Abiotic and biotic contributions to invasion resistance for ornamental fish in west-central Florida, USA

Explaining the varying success of invaders is a central question in invasion biology. Florida is a good region to test hypotheses related to invasion because of variation in invasion success where a few non-native fishes have established and spread and some have locally established, whereas many hav...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrobiologia 2018-07, Vol.817 (1), p.363-377
Hauptverfasser: Hill, Jeffrey E., Tuckett, Quenton M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 377
container_issue 1
container_start_page 363
container_title Hydrobiologia
container_volume 817
creator Hill, Jeffrey E.
Tuckett, Quenton M.
description Explaining the varying success of invaders is a central question in invasion biology. Florida is a good region to test hypotheses related to invasion because of variation in invasion success where a few non-native fishes have established and spread and some have locally established, whereas many have failed to establish despite high propagule pressure. We sampled fish and habitat near ornamental fish aquaculture facilities, sources of propagules, to test hypotheses related to habitat suitability and biotic resistance, resistance either from strongly interacting species or due to diversity (diversity–invasibility). We found a dramatic decline in non-native richness and density with increasing distance from facility effluent (virtually absent > 1,000 m). Non-native and native species richness and density were positively correlated. Increased density and richness of non-natives was associated with higher temperatures and lower abundance of select native species, including predatory largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides , but little support was found for the influence of eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki . Overall, we found mixed support for the contribution of abiotic and biotic factors and no support for the diversity–invasibility hypothesis. Additional studies into species-specific traits and manipulative experiments will provide key data on the contribution of abiotic and biotic influences on invasion success.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10750-017-3496-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1993254662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A538907853</galeid><sourcerecordid>A538907853</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-83d5ff45a460b9cc64557fed36ae0017a1d233d157e21a45d7f15faeea7e8a113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFTEQhhdR8Fj9Ad4FvFFwayYfm93LQ7G2UBCsvQ452clpyp6kJrt-_HvnsL1oBclFkpfnHeadaZq3wE-Bc_OpAjeatxxMK9XQtfpZswFtZKsBzPNmwzn0bQ-6f9m8qvWOk2cQfNPcbncxz9Ezl0b28PQ5zSXuljnmVNmcWUw_XaUPK1hjnV3yyEIuLJfkDphmN7EQ6y1x7BfWufWkFRLPp1zi6D6ym-vt6-ZFcFPFNw_3SXNz_vn72UV79fXL5dn2qvVKiLnt5ahDUNqpju8G7zultQk4ys4hZTAORiHlSNFQgFN6NAF0cIjOYO8A5Enzfq17X_KPhbqxh1g9TpNLmJdqBXCQSvVcEfruH_QuLxRpqhaGQQqtuk4QdbpSezehjSlkyubpjHiINCoMkfStlv3ATa8lGT48MRzHib_nvVtqtZfX356ysLK-5FoLBntf4sGVPxa4PS7Wrou1FN0eF2s1ecTqqcSmPZZHbf_X9BfC_KTT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993254662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abiotic and biotic contributions to invasion resistance for ornamental fish in west-central Florida, USA</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hill, Jeffrey E. ; Tuckett, Quenton M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hill, Jeffrey E. ; Tuckett, Quenton M.</creatorcontrib><description>Explaining the varying success of invaders is a central question in invasion biology. Florida is a good region to test hypotheses related to invasion because of variation in invasion success where a few non-native fishes have established and spread and some have locally established, whereas many have failed to establish despite high propagule pressure. We sampled fish and habitat near ornamental fish aquaculture facilities, sources of propagules, to test hypotheses related to habitat suitability and biotic resistance, resistance either from strongly interacting species or due to diversity (diversity–invasibility). We found a dramatic decline in non-native richness and density with increasing distance from facility effluent (virtually absent &gt; 1,000 m). Non-native and native species richness and density were positively correlated. Increased density and richness of non-natives was associated with higher temperatures and lower abundance of select native species, including predatory largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides , but little support was found for the influence of eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki . Overall, we found mixed support for the contribution of abiotic and biotic factors and no support for the diversity–invasibility hypothesis. Additional studies into species-specific traits and manipulative experiments will provide key data on the contribution of abiotic and biotic influences on invasion success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-017-3496-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Aquaculture facilities ; Aquaculture industry ; Bass ; Biodiversity ; Biology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biotic factors ; colonizing ability ; Density ; Ecology ; Ecosystem components ; Fish ; fish culture ; Fishes ; Florida ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Freshwater fishes ; Gambusia holbrooki ; Habitats ; High temperature ; Hypotheses ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Invasive fish ; Invasive species ; Invasive Species II ; Life Sciences ; Micropterus salmoides ; Native organisms ; Native species ; Ornamental fish ; Ornamental fishes ; Propagules ; species ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Success ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2018-07, Vol.817 (1), p.363-377</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Hydrobiologia is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-83d5ff45a460b9cc64557fed36ae0017a1d233d157e21a45d7f15faeea7e8a113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-83d5ff45a460b9cc64557fed36ae0017a1d233d157e21a45d7f15faeea7e8a113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10750-017-3496-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10750-017-3496-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hill, Jeffrey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuckett, Quenton M.</creatorcontrib><title>Abiotic and biotic contributions to invasion resistance for ornamental fish in west-central Florida, USA</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>Explaining the varying success of invaders is a central question in invasion biology. Florida is a good region to test hypotheses related to invasion because of variation in invasion success where a few non-native fishes have established and spread and some have locally established, whereas many have failed to establish despite high propagule pressure. We sampled fish and habitat near ornamental fish aquaculture facilities, sources of propagules, to test hypotheses related to habitat suitability and biotic resistance, resistance either from strongly interacting species or due to diversity (diversity–invasibility). We found a dramatic decline in non-native richness and density with increasing distance from facility effluent (virtually absent &gt; 1,000 m). Non-native and native species richness and density were positively correlated. Increased density and richness of non-natives was associated with higher temperatures and lower abundance of select native species, including predatory largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides , but little support was found for the influence of eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki . Overall, we found mixed support for the contribution of abiotic and biotic factors and no support for the diversity–invasibility hypothesis. Additional studies into species-specific traits and manipulative experiments will provide key data on the contribution of abiotic and biotic influences on invasion success.</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Aquaculture facilities</subject><subject>Aquaculture industry</subject><subject>Bass</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotic factors</subject><subject>colonizing ability</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem components</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>fish culture</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Gambusia holbrooki</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive fish</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Invasive Species II</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Micropterus salmoides</subject><subject>Native organisms</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Ornamental fish</subject><subject>Ornamental fishes</subject><subject>Propagules</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rFTEQhhdR8Fj9Ad4FvFFwayYfm93LQ7G2UBCsvQ452clpyp6kJrt-_HvnsL1oBclFkpfnHeadaZq3wE-Bc_OpAjeatxxMK9XQtfpZswFtZKsBzPNmwzn0bQ-6f9m8qvWOk2cQfNPcbncxz9Ezl0b28PQ5zSXuljnmVNmcWUw_XaUPK1hjnV3yyEIuLJfkDphmN7EQ6y1x7BfWufWkFRLPp1zi6D6ym-vt6-ZFcFPFNw_3SXNz_vn72UV79fXL5dn2qvVKiLnt5ahDUNqpju8G7zultQk4ys4hZTAORiHlSNFQgFN6NAF0cIjOYO8A5Enzfq17X_KPhbqxh1g9TpNLmJdqBXCQSvVcEfruH_QuLxRpqhaGQQqtuk4QdbpSezehjSlkyubpjHiINCoMkfStlv3ATa8lGT48MRzHib_nvVtqtZfX356ysLK-5FoLBntf4sGVPxa4PS7Wrou1FN0eF2s1ecTqqcSmPZZHbf_X9BfC_KTT</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Hill, Jeffrey E.</creator><creator>Tuckett, Quenton M.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Abiotic and biotic contributions to invasion resistance for ornamental fish in west-central Florida, USA</title><author>Hill, Jeffrey E. ; Tuckett, Quenton M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-83d5ff45a460b9cc64557fed36ae0017a1d233d157e21a45d7f15faeea7e8a113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Aquaculture facilities</topic><topic>Aquaculture industry</topic><topic>Bass</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotic factors</topic><topic>colonizing ability</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem components</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>fish culture</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Gambusia holbrooki</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive fish</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Invasive Species II</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Micropterus salmoides</topic><topic>Native organisms</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Ornamental fish</topic><topic>Ornamental fishes</topic><topic>Propagules</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hill, Jeffrey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuckett, Quenton M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hill, Jeffrey E.</au><au>Tuckett, Quenton M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abiotic and biotic contributions to invasion resistance for ornamental fish in west-central Florida, USA</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>817</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>377</epage><pages>363-377</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Explaining the varying success of invaders is a central question in invasion biology. Florida is a good region to test hypotheses related to invasion because of variation in invasion success where a few non-native fishes have established and spread and some have locally established, whereas many have failed to establish despite high propagule pressure. We sampled fish and habitat near ornamental fish aquaculture facilities, sources of propagules, to test hypotheses related to habitat suitability and biotic resistance, resistance either from strongly interacting species or due to diversity (diversity–invasibility). We found a dramatic decline in non-native richness and density with increasing distance from facility effluent (virtually absent &gt; 1,000 m). Non-native and native species richness and density were positively correlated. Increased density and richness of non-natives was associated with higher temperatures and lower abundance of select native species, including predatory largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides , but little support was found for the influence of eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki . Overall, we found mixed support for the contribution of abiotic and biotic factors and no support for the diversity–invasibility hypothesis. Additional studies into species-specific traits and manipulative experiments will provide key data on the contribution of abiotic and biotic influences on invasion success.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-017-3496-5</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-8158
ispartof Hydrobiologia, 2018-07, Vol.817 (1), p.363-377
issn 0018-8158
1573-5117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1993254662
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aquaculture
Aquaculture facilities
Aquaculture industry
Bass
Biodiversity
Biology
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biotic factors
colonizing ability
Density
Ecology
Ecosystem components
Fish
fish culture
Fishes
Florida
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Freshwater fishes
Gambusia holbrooki
Habitats
High temperature
Hypotheses
Indigenous species
Introduced species
Invasive fish
Invasive species
Invasive Species II
Life Sciences
Micropterus salmoides
Native organisms
Native species
Ornamental fish
Ornamental fishes
Propagules
species
Species diversity
Species richness
Success
Zoology
title Abiotic and biotic contributions to invasion resistance for ornamental fish in west-central Florida, USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A44%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abiotic%20and%20biotic%20contributions%20to%20invasion%20resistance%20for%20ornamental%20fish%20in%20west-central%20Florida,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Hill,%20Jeffrey%20E.&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=817&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=377&rft.pages=363-377&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-017-3496-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA538907853%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993254662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A538907853&rfr_iscdi=true