Effect of formaldehyde antimicrobial feed additive on the immune competence of chickens experimentally infected with a known Newcastle disease virus strain
Thirty-seven percent (37%) formaldehyde- possessing antimicrobial activity has been used in various forms as a fumigant for mould control and as a feed additive for feed preservation. The study evaluated the effects of formaldehyde-treated poultry feed on the immune response of birds to Newcastle di...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative clinical pathology 2018-05, Vol.27 (3), p.679-684 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 684 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 679 |
| container_title | Comparative clinical pathology |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Eze, Didacus Chukwuemeka Eze, Chekwube Paul Okwor, Emmanuel C. Ezema, Chuka Ogbonna, Innocent Okonkwo Omeje, Elijah Obinna Ibu, John O. |
| description | Thirty-seven percent (37%) formaldehyde- possessing antimicrobial activity has been used in various forms as a fumigant for mould control and as a feed additive for feed preservation. The study evaluated the effects of formaldehyde-treated poultry feed on the immune response of birds to Newcastle disease virus (NDV) infection with Kudu 113 strain. A total of 100 chicks were acquired from Zartech Hatchery, Ibadan, Nigeria. They were randomly appropriated into A, B, C and D experimental groups, with each group containing 25 birds. Group A chicks were vaccinated, fed treated feed and infected with ND virus while group B chicks were vaccinated, fed untreated feed and infected with ND virus. Chicks in group C were not vaccinated but fed treated feed and infected with ND virus whereas chicks in group D were not vaccinated, fed untreated feed and infected with ND virus. The data generated were analysed with analysis of variance (ANOVA). Formaldehyde-treated feed had no significant effect on the PCV, antibody response to NDV, organ index and feed intake but significantly affected the body weights of the birds. Formaldehyde, despite the antimicrobial activities, may not prevent infection of Newcastle disease virus infection, when used as a feed additive. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00580-018-2649-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1993434266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993434266</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c183x-9b2ee22df585755ae518943e96c4d65f24812c28bd15748e2056990ef5a557e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFqGzEQhpeSQh23D9DbQM-bStrVWjoW4yYFk1wS6E3I0qiWvat1JTm2n6UvWxmHkEtOMwP__w8zX1V9peSGEjL7ngjhgtSEipp1rayPH6oJ7crEO_776rVv6afqOqUNIZSLpplU_xbOockwOnBjHHRvcX2yCDpkP3gTx5XXPThEC9pan_0zwhggrxH8MOwDghmHHWYMBs8hZu3NFkMCPO4w-gFD1n1_Ah_Oa0rKwec1aNiG8RDgHg9Gp9wjWJ9QJ4RnH_cJUo7ah8_VR6f7hF9e6rR6-rl4nN_Vy4fbX_Mfy9pQ0RxruWKIjFnHBZ9xrpFTIdsGZWda23HHWkGZYWJlKZ-1AhnhnZQEHdecz1A20-rbJXcXx797TFltxn0MZaWiUjZt07KuKyp6UZWnpBTRqV25T8eTokSdGagLA1UYqDMDdSwedvGkog1_ML5Jftf0H8EjjWs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993434266</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of formaldehyde antimicrobial feed additive on the immune competence of chickens experimentally infected with a known Newcastle disease virus strain</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Eze, Didacus Chukwuemeka ; Eze, Chekwube Paul ; Okwor, Emmanuel C. ; Ezema, Chuka ; Ogbonna, Innocent Okonkwo ; Omeje, Elijah Obinna ; Ibu, John O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eze, Didacus Chukwuemeka ; Eze, Chekwube Paul ; Okwor, Emmanuel C. ; Ezema, Chuka ; Ogbonna, Innocent Okonkwo ; Omeje, Elijah Obinna ; Ibu, John O.</creatorcontrib><description>Thirty-seven percent (37%) formaldehyde- possessing antimicrobial activity has been used in various forms as a fumigant for mould control and as a feed additive for feed preservation. The study evaluated the effects of formaldehyde-treated poultry feed on the immune response of birds to Newcastle disease virus (NDV) infection with Kudu 113 strain. A total of 100 chicks were acquired from Zartech Hatchery, Ibadan, Nigeria. They were randomly appropriated into A, B, C and D experimental groups, with each group containing 25 birds. Group A chicks were vaccinated, fed treated feed and infected with ND virus while group B chicks were vaccinated, fed untreated feed and infected with ND virus. Chicks in group C were not vaccinated but fed treated feed and infected with ND virus whereas chicks in group D were not vaccinated, fed untreated feed and infected with ND virus. The data generated were analysed with analysis of variance (ANOVA). Formaldehyde-treated feed had no significant effect on the PCV, antibody response to NDV, organ index and feed intake but significantly affected the body weights of the birds. Formaldehyde, despite the antimicrobial activities, may not prevent infection of Newcastle disease virus infection, when used as a feed additive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-5641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-565X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00580-018-2649-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Animal vaccines ; Antibody response ; Antimicrobial activity ; Antimicrobial agents ; Data processing ; Formaldehyde ; Hematology ; Immune response ; Infections ; Juveniles ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Newcastle disease ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Pathology ; Preservation ; Vaccination ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Comparative clinical pathology, 2018-05, Vol.27 (3), p.679-684</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Comparative Clinical Pathology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c183x-9b2ee22df585755ae518943e96c4d65f24812c28bd15748e2056990ef5a557e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00580-018-2649-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00580-018-2649-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eze, Didacus Chukwuemeka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eze, Chekwube Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okwor, Emmanuel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezema, Chuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogbonna, Innocent Okonkwo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omeje, Elijah Obinna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibu, John O.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of formaldehyde antimicrobial feed additive on the immune competence of chickens experimentally infected with a known Newcastle disease virus strain</title><title>Comparative clinical pathology</title><addtitle>Comp Clin Pathol</addtitle><description>Thirty-seven percent (37%) formaldehyde- possessing antimicrobial activity has been used in various forms as a fumigant for mould control and as a feed additive for feed preservation. The study evaluated the effects of formaldehyde-treated poultry feed on the immune response of birds to Newcastle disease virus (NDV) infection with Kudu 113 strain. A total of 100 chicks were acquired from Zartech Hatchery, Ibadan, Nigeria. They were randomly appropriated into A, B, C and D experimental groups, with each group containing 25 birds. Group A chicks were vaccinated, fed treated feed and infected with ND virus while group B chicks were vaccinated, fed untreated feed and infected with ND virus. Chicks in group C were not vaccinated but fed treated feed and infected with ND virus whereas chicks in group D were not vaccinated, fed untreated feed and infected with ND virus. The data generated were analysed with analysis of variance (ANOVA). Formaldehyde-treated feed had no significant effect on the PCV, antibody response to NDV, organ index and feed intake but significantly affected the body weights of the birds. Formaldehyde, despite the antimicrobial activities, may not prevent infection of Newcastle disease virus infection, when used as a feed additive.</description><subject>Animal vaccines</subject><subject>Antibody response</subject><subject>Antimicrobial activity</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Formaldehyde</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Newcastle disease</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1618-5641</issn><issn>1618-565X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFqGzEQhpeSQh23D9DbQM-bStrVWjoW4yYFk1wS6E3I0qiWvat1JTm2n6UvWxmHkEtOMwP__w8zX1V9peSGEjL7ngjhgtSEipp1rayPH6oJ7crEO_776rVv6afqOqUNIZSLpplU_xbOockwOnBjHHRvcX2yCDpkP3gTx5XXPThEC9pan_0zwhggrxH8MOwDghmHHWYMBs8hZu3NFkMCPO4w-gFD1n1_Ah_Oa0rKwec1aNiG8RDgHg9Gp9wjWJ9QJ4RnH_cJUo7ah8_VR6f7hF9e6rR6-rl4nN_Vy4fbX_Mfy9pQ0RxruWKIjFnHBZ9xrpFTIdsGZWda23HHWkGZYWJlKZ-1AhnhnZQEHdecz1A20-rbJXcXx797TFltxn0MZaWiUjZt07KuKyp6UZWnpBTRqV25T8eTokSdGagLA1UYqDMDdSwedvGkog1_ML5Jftf0H8EjjWs</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Eze, Didacus Chukwuemeka</creator><creator>Eze, Chekwube Paul</creator><creator>Okwor, Emmanuel C.</creator><creator>Ezema, Chuka</creator><creator>Ogbonna, Innocent Okonkwo</creator><creator>Omeje, Elijah Obinna</creator><creator>Ibu, John O.</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Effect of formaldehyde antimicrobial feed additive on the immune competence of chickens experimentally infected with a known Newcastle disease virus strain</title><author>Eze, Didacus Chukwuemeka ; Eze, Chekwube Paul ; Okwor, Emmanuel C. ; Ezema, Chuka ; Ogbonna, Innocent Okonkwo ; Omeje, Elijah Obinna ; Ibu, John O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c183x-9b2ee22df585755ae518943e96c4d65f24812c28bd15748e2056990ef5a557e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal vaccines</topic><topic>Antibody response</topic><topic>Antimicrobial activity</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Formaldehyde</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Newcastle disease</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eze, Didacus Chukwuemeka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eze, Chekwube Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okwor, Emmanuel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezema, Chuka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogbonna, Innocent Okonkwo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omeje, Elijah Obinna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibu, John O.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Comparative clinical pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eze, Didacus Chukwuemeka</au><au>Eze, Chekwube Paul</au><au>Okwor, Emmanuel C.</au><au>Ezema, Chuka</au><au>Ogbonna, Innocent Okonkwo</au><au>Omeje, Elijah Obinna</au><au>Ibu, John O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of formaldehyde antimicrobial feed additive on the immune competence of chickens experimentally infected with a known Newcastle disease virus strain</atitle><jtitle>Comparative clinical pathology</jtitle><stitle>Comp Clin Pathol</stitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>679</spage><epage>684</epage><pages>679-684</pages><issn>1618-5641</issn><eissn>1618-565X</eissn><abstract>Thirty-seven percent (37%) formaldehyde- possessing antimicrobial activity has been used in various forms as a fumigant for mould control and as a feed additive for feed preservation. The study evaluated the effects of formaldehyde-treated poultry feed on the immune response of birds to Newcastle disease virus (NDV) infection with Kudu 113 strain. A total of 100 chicks were acquired from Zartech Hatchery, Ibadan, Nigeria. They were randomly appropriated into A, B, C and D experimental groups, with each group containing 25 birds. Group A chicks were vaccinated, fed treated feed and infected with ND virus while group B chicks were vaccinated, fed untreated feed and infected with ND virus. Chicks in group C were not vaccinated but fed treated feed and infected with ND virus whereas chicks in group D were not vaccinated, fed untreated feed and infected with ND virus. The data generated were analysed with analysis of variance (ANOVA). Formaldehyde-treated feed had no significant effect on the PCV, antibody response to NDV, organ index and feed intake but significantly affected the body weights of the birds. Formaldehyde, despite the antimicrobial activities, may not prevent infection of Newcastle disease virus infection, when used as a feed additive.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00580-018-2649-x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1618-5641 |
| ispartof | Comparative clinical pathology, 2018-05, Vol.27 (3), p.679-684 |
| issn | 1618-5641 1618-565X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1993434266 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Animal vaccines Antibody response Antimicrobial activity Antimicrobial agents Data processing Formaldehyde Hematology Immune response Infections Juveniles Medicine Medicine & Public Health Newcastle disease Oncology Original Article Pathology Preservation Vaccination Variance analysis |
| title | Effect of formaldehyde antimicrobial feed additive on the immune competence of chickens experimentally infected with a known Newcastle disease virus strain |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A44%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20formaldehyde%20antimicrobial%20feed%20additive%20on%20the%20immune%20competence%20of%20chickens%20experimentally%20infected%20with%20a%20known%20Newcastle%20disease%20virus%20strain&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20clinical%20pathology&rft.au=Eze,%20Didacus%20Chukwuemeka&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=679&rft.epage=684&rft.pages=679-684&rft.issn=1618-5641&rft.eissn=1618-565X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00580-018-2649-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1993434266%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993434266&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |