A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers
Purpose E-learning has gained much focus from educators and researchers, with many extolling e-learning over traditional learning. Despite this focus, implementation of e-learning systems often fails. The purpose of this paper is to consider a range of barriers, impacting the success of e-learning i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Information technology & people (West Linn, Or.) Or.), 2018-01, Vol.31 (1), p.156-180 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 180 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 156 |
container_title | Information technology & people (West Linn, Or.) |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Ali, Samnan Uppal, M. Amaad Gulliver, Stephen R |
description | Purpose
E-learning has gained much focus from educators and researchers, with many extolling e-learning over traditional learning. Despite this focus, implementation of e-learning systems often fails. The purpose of this paper is to consider a range of barriers, impacting the success of e-learning implementations, yet to the best of the authors’ knowledge no conceptual framework is able to consolidate existing research.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper undertook an in-depth review of literature concerning e-learning implementation barriers. Papers were extracted from established peer-reviewed journals and open sources. Articles not related to e-learning implementation barriers were discarded. A total of 259 papers were identified, published between 1990 and 2016. Hermeneutics and data-driven qualitative content analysis was used to define 68 unique barriers.
Findings
The 68 unique barriers were thematically grouped into four conceptual categories, i.e. Technology (T), Individual (I), Pedagogy (P), and Enabling Conditions (EC). These four categories led to the conceptualization of “TIPEC” framework, which highlights the key concepts hindering e-learning implementation and delivery. Results show that most articles only consider a narrow range of success barriers.
Practical implications
The proposed TIPEC framework acts as a guide for education practitioners, system developers, policy makers, and researchers. It provides stakeholders with a summary of e-learning barriers.
Originality/value
This paper fulfils an identified need for a conceptual framework that consolidates all current research related to e-learning implementation barriers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0246 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1993972225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993972225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-fb16d2095d4257f8e2c05c7352d95c22dd66d1a2455729cf55c30ebb21dcb8c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0ZiNvWd4yQeq4pCpUowlNlybKdNyRd2KsR_j6OyIDGc7g3v3cePkHtgjwCsWGx2bxQYRQYZZZhmF2QGuSioKIBfkhmTQlJepOKa3IRwZNEmGMzIepmYvjNuGE-6SSqvW_fV-4_kUO8PTayx7vaJo43Tvptk3Q6Na1036rHuu6TU3tfOh1tyVekmuLvfPifv66fd6oVuX583q-WWGg4w0qqEzGK8xaYo8qpwaJgwORdopTCI1maZBY2pEDlKUwlhOHNliWBNWZiUz8nDee7g-8-TC6M69iffxZUKpOQyR0QRXezsMr4PwbtKDb5utf9WwNRES0Vak55oqYlWjCzOkfic1439L_GHL_8Bh1JrUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993972225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Ali, Samnan ; Uppal, M. Amaad ; Gulliver, Stephen R</creator><creatorcontrib>Ali, Samnan ; Uppal, M. Amaad ; Gulliver, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
E-learning has gained much focus from educators and researchers, with many extolling e-learning over traditional learning. Despite this focus, implementation of e-learning systems often fails. The purpose of this paper is to consider a range of barriers, impacting the success of e-learning implementations, yet to the best of the authors’ knowledge no conceptual framework is able to consolidate existing research.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper undertook an in-depth review of literature concerning e-learning implementation barriers. Papers were extracted from established peer-reviewed journals and open sources. Articles not related to e-learning implementation barriers were discarded. A total of 259 papers were identified, published between 1990 and 2016. Hermeneutics and data-driven qualitative content analysis was used to define 68 unique barriers.
Findings
The 68 unique barriers were thematically grouped into four conceptual categories, i.e. Technology (T), Individual (I), Pedagogy (P), and Enabling Conditions (EC). These four categories led to the conceptualization of “TIPEC” framework, which highlights the key concepts hindering e-learning implementation and delivery. Results show that most articles only consider a narrow range of success barriers.
Practical implications
The proposed TIPEC framework acts as a guide for education practitioners, system developers, policy makers, and researchers. It provides stakeholders with a summary of e-learning barriers.
Originality/value
This paper fulfils an identified need for a conceptual framework that consolidates all current research related to e-learning implementation barriers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-3845</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>West Linn: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Administrative support ; Barriers ; Concepts ; Consolidation ; Content analysis ; Distance learning ; Exegesis & hermeneutics ; Higher education ; Implementation ; Informatics ; Information technology ; Internet ; Literature reviews ; Localization ; Online instruction ; Pedagogy ; Policy making ; Qualitative analysis ; Success ; Systems development ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching methods ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Information technology & people (West Linn, Or.), 2018-01, Vol.31 (1), p.156-180</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-fb16d2095d4257f8e2c05c7352d95c22dd66d1a2455729cf55c30ebb21dcb8c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-fb16d2095d4257f8e2c05c7352d95c22dd66d1a2455729cf55c30ebb21dcb8c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0246/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11616,27903,27904,52667</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ali, Samnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uppal, M. Amaad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulliver, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><title>A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers</title><title>Information technology & people (West Linn, Or.)</title><description>Purpose
E-learning has gained much focus from educators and researchers, with many extolling e-learning over traditional learning. Despite this focus, implementation of e-learning systems often fails. The purpose of this paper is to consider a range of barriers, impacting the success of e-learning implementations, yet to the best of the authors’ knowledge no conceptual framework is able to consolidate existing research.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper undertook an in-depth review of literature concerning e-learning implementation barriers. Papers were extracted from established peer-reviewed journals and open sources. Articles not related to e-learning implementation barriers were discarded. A total of 259 papers were identified, published between 1990 and 2016. Hermeneutics and data-driven qualitative content analysis was used to define 68 unique barriers.
Findings
The 68 unique barriers were thematically grouped into four conceptual categories, i.e. Technology (T), Individual (I), Pedagogy (P), and Enabling Conditions (EC). These four categories led to the conceptualization of “TIPEC” framework, which highlights the key concepts hindering e-learning implementation and delivery. Results show that most articles only consider a narrow range of success barriers.
Practical implications
The proposed TIPEC framework acts as a guide for education practitioners, system developers, policy makers, and researchers. It provides stakeholders with a summary of e-learning barriers.
Originality/value
This paper fulfils an identified need for a conceptual framework that consolidates all current research related to e-learning implementation barriers.</description><subject>Administrative support</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Concepts</subject><subject>Consolidation</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Exegesis & hermeneutics</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Informatics</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Systems development</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0959-3845</issn><issn>1758-5813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0ZiNvWd4yQeq4pCpUowlNlybKdNyRd2KsR_j6OyIDGc7g3v3cePkHtgjwCsWGx2bxQYRQYZZZhmF2QGuSioKIBfkhmTQlJepOKa3IRwZNEmGMzIepmYvjNuGE-6SSqvW_fV-4_kUO8PTayx7vaJo43Tvptk3Q6Na1036rHuu6TU3tfOh1tyVekmuLvfPifv66fd6oVuX583q-WWGg4w0qqEzGK8xaYo8qpwaJgwORdopTCI1maZBY2pEDlKUwlhOHNliWBNWZiUz8nDee7g-8-TC6M69iffxZUKpOQyR0QRXezsMr4PwbtKDb5utf9WwNRES0Vak55oqYlWjCzOkfic1439L_GHL_8Bh1JrUw</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Ali, Samnan</creator><creator>Uppal, M. Amaad</creator><creator>Gulliver, Stephen R</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers</title><author>Ali, Samnan ; Uppal, M. Amaad ; Gulliver, Stephen R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-fb16d2095d4257f8e2c05c7352d95c22dd66d1a2455729cf55c30ebb21dcb8c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Administrative support</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Concepts</topic><topic>Consolidation</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Exegesis & hermeneutics</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Informatics</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Systems development</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ali, Samnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uppal, M. Amaad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulliver, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Information technology & people (West Linn, Or.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ali, Samnan</au><au>Uppal, M. Amaad</au><au>Gulliver, Stephen R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers</atitle><jtitle>Information technology & people (West Linn, Or.)</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>156-180</pages><issn>0959-3845</issn><eissn>1758-5813</eissn><abstract>Purpose
E-learning has gained much focus from educators and researchers, with many extolling e-learning over traditional learning. Despite this focus, implementation of e-learning systems often fails. The purpose of this paper is to consider a range of barriers, impacting the success of e-learning implementations, yet to the best of the authors’ knowledge no conceptual framework is able to consolidate existing research.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper undertook an in-depth review of literature concerning e-learning implementation barriers. Papers were extracted from established peer-reviewed journals and open sources. Articles not related to e-learning implementation barriers were discarded. A total of 259 papers were identified, published between 1990 and 2016. Hermeneutics and data-driven qualitative content analysis was used to define 68 unique barriers.
Findings
The 68 unique barriers were thematically grouped into four conceptual categories, i.e. Technology (T), Individual (I), Pedagogy (P), and Enabling Conditions (EC). These four categories led to the conceptualization of “TIPEC” framework, which highlights the key concepts hindering e-learning implementation and delivery. Results show that most articles only consider a narrow range of success barriers.
Practical implications
The proposed TIPEC framework acts as a guide for education practitioners, system developers, policy makers, and researchers. It provides stakeholders with a summary of e-learning barriers.
Originality/value
This paper fulfils an identified need for a conceptual framework that consolidates all current research related to e-learning implementation barriers.</abstract><cop>West Linn</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0246</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-3845 |
ispartof | Information technology & people (West Linn, Or.), 2018-01, Vol.31 (1), p.156-180 |
issn | 0959-3845 1758-5813 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1993972225 |
source | Emerald Journals |
subjects | Administrative support Barriers Concepts Consolidation Content analysis Distance learning Exegesis & hermeneutics Higher education Implementation Informatics Information technology Internet Literature reviews Localization Online instruction Pedagogy Policy making Qualitative analysis Success Systems development Teachers Teaching Teaching methods Technology |
title | A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A03%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20conceptual%20framework%20highlighting%20e-learning%20implementation%20barriers&rft.jtitle=Information%20technology%20&%20people%20(West%20Linn,%20Or.)&rft.au=Ali,%20Samnan&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=156-180&rft.issn=0959-3845&rft.eissn=1758-5813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0246&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E1993972225%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993972225&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |