PROTAGORAS’ GREAT SPEECH

This article seeks to present a detailed textual analysis of Protagoras’ Great Speech in Plato's Protagoras (320c–328d). I will argue that the concept of ἀρετή (‘excellence’ or ‘virtue’) as it appears in the Great Speech is whittled down to a vague notion of civic duty. In this respect, Protago...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Classical quarterly 2017-12, Vol.67 (2), p.380-399
1. Verfasser: Nathan, A.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 399
container_issue 2
container_start_page 380
container_title Classical quarterly
container_volume 67
creator Nathan, A.R.
description This article seeks to present a detailed textual analysis of Protagoras’ Great Speech in Plato's Protagoras (320c–328d). I will argue that the concept of ἀρετή (‘excellence’ or ‘virtue’) as it appears in the Great Speech is whittled down to a vague notion of civic duty. In this respect, Protagoras is bringing himself in line with the democracy, but in doing so the ἀρετή he claims to teach loses much of its initial appeal, particularly in the eyes of his aristocratic clientele. Nevertheless, if the content of Protagoras’ Great Speech overlooks the abilities required to rise to political prominence, the form most assuredly does not. As one would expect from Plato's Protagoras, his speech is replete with just that oratorical prowess his students might expect to acquire from him. This, in turn, has a number of interesting and important implications in the broader context of the Protagoras, in particular regarding the contrast or conflict between long speeches and short-answer dialectic. Moreover, although it has long been noticed that Protagoras neglects rhetoric and personal pre-eminence in his account, as far as I know there has not been any serious attempt to analyse the stylistic aspects of this masterful speech. Accordingly, both this and (to a large extent) my attempt to interpret it within the economy of the dialogue are original.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0009838817000453
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1990491564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0009838817000453</cupid><jstor_id>26546328</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26546328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-2168948469929e78ad0d8c7a2690ae454309d265a354149637d3b0ba0e33b5263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UN1KAkEUHqIgsx6gIBC63jpn5szf5SKrBoLibtfLrDuGkq3N6EV3vUav15O0okQQXZ0D3y8fY9cI9wioH3IAsEYYg7r9SIoT1kHSmChDdMo6ezjZ4-fsIsYVAHLJocNuprNJkQ4nszT_-vjsDWdZWvTyaZb1R5fsbOFeor863i57GmRFf5SMJ8PHfjpO5sLobcJRGUuGlLXcem1cDbWZa8eVBedJkgBbcyWdkIRkldC1qKBy4IWoJFeiy-4OvpvQvO183JarZhde28gSrQWyKBW1LDyw5qGJMfhFuQnLtQvvJUK5n6D8M0GruT1oVnHbhB9BW4aU4KbFxdHTrauwrJ_9r-h_Xb8B1fRhlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1990491564</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PROTAGORAS’ GREAT SPEECH</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Nathan, A.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nathan, A.R.</creatorcontrib><description>This article seeks to present a detailed textual analysis of Protagoras’ Great Speech in Plato's Protagoras (320c–328d). I will argue that the concept of ἀρετή (‘excellence’ or ‘virtue’) as it appears in the Great Speech is whittled down to a vague notion of civic duty. In this respect, Protagoras is bringing himself in line with the democracy, but in doing so the ἀρετή he claims to teach loses much of its initial appeal, particularly in the eyes of his aristocratic clientele. Nevertheless, if the content of Protagoras’ Great Speech overlooks the abilities required to rise to political prominence, the form most assuredly does not. As one would expect from Plato's Protagoras, his speech is replete with just that oratorical prowess his students might expect to acquire from him. This, in turn, has a number of interesting and important implications in the broader context of the Protagoras, in particular regarding the contrast or conflict between long speeches and short-answer dialectic. Moreover, although it has long been noticed that Protagoras neglects rhetoric and personal pre-eminence in his account, as far as I know there has not been any serious attempt to analyse the stylistic aspects of this masterful speech. Accordingly, both this and (to a large extent) my attempt to interpret it within the economy of the dialogue are original.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-8388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0009838817000453</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Allusion ; Ambiguity ; Democracy ; Dialectics ; Dialogue ; Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics ; Greek literature ; Heroism &amp; heroes ; Hippocrates (460?-377? BC) ; Literary characters ; Literary criticism ; Literary devices ; Morality ; Narrative techniques ; Nobility ; Obligations ; Plato (427-347 BC) ; Politics ; Protagoras (485?-10 BC) ; Relativism ; Rhetoric ; Scholars ; Speech ; Speeches ; Text analysis</subject><ispartof>Classical quarterly, 2017-12, Vol.67 (2), p.380-399</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Classical Association 2017</rights><rights>The Classical Association (2017)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-2168948469929e78ad0d8c7a2690ae454309d265a354149637d3b0ba0e33b5263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-2168948469929e78ad0d8c7a2690ae454309d265a354149637d3b0ba0e33b5263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26546328$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0009838817000453/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nathan, A.R.</creatorcontrib><title>PROTAGORAS’ GREAT SPEECH</title><title>Classical quarterly</title><addtitle>The Class. Q</addtitle><description>This article seeks to present a detailed textual analysis of Protagoras’ Great Speech in Plato's Protagoras (320c–328d). I will argue that the concept of ἀρετή (‘excellence’ or ‘virtue’) as it appears in the Great Speech is whittled down to a vague notion of civic duty. In this respect, Protagoras is bringing himself in line with the democracy, but in doing so the ἀρετή he claims to teach loses much of its initial appeal, particularly in the eyes of his aristocratic clientele. Nevertheless, if the content of Protagoras’ Great Speech overlooks the abilities required to rise to political prominence, the form most assuredly does not. As one would expect from Plato's Protagoras, his speech is replete with just that oratorical prowess his students might expect to acquire from him. This, in turn, has a number of interesting and important implications in the broader context of the Protagoras, in particular regarding the contrast or conflict between long speeches and short-answer dialectic. Moreover, although it has long been noticed that Protagoras neglects rhetoric and personal pre-eminence in his account, as far as I know there has not been any serious attempt to analyse the stylistic aspects of this masterful speech. Accordingly, both this and (to a large extent) my attempt to interpret it within the economy of the dialogue are original.</description><subject>Allusion</subject><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Dialectics</subject><subject>Dialogue</subject><subject>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</subject><subject>Greek literature</subject><subject>Heroism &amp; heroes</subject><subject>Hippocrates (460?-377? BC)</subject><subject>Literary characters</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Literary devices</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Narrative techniques</subject><subject>Nobility</subject><subject>Obligations</subject><subject>Plato (427-347 BC)</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Protagoras (485?-10 BC)</subject><subject>Relativism</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Scholars</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speeches</subject><subject>Text analysis</subject><issn>0009-8388</issn><issn>1471-6844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PAF</sourceid><sourceid>PQLNA</sourceid><sourceid>PROLI</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UN1KAkEUHqIgsx6gIBC63jpn5szf5SKrBoLibtfLrDuGkq3N6EV3vUav15O0okQQXZ0D3y8fY9cI9wioH3IAsEYYg7r9SIoT1kHSmChDdMo6ezjZ4-fsIsYVAHLJocNuprNJkQ4nszT_-vjsDWdZWvTyaZb1R5fsbOFeor863i57GmRFf5SMJ8PHfjpO5sLobcJRGUuGlLXcem1cDbWZa8eVBedJkgBbcyWdkIRkldC1qKBy4IWoJFeiy-4OvpvQvO183JarZhde28gSrQWyKBW1LDyw5qGJMfhFuQnLtQvvJUK5n6D8M0GruT1oVnHbhB9BW4aU4KbFxdHTrauwrJ_9r-h_Xb8B1fRhlA</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Nathan, A.R.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Classical Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>PROTAGORAS’ GREAT SPEECH</title><author>Nathan, A.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-2168948469929e78ad0d8c7a2690ae454309d265a354149637d3b0ba0e33b5263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Allusion</topic><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Dialectics</topic><topic>Dialogue</topic><topic>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</topic><topic>Greek literature</topic><topic>Heroism &amp; heroes</topic><topic>Hippocrates (460?-377? BC)</topic><topic>Literary characters</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Literary devices</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Narrative techniques</topic><topic>Nobility</topic><topic>Obligations</topic><topic>Plato (427-347 BC)</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Protagoras (485?-10 BC)</topic><topic>Relativism</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Scholars</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speeches</topic><topic>Text analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nathan, A.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Classical quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nathan, A.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PROTAGORAS’ GREAT SPEECH</atitle><jtitle>Classical quarterly</jtitle><addtitle>The Class. Q</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>380</spage><epage>399</epage><pages>380-399</pages><issn>0009-8388</issn><eissn>1471-6844</eissn><abstract>This article seeks to present a detailed textual analysis of Protagoras’ Great Speech in Plato's Protagoras (320c–328d). I will argue that the concept of ἀρετή (‘excellence’ or ‘virtue’) as it appears in the Great Speech is whittled down to a vague notion of civic duty. In this respect, Protagoras is bringing himself in line with the democracy, but in doing so the ἀρετή he claims to teach loses much of its initial appeal, particularly in the eyes of his aristocratic clientele. Nevertheless, if the content of Protagoras’ Great Speech overlooks the abilities required to rise to political prominence, the form most assuredly does not. As one would expect from Plato's Protagoras, his speech is replete with just that oratorical prowess his students might expect to acquire from him. This, in turn, has a number of interesting and important implications in the broader context of the Protagoras, in particular regarding the contrast or conflict between long speeches and short-answer dialectic. Moreover, although it has long been noticed that Protagoras neglects rhetoric and personal pre-eminence in his account, as far as I know there has not been any serious attempt to analyse the stylistic aspects of this masterful speech. Accordingly, both this and (to a large extent) my attempt to interpret it within the economy of the dialogue are original.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0009838817000453</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-8388
ispartof Classical quarterly, 2017-12, Vol.67 (2), p.380-399
issn 0009-8388
1471-6844
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1990491564
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge Journals
subjects Allusion
Ambiguity
Democracy
Dialectics
Dialogue
Exegesis & hermeneutics
Greek literature
Heroism & heroes
Hippocrates (460?-377? BC)
Literary characters
Literary criticism
Literary devices
Morality
Narrative techniques
Nobility
Obligations
Plato (427-347 BC)
Politics
Protagoras (485?-10 BC)
Relativism
Rhetoric
Scholars
Speech
Speeches
Text analysis
title PROTAGORAS’ GREAT SPEECH
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A43%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PROTAGORAS%E2%80%99%20GREAT%20SPEECH&rft.jtitle=Classical%20quarterly&rft.au=Nathan,%20A.R.&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=380&rft.epage=399&rft.pages=380-399&rft.issn=0009-8388&rft.eissn=1471-6844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0009838817000453&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26546328%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1990491564&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0009838817000453&rft_jstor_id=26546328&rfr_iscdi=true