Parental Reflective Functioning Affects Sensitivity to Distress in Mothers with Postpartum Depression
Parental reflective functioning (PRF) refers to the capacity of caregivers to reflect upon their children’s internal mental states and intentions, which is seen as crucial for parental sensitivity, defined as the adequate behavioral response to an infant’s signals. In this study, the effect of mater...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of child and family studies 2018-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1671-1681 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1681 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1671 |
container_title | Journal of child and family studies |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Krink, Stephanie Muehlhan, Christine Luyten, Patrick Romer, Georg Ramsauer, Brigitte |
description | Parental reflective functioning (PRF) refers to the capacity of caregivers to reflect upon their children’s internal mental states and intentions, which is seen as crucial for parental sensitivity, defined as the adequate behavioral response to an infant’s signals. In this study, the effect of maternal PRF on sensitivity during the mother–infant interaction was examined in a clinical sample of 50 mothers who were experiencing postpartum depression and their infants aged three to 10 months. Mother and infant were exposed to emotional distress using the still-face procedure. It was hypothesized that low levels of PRF are associated with a decrease in maternal sensitivity in response to distress. Maternal PRF was assessed using the parental reflective functioning questionnaire (PRF). The subscales measured interest and curiosity in mental states, certainty about mental states (i.e., the recognition of the opacity of mental states), and pre-mentalizing modes (i.e., non-mentalizing modes), whereas sensitivity was evaluated using the maternal behavior Q-sort (Mini-MBQS-V). The results revealed a significant overall decrease in maternal sensitivity. As expected, the higher the scores on the pre-mentalizing modes, which indicated low levels of mentalizing through the mothers’ repudiation or defense against it, the greater the decreases in sensitivity. No effects with respect to the interest and curiosity in mental states or the certainty about mental states were found. Our findings determined that the pre-mentalizing modes are predictive of sensitivity to distress in mothers with postpartum depression. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10826-017-1000-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1992786054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1992786054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-83955bed4f8d7c01a9266ae166a148f6b0393e598b48539283472bad3b7a83e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwA9gsMQf8iBN7rFoKSEVUPGbLSW9aV60TbAfUf4-rMLCw3Ifvd46lg9A1JbeUkPIuUCJZkRFaZmknmThBIypKnjGZ89M0k4KlC8vP0UUI24QoydQIwdJ4cNHs8Cs0O6ij_QI8710aWmfdGk-aJr0G_AYu2HS18YBji2c2RA8hYOvwcxs34AP-tnGDl22InfGx3-MZdEckGV2is8bsAlz99jH6mN-_Tx-zxcvD03SyyGpOi5hJroSoYJU3clXWhBrFisIATYXmsikqwhUHoWSVS8EVkzwvWWVWvCqN5ED5GN0Mvp1vP3sIUW_b3rv0paZKsVIWROSJogNV-zYED43uvN0bf9CU6GOaekhTpzSPO9EiadigCYl1a_B_nP8V_QCYtXgr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992786054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parental Reflective Functioning Affects Sensitivity to Distress in Mothers with Postpartum Depression</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Krink, Stephanie ; Muehlhan, Christine ; Luyten, Patrick ; Romer, Georg ; Ramsauer, Brigitte</creator><creatorcontrib>Krink, Stephanie ; Muehlhan, Christine ; Luyten, Patrick ; Romer, Georg ; Ramsauer, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><description>Parental reflective functioning (PRF) refers to the capacity of caregivers to reflect upon their children’s internal mental states and intentions, which is seen as crucial for parental sensitivity, defined as the adequate behavioral response to an infant’s signals. In this study, the effect of maternal PRF on sensitivity during the mother–infant interaction was examined in a clinical sample of 50 mothers who were experiencing postpartum depression and their infants aged three to 10 months. Mother and infant were exposed to emotional distress using the still-face procedure. It was hypothesized that low levels of PRF are associated with a decrease in maternal sensitivity in response to distress. Maternal PRF was assessed using the parental reflective functioning questionnaire (PRF). The subscales measured interest and curiosity in mental states, certainty about mental states (i.e., the recognition of the opacity of mental states), and pre-mentalizing modes (i.e., non-mentalizing modes), whereas sensitivity was evaluated using the maternal behavior Q-sort (Mini-MBQS-V). The results revealed a significant overall decrease in maternal sensitivity. As expected, the higher the scores on the pre-mentalizing modes, which indicated low levels of mentalizing through the mothers’ repudiation or defense against it, the greater the decreases in sensitivity. No effects with respect to the interest and curiosity in mental states or the certainty about mental states were found. Our findings determined that the pre-mentalizing modes are predictive of sensitivity to distress in mothers with postpartum depression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-1024</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10826-017-1000-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral responses ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Caregivers ; Child and School Psychology ; Curiosity ; Emotional distress ; Infants ; Maternal depression ; Mental states ; Mother-child relations ; Mother-infant relations ; Mothers ; Original Paper ; Parents & parenting ; Personality Traits ; Postpartum depression ; Postpartum period ; Psychological distress ; Psychology ; Questionnaires ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Still face ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Journal of child and family studies, 2018-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1671-1681</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Journal of Child and Family Studies is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-83955bed4f8d7c01a9266ae166a148f6b0393e598b48539283472bad3b7a83e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-83955bed4f8d7c01a9266ae166a148f6b0393e598b48539283472bad3b7a83e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10826-017-1000-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10826-017-1000-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27901,27902,30976,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krink, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muehlhan, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luyten, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romer, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsauer, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><title>Parental Reflective Functioning Affects Sensitivity to Distress in Mothers with Postpartum Depression</title><title>Journal of child and family studies</title><addtitle>J Child Fam Stud</addtitle><description>Parental reflective functioning (PRF) refers to the capacity of caregivers to reflect upon their children’s internal mental states and intentions, which is seen as crucial for parental sensitivity, defined as the adequate behavioral response to an infant’s signals. In this study, the effect of maternal PRF on sensitivity during the mother–infant interaction was examined in a clinical sample of 50 mothers who were experiencing postpartum depression and their infants aged three to 10 months. Mother and infant were exposed to emotional distress using the still-face procedure. It was hypothesized that low levels of PRF are associated with a decrease in maternal sensitivity in response to distress. Maternal PRF was assessed using the parental reflective functioning questionnaire (PRF). The subscales measured interest and curiosity in mental states, certainty about mental states (i.e., the recognition of the opacity of mental states), and pre-mentalizing modes (i.e., non-mentalizing modes), whereas sensitivity was evaluated using the maternal behavior Q-sort (Mini-MBQS-V). The results revealed a significant overall decrease in maternal sensitivity. As expected, the higher the scores on the pre-mentalizing modes, which indicated low levels of mentalizing through the mothers’ repudiation or defense against it, the greater the decreases in sensitivity. No effects with respect to the interest and curiosity in mental states or the certainty about mental states were found. Our findings determined that the pre-mentalizing modes are predictive of sensitivity to distress in mothers with postpartum depression.</description><subject>Behavioral responses</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Curiosity</subject><subject>Emotional distress</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Maternal depression</subject><subject>Mental states</subject><subject>Mother-child relations</subject><subject>Mother-infant relations</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Personality Traits</subject><subject>Postpartum depression</subject><subject>Postpartum period</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Still face</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>1062-1024</issn><issn>1573-2843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwA9gsMQf8iBN7rFoKSEVUPGbLSW9aV60TbAfUf4-rMLCw3Ifvd46lg9A1JbeUkPIuUCJZkRFaZmknmThBIypKnjGZ89M0k4KlC8vP0UUI24QoydQIwdJ4cNHs8Cs0O6ij_QI8710aWmfdGk-aJr0G_AYu2HS18YBji2c2RA8hYOvwcxs34AP-tnGDl22InfGx3-MZdEckGV2is8bsAlz99jH6mN-_Tx-zxcvD03SyyGpOi5hJroSoYJU3clXWhBrFisIATYXmsikqwhUHoWSVS8EVkzwvWWVWvCqN5ED5GN0Mvp1vP3sIUW_b3rv0paZKsVIWROSJogNV-zYED43uvN0bf9CU6GOaekhTpzSPO9EiadigCYl1a_B_nP8V_QCYtXgr</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Krink, Stephanie</creator><creator>Muehlhan, Christine</creator><creator>Luyten, Patrick</creator><creator>Romer, Georg</creator><creator>Ramsauer, Brigitte</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Parental Reflective Functioning Affects Sensitivity to Distress in Mothers with Postpartum Depression</title><author>Krink, Stephanie ; Muehlhan, Christine ; Luyten, Patrick ; Romer, Georg ; Ramsauer, Brigitte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-83955bed4f8d7c01a9266ae166a148f6b0393e598b48539283472bad3b7a83e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Behavioral responses</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Curiosity</topic><topic>Emotional distress</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Maternal depression</topic><topic>Mental states</topic><topic>Mother-child relations</topic><topic>Mother-infant relations</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Personality Traits</topic><topic>Postpartum depression</topic><topic>Postpartum period</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Still face</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krink, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muehlhan, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luyten, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romer, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsauer, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of child and family studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krink, Stephanie</au><au>Muehlhan, Christine</au><au>Luyten, Patrick</au><au>Romer, Georg</au><au>Ramsauer, Brigitte</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parental Reflective Functioning Affects Sensitivity to Distress in Mothers with Postpartum Depression</atitle><jtitle>Journal of child and family studies</jtitle><stitle>J Child Fam Stud</stitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1671</spage><epage>1681</epage><pages>1671-1681</pages><issn>1062-1024</issn><eissn>1573-2843</eissn><abstract>Parental reflective functioning (PRF) refers to the capacity of caregivers to reflect upon their children’s internal mental states and intentions, which is seen as crucial for parental sensitivity, defined as the adequate behavioral response to an infant’s signals. In this study, the effect of maternal PRF on sensitivity during the mother–infant interaction was examined in a clinical sample of 50 mothers who were experiencing postpartum depression and their infants aged three to 10 months. Mother and infant were exposed to emotional distress using the still-face procedure. It was hypothesized that low levels of PRF are associated with a decrease in maternal sensitivity in response to distress. Maternal PRF was assessed using the parental reflective functioning questionnaire (PRF). The subscales measured interest and curiosity in mental states, certainty about mental states (i.e., the recognition of the opacity of mental states), and pre-mentalizing modes (i.e., non-mentalizing modes), whereas sensitivity was evaluated using the maternal behavior Q-sort (Mini-MBQS-V). The results revealed a significant overall decrease in maternal sensitivity. As expected, the higher the scores on the pre-mentalizing modes, which indicated low levels of mentalizing through the mothers’ repudiation or defense against it, the greater the decreases in sensitivity. No effects with respect to the interest and curiosity in mental states or the certainty about mental states were found. Our findings determined that the pre-mentalizing modes are predictive of sensitivity to distress in mothers with postpartum depression.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10826-017-1000-5</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1062-1024 |
ispartof | Journal of child and family studies, 2018-05, Vol.27 (5), p.1671-1681 |
issn | 1062-1024 1573-2843 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1992786054 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Behavioral responses Behavioral Science and Psychology Caregivers Child and School Psychology Curiosity Emotional distress Infants Maternal depression Mental states Mother-child relations Mother-infant relations Mothers Original Paper Parents & parenting Personality Traits Postpartum depression Postpartum period Psychological distress Psychology Questionnaires Social Sciences Sociology Still face Young Children |
title | Parental Reflective Functioning Affects Sensitivity to Distress in Mothers with Postpartum Depression |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T18%3A33%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parental%20Reflective%20Functioning%20Affects%20Sensitivity%20to%20Distress%20in%20Mothers%20with%20Postpartum%20Depression&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20child%20and%20family%20studies&rft.au=Krink,%20Stephanie&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1671&rft.epage=1681&rft.pages=1671-1681&rft.issn=1062-1024&rft.eissn=1573-2843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10826-017-1000-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1992786054%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992786054&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |