Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice
The choice of performance rating format may influence employees' fairness perceptions. Participants in two studies, one consisting of 208 participants and the other of 393 participants, evaluated the fairness of common relative and absolute rating formats. The participants in the second study a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of selection and assessment 2007-09, Vol.15 (3), p.302-316 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 316 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 302 |
container_title | International journal of selection and assessment |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Roch, Sylvia G. Sternburgh, Angela M. Caputo, Pat M. |
description | The choice of performance rating format may influence employees' fairness perceptions. Participants in two studies, one consisting of 208 participants and the other of 393 participants, evaluated the fairness of common relative and absolute rating formats. The participants in the second study also evaluated the fairness of two rating formats, one absolute and one relative, presented in organizational contexts of varying procedural and distributive justice. Results indicate that not only are absolute formats perceived as more fair than relative formats, but differences in fairness perceptions also occur among relative and absolute formats. Furthermore, it appears that rating format influences procedural justice, especially when outcomes are perceived as fair. Implications for organizations' appraisal practices are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00390.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_199284922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1320649591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-7ea5a020bd61ec3197f97102364fc0748d790d625a52091d89873cae1dd1a2f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOD_-Q_C-9SRpm0TwYgw3J0PFDya7CVmbjtaunUk3p7_edBOvzc1JznmfcHgQwgRC4s9lGZIoEQFlQoYUgIcATEK4PUC9v8Eh6oFM4gB4_HaMTpwrwacYpz1k-nPXVOvW4I3DT6bSbbEx-NHYvLFLXacGP_lWvcDD7t26Kzxerqoi9c2mdtincK4LWxvnsK4z3NiFrovv3VhXuFy7tkjNGTrKdeXM-W89Ra_Dm5fBbTB5GI0H_UmQMi4g4EbHGijMs4SYlBHJc8kJUJZEeQo8EhmXkCU01jEFSTIhBWepNiTLiKZ5xE7Rxf7flW0-1sa1qmzW1i_iFJGSikhS6kNiH0pt45w1uVrZYqntlyKgOqeqVJ061alTnVO1c6q2Hr3eo59FZb7-zanx3XPf3zwf7PnCtWb7x2v7rhLOeKym9yM1nD6DoLOZmrAfaSKNMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199284922</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Roch, Sylvia G. ; Sternburgh, Angela M. ; Caputo, Pat M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roch, Sylvia G. ; Sternburgh, Angela M. ; Caputo, Pat M.</creatorcontrib><description>The choice of performance rating format may influence employees' fairness perceptions. Participants in two studies, one consisting of 208 participants and the other of 393 participants, evaluated the fairness of common relative and absolute rating formats. The participants in the second study also evaluated the fairness of two rating formats, one absolute and one relative, presented in organizational contexts of varying procedural and distributive justice. Results indicate that not only are absolute formats perceived as more fair than relative formats, but differences in fairness perceptions also occur among relative and absolute formats. Furthermore, it appears that rating format influences procedural justice, especially when outcomes are perceived as fair. Implications for organizations' appraisal practices are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-075X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2389</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00390.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Decision analysis ; Organizational justice ; Perceptions ; Performance appraisal ; Ratings & rankings ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of selection and assessment, 2007-09, Vol.15 (3), p.302-316</ispartof><rights>2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-7ea5a020bd61ec3197f97102364fc0748d790d625a52091d89873cae1dd1a2f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-7ea5a020bd61ec3197f97102364fc0748d790d625a52091d89873cae1dd1a2f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1468-2389.2007.00390.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1468-2389.2007.00390.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roch, Sylvia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sternburgh, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caputo, Pat M.</creatorcontrib><title>Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice</title><title>International journal of selection and assessment</title><description>The choice of performance rating format may influence employees' fairness perceptions. Participants in two studies, one consisting of 208 participants and the other of 393 participants, evaluated the fairness of common relative and absolute rating formats. The participants in the second study also evaluated the fairness of two rating formats, one absolute and one relative, presented in organizational contexts of varying procedural and distributive justice. Results indicate that not only are absolute formats perceived as more fair than relative formats, but differences in fairness perceptions also occur among relative and absolute formats. Furthermore, it appears that rating format influences procedural justice, especially when outcomes are perceived as fair. Implications for organizations' appraisal practices are discussed.</description><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Organizational justice</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Performance appraisal</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0965-075X</issn><issn>1468-2389</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOD_-Q_C-9SRpm0TwYgw3J0PFDya7CVmbjtaunUk3p7_edBOvzc1JznmfcHgQwgRC4s9lGZIoEQFlQoYUgIcATEK4PUC9v8Eh6oFM4gB4_HaMTpwrwacYpz1k-nPXVOvW4I3DT6bSbbEx-NHYvLFLXacGP_lWvcDD7t26Kzxerqoi9c2mdtincK4LWxvnsK4z3NiFrovv3VhXuFy7tkjNGTrKdeXM-W89Ra_Dm5fBbTB5GI0H_UmQMi4g4EbHGijMs4SYlBHJc8kJUJZEeQo8EhmXkCU01jEFSTIhBWepNiTLiKZ5xE7Rxf7flW0-1sa1qmzW1i_iFJGSikhS6kNiH0pt45w1uVrZYqntlyKgOqeqVJ061alTnVO1c6q2Hr3eo59FZb7-zanx3XPf3zwf7PnCtWb7x2v7rhLOeKym9yM1nD6DoLOZmrAfaSKNMw</recordid><startdate>200709</startdate><enddate>200709</enddate><creator>Roch, Sylvia G.</creator><creator>Sternburgh, Angela M.</creator><creator>Caputo, Pat M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200709</creationdate><title>Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice</title><author>Roch, Sylvia G. ; Sternburgh, Angela M. ; Caputo, Pat M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-7ea5a020bd61ec3197f97102364fc0748d790d625a52091d89873cae1dd1a2f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Organizational justice</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Performance appraisal</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roch, Sylvia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sternburgh, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caputo, Pat M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of selection and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roch, Sylvia G.</au><au>Sternburgh, Angela M.</au><au>Caputo, Pat M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice</atitle><jtitle>International journal of selection and assessment</jtitle><date>2007-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>302</spage><epage>316</epage><pages>302-316</pages><issn>0965-075X</issn><eissn>1468-2389</eissn><abstract>The choice of performance rating format may influence employees' fairness perceptions. Participants in two studies, one consisting of 208 participants and the other of 393 participants, evaluated the fairness of common relative and absolute rating formats. The participants in the second study also evaluated the fairness of two rating formats, one absolute and one relative, presented in organizational contexts of varying procedural and distributive justice. Results indicate that not only are absolute formats perceived as more fair than relative formats, but differences in fairness perceptions also occur among relative and absolute formats. Furthermore, it appears that rating format influences procedural justice, especially when outcomes are perceived as fair. Implications for organizations' appraisal practices are discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00390.x</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0965-075X |
ispartof | International journal of selection and assessment, 2007-09, Vol.15 (3), p.302-316 |
issn | 0965-075X 1468-2389 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_199284922 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Decision analysis Organizational justice Perceptions Performance appraisal Ratings & rankings Studies |
title | Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A36%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Absolute%20vs%20Relative%20Performance%20Rating%20Formats:%20Implications%20for%20fairness%20and%20organizational%20justice&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20selection%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Roch,%20Sylvia%20G.&rft.date=2007-09&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=302&rft.epage=316&rft.pages=302-316&rft.issn=0965-075X&rft.eissn=1468-2389&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00390.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1320649591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199284922&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |