Is There a Gendered Path to Tenure? A Multi-State Approach to Examine the Academic Trajectories of U.S. Doctoral Recipients in the Sciences
With a focus on possible gender differences, this study used 2003-2013 data from the Survey of Doctorate Recipients to examine individual, institutional, and early employment factors that contribute to career paths of recent doctorates who enter postsecondary academic appointments. Findings showed s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Research in higher education 2018-11, Vol.59 (7), p.897-932 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 932 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 897 |
| container_title | Research in higher education |
| container_volume | 59 |
| creator | Webber, Karen L. Canché, Manuel González |
| description | With a focus on possible gender differences, this study used 2003-2013 data from the Survey of Doctorate Recipients to examine individual, institutional, and early employment factors that contribute to career paths of recent doctorates who enter postsecondary academic appointments. Findings showed some noteworthy differences by gender including lower salary and longer time to degree for women, but overall results indicated no strong, comprehensive evidence of a gendered path to tenure during the first decade after degree completion. Scholarly publications and activities such as research and a postdoctoral appointment in early years following degree completion were the most important contributors for both men and women. Implications for policy and planning are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11162-018-9492-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1992795694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1192841</ericid><jstor_id>45180351</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45180351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-5ec7bb48318f55bb899f63dace6698619d5137949aa132a28edf0852c10497a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFuEzEQhi1EJULhATggWao4Onjs9a59qqISSlErqiaVuFmOd5Y4SnZT25HoM_SlcboI9cTF9sz834znJ-QD8Clw3nxOAFALxkEzUxnBqldkAqqRDLT--ZpMuKyBlUO9IW9T2vDCFGBCnq4SXa4xInX0Evu2vFp66_Ka5oEusT9EPKczenPY5sAW2WWks_0-Ds4_K-a_3S70SPO65L1rcRc8XUa3QZ-HGDDRoaP308WUfhmOGbeld-jDPmCfEw39M7jwJfSY3pGTzm0Tvv97n5L7r_PlxTd2_ePy6mJ2zbysdWYKfbNaVVqC7pRarbQxXS1b57Guja7BtApkU1xwDqRwQmPbca2EB16Zxml5Ss7GvmWPhwOmbDfDIfZlpAVjRGNUbaqiglHl45BSxM7uY9i5-GiB26PndvTcFs_t0XN7ZD6ODMbg_-nn3wGM0BWUuhjrqdT6XxhfTP5P008jtEnFwZe_ELIAlQLNZVn5D6OumBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992795694</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is There a Gendered Path to Tenure? A Multi-State Approach to Examine the Academic Trajectories of U.S. Doctoral Recipients in the Sciences</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Webber, Karen L. ; Canché, Manuel González</creator><creatorcontrib>Webber, Karen L. ; Canché, Manuel González</creatorcontrib><description>With a focus on possible gender differences, this study used 2003-2013 data from the Survey of Doctorate Recipients to examine individual, institutional, and early employment factors that contribute to career paths of recent doctorates who enter postsecondary academic appointments. Findings showed some noteworthy differences by gender including lower salary and longer time to degree for women, but overall results indicated no strong, comprehensive evidence of a gendered path to tenure during the first decade after degree completion. Scholarly publications and activities such as research and a postdoctoral appointment in early years following degree completion were the most important contributors for both men and women. Implications for policy and planning are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-0365</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-188X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11162-018-9492-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Academic degrees ; Career Development ; College Faculty ; Doctoral Degrees ; Education ; Faculty Publishing ; Gender Differences ; Higher Education ; Individual Characteristics ; Institutional Characteristics ; Postdoctoral Education ; Salary Wage Differentials ; Scholarship ; Tenure ; Time to Degree</subject><ispartof>Research in higher education, 2018-11, Vol.59 (7), p.897-932</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V., 2018</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Research in Higher Education is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-5ec7bb48318f55bb899f63dace6698619d5137949aa132a28edf0852c10497a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-5ec7bb48318f55bb899f63dace6698619d5137949aa132a28edf0852c10497a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2353-5043</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45180351$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45180351$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1192841$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Webber, Karen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canché, Manuel González</creatorcontrib><title>Is There a Gendered Path to Tenure? A Multi-State Approach to Examine the Academic Trajectories of U.S. Doctoral Recipients in the Sciences</title><title>Research in higher education</title><addtitle>Res High Educ</addtitle><description>With a focus on possible gender differences, this study used 2003-2013 data from the Survey of Doctorate Recipients to examine individual, institutional, and early employment factors that contribute to career paths of recent doctorates who enter postsecondary academic appointments. Findings showed some noteworthy differences by gender including lower salary and longer time to degree for women, but overall results indicated no strong, comprehensive evidence of a gendered path to tenure during the first decade after degree completion. Scholarly publications and activities such as research and a postdoctoral appointment in early years following degree completion were the most important contributors for both men and women. Implications for policy and planning are discussed.</description><subject>Academic degrees</subject><subject>Career Development</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Doctoral Degrees</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Faculty Publishing</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Institutional Characteristics</subject><subject>Postdoctoral Education</subject><subject>Salary Wage Differentials</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Time to Degree</subject><issn>0361-0365</issn><issn>1573-188X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFuEzEQhi1EJULhATggWao4Onjs9a59qqISSlErqiaVuFmOd5Y4SnZT25HoM_SlcboI9cTF9sz834znJ-QD8Clw3nxOAFALxkEzUxnBqldkAqqRDLT--ZpMuKyBlUO9IW9T2vDCFGBCnq4SXa4xInX0Evu2vFp66_Ka5oEusT9EPKczenPY5sAW2WWks_0-Ds4_K-a_3S70SPO65L1rcRc8XUa3QZ-HGDDRoaP308WUfhmOGbeld-jDPmCfEw39M7jwJfSY3pGTzm0Tvv97n5L7r_PlxTd2_ePy6mJ2zbysdWYKfbNaVVqC7pRarbQxXS1b57Guja7BtApkU1xwDqRwQmPbca2EB16Zxml5Ss7GvmWPhwOmbDfDIfZlpAVjRGNUbaqiglHl45BSxM7uY9i5-GiB26PndvTcFs_t0XN7ZD6ODMbg_-nn3wGM0BWUuhjrqdT6XxhfTP5P008jtEnFwZe_ELIAlQLNZVn5D6OumBE</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Webber, Karen L.</creator><creator>Canché, Manuel González</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2353-5043</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Is There a Gendered Path to Tenure? A Multi-State Approach to Examine the Academic Trajectories of U.S. Doctoral Recipients in the Sciences</title><author>Webber, Karen L. ; Canché, Manuel González</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-5ec7bb48318f55bb899f63dace6698619d5137949aa132a28edf0852c10497a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic degrees</topic><topic>Career Development</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Doctoral Degrees</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Faculty Publishing</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Institutional Characteristics</topic><topic>Postdoctoral Education</topic><topic>Salary Wage Differentials</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Time to Degree</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Webber, Karen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canché, Manuel González</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Research in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Webber, Karen L.</au><au>Canché, Manuel González</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1192841</ericid><atitle>Is There a Gendered Path to Tenure? A Multi-State Approach to Examine the Academic Trajectories of U.S. Doctoral Recipients in the Sciences</atitle><jtitle>Research in higher education</jtitle><stitle>Res High Educ</stitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>897</spage><epage>932</epage><pages>897-932</pages><issn>0361-0365</issn><eissn>1573-188X</eissn><abstract>With a focus on possible gender differences, this study used 2003-2013 data from the Survey of Doctorate Recipients to examine individual, institutional, and early employment factors that contribute to career paths of recent doctorates who enter postsecondary academic appointments. Findings showed some noteworthy differences by gender including lower salary and longer time to degree for women, but overall results indicated no strong, comprehensive evidence of a gendered path to tenure during the first decade after degree completion. Scholarly publications and activities such as research and a postdoctoral appointment in early years following degree completion were the most important contributors for both men and women. Implications for policy and planning are discussed.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11162-018-9492-4</doi><tpages>36</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2353-5043</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0361-0365 |
| ispartof | Research in higher education, 2018-11, Vol.59 (7), p.897-932 |
| issn | 0361-0365 1573-188X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1992795694 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Academic degrees Career Development College Faculty Doctoral Degrees Education Faculty Publishing Gender Differences Higher Education Individual Characteristics Institutional Characteristics Postdoctoral Education Salary Wage Differentials Scholarship Tenure Time to Degree |
| title | Is There a Gendered Path to Tenure? A Multi-State Approach to Examine the Academic Trajectories of U.S. Doctoral Recipients in the Sciences |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T22%3A38%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20There%20a%20Gendered%20Path%20to%20Tenure?%20A%20Multi-State%20Approach%20to%20Examine%20the%20Academic%20Trajectories%20of%20U.S.%20Doctoral%20Recipients%20in%20the%20Sciences&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Webber,%20Karen%20L.&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=897&rft.epage=932&rft.pages=897-932&rft.issn=0361-0365&rft.eissn=1573-188X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11162-018-9492-4&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45180351%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992795694&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1192841&rft_jstor_id=45180351&rfr_iscdi=true |