Adjusting policy implementation frameworks for non‐pluralist conditions: A case study of Ukraine's single tax for small business

Summary Traditional frameworks for assessing policy implementation have been developed almost exclusively in the context of market‐based, pluralist democracies. This research explores policy processes in more diverse contexts, testing the applicability of existing implementation measurement models i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public administration and development 2018-02, Vol.38 (1), p.26-38
1. Verfasser: Fischer‐Smith, Ruth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 38
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Public administration and development
container_volume 38
creator Fischer‐Smith, Ruth
description Summary Traditional frameworks for assessing policy implementation have been developed almost exclusively in the context of market‐based, pluralist democracies. This research explores policy processes in more diverse contexts, testing the applicability of existing implementation measurement models in the socio‐political context of a post‐Soviet country. Fieldwork conducted in Ukraine examines the factors affecting implementation of the Simplified Single Tax policy and considers the impact of formal and informal institutions on policy processes and small business conditions. Results include an expanded model for assessing policy implementation in non‐pluralist conditions, an original contribution to the fields of policy, small business, and development studies. The research further contributes to the literature concerning policy transfer, policy advocacy, and tax reform in developing nations. For theoreticians, this research may inform design considerations when conducting policy research outside of a pluralist democracy. For practitioners, it may inform efforts to mitigate implementation obstacles in diverse socio‐political contexts.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pad.1818
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1994340856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1994340856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-fa2a6b363308e927c64775f2ba43e29b870e15811f46a568decbfca4e72e1db73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1Kw0AUBeBBFKxV8BEGXOgmdWbyM4m7Un-hoAsL7sIkuSPTTjJxbkLtTnwCn9EnMbVuXV24fJwDh5BTziacMXHZqmrCU57ukRFnWRbwRLzskxETkgeCyfiQHCEuGRtwJkfkc1ote-xM80pbZ025oaZuLdTQdKozrqHaqxrWzq-Qaudp45rvj6_W9l5Zgx0tXVOZLcQrOqWlQqDY9dWGOk0XK69MA-dIcci3QDv1_huCtbKWFv3wBsRjcqCVRTj5u2OyuL15nt0H88e7h9l0HpQiC9NAK6GSIkzCkKWQCVkmkZSxFoWKQhBZkUoGPE4511Gi4iStoCx0qSKQAnhVyHBMzna5rXdvPWCXL13vm6Ey51kWhRFL42RQFztVeofoQeetN7Xym5yzfLtwPiycbxceaLCja2Nh86_Ln6bXv_4H6xuAFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1994340856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adjusting policy implementation frameworks for non‐pluralist conditions: A case study of Ukraine's single tax for small business</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</creator><creatorcontrib>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Traditional frameworks for assessing policy implementation have been developed almost exclusively in the context of market‐based, pluralist democracies. This research explores policy processes in more diverse contexts, testing the applicability of existing implementation measurement models in the socio‐political context of a post‐Soviet country. Fieldwork conducted in Ukraine examines the factors affecting implementation of the Simplified Single Tax policy and considers the impact of formal and informal institutions on policy processes and small business conditions. Results include an expanded model for assessing policy implementation in non‐pluralist conditions, an original contribution to the fields of policy, small business, and development studies. The research further contributes to the literature concerning policy transfer, policy advocacy, and tax reform in developing nations. For theoreticians, this research may inform design considerations when conducting policy research outside of a pluralist democracy. For practitioners, it may inform efforts to mitigate implementation obstacles in diverse socio‐political contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-2075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-162X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pad.1818</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Case studies ; Democracy ; Developing countries ; developing nations ; Development policy ; Development studies ; Fieldwork ; implementation frameworks ; informal institutions ; LDCs ; Measurement ; policy advocacy ; Policy analysis ; Policy implementation ; Policy making ; Policy transfer ; Postcommunist societies ; post‐Soviet transition nations ; Research design ; Small business ; small business conditions ; small business policy ; Sociopolitical factors ; tax policy reforms ; Tax reform ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>Public administration and development, 2018-02, Vol.38 (1), p.26-38</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-fa2a6b363308e927c64775f2ba43e29b870e15811f46a568decbfca4e72e1db73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-fa2a6b363308e927c64775f2ba43e29b870e15811f46a568decbfca4e72e1db73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0381-888X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpad.1818$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpad.1818$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27865,27923,27924,30998,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</creatorcontrib><title>Adjusting policy implementation frameworks for non‐pluralist conditions: A case study of Ukraine's single tax for small business</title><title>Public administration and development</title><description>Summary Traditional frameworks for assessing policy implementation have been developed almost exclusively in the context of market‐based, pluralist democracies. This research explores policy processes in more diverse contexts, testing the applicability of existing implementation measurement models in the socio‐political context of a post‐Soviet country. Fieldwork conducted in Ukraine examines the factors affecting implementation of the Simplified Single Tax policy and considers the impact of formal and informal institutions on policy processes and small business conditions. Results include an expanded model for assessing policy implementation in non‐pluralist conditions, an original contribution to the fields of policy, small business, and development studies. The research further contributes to the literature concerning policy transfer, policy advocacy, and tax reform in developing nations. For theoreticians, this research may inform design considerations when conducting policy research outside of a pluralist democracy. For practitioners, it may inform efforts to mitigate implementation obstacles in diverse socio‐political contexts.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>developing nations</subject><subject>Development policy</subject><subject>Development studies</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>implementation frameworks</subject><subject>informal institutions</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>policy advocacy</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Policy implementation</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Policy transfer</subject><subject>Postcommunist societies</subject><subject>post‐Soviet transition nations</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Small business</subject><subject>small business conditions</subject><subject>small business policy</subject><subject>Sociopolitical factors</subject><subject>tax policy reforms</subject><subject>Tax reform</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>0271-2075</issn><issn>1099-162X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1Kw0AUBeBBFKxV8BEGXOgmdWbyM4m7Un-hoAsL7sIkuSPTTjJxbkLtTnwCn9EnMbVuXV24fJwDh5BTziacMXHZqmrCU57ukRFnWRbwRLzskxETkgeCyfiQHCEuGRtwJkfkc1ote-xM80pbZ025oaZuLdTQdKozrqHaqxrWzq-Qaudp45rvj6_W9l5Zgx0tXVOZLcQrOqWlQqDY9dWGOk0XK69MA-dIcci3QDv1_huCtbKWFv3wBsRjcqCVRTj5u2OyuL15nt0H88e7h9l0HpQiC9NAK6GSIkzCkKWQCVkmkZSxFoWKQhBZkUoGPE4511Gi4iStoCx0qSKQAnhVyHBMzna5rXdvPWCXL13vm6Ey51kWhRFL42RQFztVeofoQeetN7Xym5yzfLtwPiycbxceaLCja2Nh86_Ln6bXv_4H6xuAFg</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0381-888X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Adjusting policy implementation frameworks for non‐pluralist conditions: A case study of Ukraine's single tax for small business</title><author>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2938-fa2a6b363308e927c64775f2ba43e29b870e15811f46a568decbfca4e72e1db73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>developing nations</topic><topic>Development policy</topic><topic>Development studies</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>implementation frameworks</topic><topic>informal institutions</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>policy advocacy</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Policy implementation</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Policy transfer</topic><topic>Postcommunist societies</topic><topic>post‐Soviet transition nations</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Small business</topic><topic>small business conditions</topic><topic>small business policy</topic><topic>Sociopolitical factors</topic><topic>tax policy reforms</topic><topic>Tax reform</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Public administration and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fischer‐Smith, Ruth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adjusting policy implementation frameworks for non‐pluralist conditions: A case study of Ukraine's single tax for small business</atitle><jtitle>Public administration and development</jtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>26-38</pages><issn>0271-2075</issn><eissn>1099-162X</eissn><abstract>Summary Traditional frameworks for assessing policy implementation have been developed almost exclusively in the context of market‐based, pluralist democracies. This research explores policy processes in more diverse contexts, testing the applicability of existing implementation measurement models in the socio‐political context of a post‐Soviet country. Fieldwork conducted in Ukraine examines the factors affecting implementation of the Simplified Single Tax policy and considers the impact of formal and informal institutions on policy processes and small business conditions. Results include an expanded model for assessing policy implementation in non‐pluralist conditions, an original contribution to the fields of policy, small business, and development studies. The research further contributes to the literature concerning policy transfer, policy advocacy, and tax reform in developing nations. For theoreticians, this research may inform design considerations when conducting policy research outside of a pluralist democracy. For practitioners, it may inform efforts to mitigate implementation obstacles in diverse socio‐political contexts.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pad.1818</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0381-888X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0271-2075
ispartof Public administration and development, 2018-02, Vol.38 (1), p.26-38
issn 0271-2075
1099-162X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1994340856
source PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Advocacy
Case studies
Democracy
Developing countries
developing nations
Development policy
Development studies
Fieldwork
implementation frameworks
informal institutions
LDCs
Measurement
policy advocacy
Policy analysis
Policy implementation
Policy making
Policy transfer
Postcommunist societies
post‐Soviet transition nations
Research design
Small business
small business conditions
small business policy
Sociopolitical factors
tax policy reforms
Tax reform
Taxation
title Adjusting policy implementation frameworks for non‐pluralist conditions: A case study of Ukraine's single tax for small business
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A25%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adjusting%20policy%20implementation%20frameworks%20for%20non%E2%80%90pluralist%20conditions:%20A%20case%20study%20of%20Ukraine's%20single%20tax%20for%20small%20business&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20and%20development&rft.au=Fischer%E2%80%90Smith,%20Ruth&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=26-38&rft.issn=0271-2075&rft.eissn=1099-162X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pad.1818&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1994340856%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1994340856&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true