Rigid polyisocyanurate–waterglass foam composite: Preparation, mechanism, and thermal and flame‐retardant properties

ABSTRACT A rigid polyisocyanurate–waterglass foam (PIWGRF) composite was prepared with polyaryl poly(methylene isocyanate) and waterglass (WG) as the main materials; water as a blowing agent, and no polyols. We speculated the formation mechanism of the PIWGRFs on the basis of the analysis of experim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied polymer science 2018-05, Vol.135 (17), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Feng, Guo‐Dong, Hu, Li‐Hong, Ma, Yan, Zhang, Meng, Liu, Cheng‐Guo, Zhou, Yong‐Hong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 17
container_start_page
container_title Journal of applied polymer science
container_volume 135
creator Feng, Guo‐Dong
Hu, Li‐Hong
Ma, Yan
Zhang, Meng
Liu, Cheng‐Guo
Zhou, Yong‐Hong
description ABSTRACT A rigid polyisocyanurate–waterglass foam (PIWGRF) composite was prepared with polyaryl poly(methylene isocyanate) and waterglass (WG) as the main materials; water as a blowing agent, and no polyols. We speculated the formation mechanism of the PIWGRFs on the basis of the analysis of experiment data, scanning electron microscopy characterization, and transmission electron microscopy. The results show that three‐dimensional nanoflakes derived from the cured WG was observed; this was connected with polyisocyanurate by secondary bonding (SiOHN). Thermogravimetric testing indicated that the thermal stability and residual mass (34%) of the PIWGRFs were significantly higher than those of rigid traditional polyurethane foams (T‐PUFs). When the core density of the PIWGRFs was 32.6 kg/m3, the strength was up to 162.9 KPa by excessive filling. The flame retardancy of the PIWGRFs, including the time to ignition, heat‐release rate, total smoke of release, and limiting oxygen index, was obviously better than that of the T‐PUFs. The structure of the residual char was more dense and orderly; this was also an effective barrier layer. The reason was attributed to the fact that the WG did not contain combustible elements. So, the PIWGRFs had excellent thermal stability, flame retardancy, and environmental friendliness. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46182.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/app.46182
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1991275310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1991275310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-5145d245f2bb03202d1668c309e899105f9d47d2ef0cddcceadc7d19b582fc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsL3yDgSui0STqZH3el-AcFi3Qf0vy0KTOTmEyps_MRBN_QJzF23Lq6F-53zuEeAK4xGmOEyIQ7N04zXJATMMCozJM0I8UpGMQbToqypOfgIoQdQhhTlA3A-6vZGAmdrToTrOh4s_e8Vd8fX4c4_KbiIUBteQ2FrZ0NplV3cOmV4xEzthnBWoktb0yoR5A3ErZb5WteHXdd8TpafXrVci9500LnrVO-NSpcgjPNq6Cu_uYQrB7uV_OnZPHy-DyfLRJBypwkFKdUkpRqsl6jKUFE4iwrxBSVKn6DEdWlTHNJlEZCSiEUlyKXuFzTgmiRTYfgpreNyW97FVq2s3vfxESGo57kdIpRpG57SngbgleaOW9q7juGEfvtlcVe2bHXyE569mAq1f0Pstly2St-ANyRfl8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1991275310</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rigid polyisocyanurate–waterglass foam composite: Preparation, mechanism, and thermal and flame‐retardant properties</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Feng, Guo‐Dong ; Hu, Li‐Hong ; Ma, Yan ; Zhang, Meng ; Liu, Cheng‐Guo ; Zhou, Yong‐Hong</creator><creatorcontrib>Feng, Guo‐Dong ; Hu, Li‐Hong ; Ma, Yan ; Zhang, Meng ; Liu, Cheng‐Guo ; Zhou, Yong‐Hong</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT A rigid polyisocyanurate–waterglass foam (PIWGRF) composite was prepared with polyaryl poly(methylene isocyanate) and waterglass (WG) as the main materials; water as a blowing agent, and no polyols. We speculated the formation mechanism of the PIWGRFs on the basis of the analysis of experiment data, scanning electron microscopy characterization, and transmission electron microscopy. The results show that three‐dimensional nanoflakes derived from the cured WG was observed; this was connected with polyisocyanurate by secondary bonding (SiOHN). Thermogravimetric testing indicated that the thermal stability and residual mass (34%) of the PIWGRFs were significantly higher than those of rigid traditional polyurethane foams (T‐PUFs). When the core density of the PIWGRFs was 32.6 kg/m3, the strength was up to 162.9 KPa by excessive filling. The flame retardancy of the PIWGRFs, including the time to ignition, heat‐release rate, total smoke of release, and limiting oxygen index, was obviously better than that of the T‐PUFs. The structure of the residual char was more dense and orderly; this was also an effective barrier layer. The reason was attributed to the fact that the WG did not contain combustible elements. So, the PIWGRFs had excellent thermal stability, flame retardancy, and environmental friendliness. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46182.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/app.46182</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Barrier layers ; Blowing agents ; composites ; degradation ; Electron microscopy ; Flammability ; foams ; Materials science ; Plastic foam ; Polymers ; Polyols ; Polyurethane foam ; Smoke ; thermal properties ; Thermal stability</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied polymer science, 2018-05, Vol.135 (17), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-5145d245f2bb03202d1668c309e899105f9d47d2ef0cddcceadc7d19b582fc63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-5145d245f2bb03202d1668c309e899105f9d47d2ef0cddcceadc7d19b582fc63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5385-5414</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fapp.46182$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fapp.46182$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feng, Guo‐Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Li‐Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Cheng‐Guo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yong‐Hong</creatorcontrib><title>Rigid polyisocyanurate–waterglass foam composite: Preparation, mechanism, and thermal and flame‐retardant properties</title><title>Journal of applied polymer science</title><description>ABSTRACT A rigid polyisocyanurate–waterglass foam (PIWGRF) composite was prepared with polyaryl poly(methylene isocyanate) and waterglass (WG) as the main materials; water as a blowing agent, and no polyols. We speculated the formation mechanism of the PIWGRFs on the basis of the analysis of experiment data, scanning electron microscopy characterization, and transmission electron microscopy. The results show that three‐dimensional nanoflakes derived from the cured WG was observed; this was connected with polyisocyanurate by secondary bonding (SiOHN). Thermogravimetric testing indicated that the thermal stability and residual mass (34%) of the PIWGRFs were significantly higher than those of rigid traditional polyurethane foams (T‐PUFs). When the core density of the PIWGRFs was 32.6 kg/m3, the strength was up to 162.9 KPa by excessive filling. The flame retardancy of the PIWGRFs, including the time to ignition, heat‐release rate, total smoke of release, and limiting oxygen index, was obviously better than that of the T‐PUFs. The structure of the residual char was more dense and orderly; this was also an effective barrier layer. The reason was attributed to the fact that the WG did not contain combustible elements. So, the PIWGRFs had excellent thermal stability, flame retardancy, and environmental friendliness. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46182.</description><subject>Barrier layers</subject><subject>Blowing agents</subject><subject>composites</subject><subject>degradation</subject><subject>Electron microscopy</subject><subject>Flammability</subject><subject>foams</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Plastic foam</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Polyols</subject><subject>Polyurethane foam</subject><subject>Smoke</subject><subject>thermal properties</subject><subject>Thermal stability</subject><issn>0021-8995</issn><issn>1097-4628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsL3yDgSui0STqZH3el-AcFi3Qf0vy0KTOTmEyps_MRBN_QJzF23Lq6F-53zuEeAK4xGmOEyIQ7N04zXJATMMCozJM0I8UpGMQbToqypOfgIoQdQhhTlA3A-6vZGAmdrToTrOh4s_e8Vd8fX4c4_KbiIUBteQ2FrZ0NplV3cOmV4xEzthnBWoktb0yoR5A3ErZb5WteHXdd8TpafXrVci9500LnrVO-NSpcgjPNq6Cu_uYQrB7uV_OnZPHy-DyfLRJBypwkFKdUkpRqsl6jKUFE4iwrxBSVKn6DEdWlTHNJlEZCSiEUlyKXuFzTgmiRTYfgpreNyW97FVq2s3vfxESGo57kdIpRpG57SngbgleaOW9q7juGEfvtlcVe2bHXyE569mAq1f0Pstly2St-ANyRfl8</recordid><startdate>20180505</startdate><enddate>20180505</enddate><creator>Feng, Guo‐Dong</creator><creator>Hu, Li‐Hong</creator><creator>Ma, Yan</creator><creator>Zhang, Meng</creator><creator>Liu, Cheng‐Guo</creator><creator>Zhou, Yong‐Hong</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5385-5414</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180505</creationdate><title>Rigid polyisocyanurate–waterglass foam composite: Preparation, mechanism, and thermal and flame‐retardant properties</title><author>Feng, Guo‐Dong ; Hu, Li‐Hong ; Ma, Yan ; Zhang, Meng ; Liu, Cheng‐Guo ; Zhou, Yong‐Hong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2972-5145d245f2bb03202d1668c309e899105f9d47d2ef0cddcceadc7d19b582fc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Barrier layers</topic><topic>Blowing agents</topic><topic>composites</topic><topic>degradation</topic><topic>Electron microscopy</topic><topic>Flammability</topic><topic>foams</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Plastic foam</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Polyols</topic><topic>Polyurethane foam</topic><topic>Smoke</topic><topic>thermal properties</topic><topic>Thermal stability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feng, Guo‐Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Li‐Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Cheng‐Guo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yong‐Hong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied polymer science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feng, Guo‐Dong</au><au>Hu, Li‐Hong</au><au>Ma, Yan</au><au>Zhang, Meng</au><au>Liu, Cheng‐Guo</au><au>Zhou, Yong‐Hong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rigid polyisocyanurate–waterglass foam composite: Preparation, mechanism, and thermal and flame‐retardant properties</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied polymer science</jtitle><date>2018-05-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>17</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0021-8995</issn><eissn>1097-4628</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT A rigid polyisocyanurate–waterglass foam (PIWGRF) composite was prepared with polyaryl poly(methylene isocyanate) and waterglass (WG) as the main materials; water as a blowing agent, and no polyols. We speculated the formation mechanism of the PIWGRFs on the basis of the analysis of experiment data, scanning electron microscopy characterization, and transmission electron microscopy. The results show that three‐dimensional nanoflakes derived from the cured WG was observed; this was connected with polyisocyanurate by secondary bonding (SiOHN). Thermogravimetric testing indicated that the thermal stability and residual mass (34%) of the PIWGRFs were significantly higher than those of rigid traditional polyurethane foams (T‐PUFs). When the core density of the PIWGRFs was 32.6 kg/m3, the strength was up to 162.9 KPa by excessive filling. The flame retardancy of the PIWGRFs, including the time to ignition, heat‐release rate, total smoke of release, and limiting oxygen index, was obviously better than that of the T‐PUFs. The structure of the residual char was more dense and orderly; this was also an effective barrier layer. The reason was attributed to the fact that the WG did not contain combustible elements. So, the PIWGRFs had excellent thermal stability, flame retardancy, and environmental friendliness. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46182.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/app.46182</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5385-5414</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8995
ispartof Journal of applied polymer science, 2018-05, Vol.135 (17), p.n/a
issn 0021-8995
1097-4628
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1991275310
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Barrier layers
Blowing agents
composites
degradation
Electron microscopy
Flammability
foams
Materials science
Plastic foam
Polymers
Polyols
Polyurethane foam
Smoke
thermal properties
Thermal stability
title Rigid polyisocyanurate–waterglass foam composite: Preparation, mechanism, and thermal and flame‐retardant properties
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T11%3A19%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rigid%20polyisocyanurate%E2%80%93waterglass%20foam%20composite:%20Preparation,%20mechanism,%20and%20thermal%20and%20flame%E2%80%90retardant%20properties&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20polymer%20science&rft.au=Feng,%20Guo%E2%80%90Dong&rft.date=2018-05-05&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=17&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0021-8995&rft.eissn=1097-4628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/app.46182&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1991275310%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1991275310&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true