Medievalism: New discipline or scholarly no‐man's land?

The term “medievalism” refers to how people have, since the 15th century, conceptualised the thousand years of history preceding that date. The study of medievalism is therefore not about the Middle Ages per se, but rather the ways in which the medieval period has been imagined in the centuries sinc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:History compass 2018-02, Vol.16 (2), p.n/a
1. Verfasser: Marsden, Richard A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title History compass
container_volume 16
creator Marsden, Richard A.
description The term “medievalism” refers to how people have, since the 15th century, conceptualised the thousand years of history preceding that date. The study of medievalism is therefore not about the Middle Ages per se, but rather the ways in which the medieval period has been imagined in the centuries since it ended. Yet the field's origins date from as recently as the 1970s. Medievalism Studies is thus still finding its feet and must consequently deal with some existential questions about its scope and remit, its methodological underpinnings, its implications for how history is periodised, and its relationship with more established disciplines. It also faces criticisms of Anglo‐centricism as well as hostility from some historians thanks to the doubts its practitioners raise over established delineations between scholarly and creative depictions of the medieval period. Nonetheless, this new field offers a much‐needed challenge to the calcified disciplinary boundaries that shape academia today.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/hic3.12439
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1993212339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993212339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2269-9504c7c2e7b2d54ccdad32a9a73a4d28df92e72acb05e3c3b84496491b8faf093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KxDAQh4MouK5efIKCB0HommTSP_EiUtRdWPWi55AmKZslbdfEdenNR_AZfRJb68GTc5mB3zcz8CF0SvCM9HW5sgpmhDLge2hCWJbHOGF0_898iI5CWGOcAKTJBPEHo615l86G-ip6NLtI26DsxtnGRK2Pglq1TnrXRU379fFZy-Y8RE42-voYHVTSBXPy26fo5e72uZjHy6f7RXGzjBWlKY95gpnKFDVZSXXClNJSA5VcZiCZprmueJ9RqUqcGFBQ5ozxlHFS5pWsMIcpOhvvbnz7ujXhTazbrW_6l4JwDpRQgIG6GCnl2xC8qcTG21r6ThAsBjViUCN-1PQwGeGddab7hxTzRQHjzjc9xGVj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993212339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Medievalism: New discipline or scholarly no‐man's land?</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Marsden, Richard A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marsden, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><description>The term “medievalism” refers to how people have, since the 15th century, conceptualised the thousand years of history preceding that date. The study of medievalism is therefore not about the Middle Ages per se, but rather the ways in which the medieval period has been imagined in the centuries since it ended. Yet the field's origins date from as recently as the 1970s. Medievalism Studies is thus still finding its feet and must consequently deal with some existential questions about its scope and remit, its methodological underpinnings, its implications for how history is periodised, and its relationship with more established disciplines. It also faces criticisms of Anglo‐centricism as well as hostility from some historians thanks to the doubts its practitioners raise over established delineations between scholarly and creative depictions of the medieval period. Nonetheless, this new field offers a much‐needed challenge to the calcified disciplinary boundaries that shape academia today.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-0542</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-0542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/hic3.12439</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Medieval period</subject><ispartof>History compass, 2018-02, Vol.16 (2), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2269-9504c7c2e7b2d54ccdad32a9a73a4d28df92e72acb05e3c3b84496491b8faf093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1019-609X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fhic3.12439$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fhic3.12439$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marsden, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><title>Medievalism: New discipline or scholarly no‐man's land?</title><title>History compass</title><description>The term “medievalism” refers to how people have, since the 15th century, conceptualised the thousand years of history preceding that date. The study of medievalism is therefore not about the Middle Ages per se, but rather the ways in which the medieval period has been imagined in the centuries since it ended. Yet the field's origins date from as recently as the 1970s. Medievalism Studies is thus still finding its feet and must consequently deal with some existential questions about its scope and remit, its methodological underpinnings, its implications for how history is periodised, and its relationship with more established disciplines. It also faces criticisms of Anglo‐centricism as well as hostility from some historians thanks to the doubts its practitioners raise over established delineations between scholarly and creative depictions of the medieval period. Nonetheless, this new field offers a much‐needed challenge to the calcified disciplinary boundaries that shape academia today.</description><subject>Medieval period</subject><issn>1478-0542</issn><issn>1478-0542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9KxDAQh4MouK5efIKCB0HommTSP_EiUtRdWPWi55AmKZslbdfEdenNR_AZfRJb68GTc5mB3zcz8CF0SvCM9HW5sgpmhDLge2hCWJbHOGF0_898iI5CWGOcAKTJBPEHo615l86G-ip6NLtI26DsxtnGRK2Pglq1TnrXRU379fFZy-Y8RE42-voYHVTSBXPy26fo5e72uZjHy6f7RXGzjBWlKY95gpnKFDVZSXXClNJSA5VcZiCZprmueJ9RqUqcGFBQ5ozxlHFS5pWsMIcpOhvvbnz7ujXhTazbrW_6l4JwDpRQgIG6GCnl2xC8qcTG21r6ThAsBjViUCN-1PQwGeGddab7hxTzRQHjzjc9xGVj</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Marsden, Richard A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1019-609X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Medievalism: New discipline or scholarly no‐man's land?</title><author>Marsden, Richard A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2269-9504c7c2e7b2d54ccdad32a9a73a4d28df92e72acb05e3c3b84496491b8faf093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Medieval period</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marsden, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>History compass</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marsden, Richard A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Medievalism: New discipline or scholarly no‐man's land?</atitle><jtitle>History compass</jtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1478-0542</issn><eissn>1478-0542</eissn><abstract>The term “medievalism” refers to how people have, since the 15th century, conceptualised the thousand years of history preceding that date. The study of medievalism is therefore not about the Middle Ages per se, but rather the ways in which the medieval period has been imagined in the centuries since it ended. Yet the field's origins date from as recently as the 1970s. Medievalism Studies is thus still finding its feet and must consequently deal with some existential questions about its scope and remit, its methodological underpinnings, its implications for how history is periodised, and its relationship with more established disciplines. It also faces criticisms of Anglo‐centricism as well as hostility from some historians thanks to the doubts its practitioners raise over established delineations between scholarly and creative depictions of the medieval period. Nonetheless, this new field offers a much‐needed challenge to the calcified disciplinary boundaries that shape academia today.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/hic3.12439</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1019-609X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1478-0542
ispartof History compass, 2018-02, Vol.16 (2), p.n/a
issn 1478-0542
1478-0542
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1993212339
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Medieval period
title Medievalism: New discipline or scholarly no‐man's land?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T02%3A29%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medievalism:%20New%20discipline%20or%20scholarly%20no%E2%80%90man's%20land?&rft.jtitle=History%20compass&rft.au=Marsden,%20Richard%20A.&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1478-0542&rft.eissn=1478-0542&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/hic3.12439&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1993212339%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993212339&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true