Alternatives to full listing for second stage sampling: Methods and implications
International best practice on survey design recommends using a complete listing to develop the second-stage sampling frame for a household survey. In certain contexts, though, this approach may not be practical or possible due to concerns ranging from cost to security. This paper focuses specifical...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Statistical journal of the IAOS 2017, Vol.33 (3), p.701-718 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 718 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 701 |
container_title | Statistical journal of the IAOS |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Himelein, Kristen Eckman, Stephanie Murray, Siobhan Bauer, Johannes |
description | International best practice on survey design recommends using a complete listing to develop the second-stage sampling frame for a household survey. In certain contexts, though, this approach may not be practical or possible due to concerns ranging from cost to security. This paper focuses specifically on security constraints encountered during the planning of a survey in Mogadishu, Somalia. The paper develops an artificial census for three neighborhoods based on data from the Mogadishu High Frequency Survey. Simulation models are then used to select individual dwellings to examine the implications of the choice of second stage selection methodology on bias and variance. Among the other findings, the simulations show that the bias introduced by a random walk design leads to the underestimation of the number of households in poverty by approximately 10 percent, with unweighted random point selection design leading to overestimation of a similar magnitude. The paper also discusses the time required and technical complexity of the associated back-office preparation work and weight calculations for each method. The paper concludes by considering practicality of each method, including the ease of implementation and options for remote verification, and outlines areas for future research and pilot testing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3233/SJI-160341 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1994004274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1994004274</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-abc9f9200c1a33f7e07b45a6e6e66f17e3d5e427a92e4fdacf34aedd8e03ccb03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsXP0HAm7CabJJN460U_1QqCuo5pNlJ3ZJu6k4q-O2NVuYww7w3D-ZHyDlnV6IW4vr1cV7xhgnJD8iIT7SqTK3k4d8sK90odUxOENeMKaOlHJGXacww9C53X4A0Jxp2MdLYYe76FQ1poAg-9S3F7FZA0W22sSg39AnyR2qRuqJ1v0tfMlKPp-QouIhw9t_H5P3u9m32UC2e7-ez6aLyXMtcuaU3wdSMee6ECBqYXkrlGijVBK5BtApkrZ2pQYbW-SCkg7adABPeL5kYk4t97nZInzvAbNdpVx6JaLkxkrFyLIvrcu_yQ0IcINjt0G3c8G05s7_EbCFm98TED696XzY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1994004274</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alternatives to full listing for second stage sampling: Methods and implications</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Himelein, Kristen ; Eckman, Stephanie ; Murray, Siobhan ; Bauer, Johannes</creator><creatorcontrib>Himelein, Kristen ; Eckman, Stephanie ; Murray, Siobhan ; Bauer, Johannes</creatorcontrib><description>International best practice on survey design recommends using a complete listing to develop the second-stage sampling frame for a household survey. In certain contexts, though, this approach may not be practical or possible due to concerns ranging from cost to security. This paper focuses specifically on security constraints encountered during the planning of a survey in Mogadishu, Somalia. The paper develops an artificial census for three neighborhoods based on data from the Mogadishu High Frequency Survey. Simulation models are then used to select individual dwellings to examine the implications of the choice of second stage selection methodology on bias and variance. Among the other findings, the simulations show that the bias introduced by a random walk design leads to the underestimation of the number of households in poverty by approximately 10 percent, with unweighted random point selection design leading to overestimation of a similar magnitude. The paper also discusses the time required and technical complexity of the associated back-office preparation work and weight calculations for each method. The paper concludes by considering practicality of each method, including the ease of implementation and options for remote verification, and outlines areas for future research and pilot testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1874-7655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-9254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3233/SJI-160341</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: IOS Press BV</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Bias ; Computer simulation ; Dwellings ; Households ; Random walk ; Sampling methods ; Security ; Three dimensional models</subject><ispartof>Statistical journal of the IAOS, 2017, Vol.33 (3), p.701-718</ispartof><rights>Copyright IOS Press BV 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-abc9f9200c1a33f7e07b45a6e6e66f17e3d5e427a92e4fdacf34aedd8e03ccb03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-abc9f9200c1a33f7e07b45a6e6e66f17e3d5e427a92e4fdacf34aedd8e03ccb03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Himelein, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckman, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Siobhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Johannes</creatorcontrib><title>Alternatives to full listing for second stage sampling: Methods and implications</title><title>Statistical journal of the IAOS</title><description>International best practice on survey design recommends using a complete listing to develop the second-stage sampling frame for a household survey. In certain contexts, though, this approach may not be practical or possible due to concerns ranging from cost to security. This paper focuses specifically on security constraints encountered during the planning of a survey in Mogadishu, Somalia. The paper develops an artificial census for three neighborhoods based on data from the Mogadishu High Frequency Survey. Simulation models are then used to select individual dwellings to examine the implications of the choice of second stage selection methodology on bias and variance. Among the other findings, the simulations show that the bias introduced by a random walk design leads to the underestimation of the number of households in poverty by approximately 10 percent, with unweighted random point selection design leading to overestimation of a similar magnitude. The paper also discusses the time required and technical complexity of the associated back-office preparation work and weight calculations for each method. The paper concludes by considering practicality of each method, including the ease of implementation and options for remote verification, and outlines areas for future research and pilot testing.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Dwellings</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Random walk</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><issn>1874-7655</issn><issn>1875-9254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsXP0HAm7CabJJN460U_1QqCuo5pNlJ3ZJu6k4q-O2NVuYww7w3D-ZHyDlnV6IW4vr1cV7xhgnJD8iIT7SqTK3k4d8sK90odUxOENeMKaOlHJGXacww9C53X4A0Jxp2MdLYYe76FQ1poAg-9S3F7FZA0W22sSg39AnyR2qRuqJ1v0tfMlKPp-QouIhw9t_H5P3u9m32UC2e7-ez6aLyXMtcuaU3wdSMee6ECBqYXkrlGijVBK5BtApkrZ2pQYbW-SCkg7adABPeL5kYk4t97nZInzvAbNdpVx6JaLkxkrFyLIvrcu_yQ0IcINjt0G3c8G05s7_EbCFm98TED696XzY</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Himelein, Kristen</creator><creator>Eckman, Stephanie</creator><creator>Murray, Siobhan</creator><creator>Bauer, Johannes</creator><general>IOS Press BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Alternatives to full listing for second stage sampling: Methods and implications</title><author>Himelein, Kristen ; Eckman, Stephanie ; Murray, Siobhan ; Bauer, Johannes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c174t-abc9f9200c1a33f7e07b45a6e6e66f17e3d5e427a92e4fdacf34aedd8e03ccb03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Dwellings</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Random walk</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Himelein, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckman, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Siobhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Johannes</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Statistical journal of the IAOS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Himelein, Kristen</au><au>Eckman, Stephanie</au><au>Murray, Siobhan</au><au>Bauer, Johannes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alternatives to full listing for second stage sampling: Methods and implications</atitle><jtitle>Statistical journal of the IAOS</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>701</spage><epage>718</epage><pages>701-718</pages><issn>1874-7655</issn><eissn>1875-9254</eissn><abstract>International best practice on survey design recommends using a complete listing to develop the second-stage sampling frame for a household survey. In certain contexts, though, this approach may not be practical or possible due to concerns ranging from cost to security. This paper focuses specifically on security constraints encountered during the planning of a survey in Mogadishu, Somalia. The paper develops an artificial census for three neighborhoods based on data from the Mogadishu High Frequency Survey. Simulation models are then used to select individual dwellings to examine the implications of the choice of second stage selection methodology on bias and variance. Among the other findings, the simulations show that the bias introduced by a random walk design leads to the underestimation of the number of households in poverty by approximately 10 percent, with unweighted random point selection design leading to overestimation of a similar magnitude. The paper also discusses the time required and technical complexity of the associated back-office preparation work and weight calculations for each method. The paper concludes by considering practicality of each method, including the ease of implementation and options for remote verification, and outlines areas for future research and pilot testing.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>IOS Press BV</pub><doi>10.3233/SJI-160341</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1874-7655 |
ispartof | Statistical journal of the IAOS, 2017, Vol.33 (3), p.701-718 |
issn | 1874-7655 1875-9254 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1994004274 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Best practice Bias Computer simulation Dwellings Households Random walk Sampling methods Security Three dimensional models |
title | Alternatives to full listing for second stage sampling: Methods and implications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A57%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alternatives%20to%20full%20listing%20for%20second%20stage%20sampling:%20Methods%20and%20implications&rft.jtitle=Statistical%20journal%20of%20the%20IAOS&rft.au=Himelein,%20Kristen&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=701&rft.epage=718&rft.pages=701-718&rft.issn=1874-7655&rft.eissn=1875-9254&rft_id=info:doi/10.3233/SJI-160341&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1994004274%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1994004274&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |