Abiotic and biotic contributions to invasion resistance for ornamental fish in west-central Florida, USA
Explaining the varying success of invaders is a central question in invasion biology. Florida is a good region to test hypotheses related to invasion because of variation in invasion success where a few non-native fishes have established and spread and some have locally established, whereas many hav...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrobiologia 2018-07, Vol.817 (1), p.363-377 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 377 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 363 |
container_title | Hydrobiologia |
container_volume | 817 |
creator | Hill, Jeffrey E. Tuckett, Quenton M. |
description | Explaining the varying success of invaders is a central question in invasion biology. Florida is a good region to test hypotheses related to invasion because of variation in invasion success where a few non-native fishes have established and spread and some have locally established, whereas many have failed to establish despite high propagule pressure. We sampled fish and habitat near ornamental fish aquaculture facilities, sources of propagules, to test hypotheses related to habitat suitability and biotic resistance, resistance either from strongly interacting species or due to diversity (diversity–invasibility). We found a dramatic decline in non-native richness and density with increasing distance from facility effluent (virtually absent > 1,000 m). Non-native and native species richness and density were positively correlated. Increased density and richness of non-natives was associated with higher temperatures and lower abundance of select native species, including predatory largemouth bass
Micropterus salmoides
, but little support was found for the influence of eastern mosquitofish
Gambusia holbrooki
. Overall, we found mixed support for the contribution of abiotic and biotic factors and no support for the diversity–invasibility hypothesis. Additional studies into species-specific traits and manipulative experiments will provide key data on the contribution of abiotic and biotic influences on invasion success. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10750-017-3496-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1993254662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A538907853</galeid><sourcerecordid>A538907853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-83d5ff45a460b9cc64557fed36ae0017a1d233d157e21a45d7f15faeea7e8a113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFTEQhhdR8Fj9Ad4FvFFwayYfm93LQ7G2UBCsvQ452clpyp6kJrt-_HvnsL1oBclFkpfnHeadaZq3wE-Bc_OpAjeatxxMK9XQtfpZswFtZKsBzPNmwzn0bQ-6f9m8qvWOk2cQfNPcbncxz9Ezl0b28PQ5zSXuljnmVNmcWUw_XaUPK1hjnV3yyEIuLJfkDphmN7EQ6y1x7BfWufWkFRLPp1zi6D6ym-vt6-ZFcFPFNw_3SXNz_vn72UV79fXL5dn2qvVKiLnt5ahDUNqpju8G7zultQk4ys4hZTAORiHlSNFQgFN6NAF0cIjOYO8A5Enzfq17X_KPhbqxh1g9TpNLmJdqBXCQSvVcEfruH_QuLxRpqhaGQQqtuk4QdbpSezehjSlkyubpjHiINCoMkfStlv3ATa8lGT48MRzHib_nvVtqtZfX356ysLK-5FoLBntf4sGVPxa4PS7Wrou1FN0eF2s1ecTqqcSmPZZHbf_X9BfC_KTT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993254662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abiotic and biotic contributions to invasion resistance for ornamental fish in west-central Florida, USA</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hill, Jeffrey E. ; Tuckett, Quenton M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hill, Jeffrey E. ; Tuckett, Quenton M.</creatorcontrib><description>Explaining the varying success of invaders is a central question in invasion biology. Florida is a good region to test hypotheses related to invasion because of variation in invasion success where a few non-native fishes have established and spread and some have locally established, whereas many have failed to establish despite high propagule pressure. We sampled fish and habitat near ornamental fish aquaculture facilities, sources of propagules, to test hypotheses related to habitat suitability and biotic resistance, resistance either from strongly interacting species or due to diversity (diversity–invasibility). We found a dramatic decline in non-native richness and density with increasing distance from facility effluent (virtually absent > 1,000 m). Non-native and native species richness and density were positively correlated. Increased density and richness of non-natives was associated with higher temperatures and lower abundance of select native species, including predatory largemouth bass
Micropterus salmoides
, but little support was found for the influence of eastern mosquitofish
Gambusia holbrooki
. Overall, we found mixed support for the contribution of abiotic and biotic factors and no support for the diversity–invasibility hypothesis. Additional studies into species-specific traits and manipulative experiments will provide key data on the contribution of abiotic and biotic influences on invasion success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-017-3496-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Aquaculture facilities ; Aquaculture industry ; Bass ; Biodiversity ; Biology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biotic factors ; colonizing ability ; Density ; Ecology ; Ecosystem components ; Fish ; fish culture ; Fishes ; Florida ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Freshwater fishes ; Gambusia holbrooki ; Habitats ; High temperature ; Hypotheses ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Invasive fish ; Invasive species ; Invasive Species II ; Life Sciences ; Micropterus salmoides ; Native organisms ; Native species ; Ornamental fish ; Ornamental fishes ; Propagules ; species ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Success ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2018-07, Vol.817 (1), p.363-377</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Hydrobiologia is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-83d5ff45a460b9cc64557fed36ae0017a1d233d157e21a45d7f15faeea7e8a113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-83d5ff45a460b9cc64557fed36ae0017a1d233d157e21a45d7f15faeea7e8a113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10750-017-3496-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10750-017-3496-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hill, Jeffrey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuckett, Quenton M.</creatorcontrib><title>Abiotic and biotic contributions to invasion resistance for ornamental fish in west-central Florida, USA</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>Explaining the varying success of invaders is a central question in invasion biology. Florida is a good region to test hypotheses related to invasion because of variation in invasion success where a few non-native fishes have established and spread and some have locally established, whereas many have failed to establish despite high propagule pressure. We sampled fish and habitat near ornamental fish aquaculture facilities, sources of propagules, to test hypotheses related to habitat suitability and biotic resistance, resistance either from strongly interacting species or due to diversity (diversity–invasibility). We found a dramatic decline in non-native richness and density with increasing distance from facility effluent (virtually absent > 1,000 m). Non-native and native species richness and density were positively correlated. Increased density and richness of non-natives was associated with higher temperatures and lower abundance of select native species, including predatory largemouth bass
Micropterus salmoides
, but little support was found for the influence of eastern mosquitofish
Gambusia holbrooki
. Overall, we found mixed support for the contribution of abiotic and biotic factors and no support for the diversity–invasibility hypothesis. Additional studies into species-specific traits and manipulative experiments will provide key data on the contribution of abiotic and biotic influences on invasion success.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquaculture facilities</subject><subject>Aquaculture industry</subject><subject>Bass</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotic factors</subject><subject>colonizing ability</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem components</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>fish culture</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Gambusia holbrooki</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive fish</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Invasive Species II</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Micropterus salmoides</subject><subject>Native organisms</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Ornamental fish</subject><subject>Ornamental fishes</subject><subject>Propagules</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rFTEQhhdR8Fj9Ad4FvFFwayYfm93LQ7G2UBCsvQ452clpyp6kJrt-_HvnsL1oBclFkpfnHeadaZq3wE-Bc_OpAjeatxxMK9XQtfpZswFtZKsBzPNmwzn0bQ-6f9m8qvWOk2cQfNPcbncxz9Ezl0b28PQ5zSXuljnmVNmcWUw_XaUPK1hjnV3yyEIuLJfkDphmN7EQ6y1x7BfWufWkFRLPp1zi6D6ym-vt6-ZFcFPFNw_3SXNz_vn72UV79fXL5dn2qvVKiLnt5ahDUNqpju8G7zultQk4ys4hZTAORiHlSNFQgFN6NAF0cIjOYO8A5Enzfq17X_KPhbqxh1g9TpNLmJdqBXCQSvVcEfruH_QuLxRpqhaGQQqtuk4QdbpSezehjSlkyubpjHiINCoMkfStlv3ATa8lGT48MRzHib_nvVtqtZfX356ysLK-5FoLBntf4sGVPxa4PS7Wrou1FN0eF2s1ecTqqcSmPZZHbf_X9BfC_KTT</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Hill, Jeffrey E.</creator><creator>Tuckett, Quenton M.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Abiotic and biotic contributions to invasion resistance for ornamental fish in west-central Florida, USA</title><author>Hill, Jeffrey E. ; Tuckett, Quenton M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-83d5ff45a460b9cc64557fed36ae0017a1d233d157e21a45d7f15faeea7e8a113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquaculture facilities</topic><topic>Aquaculture industry</topic><topic>Bass</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotic factors</topic><topic>colonizing ability</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem components</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>fish culture</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Gambusia holbrooki</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive fish</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Invasive Species II</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Micropterus salmoides</topic><topic>Native organisms</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Ornamental fish</topic><topic>Ornamental fishes</topic><topic>Propagules</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hill, Jeffrey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuckett, Quenton M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hill, Jeffrey E.</au><au>Tuckett, Quenton M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abiotic and biotic contributions to invasion resistance for ornamental fish in west-central Florida, USA</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>817</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>377</epage><pages>363-377</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Explaining the varying success of invaders is a central question in invasion biology. Florida is a good region to test hypotheses related to invasion because of variation in invasion success where a few non-native fishes have established and spread and some have locally established, whereas many have failed to establish despite high propagule pressure. We sampled fish and habitat near ornamental fish aquaculture facilities, sources of propagules, to test hypotheses related to habitat suitability and biotic resistance, resistance either from strongly interacting species or due to diversity (diversity–invasibility). We found a dramatic decline in non-native richness and density with increasing distance from facility effluent (virtually absent > 1,000 m). Non-native and native species richness and density were positively correlated. Increased density and richness of non-natives was associated with higher temperatures and lower abundance of select native species, including predatory largemouth bass
Micropterus salmoides
, but little support was found for the influence of eastern mosquitofish
Gambusia holbrooki
. Overall, we found mixed support for the contribution of abiotic and biotic factors and no support for the diversity–invasibility hypothesis. Additional studies into species-specific traits and manipulative experiments will provide key data on the contribution of abiotic and biotic influences on invasion success.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-017-3496-5</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2018-07, Vol.817 (1), p.363-377 |
issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1993254662 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Aquaculture Aquaculture facilities Aquaculture industry Bass Biodiversity Biology Biomedical and Life Sciences Biotic factors colonizing ability Density Ecology Ecosystem components Fish fish culture Fishes Florida Freshwater & Marine Ecology Freshwater fishes Gambusia holbrooki Habitats High temperature Hypotheses Indigenous species Introduced species Invasive fish Invasive species Invasive Species II Life Sciences Micropterus salmoides Native organisms Native species Ornamental fish Ornamental fishes Propagules species Species diversity Species richness Success Zoology |
title | Abiotic and biotic contributions to invasion resistance for ornamental fish in west-central Florida, USA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A44%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abiotic%20and%20biotic%20contributions%20to%20invasion%20resistance%20for%20ornamental%20fish%20in%20west-central%20Florida,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Hill,%20Jeffrey%20E.&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=817&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=377&rft.pages=363-377&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-017-3496-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA538907853%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993254662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A538907853&rfr_iscdi=true |