldwork conducted in Ukraine examines the factors affecting implementation of the Simplified Single Tax policy and considers the impact of formal and informal institutions on policy processes and small business conditions. Results include an expanded model for assessing policy implementation in non‐pluralist conditions, an original contribution to the fields of policy, small business, and development studies. The research further contributes to the literature concerning policy transfer, policy advocacy, and tax reform in developing nations. For theoreticians, this research may inform design considerations when conducting policy research outside of a pluralist democracy. For practitioners, it may inform efforts to mitigate implementation obstacles in diverse socio‐political contexts.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>developing nations</subject><subject>Development policy</subject><subject>Development studies</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>implementation frameworks</subject><subject>informal institutions</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>policy advocacy</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Policy implementation</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Policy transfer</subject><subject>Postcommunist societies</subject><subject>post‐Soviet transition nations</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Small business</subject><subject>small business conditions</subject><subject>small business policy</subject><subject>Sociopolitical factors</subject><subject>tax policy reforms</subject><subject>Tax reform</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>0271-2075</issn><issn>1099-162X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1Kw0AUBeBBFKxV8BEGXOgmdWbyM4m7Un-hoAsL7sIkuSPTTjJxbkLtTnwCn9EnMbVuXV24fJwDh5BTziacMXHZqmrCU57ukRFnWRbwRLzskxETkgeCyfiQHCEuGRtwJkfkc1ote-xM80pbZ025oaZuLdTQdKozrqHaqxrWzq-Qaudp45rvj6_W9l5Zgx0tXVOZLcQrOqWlQqDY9dWGOk0XK69MA-dIcci3QDv1_huCtbKWFv3wBsRjcqCVRTj5u2OyuL15nt0H88e7h9l0HpQiC9NAK6GSIkzCkKWQCVkmkZSxFoWKQhBZkUoGPE4511Gi4iStoCx0qSKQAnhVyHBMzna5rXdvPWCXL13vm6Ey51kWhRFL42RQFztVeofoQeetN7Xym5yzfLtwPiycbxceaLCja2Nh86_Ln6bXv_4H6xuAFg</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0381-888X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Adjusting policy implementation frameworks for non‐pluralist conditions: A case study of Ukraine's single tax for small business</title><author>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-fa2a6b363308e927c64775f2ba43e29b870e15811f46a568decbfca4e72e1db73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>developing nations</topic><topic>Development policy</topic><topic>Development studies</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>implementation frameworks</topic><topic>informal institutions</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>policy advocacy</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Policy implementation</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Policy transfer</topic><topic>Postcommunist societies</topic><topic>post‐Soviet transition nations</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Small business</topic><topic>small business conditions</topic><topic>small business policy</topic><topic>Sociopolitical factors</topic><topic>tax policy reforms</topic><topic>Tax reform</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Public administration and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adjusting policy implementation frameworks for non‐pluralist conditions: A case study of Ukraine's single tax for small business</atitle><jtitle>Public administration and development</jtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>26-38</pages><issn>0271-2075</issn><eissn>1099-162X</eissn><abstract>Summary
Traditional frameworks for assessing policy implementation have been developed almost exclusively in the context of market‐based, pluralist democracies. This research explores policy processes in more diverse contexts, testing the applicability of existing implementation measurement models in the socio‐political context of a post‐Soviet country. Fieldwork conducted in Ukraine examines the factors affecting implementation of the Simplified Single Tax policy and considers the impact of formal and informal institutions on policy processes and small business conditions. Results include an expanded model for assessing policy implementation in non‐pluralist conditions, an original contribution to the fields of policy, small business, and development studies. The research further contributes to the literature concerning policy transfer, policy advocacy, and tax reform in developing nations. For theoreticians, this research may inform design considerations when conducting policy research outside of a pluralist democracy. For practitioners, it may inform efforts to mitigate implementation obstacles in diverse socio‐political contexts.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pad.1818</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0381-888X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0271-2075 |
ispartof | Public administration and development, 2018-02, Vol.38 (1), p.26-38 |
issn | 0271-2075 1099-162X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1994340856 |
source | PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Advocacy Case studies Democracy Developing countries developing nations Development policy Development studies Fieldwork implementation frameworks informal institutions LDCs Measurement policy advocacy Policy analysis Policy implementation Policy making Policy transfer Postcommunist societies post‐Soviet transition nations Research design Small business small business conditions small business policy Sociopolitical factors tax policy reforms Tax reform Taxation |
title | Adjusting policy implementation frameworks for non‐pluralist conditions: A case study of Ukraine's single tax for small business |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A25%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adjusting%20policy%20implementation%20frameworks%20for%20non%E2%80%90pluralist%20conditions:%20A%20case%20study%20of%20Ukraine's%20single%20tax%20for%20small%20business&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20and%20development&rft.au=Fischer%E2%80%90Smith,%20Ruth&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=26-38&rft.issn=0271-2075&rft.eissn=1099-162X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pad.1818&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1994340856%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1994340856&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |