Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice

The choice of performance rating format may influence employees' fairness perceptions. Participants in two studies, one consisting of 208 participants and the other of 393 participants, evaluated the fairness of common relative and absolute rating formats. The participants in the second study a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of selection and assessment 2007-09, Vol.15 (3), p.302-316
Hauptverfasser: Roch, Sylvia G., Sternburgh, Angela M., Caputo, Pat M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 316
container_issue 3
container_start_page 302
container_title International journal of selection and assessment
container_volume 15
creator Roch, Sylvia G.
Sternburgh, Angela M.
Caputo, Pat M.
description The choice of performance rating format may influence employees' fairness perceptions. Participants in two studies, one consisting of 208 participants and the other of 393 participants, evaluated the fairness of common relative and absolute rating formats. The participants in the second study also evaluated the fairness of two rating formats, one absolute and one relative, presented in organizational contexts of varying procedural and distributive justice. Results indicate that not only are absolute formats perceived as more fair than relative formats, but differences in fairness perceptions also occur among relative and absolute formats. Furthermore, it appears that rating format influences procedural justice, especially when outcomes are perceived as fair. Implications for organizations' appraisal practices are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00390.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_199284922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1320649591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-7ea5a020bd61ec3197f97102364fc0748d790d625a52091d89873cae1dd1a2f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOD_-Q_C-9SRpm0TwYgw3J0PFDya7CVmbjtaunUk3p7_edBOvzc1JznmfcHgQwgRC4s9lGZIoEQFlQoYUgIcATEK4PUC9v8Eh6oFM4gB4_HaMTpwrwacYpz1k-nPXVOvW4I3DT6bSbbEx-NHYvLFLXacGP_lWvcDD7t26Kzxerqoi9c2mdtincK4LWxvnsK4z3NiFrovv3VhXuFy7tkjNGTrKdeXM-W89Ra_Dm5fBbTB5GI0H_UmQMi4g4EbHGijMs4SYlBHJc8kJUJZEeQo8EhmXkCU01jEFSTIhBWepNiTLiKZ5xE7Rxf7flW0-1sa1qmzW1i_iFJGSikhS6kNiH0pt45w1uVrZYqntlyKgOqeqVJ061alTnVO1c6q2Hr3eo59FZb7-zanx3XPf3zwf7PnCtWb7x2v7rhLOeKym9yM1nD6DoLOZmrAfaSKNMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199284922</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Roch, Sylvia G. ; Sternburgh, Angela M. ; Caputo, Pat M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roch, Sylvia G. ; Sternburgh, Angela M. ; Caputo, Pat M.</creatorcontrib><description>The choice of performance rating format may influence employees' fairness perceptions. Participants in two studies, one consisting of 208 participants and the other of 393 participants, evaluated the fairness of common relative and absolute rating formats. The participants in the second study also evaluated the fairness of two rating formats, one absolute and one relative, presented in organizational contexts of varying procedural and distributive justice. Results indicate that not only are absolute formats perceived as more fair than relative formats, but differences in fairness perceptions also occur among relative and absolute formats. Furthermore, it appears that rating format influences procedural justice, especially when outcomes are perceived as fair. Implications for organizations' appraisal practices are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-075X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2389</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00390.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Decision analysis ; Organizational justice ; Perceptions ; Performance appraisal ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of selection and assessment, 2007-09, Vol.15 (3), p.302-316</ispartof><rights>2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-7ea5a020bd61ec3197f97102364fc0748d790d625a52091d89873cae1dd1a2f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-7ea5a020bd61ec3197f97102364fc0748d790d625a52091d89873cae1dd1a2f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1468-2389.2007.00390.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1468-2389.2007.00390.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roch, Sylvia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sternburgh, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caputo, Pat M.</creatorcontrib><title>Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice</title><title>International journal of selection and assessment</title><description>The choice of performance rating format may influence employees' fairness perceptions. Participants in two studies, one consisting of 208 participants and the other of 393 participants, evaluated the fairness of common relative and absolute rating formats. The participants in the second study also evaluated the fairness of two rating formats, one absolute and one relative, presented in organizational contexts of varying procedural and distributive justice. Results indicate that not only are absolute formats perceived as more fair than relative formats, but differences in fairness perceptions also occur among relative and absolute formats. Furthermore, it appears that rating format influences procedural justice, especially when outcomes are perceived as fair. Implications for organizations' appraisal practices are discussed.</description><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Organizational justice</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Performance appraisal</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0965-075X</issn><issn>1468-2389</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOD_-Q_C-9SRpm0TwYgw3J0PFDya7CVmbjtaunUk3p7_edBOvzc1JznmfcHgQwgRC4s9lGZIoEQFlQoYUgIcATEK4PUC9v8Eh6oFM4gB4_HaMTpwrwacYpz1k-nPXVOvW4I3DT6bSbbEx-NHYvLFLXacGP_lWvcDD7t26Kzxerqoi9c2mdtincK4LWxvnsK4z3NiFrovv3VhXuFy7tkjNGTrKdeXM-W89Ra_Dm5fBbTB5GI0H_UmQMi4g4EbHGijMs4SYlBHJc8kJUJZEeQo8EhmXkCU01jEFSTIhBWepNiTLiKZ5xE7Rxf7flW0-1sa1qmzW1i_iFJGSikhS6kNiH0pt45w1uVrZYqntlyKgOqeqVJ061alTnVO1c6q2Hr3eo59FZb7-zanx3XPf3zwf7PnCtWb7x2v7rhLOeKym9yM1nD6DoLOZmrAfaSKNMw</recordid><startdate>200709</startdate><enddate>200709</enddate><creator>Roch, Sylvia G.</creator><creator>Sternburgh, Angela M.</creator><creator>Caputo, Pat M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200709</creationdate><title>Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice</title><author>Roch, Sylvia G. ; Sternburgh, Angela M. ; Caputo, Pat M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3780-7ea5a020bd61ec3197f97102364fc0748d790d625a52091d89873cae1dd1a2f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Organizational justice</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Performance appraisal</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roch, Sylvia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sternburgh, Angela M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caputo, Pat M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of selection and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roch, Sylvia G.</au><au>Sternburgh, Angela M.</au><au>Caputo, Pat M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice</atitle><jtitle>International journal of selection and assessment</jtitle><date>2007-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>302</spage><epage>316</epage><pages>302-316</pages><issn>0965-075X</issn><eissn>1468-2389</eissn><abstract>The choice of performance rating format may influence employees' fairness perceptions. Participants in two studies, one consisting of 208 participants and the other of 393 participants, evaluated the fairness of common relative and absolute rating formats. The participants in the second study also evaluated the fairness of two rating formats, one absolute and one relative, presented in organizational contexts of varying procedural and distributive justice. Results indicate that not only are absolute formats perceived as more fair than relative formats, but differences in fairness perceptions also occur among relative and absolute formats. Furthermore, it appears that rating format influences procedural justice, especially when outcomes are perceived as fair. Implications for organizations' appraisal practices are discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00390.x</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0965-075X
ispartof International journal of selection and assessment, 2007-09, Vol.15 (3), p.302-316
issn 0965-075X
1468-2389
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_199284922
source Wiley Journals
subjects Decision analysis
Organizational justice
Perceptions
Performance appraisal
Ratings & rankings
Studies
title Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for fairness and organizational justice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A36%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Absolute%20vs%20Relative%20Performance%20Rating%20Formats:%20Implications%20for%20fairness%20and%20organizational%20justice&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20selection%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Roch,%20Sylvia%20G.&rft.date=2007-09&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=302&rft.epage=316&rft.pages=302-316&rft.issn=0965-075X&rft.eissn=1468-2389&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00390.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1320649591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199284922&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true