Revisiting Bedrock Values: The Stability and Predictive Power of the Society Works Best Index
In their 2011 piece, Smith et al. argue that there is a set of fundamental or bedrock values that predict ideology and that are strongly influenced by genetics. These values are considered universal, stable, and less susceptible to environmental changes. Smith et al. propose a scale to measure such...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American politics research 2018-03, Vol.46 (2), p.308-335 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 335 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 308 |
container_title | American politics research |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Torres, Michelle Smith, Steven S. |
description | In their 2011 piece, Smith et al. argue that there is a set of fundamental or bedrock values that predict ideology and that are strongly influenced by genetics. These values are considered universal, stable, and less susceptible to environmental changes. Smith et al. propose a scale to measure such values: the Society Works Best Index (SWBI). This is an important contribution, but the SWBI requires further evaluation. Using novel panel data, we evaluate the measure, improve on the empirical application with a national panel, and suggest improvements in the scale. We find that the SWBI is no more stable than other measures of ideology and that the observed changes are attributed to measurement error and environmental factors. Furthermore, like many other political attitudes, its predictive power is mediated by levels of political interest. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1532673X17733797 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1992489877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1532673X17733797</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1992489877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-255fc754b0102b5b83b0414dba263ba70b542dc3a475c97c1b31abf44663c9d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgXb17DHhezeem602LH4WCRevHRZYkm61p66YmabX_3iz1IIKnecO892bmAXCM0SnGQpxhTkkh6EvClIpS7IAe5pzkqaG7HaYk7-b74CCEGUKYsL7ogdd7s7bBRttO4aWpvdNz-CQXKxPO4eTNwIcolV3YuIGyreHYm9rqaNcGjt2n8dA1MHYsp61JnGfn5yH5hAiHbW2-DsFeIxfBHP3UDDxeX00Gt_no7mY4uBjlmqIy5oTzRgvOFMKIKK76VCGGWa0kKaiSAinOSK2pZILrUmisKJaqYawoqC5rRDNwsvVdeveRbo_VzK18m1ZWuCzTp2U_xZIBtGVp70LwpqmW3r5Lv6kwqroQq78hJkm-lQQ5Nb9M_-N_A64ZcMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992489877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting Bedrock Values: The Stability and Predictive Power of the Society Works Best Index</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Torres, Michelle ; Smith, Steven S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Torres, Michelle ; Smith, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><description>In their 2011 piece, Smith et al. argue that there is a set of fundamental or bedrock values that predict ideology and that are strongly influenced by genetics. These values are considered universal, stable, and less susceptible to environmental changes. Smith et al. propose a scale to measure such values: the Society Works Best Index (SWBI). This is an important contribution, but the SWBI requires further evaluation. Using novel panel data, we evaluate the measure, improve on the empirical application with a national panel, and suggest improvements in the scale. We find that the SWBI is no more stable than other measures of ideology and that the observed changes are attributed to measurement error and environmental factors. Furthermore, like many other political attitudes, its predictive power is mediated by levels of political interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1532-673X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1532673X17733797</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Change agents ; Environmental aspects ; Genetics ; Ideology ; Indexes ; Measurement ; Measurement errors ; Panel data ; Political attitudes ; Political power ; Power ; Society ; Values</subject><ispartof>American politics research, 2018-03, Vol.46 (2), p.308-335</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-255fc754b0102b5b83b0414dba263ba70b542dc3a475c97c1b31abf44663c9d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-255fc754b0102b5b83b0414dba263ba70b542dc3a475c97c1b31abf44663c9d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1532673X17733797$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1532673X17733797$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torres, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting Bedrock Values: The Stability and Predictive Power of the Society Works Best Index</title><title>American politics research</title><description>In their 2011 piece, Smith et al. argue that there is a set of fundamental or bedrock values that predict ideology and that are strongly influenced by genetics. These values are considered universal, stable, and less susceptible to environmental changes. Smith et al. propose a scale to measure such values: the Society Works Best Index (SWBI). This is an important contribution, but the SWBI requires further evaluation. Using novel panel data, we evaluate the measure, improve on the empirical application with a national panel, and suggest improvements in the scale. We find that the SWBI is no more stable than other measures of ideology and that the observed changes are attributed to measurement error and environmental factors. Furthermore, like many other political attitudes, its predictive power is mediated by levels of political interest.</description><subject>Change agents</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Measurement errors</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>1532-673X</issn><issn>1552-3373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgXb17DHhezeem602LH4WCRevHRZYkm61p66YmabX_3iz1IIKnecO892bmAXCM0SnGQpxhTkkh6EvClIpS7IAe5pzkqaG7HaYk7-b74CCEGUKYsL7ogdd7s7bBRttO4aWpvdNz-CQXKxPO4eTNwIcolV3YuIGyreHYm9rqaNcGjt2n8dA1MHYsp61JnGfn5yH5hAiHbW2-DsFeIxfBHP3UDDxeX00Gt_no7mY4uBjlmqIy5oTzRgvOFMKIKK76VCGGWa0kKaiSAinOSK2pZILrUmisKJaqYawoqC5rRDNwsvVdeveRbo_VzK18m1ZWuCzTp2U_xZIBtGVp70LwpqmW3r5Lv6kwqroQq78hJkm-lQQ5Nb9M_-N_A64ZcMk</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Torres, Michelle</creator><creator>Smith, Steven S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Revisiting Bedrock Values: The Stability and Predictive Power of the Society Works Best Index</title><author>Torres, Michelle ; Smith, Steven S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-255fc754b0102b5b83b0414dba263ba70b542dc3a475c97c1b31abf44663c9d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Change agents</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Measurement errors</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torres, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Steven S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>American politics research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torres, Michelle</au><au>Smith, Steven S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting Bedrock Values: The Stability and Predictive Power of the Society Works Best Index</atitle><jtitle>American politics research</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>308</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>308-335</pages><issn>1532-673X</issn><eissn>1552-3373</eissn><abstract>In their 2011 piece, Smith et al. argue that there is a set of fundamental or bedrock values that predict ideology and that are strongly influenced by genetics. These values are considered universal, stable, and less susceptible to environmental changes. Smith et al. propose a scale to measure such values: the Society Works Best Index (SWBI). This is an important contribution, but the SWBI requires further evaluation. Using novel panel data, we evaluate the measure, improve on the empirical application with a national panel, and suggest improvements in the scale. We find that the SWBI is no more stable than other measures of ideology and that the observed changes are attributed to measurement error and environmental factors. Furthermore, like many other political attitudes, its predictive power is mediated by levels of political interest.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1532673X17733797</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1532-673X |
ispartof | American politics research, 2018-03, Vol.46 (2), p.308-335 |
issn | 1532-673X 1552-3373 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1992489877 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Change agents Environmental aspects Genetics Ideology Indexes Measurement Measurement errors Panel data Political attitudes Political power Power Society Values |
title | Revisiting Bedrock Values: The Stability and Predictive Power of the Society Works Best Index |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A09%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20Bedrock%20Values:%20The%20Stability%20and%20Predictive%20Power%20of%20the%20Society%20Works%20Best%20Index&rft.jtitle=American%20politics%20research&rft.au=Torres,%20Michelle&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=308&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=308-335&rft.issn=1532-673X&rft.eissn=1552-3373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1532673X17733797&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1992489877%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992489877&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1532673X17733797&rfr_iscdi=true |