Orbit error characteristic and distribution of TLE using CHAMP orbit data

Space object orbital covariance data is required for collision risk assessments, but publicly accessible two line element (TLE) data does not provide orbital error information. This paper compared historical TLE data and GPS precision ephemerides of CHAMP to assess TLE orbit accuracy from 2002 to 20...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Astrophysics and space science 2018-02, Vol.363 (2), p.1-6, Article 31
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Xiao-li, Xiong, Yong-qing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1
container_title Astrophysics and space science
container_volume 363
creator Xu, Xiao-li
Xiong, Yong-qing
description Space object orbital covariance data is required for collision risk assessments, but publicly accessible two line element (TLE) data does not provide orbital error information. This paper compared historical TLE data and GPS precision ephemerides of CHAMP to assess TLE orbit accuracy from 2002 to 2008, inclusive. TLE error spatial variations with longitude and latitude were calculated to analyze error characteristics and distribution. The results indicate that TLE orbit data are systematically biased from the limited SGP4 model. The biases can reach the level of kilometers, and the sign and magnitude are correlate significantly with longitude.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10509-018-3251-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1992866435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1992866435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-f91adc3aad11dfead7c3b47c62b0c43b25eb73ec9bdcb927444adf288ea437d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAURS0EEqHwA9gsMRv8lTgeq6rQSkVlKFI3y18priAudjLQX09KGFiY3nvSPfdJB4Bbgu8JxuIhE1xiiTCpEaMlQcczUJBSUCR5tT0HBcaYo4rj7SW4ynk_nLKSogDLdTKhgz6lmKB900nbzqeQu2Chbh10w5qC6bsQWxgbuFnNYZ9Du4OzxfT5BcYf3OlOX4OLRr9nf_M7J-D1cb6ZLdBq_bScTVfIspp2qJFEO8u0doS4xmsnLDNc2IoabDkztPRGMG-lcdZIKjjn2jW0rr3mTDjGJuBu7D2k-Nn73Kl97FM7vFRESlpXFWflkCJjyqaYc_KNOqTwodOXIlidjKnRmBqMqZMxdRwYOjJ5yLY7n_40_wt9A031b2U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992866435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Orbit error characteristic and distribution of TLE using CHAMP orbit data</title><source>Springer LINK 全文期刊数据库</source><creator>Xu, Xiao-li ; Xiong, Yong-qing</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiao-li ; Xiong, Yong-qing</creatorcontrib><description>Space object orbital covariance data is required for collision risk assessments, but publicly accessible two line element (TLE) data does not provide orbital error information. This paper compared historical TLE data and GPS precision ephemerides of CHAMP to assess TLE orbit accuracy from 2002 to 2008, inclusive. TLE error spatial variations with longitude and latitude were calculated to analyze error characteristics and distribution. The results indicate that TLE orbit data are systematically biased from the limited SGP4 model. The biases can reach the level of kilometers, and the sign and magnitude are correlate significantly with longitude.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-640X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-946X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10509-018-3251-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Astrobiology ; Astronomy ; Astrophysics ; Astrophysics and Astroparticles ; Collisions ; Cosmology ; Covariance ; Ephemerides ; Error analysis ; Longitude ; Observations and Techniques ; Original Article ; Physics ; Physics and Astronomy ; Risk assessment ; Space Exploration and Astronautics ; Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</subject><ispartof>Astrophysics and space science, 2018-02, Vol.363 (2), p.1-6, Article 31</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Astrophysics and Space Science is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-f91adc3aad11dfead7c3b47c62b0c43b25eb73ec9bdcb927444adf288ea437d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-f91adc3aad11dfead7c3b47c62b0c43b25eb73ec9bdcb927444adf288ea437d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10509-018-3251-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10509-018-3251-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiao-li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Yong-qing</creatorcontrib><title>Orbit error characteristic and distribution of TLE using CHAMP orbit data</title><title>Astrophysics and space science</title><addtitle>Astrophys Space Sci</addtitle><description>Space object orbital covariance data is required for collision risk assessments, but publicly accessible two line element (TLE) data does not provide orbital error information. This paper compared historical TLE data and GPS precision ephemerides of CHAMP to assess TLE orbit accuracy from 2002 to 2008, inclusive. TLE error spatial variations with longitude and latitude were calculated to analyze error characteristics and distribution. The results indicate that TLE orbit data are systematically biased from the limited SGP4 model. The biases can reach the level of kilometers, and the sign and magnitude are correlate significantly with longitude.</description><subject>Astrobiology</subject><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Astrophysics</subject><subject>Astrophysics and Astroparticles</subject><subject>Collisions</subject><subject>Cosmology</subject><subject>Covariance</subject><subject>Ephemerides</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Longitude</subject><subject>Observations and Techniques</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics and Astronomy</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Space Exploration and Astronautics</subject><subject>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</subject><issn>0004-640X</issn><issn>1572-946X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAURS0EEqHwA9gsMRv8lTgeq6rQSkVlKFI3y18priAudjLQX09KGFiY3nvSPfdJB4Bbgu8JxuIhE1xiiTCpEaMlQcczUJBSUCR5tT0HBcaYo4rj7SW4ynk_nLKSogDLdTKhgz6lmKB900nbzqeQu2Chbh10w5qC6bsQWxgbuFnNYZ9Du4OzxfT5BcYf3OlOX4OLRr9nf_M7J-D1cb6ZLdBq_bScTVfIspp2qJFEO8u0doS4xmsnLDNc2IoabDkztPRGMG-lcdZIKjjn2jW0rr3mTDjGJuBu7D2k-Nn73Kl97FM7vFRESlpXFWflkCJjyqaYc_KNOqTwodOXIlidjKnRmBqMqZMxdRwYOjJ5yLY7n_40_wt9A031b2U</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Xu, Xiao-li</creator><creator>Xiong, Yong-qing</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Orbit error characteristic and distribution of TLE using CHAMP orbit data</title><author>Xu, Xiao-li ; Xiong, Yong-qing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-f91adc3aad11dfead7c3b47c62b0c43b25eb73ec9bdcb927444adf288ea437d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Astrobiology</topic><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Astrophysics</topic><topic>Astrophysics and Astroparticles</topic><topic>Collisions</topic><topic>Cosmology</topic><topic>Covariance</topic><topic>Ephemerides</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Longitude</topic><topic>Observations and Techniques</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics and Astronomy</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Space Exploration and Astronautics</topic><topic>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xiao-li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Yong-qing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Astrophysics and space science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Xiao-li</au><au>Xiong, Yong-qing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Orbit error characteristic and distribution of TLE using CHAMP orbit data</atitle><jtitle>Astrophysics and space science</jtitle><stitle>Astrophys Space Sci</stitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>363</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><artnum>31</artnum><issn>0004-640X</issn><eissn>1572-946X</eissn><abstract>Space object orbital covariance data is required for collision risk assessments, but publicly accessible two line element (TLE) data does not provide orbital error information. This paper compared historical TLE data and GPS precision ephemerides of CHAMP to assess TLE orbit accuracy from 2002 to 2008, inclusive. TLE error spatial variations with longitude and latitude were calculated to analyze error characteristics and distribution. The results indicate that TLE orbit data are systematically biased from the limited SGP4 model. The biases can reach the level of kilometers, and the sign and magnitude are correlate significantly with longitude.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10509-018-3251-z</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-640X
ispartof Astrophysics and space science, 2018-02, Vol.363 (2), p.1-6, Article 31
issn 0004-640X
1572-946X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1992866435
source Springer LINK 全文期刊数据库
subjects Astrobiology
Astronomy
Astrophysics
Astrophysics and Astroparticles
Collisions
Cosmology
Covariance
Ephemerides
Error analysis
Longitude
Observations and Techniques
Original Article
Physics
Physics and Astronomy
Risk assessment
Space Exploration and Astronautics
Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics
title Orbit error characteristic and distribution of TLE using CHAMP orbit data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A32%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Orbit%20error%20characteristic%20and%20distribution%20of%20TLE%20using%20CHAMP%20orbit%20data&rft.jtitle=Astrophysics%20and%20space%20science&rft.au=Xu,%20Xiao-li&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=363&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.artnum=31&rft.issn=0004-640X&rft.eissn=1572-946X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10509-018-3251-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1992866435%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992866435&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true