From Innovation to Impact: How Higher Education Can Evaluate Innovation's Impact and More Precisely Scale Student Support
[...]using attendance data from the institution's tracking system, we identified the list of students who visited the ACCelerator and considered those students the pilot or program participant group. Since access to the ACCelerator is open to all students, we considered the eligible control gro...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Planning for higher education 2017-07, Vol.45 (4), p.125-136 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 136 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 125 |
| container_title | Planning for higher education |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Milliron, Mark Kil, David Malcolm, Laura Gee, Grace |
| description | [...]using attendance data from the institution's tracking system, we identified the list of students who visited the ACCelerator and considered those students the pilot or program participant group. Since access to the ACCelerator is open to all students, we considered the eligible control group (the group of students valid for PPSM matching) to be all other students who did not visit the ACCelerator during the same term. In the case of the analysis of THINK TANK services, there was interest in applying, enhancing, and automating this methodology to control for selection bias. [...]the next step in UA's analysis-in partnership with Civitas Learning-was automating the ability to run PSM with the added rigor of using a prediction as part of propensity score matching-PPSM. [...]we identified the list of students who used THINK TANK services each term and considered those students the pilot or program participant group. [...]overall, these findings provide support for the continued investment in services that have proven to help students and improve outcomes for wider institutional leadership. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1991592739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A526051986</galeid><sourcerecordid>A526051986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g679-b0f4379bd54a4591aa1c8e109d8b2dd5a1e44260f1b9eb5b61d0382df31650ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNjkFrwkAQhXNoodb2Pwz00FPKbjabZHsT0RqwtKB3mexObCTuppuNxX_fgB5kDg_mfW_e3EUTlossZqoQD9Fj3x8YY4WSfBKdl94dobTWnTA0zkJwUB471OEdVu4PVs3-hzwszKAv_hwtLE7YDhjoJvfaX2OA1sCn8wTfnnTTU3uGjcaWYBMGQzbAZug658NTdF9j29PzVafRdrnYzlfx-uujnM_W8T7LVVyxOhW5qoxMMZWKI3JdEGfKFFVijEROaZpkrOaVokpWGTdMFImpBc8k0ySm0cvlbOfd70B92B3c4O3YuONKcamSXKiRertQ-_HTXWNrFzzqcQwdG-0s1c24n8mxSXJVZOIfCL5oGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1991592739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From Innovation to Impact: How Higher Education Can Evaluate Innovation's Impact and More Precisely Scale Student Support</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Milliron, Mark ; Kil, David ; Malcolm, Laura ; Gee, Grace</creator><creatorcontrib>Milliron, Mark ; Kil, David ; Malcolm, Laura ; Gee, Grace</creatorcontrib><description>[...]using attendance data from the institution's tracking system, we identified the list of students who visited the ACCelerator and considered those students the pilot or program participant group. Since access to the ACCelerator is open to all students, we considered the eligible control group (the group of students valid for PPSM matching) to be all other students who did not visit the ACCelerator during the same term. In the case of the analysis of THINK TANK services, there was interest in applying, enhancing, and automating this methodology to control for selection bias. [...]the next step in UA's analysis-in partnership with Civitas Learning-was automating the ability to run PSM with the added rigor of using a prediction as part of propensity score matching-PPSM. [...]we identified the list of students who used THINK TANK services each term and considered those students the pilot or program participant group. [...]overall, these findings provide support for the continued investment in services that have proven to help students and improve outcomes for wider institutional leadership.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-0983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ann Arbor: Society for College and University Planning</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Algorithms ; Awards & honors ; Bias ; College campuses ; Community Colleges ; Control Groups ; Developmental Studies Programs ; Distance learning ; Education ; Educational aspects ; Educational Needs ; Educational planning ; Educational Technology ; Higher education ; Initiatives ; Innovations ; Leadership ; Methods ; Outcomes of Education ; Product design ; Quality control ; Social aspects ; Student services ; Students ; Success ; Technological innovations</subject><ispartof>Planning for higher education, 2017-07, Vol.45 (4), p.125-136</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Society for College and University Planning</rights><rights>Copyright Society for College and University Planning Jul-Sep 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Milliron, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kil, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malcolm, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gee, Grace</creatorcontrib><title>From Innovation to Impact: How Higher Education Can Evaluate Innovation's Impact and More Precisely Scale Student Support</title><title>Planning for higher education</title><description>[...]using attendance data from the institution's tracking system, we identified the list of students who visited the ACCelerator and considered those students the pilot or program participant group. Since access to the ACCelerator is open to all students, we considered the eligible control group (the group of students valid for PPSM matching) to be all other students who did not visit the ACCelerator during the same term. In the case of the analysis of THINK TANK services, there was interest in applying, enhancing, and automating this methodology to control for selection bias. [...]the next step in UA's analysis-in partnership with Civitas Learning-was automating the ability to run PSM with the added rigor of using a prediction as part of propensity score matching-PPSM. [...]we identified the list of students who used THINK TANK services each term and considered those students the pilot or program participant group. [...]overall, these findings provide support for the continued investment in services that have proven to help students and improve outcomes for wider institutional leadership.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Awards & honors</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>College campuses</subject><subject>Community Colleges</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Developmental Studies Programs</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational aspects</subject><subject>Educational Needs</subject><subject>Educational planning</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Initiatives</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Product design</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Student services</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Technological innovations</subject><issn>0736-0983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpNjkFrwkAQhXNoodb2Pwz00FPKbjabZHsT0RqwtKB3mexObCTuppuNxX_fgB5kDg_mfW_e3EUTlossZqoQD9Fj3x8YY4WSfBKdl94dobTWnTA0zkJwUB471OEdVu4PVs3-hzwszKAv_hwtLE7YDhjoJvfaX2OA1sCn8wTfnnTTU3uGjcaWYBMGQzbAZug658NTdF9j29PzVafRdrnYzlfx-uujnM_W8T7LVVyxOhW5qoxMMZWKI3JdEGfKFFVijEROaZpkrOaVokpWGTdMFImpBc8k0ySm0cvlbOfd70B92B3c4O3YuONKcamSXKiRertQ-_HTXWNrFzzqcQwdG-0s1c24n8mxSXJVZOIfCL5oGQ</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Milliron, Mark</creator><creator>Kil, David</creator><creator>Malcolm, Laura</creator><creator>Gee, Grace</creator><general>Society for College and University Planning</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>From Innovation to Impact: How Higher Education Can Evaluate Innovation's Impact and More Precisely Scale Student Support</title><author>Milliron, Mark ; Kil, David ; Malcolm, Laura ; Gee, Grace</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g679-b0f4379bd54a4591aa1c8e109d8b2dd5a1e44260f1b9eb5b61d0382df31650ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Awards & honors</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>College campuses</topic><topic>Community Colleges</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Developmental Studies Programs</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational aspects</topic><topic>Educational Needs</topic><topic>Educational planning</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Initiatives</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Product design</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Student services</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Technological innovations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Milliron, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kil, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malcolm, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gee, Grace</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Planning for higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Milliron, Mark</au><au>Kil, David</au><au>Malcolm, Laura</au><au>Gee, Grace</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From Innovation to Impact: How Higher Education Can Evaluate Innovation's Impact and More Precisely Scale Student Support</atitle><jtitle>Planning for higher education</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>125-136</pages><issn>0736-0983</issn><abstract>[...]using attendance data from the institution's tracking system, we identified the list of students who visited the ACCelerator and considered those students the pilot or program participant group. Since access to the ACCelerator is open to all students, we considered the eligible control group (the group of students valid for PPSM matching) to be all other students who did not visit the ACCelerator during the same term. In the case of the analysis of THINK TANK services, there was interest in applying, enhancing, and automating this methodology to control for selection bias. [...]the next step in UA's analysis-in partnership with Civitas Learning-was automating the ability to run PSM with the added rigor of using a prediction as part of propensity score matching-PPSM. [...]we identified the list of students who used THINK TANK services each term and considered those students the pilot or program participant group. [...]overall, these findings provide support for the continued investment in services that have proven to help students and improve outcomes for wider institutional leadership.</abstract><cop>Ann Arbor</cop><pub>Society for College and University Planning</pub><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0736-0983 |
| ispartof | Planning for higher education, 2017-07, Vol.45 (4), p.125-136 |
| issn | 0736-0983 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1991592739 |
| source | Education Source |
| subjects | Academic achievement Algorithms Awards & honors Bias College campuses Community Colleges Control Groups Developmental Studies Programs Distance learning Education Educational aspects Educational Needs Educational planning Educational Technology Higher education Initiatives Innovations Leadership Methods Outcomes of Education Product design Quality control Social aspects Student services Students Success Technological innovations |
| title | From Innovation to Impact: How Higher Education Can Evaluate Innovation's Impact and More Precisely Scale Student Support |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T08%3A20%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20Innovation%20to%20Impact:%20How%20Higher%20Education%20Can%20Evaluate%20Innovation's%20Impact%20and%20More%20Precisely%20Scale%20Student%20Support&rft.jtitle=Planning%20for%20higher%20education&rft.au=Milliron,%20Mark&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=125-136&rft.issn=0736-0983&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA526051986%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1991592739&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A526051986&rfr_iscdi=true |