A DEA ranking method based on cross-efficiency intervals and signal-to-noise ratio

Cross-efficiency evaluation is a useful approach to ranking decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The possible existence of multiple optimal weights for the DEA may reduce the usefulness of the cross-efficiency evaluation since the ranking is according to the choice of wei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of operations research 2018-02, Vol.261 (1-2), p.207-232
1. Verfasser: Liu, Shiang-Tai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 207
container_title Annals of operations research
container_volume 261
creator Liu, Shiang-Tai
description Cross-efficiency evaluation is a useful approach to ranking decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The possible existence of multiple optimal weights for the DEA may reduce the usefulness of the cross-efficiency evaluation since the ranking is according to the choice of weights that different DMUs make. Most of existing approaches for cross-efficiency evaluation employ the average cross-efficiency to further discriminate among the DEA efficient units or focus on how to determine input and output weights uniquely, but lay little emphasis on the consideration of the ranges and variances of cross-efficiencies as alternative ranking factors. In this paper we consider cross-efficiency intervals and their variances for ranking DMUs. The aggressive and benevolent formulations are taken into account at the same time. Consequently, a number of cross-efficiency intervals is obtained for each DMU. The signal-to-noise (SN) ratio, originally designed for optimizing the robustness of a process, is constructed as a numerical index for ranking DMUs. A nonlinear fractional program with bound constraints is formulated to find the optimal value of the SN ratio. By model reduction and variable substitution, this nonlinear fractional program is transformed into a quadratic one for deriving the global optimum solution. With the derived SN ratios, we are able to fully rank all DMUs accordingly. Two examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the methodology proposed in this paper.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10479-017-2562-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1992796616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A523273872</galeid><sourcerecordid>A523273872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-9073217804f01b8a2e5154fae029acbae7982030b40d608319c7dbd399b97f0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQhS1UpG4XfkBvlnqtYWzHsX1c0W2phFQJwdlyEieY7trUk63Ev8cQpMKhl5nL957ezCPkM4czDqDPkUOjLQOumVCtYOaIrLjSglkpzQeyAqEapqSEj-QT4j0AcG7Uilxv6Lfthhaffsc00X2Y7_JAO49hoDnRvmREFsYx9jGk_pHGNIfy1--Q-jRQjFPyOzZnlnLEUG3mmE_I8ViBcPq61-T2-_bm4pJd_frx82JzxfpG8ZlZ0FJwbaAZgXfGi6C4akYfQFjfdz5oawRI6BoYWjCS214P3SCt7awewcs1-bL4PpT85xBwdvf5UGoedNxaoW3b8vYfNfldcDGNeS6-30fs3UYJKbQ0WlTq6xuqO2BMAeuoB97NOPkD4nucL_jLf0oY3UOJe18eHQf33Idb-nC1D_fchzNVIxYNVjZNobyJ-1_RE89Piqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992796616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A DEA ranking method based on cross-efficiency intervals and signal-to-noise ratio</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Liu, Shiang-Tai</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shiang-Tai</creatorcontrib><description>Cross-efficiency evaluation is a useful approach to ranking decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The possible existence of multiple optimal weights for the DEA may reduce the usefulness of the cross-efficiency evaluation since the ranking is according to the choice of weights that different DMUs make. Most of existing approaches for cross-efficiency evaluation employ the average cross-efficiency to further discriminate among the DEA efficient units or focus on how to determine input and output weights uniquely, but lay little emphasis on the consideration of the ranges and variances of cross-efficiencies as alternative ranking factors. In this paper we consider cross-efficiency intervals and their variances for ranking DMUs. The aggressive and benevolent formulations are taken into account at the same time. Consequently, a number of cross-efficiency intervals is obtained for each DMU. The signal-to-noise (SN) ratio, originally designed for optimizing the robustness of a process, is constructed as a numerical index for ranking DMUs. A nonlinear fractional program with bound constraints is formulated to find the optimal value of the SN ratio. By model reduction and variable substitution, this nonlinear fractional program is transformed into a quadratic one for deriving the global optimum solution. With the derived SN ratios, we are able to fully rank all DMUs accordingly. Two examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the methodology proposed in this paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-5330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2562-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Combinatorics ; Data envelopment analysis ; Decision analysis ; Decision making ; Decision making units ; Efficiency ; Formulations ; Intervals ; Management science ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Mathematical programming ; Model reduction ; Operations research ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Optimization ; Original Paper ; Ranking ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Signal to noise ratio ; Theory of Computation</subject><ispartof>Annals of operations research, 2018-02, Vol.261 (1-2), p.207-232</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Annals of Operations Research is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-9073217804f01b8a2e5154fae029acbae7982030b40d608319c7dbd399b97f0a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-9073217804f01b8a2e5154fae029acbae7982030b40d608319c7dbd399b97f0a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10479-017-2562-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-017-2562-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shiang-Tai</creatorcontrib><title>A DEA ranking method based on cross-efficiency intervals and signal-to-noise ratio</title><title>Annals of operations research</title><addtitle>Ann Oper Res</addtitle><description>Cross-efficiency evaluation is a useful approach to ranking decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The possible existence of multiple optimal weights for the DEA may reduce the usefulness of the cross-efficiency evaluation since the ranking is according to the choice of weights that different DMUs make. Most of existing approaches for cross-efficiency evaluation employ the average cross-efficiency to further discriminate among the DEA efficient units or focus on how to determine input and output weights uniquely, but lay little emphasis on the consideration of the ranges and variances of cross-efficiencies as alternative ranking factors. In this paper we consider cross-efficiency intervals and their variances for ranking DMUs. The aggressive and benevolent formulations are taken into account at the same time. Consequently, a number of cross-efficiency intervals is obtained for each DMU. The signal-to-noise (SN) ratio, originally designed for optimizing the robustness of a process, is constructed as a numerical index for ranking DMUs. A nonlinear fractional program with bound constraints is formulated to find the optimal value of the SN ratio. By model reduction and variable substitution, this nonlinear fractional program is transformed into a quadratic one for deriving the global optimum solution. With the derived SN ratios, we are able to fully rank all DMUs accordingly. Two examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the methodology proposed in this paper.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Combinatorics</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision making units</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>Intervals</subject><subject>Management science</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematical programming</subject><subject>Model reduction</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Ranking</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><subject>Theory of Computation</subject><issn>0254-5330</issn><issn>1572-9338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQhS1UpG4XfkBvlnqtYWzHsX1c0W2phFQJwdlyEieY7trUk63Ev8cQpMKhl5nL957ezCPkM4czDqDPkUOjLQOumVCtYOaIrLjSglkpzQeyAqEapqSEj-QT4j0AcG7Uilxv6Lfthhaffsc00X2Y7_JAO49hoDnRvmREFsYx9jGk_pHGNIfy1--Q-jRQjFPyOzZnlnLEUG3mmE_I8ViBcPq61-T2-_bm4pJd_frx82JzxfpG8ZlZ0FJwbaAZgXfGi6C4akYfQFjfdz5oawRI6BoYWjCS214P3SCt7awewcs1-bL4PpT85xBwdvf5UGoedNxaoW3b8vYfNfldcDGNeS6-30fs3UYJKbQ0WlTq6xuqO2BMAeuoB97NOPkD4nucL_jLf0oY3UOJe18eHQf33Idb-nC1D_fchzNVIxYNVjZNobyJ-1_RE89Piqw</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Liu, Shiang-Tai</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>A DEA ranking method based on cross-efficiency intervals and signal-to-noise ratio</title><author>Liu, Shiang-Tai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-9073217804f01b8a2e5154fae029acbae7982030b40d608319c7dbd399b97f0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Combinatorics</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision making units</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>Intervals</topic><topic>Management science</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematical programming</topic><topic>Model reduction</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Ranking</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><topic>Theory of Computation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shiang-Tai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Shiang-Tai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A DEA ranking method based on cross-efficiency intervals and signal-to-noise ratio</atitle><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle><stitle>Ann Oper Res</stitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>261</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>207-232</pages><issn>0254-5330</issn><eissn>1572-9338</eissn><abstract>Cross-efficiency evaluation is a useful approach to ranking decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The possible existence of multiple optimal weights for the DEA may reduce the usefulness of the cross-efficiency evaluation since the ranking is according to the choice of weights that different DMUs make. Most of existing approaches for cross-efficiency evaluation employ the average cross-efficiency to further discriminate among the DEA efficient units or focus on how to determine input and output weights uniquely, but lay little emphasis on the consideration of the ranges and variances of cross-efficiencies as alternative ranking factors. In this paper we consider cross-efficiency intervals and their variances for ranking DMUs. The aggressive and benevolent formulations are taken into account at the same time. Consequently, a number of cross-efficiency intervals is obtained for each DMU. The signal-to-noise (SN) ratio, originally designed for optimizing the robustness of a process, is constructed as a numerical index for ranking DMUs. A nonlinear fractional program with bound constraints is formulated to find the optimal value of the SN ratio. By model reduction and variable substitution, this nonlinear fractional program is transformed into a quadratic one for deriving the global optimum solution. With the derived SN ratios, we are able to fully rank all DMUs accordingly. Two examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the methodology proposed in this paper.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10479-017-2562-8</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0254-5330
ispartof Annals of operations research, 2018-02, Vol.261 (1-2), p.207-232
issn 0254-5330
1572-9338
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1992796616
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Business Source Complete
subjects Business and Management
Combinatorics
Data envelopment analysis
Decision analysis
Decision making
Decision making units
Efficiency
Formulations
Intervals
Management science
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Mathematical programming
Model reduction
Operations research
Operations Research/Decision Theory
Optimization
Original Paper
Ranking
Robustness (mathematics)
Signal to noise ratio
Theory of Computation
title A DEA ranking method based on cross-efficiency intervals and signal-to-noise ratio
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T20%3A07%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20DEA%20ranking%20method%20based%20on%20cross-efficiency%20intervals%20and%20signal-to-noise%20ratio&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20operations%20research&rft.au=Liu,%20Shiang-Tai&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=261&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=207-232&rft.issn=0254-5330&rft.eissn=1572-9338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10479-017-2562-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA523273872%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992796616&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A523273872&rfr_iscdi=true