Update to the Global Climate Data package: analysis of empirical bias correction methods in the context of producing very high resolution climate projections

ABSTRACT While global climate models (GCMs) are useful for simulating climatic responses to perturbations in the Earth's climate system, there are many instances where higher spatial resolution information is necessary. In all instances, interpretation of interpolated or downscaled GCMs must be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of climatology 2018-02, Vol.38 (2), p.825-840
Hauptverfasser: Mosier, Thomas M., Hill, David F., Sharp, Kendra V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 840
container_issue 2
container_start_page 825
container_title International journal of climatology
container_volume 38
creator Mosier, Thomas M.
Hill, David F.
Sharp, Kendra V.
description ABSTRACT While global climate models (GCMs) are useful for simulating climatic responses to perturbations in the Earth's climate system, there are many instances where higher spatial resolution information is necessary. In all instances, interpretation of interpolated or downscaled GCMs must be done cautiously because each method has its own set of assumptions and potential disadvantages. Here, we present an update to the Global Climate Data (GCD) package, which enables the package to efficiently bias correct and interpolate precipitation and air temperature output from GCM simulations to very high spatial resolutions using the delta change method. While the delta change method is relatively simple, it has previously been shown to enhance the physical representation of interpolated climate time‐series compared to directly interpolating the gridded climate time‐series to a higher spatial resolution. The bias correction methods programmed into the GCD package are univariate empirical quantile mapping (QM) and bivariate empirical joint bias correction (JBC). The skill of QM and JBC for improving GCM simulations processed with the delta change method is evaluated through comparing the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of the interpolated GCM simulations to the CDFs of Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) station observations for three test regions: Oregon (in the USA), the Alps (spanning several countries in Europe), and the Ganges Delta (in India and Bangladesh). We also assess the representation of precipitation and mean temperature joint probability distributions relative to those present in GHCN station observations. Overall, GCM simulations that are bias corrected with QM prior to being input to the delta change method perform best under our analysis. The Global Climate Data (GCD) package, available at www.GlobalClimateData.org, is an open‐source model written in Matlab to create very high resolution monthly climate surfaces for any global land area. The GCD package is able to read a wide range of input data formats and synthesizes climate surfaces using the delta change method. This update to the GCD package enables climate models to be bias corrected relative to a reference gridded time‐series before being.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/joc.5213
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1992831489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1992831489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-d8baf316742f06b5470ad16f1e4370679b19fd3d067b000c3f2fe0e3ffaa8e083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqUgcQRLbNik2HGa2OxQgQKq1A1dR44zbl3SONgukMNwV9yfLasZjb73Zt4gdE3JiBKS3q2tGo1Tyk7QgBJRJIRwfooGhAuR8Izyc3Th_ZoQIgTNB-h30dUyAA4WhxXgaWMr2eBJYza76aMMEndSfcgl3GPZyqb3xmOrMWw644yKbGWkx8o6ByoY2-INhJWtPTbt3lHZNsBP2Gk6Z-utMu0Sf4Hr8cosV9iBt812L1THpRFbH7z8JTrTsvFwdaxDtHh-ep-8JLP59HXyMEsUGwuW1LySmtG8yFJN8mqcFUTWNNcUMlaQvBAVFbpmdWyrmFwxnWogwLSWkgPhbIhuDr5x9-cWfCjXdutiXF9SIVLOaMZFpG4PlHLWewe67Fw82fUlJeXu-VGlyt3zI5oc0G_TQP8vV77NJ3v-D39hiI0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992831489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Update to the Global Climate Data package: analysis of empirical bias correction methods in the context of producing very high resolution climate projections</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Mosier, Thomas M. ; Hill, David F. ; Sharp, Kendra V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mosier, Thomas M. ; Hill, David F. ; Sharp, Kendra V.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT While global climate models (GCMs) are useful for simulating climatic responses to perturbations in the Earth's climate system, there are many instances where higher spatial resolution information is necessary. In all instances, interpretation of interpolated or downscaled GCMs must be done cautiously because each method has its own set of assumptions and potential disadvantages. Here, we present an update to the Global Climate Data (GCD) package, which enables the package to efficiently bias correct and interpolate precipitation and air temperature output from GCM simulations to very high spatial resolutions using the delta change method. While the delta change method is relatively simple, it has previously been shown to enhance the physical representation of interpolated climate time‐series compared to directly interpolating the gridded climate time‐series to a higher spatial resolution. The bias correction methods programmed into the GCD package are univariate empirical quantile mapping (QM) and bivariate empirical joint bias correction (JBC). The skill of QM and JBC for improving GCM simulations processed with the delta change method is evaluated through comparing the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of the interpolated GCM simulations to the CDFs of Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) station observations for three test regions: Oregon (in the USA), the Alps (spanning several countries in Europe), and the Ganges Delta (in India and Bangladesh). We also assess the representation of precipitation and mean temperature joint probability distributions relative to those present in GHCN station observations. Overall, GCM simulations that are bias corrected with QM prior to being input to the delta change method perform best under our analysis. The Global Climate Data (GCD) package, available at www.GlobalClimateData.org, is an open‐source model written in Matlab to create very high resolution monthly climate surfaces for any global land area. The GCD package is able to read a wide range of input data formats and synthesizes climate surfaces using the delta change method. This update to the GCD package enables climate models to be bias corrected relative to a reference gridded time‐series before being.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/joc.5213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Air temperature ; Bias ; bias correction ; Bivariate analysis ; change factors ; Climate ; Climate models ; Climate system ; Climatic analysis ; Climatic data ; Climatology ; Computer simulation ; Data processing ; delta change method ; Distribution functions ; Earth ; Empirical analysis ; Global climate ; Global climate models ; gridded climate ; Mean temperatures ; Meteorological satellites ; Methods ; monthly time‐series ; Precipitation ; Probability theory ; Representations ; Resolution ; Simulation ; Spatial resolution ; temperature ; Time series</subject><ispartof>International journal of climatology, 2018-02, Vol.38 (2), p.825-840</ispartof><rights>2017 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><rights>2018 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-d8baf316742f06b5470ad16f1e4370679b19fd3d067b000c3f2fe0e3ffaa8e083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-d8baf316742f06b5470ad16f1e4370679b19fd3d067b000c3f2fe0e3ffaa8e083</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4071-4417</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjoc.5213$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjoc.5213$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mosier, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Kendra V.</creatorcontrib><title>Update to the Global Climate Data package: analysis of empirical bias correction methods in the context of producing very high resolution climate projections</title><title>International journal of climatology</title><description>ABSTRACT While global climate models (GCMs) are useful for simulating climatic responses to perturbations in the Earth's climate system, there are many instances where higher spatial resolution information is necessary. In all instances, interpretation of interpolated or downscaled GCMs must be done cautiously because each method has its own set of assumptions and potential disadvantages. Here, we present an update to the Global Climate Data (GCD) package, which enables the package to efficiently bias correct and interpolate precipitation and air temperature output from GCM simulations to very high spatial resolutions using the delta change method. While the delta change method is relatively simple, it has previously been shown to enhance the physical representation of interpolated climate time‐series compared to directly interpolating the gridded climate time‐series to a higher spatial resolution. The bias correction methods programmed into the GCD package are univariate empirical quantile mapping (QM) and bivariate empirical joint bias correction (JBC). The skill of QM and JBC for improving GCM simulations processed with the delta change method is evaluated through comparing the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of the interpolated GCM simulations to the CDFs of Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) station observations for three test regions: Oregon (in the USA), the Alps (spanning several countries in Europe), and the Ganges Delta (in India and Bangladesh). We also assess the representation of precipitation and mean temperature joint probability distributions relative to those present in GHCN station observations. Overall, GCM simulations that are bias corrected with QM prior to being input to the delta change method perform best under our analysis. The Global Climate Data (GCD) package, available at www.GlobalClimateData.org, is an open‐source model written in Matlab to create very high resolution monthly climate surfaces for any global land area. The GCD package is able to read a wide range of input data formats and synthesizes climate surfaces using the delta change method. This update to the GCD package enables climate models to be bias corrected relative to a reference gridded time‐series before being.</description><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>bias correction</subject><subject>Bivariate analysis</subject><subject>change factors</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climate system</subject><subject>Climatic analysis</subject><subject>Climatic data</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>delta change method</subject><subject>Distribution functions</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Global climate models</subject><subject>gridded climate</subject><subject>Mean temperatures</subject><subject>Meteorological satellites</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>monthly time‐series</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>temperature</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>0899-8418</issn><issn>1097-0088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqUgcQRLbNik2HGa2OxQgQKq1A1dR44zbl3SONgukMNwV9yfLasZjb73Zt4gdE3JiBKS3q2tGo1Tyk7QgBJRJIRwfooGhAuR8Izyc3Th_ZoQIgTNB-h30dUyAA4WhxXgaWMr2eBJYza76aMMEndSfcgl3GPZyqb3xmOrMWw644yKbGWkx8o6ByoY2-INhJWtPTbt3lHZNsBP2Gk6Z-utMu0Sf4Hr8cosV9iBt812L1THpRFbH7z8JTrTsvFwdaxDtHh-ep-8JLP59HXyMEsUGwuW1LySmtG8yFJN8mqcFUTWNNcUMlaQvBAVFbpmdWyrmFwxnWogwLSWkgPhbIhuDr5x9-cWfCjXdutiXF9SIVLOaMZFpG4PlHLWewe67Fw82fUlJeXu-VGlyt3zI5oc0G_TQP8vV77NJ3v-D39hiI0</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Mosier, Thomas M.</creator><creator>Hill, David F.</creator><creator>Sharp, Kendra V.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4071-4417</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Update to the Global Climate Data package: analysis of empirical bias correction methods in the context of producing very high resolution climate projections</title><author>Mosier, Thomas M. ; Hill, David F. ; Sharp, Kendra V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3593-d8baf316742f06b5470ad16f1e4370679b19fd3d067b000c3f2fe0e3ffaa8e083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>bias correction</topic><topic>Bivariate analysis</topic><topic>change factors</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climate system</topic><topic>Climatic analysis</topic><topic>Climatic data</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>delta change method</topic><topic>Distribution functions</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Global climate models</topic><topic>gridded climate</topic><topic>Mean temperatures</topic><topic>Meteorological satellites</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>monthly time‐series</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>temperature</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mosier, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Kendra V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mosier, Thomas M.</au><au>Hill, David F.</au><au>Sharp, Kendra V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Update to the Global Climate Data package: analysis of empirical bias correction methods in the context of producing very high resolution climate projections</atitle><jtitle>International journal of climatology</jtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>825</spage><epage>840</epage><pages>825-840</pages><issn>0899-8418</issn><eissn>1097-0088</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT While global climate models (GCMs) are useful for simulating climatic responses to perturbations in the Earth's climate system, there are many instances where higher spatial resolution information is necessary. In all instances, interpretation of interpolated or downscaled GCMs must be done cautiously because each method has its own set of assumptions and potential disadvantages. Here, we present an update to the Global Climate Data (GCD) package, which enables the package to efficiently bias correct and interpolate precipitation and air temperature output from GCM simulations to very high spatial resolutions using the delta change method. While the delta change method is relatively simple, it has previously been shown to enhance the physical representation of interpolated climate time‐series compared to directly interpolating the gridded climate time‐series to a higher spatial resolution. The bias correction methods programmed into the GCD package are univariate empirical quantile mapping (QM) and bivariate empirical joint bias correction (JBC). The skill of QM and JBC for improving GCM simulations processed with the delta change method is evaluated through comparing the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of the interpolated GCM simulations to the CDFs of Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) station observations for three test regions: Oregon (in the USA), the Alps (spanning several countries in Europe), and the Ganges Delta (in India and Bangladesh). We also assess the representation of precipitation and mean temperature joint probability distributions relative to those present in GHCN station observations. Overall, GCM simulations that are bias corrected with QM prior to being input to the delta change method perform best under our analysis. The Global Climate Data (GCD) package, available at www.GlobalClimateData.org, is an open‐source model written in Matlab to create very high resolution monthly climate surfaces for any global land area. The GCD package is able to read a wide range of input data formats and synthesizes climate surfaces using the delta change method. This update to the GCD package enables climate models to be bias corrected relative to a reference gridded time‐series before being.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/joc.5213</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4071-4417</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-8418
ispartof International journal of climatology, 2018-02, Vol.38 (2), p.825-840
issn 0899-8418
1097-0088
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1992831489
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Air temperature
Bias
bias correction
Bivariate analysis
change factors
Climate
Climate models
Climate system
Climatic analysis
Climatic data
Climatology
Computer simulation
Data processing
delta change method
Distribution functions
Earth
Empirical analysis
Global climate
Global climate models
gridded climate
Mean temperatures
Meteorological satellites
Methods
monthly time‐series
Precipitation
Probability theory
Representations
Resolution
Simulation
Spatial resolution
temperature
Time series
title Update to the Global Climate Data package: analysis of empirical bias correction methods in the context of producing very high resolution climate projections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T23%3A37%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Update%20to%20the%20Global%20Climate%20Data%20package:%20analysis%20of%20empirical%20bias%20correction%20methods%20in%20the%20context%20of%20producing%20very%20high%20resolution%20climate%20projections&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20climatology&rft.au=Mosier,%20Thomas%20M.&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=825&rft.epage=840&rft.pages=825-840&rft.issn=0899-8418&rft.eissn=1097-0088&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/joc.5213&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1992831489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992831489&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true