China’s International Leadership: Regional Activism vs. Global Reluctance
Since the late 1990s, China has been actively seeking a leadership role in its region, while taking a more reluctant attitude toward global leadership. Drawing upon recent research on status in international relations, this article seeks to explain the variation in China’s leadership at regional and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Chinese political science review 2018-03, Vol.3 (1), p.48-61 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 61 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 48 |
| container_title | Chinese political science review |
| container_volume | 3 |
| creator | Pu, Xiaoyu |
| description | Since the late 1990s, China has been actively seeking a leadership role in its region, while taking a more reluctant attitude toward global leadership. Drawing upon recent research on status in international relations, this article seeks to explain the variation in China’s leadership at regional and global levels. A rising power does not always maximize its status on the world stage. China seeks an active role in East Asia due to its strong interests and identity commitment within the region. However, China takes a more reluctant approach toward global leadership, because higher status brings additional responsibilities and risks. Due to various limitations, China cannot become a new hegemonic power. But China can be a co-leader in regional and global affairs, and it can also be a more active leader in the developing world. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s41111-017-0079-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1993207572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993207572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6796ba506277dd7aa0b0d77a1e5d13f25f501fee72dfabddc616d30a130596893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWGofwN2A69SbZJIYd6VoLQwIRdchM8m0U6YzYzItuPM13PksPopPYsqIuPFu7g_nHC4fQpcEpgRAXoeUxMJAJI6rwuIEjSgTHKeU09PfOU3P0SSELQBQkkoQcoSy-aZqzNfbe0iWTe98Y_qqbUydZM5Y58Om6m6TlVsPx1nRV4cq7JJDmCaLus1N_fmxcvW-6E1TuAt0Vpo6uMlPH6Pn-7un-QPOHhfL-SzDBeOqx0IqkRsOgkpprTQGcrBSGuK4JaykvORASucktaXJrS0EEZaBIQy4EjeKjdHVkNv59mXvQq-37T6-XgdNlGIUJJc0qsigKnwbgnel7ny1M_5VE9BHbnrgpiM3feSmRfTQwROitlk7_yf5X9M3Xi1w7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993207572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>China’s International Leadership: Regional Activism vs. Global Reluctance</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Pu, Xiaoyu</creator><creatorcontrib>Pu, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><description>Since the late 1990s, China has been actively seeking a leadership role in its region, while taking a more reluctant attitude toward global leadership. Drawing upon recent research on status in international relations, this article seeks to explain the variation in China’s leadership at regional and global levels. A rising power does not always maximize its status on the world stage. China seeks an active role in East Asia due to its strong interests and identity commitment within the region. However, China takes a more reluctant approach toward global leadership, because higher status brings additional responsibilities and risks. Due to various limitations, China cannot become a new hegemonic power. But China can be a co-leader in regional and global affairs, and it can also be a more active leader in the developing world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2365-4244</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2365-4252</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41111-017-0079-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Activism ; Hegemony ; Identity ; International relations ; Leadership ; Original Article ; Political Science ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies</subject><ispartof>Chinese political science review, 2018-03, Vol.3 (1), p.48-61</ispartof><rights>Fudan University and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017</rights><rights>Chinese Political Science Review is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6796ba506277dd7aa0b0d77a1e5d13f25f501fee72dfabddc616d30a130596893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6796ba506277dd7aa0b0d77a1e5d13f25f501fee72dfabddc616d30a130596893</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5059-3324</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41111-017-0079-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41111-017-0079-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pu, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><title>China’s International Leadership: Regional Activism vs. Global Reluctance</title><title>Chinese political science review</title><addtitle>Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev</addtitle><description>Since the late 1990s, China has been actively seeking a leadership role in its region, while taking a more reluctant attitude toward global leadership. Drawing upon recent research on status in international relations, this article seeks to explain the variation in China’s leadership at regional and global levels. A rising power does not always maximize its status on the world stage. China seeks an active role in East Asia due to its strong interests and identity commitment within the region. However, China takes a more reluctant approach toward global leadership, because higher status brings additional responsibilities and risks. Due to various limitations, China cannot become a new hegemonic power. But China can be a co-leader in regional and global affairs, and it can also be a more active leader in the developing world.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><issn>2365-4244</issn><issn>2365-4252</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWGofwN2A69SbZJIYd6VoLQwIRdchM8m0U6YzYzItuPM13PksPopPYsqIuPFu7g_nHC4fQpcEpgRAXoeUxMJAJI6rwuIEjSgTHKeU09PfOU3P0SSELQBQkkoQcoSy-aZqzNfbe0iWTe98Y_qqbUydZM5Y58Om6m6TlVsPx1nRV4cq7JJDmCaLus1N_fmxcvW-6E1TuAt0Vpo6uMlPH6Pn-7un-QPOHhfL-SzDBeOqx0IqkRsOgkpprTQGcrBSGuK4JaykvORASucktaXJrS0EEZaBIQy4EjeKjdHVkNv59mXvQq-37T6-XgdNlGIUJJc0qsigKnwbgnel7ny1M_5VE9BHbnrgpiM3feSmRfTQwROitlk7_yf5X9M3Xi1w7A</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Pu, Xiaoyu</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5059-3324</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>China’s International Leadership: Regional Activism vs. Global Reluctance</title><author>Pu, Xiaoyu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-6796ba506277dd7aa0b0d77a1e5d13f25f501fee72dfabddc616d30a130596893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pu, Xiaoyu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Chinese political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pu, Xiaoyu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>China’s International Leadership: Regional Activism vs. Global Reluctance</atitle><jtitle>Chinese political science review</jtitle><stitle>Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev</stitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>48-61</pages><issn>2365-4244</issn><eissn>2365-4252</eissn><abstract>Since the late 1990s, China has been actively seeking a leadership role in its region, while taking a more reluctant attitude toward global leadership. Drawing upon recent research on status in international relations, this article seeks to explain the variation in China’s leadership at regional and global levels. A rising power does not always maximize its status on the world stage. China seeks an active role in East Asia due to its strong interests and identity commitment within the region. However, China takes a more reluctant approach toward global leadership, because higher status brings additional responsibilities and risks. Due to various limitations, China cannot become a new hegemonic power. But China can be a co-leader in regional and global affairs, and it can also be a more active leader in the developing world.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s41111-017-0079-6</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5059-3324</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2365-4244 |
| ispartof | Chinese political science review, 2018-03, Vol.3 (1), p.48-61 |
| issn | 2365-4244 2365-4252 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1993207572 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Activism Hegemony Identity International relations Leadership Original Article Political Science Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies |
| title | China’s International Leadership: Regional Activism vs. Global Reluctance |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T00%3A18%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=China%E2%80%99s%20International%20Leadership:%20Regional%20Activism%20vs.%20Global%C2%A0Reluctance&rft.jtitle=Chinese%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=Pu,%20Xiaoyu&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=48-61&rft.issn=2365-4244&rft.eissn=2365-4252&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41111-017-0079-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1993207572%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993207572&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |