A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers

Purpose E-learning has gained much focus from educators and researchers, with many extolling e-learning over traditional learning. Despite this focus, implementation of e-learning systems often fails. The purpose of this paper is to consider a range of barriers, impacting the success of e-learning i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Information technology & people (West Linn, Or.) Or.), 2018-01, Vol.31 (1), p.156-180
Hauptverfasser: Ali, Samnan, Uppal, M. Amaad, Gulliver, Stephen R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 180
container_issue 1
container_start_page 156
container_title Information technology & people (West Linn, Or.)
container_volume 31
creator Ali, Samnan
Uppal, M. Amaad
Gulliver, Stephen R
description Purpose E-learning has gained much focus from educators and researchers, with many extolling e-learning over traditional learning. Despite this focus, implementation of e-learning systems often fails. The purpose of this paper is to consider a range of barriers, impacting the success of e-learning implementations, yet to the best of the authors’ knowledge no conceptual framework is able to consolidate existing research. Design/methodology/approach This paper undertook an in-depth review of literature concerning e-learning implementation barriers. Papers were extracted from established peer-reviewed journals and open sources. Articles not related to e-learning implementation barriers were discarded. A total of 259 papers were identified, published between 1990 and 2016. Hermeneutics and data-driven qualitative content analysis was used to define 68 unique barriers. Findings The 68 unique barriers were thematically grouped into four conceptual categories, i.e. Technology (T), Individual (I), Pedagogy (P), and Enabling Conditions (EC). These four categories led to the conceptualization of “TIPEC” framework, which highlights the key concepts hindering e-learning implementation and delivery. Results show that most articles only consider a narrow range of success barriers. Practical implications The proposed TIPEC framework acts as a guide for education practitioners, system developers, policy makers, and researchers. It provides stakeholders with a summary of e-learning barriers. Originality/value This paper fulfils an identified need for a conceptual framework that consolidates all current research related to e-learning implementation barriers.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0246
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1993972225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993972225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-fb16d2095d4257f8e2c05c7352d95c22dd66d1a2455729cf55c30ebb21dcb8c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0ZiNvWd4yQeq4pCpUowlNlybKdNyRd2KsR_j6OyIDGc7g3v3cePkHtgjwCsWGx2bxQYRQYZZZhmF2QGuSioKIBfkhmTQlJepOKa3IRwZNEmGMzIepmYvjNuGE-6SSqvW_fV-4_kUO8PTayx7vaJo43Tvptk3Q6Na1036rHuu6TU3tfOh1tyVekmuLvfPifv66fd6oVuX583q-WWGg4w0qqEzGK8xaYo8qpwaJgwORdopTCI1maZBY2pEDlKUwlhOHNliWBNWZiUz8nDee7g-8-TC6M69iffxZUKpOQyR0QRXezsMr4PwbtKDb5utf9WwNRES0Vak55oqYlWjCzOkfic1439L_GHL_8Bh1JrUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993972225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><creator>Ali, Samnan ; Uppal, M. Amaad ; Gulliver, Stephen R</creator><creatorcontrib>Ali, Samnan ; Uppal, M. Amaad ; Gulliver, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose E-learning has gained much focus from educators and researchers, with many extolling e-learning over traditional learning. Despite this focus, implementation of e-learning systems often fails. The purpose of this paper is to consider a range of barriers, impacting the success of e-learning implementations, yet to the best of the authors’ knowledge no conceptual framework is able to consolidate existing research. Design/methodology/approach This paper undertook an in-depth review of literature concerning e-learning implementation barriers. Papers were extracted from established peer-reviewed journals and open sources. Articles not related to e-learning implementation barriers were discarded. A total of 259 papers were identified, published between 1990 and 2016. Hermeneutics and data-driven qualitative content analysis was used to define 68 unique barriers. Findings The 68 unique barriers were thematically grouped into four conceptual categories, i.e. Technology (T), Individual (I), Pedagogy (P), and Enabling Conditions (EC). These four categories led to the conceptualization of “TIPEC” framework, which highlights the key concepts hindering e-learning implementation and delivery. Results show that most articles only consider a narrow range of success barriers. Practical implications The proposed TIPEC framework acts as a guide for education practitioners, system developers, policy makers, and researchers. It provides stakeholders with a summary of e-learning barriers. Originality/value This paper fulfils an identified need for a conceptual framework that consolidates all current research related to e-learning implementation barriers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-3845</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>West Linn: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Administrative support ; Barriers ; Concepts ; Consolidation ; Content analysis ; Distance learning ; Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics ; Higher education ; Implementation ; Informatics ; Information technology ; Internet ; Literature reviews ; Localization ; Online instruction ; Pedagogy ; Policy making ; Qualitative analysis ; Success ; Systems development ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching methods ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Information technology &amp; people (West Linn, Or.), 2018-01, Vol.31 (1), p.156-180</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-fb16d2095d4257f8e2c05c7352d95c22dd66d1a2455729cf55c30ebb21dcb8c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-fb16d2095d4257f8e2c05c7352d95c22dd66d1a2455729cf55c30ebb21dcb8c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0246/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11616,27903,27904,52667</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ali, Samnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uppal, M. Amaad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulliver, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><title>A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers</title><title>Information technology &amp; people (West Linn, Or.)</title><description>Purpose E-learning has gained much focus from educators and researchers, with many extolling e-learning over traditional learning. Despite this focus, implementation of e-learning systems often fails. The purpose of this paper is to consider a range of barriers, impacting the success of e-learning implementations, yet to the best of the authors’ knowledge no conceptual framework is able to consolidate existing research. Design/methodology/approach This paper undertook an in-depth review of literature concerning e-learning implementation barriers. Papers were extracted from established peer-reviewed journals and open sources. Articles not related to e-learning implementation barriers were discarded. A total of 259 papers were identified, published between 1990 and 2016. Hermeneutics and data-driven qualitative content analysis was used to define 68 unique barriers. Findings The 68 unique barriers were thematically grouped into four conceptual categories, i.e. Technology (T), Individual (I), Pedagogy (P), and Enabling Conditions (EC). These four categories led to the conceptualization of “TIPEC” framework, which highlights the key concepts hindering e-learning implementation and delivery. Results show that most articles only consider a narrow range of success barriers. Practical implications The proposed TIPEC framework acts as a guide for education practitioners, system developers, policy makers, and researchers. It provides stakeholders with a summary of e-learning barriers. Originality/value This paper fulfils an identified need for a conceptual framework that consolidates all current research related to e-learning implementation barriers.</description><subject>Administrative support</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Concepts</subject><subject>Consolidation</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Informatics</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Systems development</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0959-3845</issn><issn>1758-5813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0ZiNvWd4yQeq4pCpUowlNlybKdNyRd2KsR_j6OyIDGc7g3v3cePkHtgjwCsWGx2bxQYRQYZZZhmF2QGuSioKIBfkhmTQlJepOKa3IRwZNEmGMzIepmYvjNuGE-6SSqvW_fV-4_kUO8PTayx7vaJo43Tvptk3Q6Na1036rHuu6TU3tfOh1tyVekmuLvfPifv66fd6oVuX583q-WWGg4w0qqEzGK8xaYo8qpwaJgwORdopTCI1maZBY2pEDlKUwlhOHNliWBNWZiUz8nDee7g-8-TC6M69iffxZUKpOQyR0QRXezsMr4PwbtKDb5utf9WwNRES0Vak55oqYlWjCzOkfic1439L_GHL_8Bh1JrUw</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Ali, Samnan</creator><creator>Uppal, M. Amaad</creator><creator>Gulliver, Stephen R</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers</title><author>Ali, Samnan ; Uppal, M. Amaad ; Gulliver, Stephen R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-fb16d2095d4257f8e2c05c7352d95c22dd66d1a2455729cf55c30ebb21dcb8c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Administrative support</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Concepts</topic><topic>Consolidation</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Informatics</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Systems development</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ali, Samnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uppal, M. Amaad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulliver, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Information technology &amp; people (West Linn, Or.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ali, Samnan</au><au>Uppal, M. Amaad</au><au>Gulliver, Stephen R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers</atitle><jtitle>Information technology &amp; people (West Linn, Or.)</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>180</epage><pages>156-180</pages><issn>0959-3845</issn><eissn>1758-5813</eissn><abstract>Purpose E-learning has gained much focus from educators and researchers, with many extolling e-learning over traditional learning. Despite this focus, implementation of e-learning systems often fails. The purpose of this paper is to consider a range of barriers, impacting the success of e-learning implementations, yet to the best of the authors’ knowledge no conceptual framework is able to consolidate existing research. Design/methodology/approach This paper undertook an in-depth review of literature concerning e-learning implementation barriers. Papers were extracted from established peer-reviewed journals and open sources. Articles not related to e-learning implementation barriers were discarded. A total of 259 papers were identified, published between 1990 and 2016. Hermeneutics and data-driven qualitative content analysis was used to define 68 unique barriers. Findings The 68 unique barriers were thematically grouped into four conceptual categories, i.e. Technology (T), Individual (I), Pedagogy (P), and Enabling Conditions (EC). These four categories led to the conceptualization of “TIPEC” framework, which highlights the key concepts hindering e-learning implementation and delivery. Results show that most articles only consider a narrow range of success barriers. Practical implications The proposed TIPEC framework acts as a guide for education practitioners, system developers, policy makers, and researchers. It provides stakeholders with a summary of e-learning barriers. Originality/value This paper fulfils an identified need for a conceptual framework that consolidates all current research related to e-learning implementation barriers.</abstract><cop>West Linn</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0246</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-3845
ispartof Information technology & people (West Linn, Or.), 2018-01, Vol.31 (1), p.156-180
issn 0959-3845
1758-5813
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1993972225
source Emerald Journals
subjects Administrative support
Barriers
Concepts
Consolidation
Content analysis
Distance learning
Exegesis & hermeneutics
Higher education
Implementation
Informatics
Information technology
Internet
Literature reviews
Localization
Online instruction
Pedagogy
Policy making
Qualitative analysis
Success
Systems development
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching methods
Technology
title A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A03%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20conceptual%20framework%20highlighting%20e-learning%20implementation%20barriers&rft.jtitle=Information%20technology%20&%20people%20(West%20Linn,%20Or.)&rft.au=Ali,%20Samnan&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=180&rft.pages=156-180&rft.issn=0959-3845&rft.eissn=1758-5813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0246&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E1993972225%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993972225&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true