Randomised comparison of primary stent placement versus primary angioplasty followed by selective stent placement in patients with iliac-artery occlusive disease

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is a safe, simple, and successful treatment for intermittent claudication caused by iliac-artery occlusive disease. Primary stent placement has been proposed as more effective than PTA. We compared the technical results and clinical outcomes of two treatme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 1998-04, Vol.351 (9110), p.1153-1159
Hauptverfasser: Tetteroo, Eric, van der Graaf, Yolanda, Bosch, Johanna L, D van Engelen, Andries, Hunink, Maria GM, Eikelboom, Bert C, Mali, Willem P Th M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1159
container_issue 9110
container_start_page 1153
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 351
creator Tetteroo, Eric
van der Graaf, Yolanda
Bosch, Johanna L
D van Engelen, Andries
Hunink, Maria GM
Eikelboom, Bert C
Mali, Willem P Th M
description Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is a safe, simple, and successful treatment for intermittent claudication caused by iliac-artery occlusive disease. Primary stent placement has been proposed as more effective than PTA. We compared the technical results and clinical outcomes of two treatment strategies—primary placement of a stent across the stenotic segment of the iliac artery, or primary PTA followed by selective stent placement when haemodynamic results were inadequate. We randomly assigned 279 patients with intermittent claudication, recruited from departments of vascular surgery, either to direct stent placement (group I, n=143) or primary angioplasty (group II, n=136), with subsequent stent placement in case of a residual mean pressure gradient greater than 10 mm Hg across the treated site. The main inclusion criterion was intermittent claudication on the basis of iliac-artery stenosis of more than 50%, proven by angiography. All patients had a clinical assesment before intervention and at 3, 12, and 24 months. Clinical success was defined as improvement of at least one clinical category. Secondary endpoints were initial technical results, procedural complications, cumulative patency as assessed by duplex ultrasonography, and quality of life. In group II, selective stent placement was done in 59 (43%) of the 136 patients. The mean follow-up was 9-3 months (range 3–24). Initial haemodynamic success and complication rates were 119 (81%) of 149 limbs and 6 (4%) of 143 limbs (group I) versus 103 (82%) of 126 limbs and 10 (7%) of 136 limbs (group II), respectively. Clinical success rates at 2 years were 29 (78%) of 37 patients and 26 (77%) of 34 patients in groups I and II, respectively (p=0-6); however, 43% and 35% of the patients, respectively, still had symptoms. Quality of life improved significantly after intervention (p < 0-05) but we found no difference between the groups during follow-up. 2-year cumulative patency rates were similar at 71% versus 70% (p=0-2), respectively, as were reintervention rates at 7% versus 4%, respectively (95% Cl -2% to 9%). There were no substantial differences in technical results and clinical outcomes of the two treatment strategies both at short-term and long-term follow-up. Since angioplasty followed by selective stent placement is less expensive than direct placement of a stent, the former seems to be the treatment of choice for lifestyle-limiting intermittent claudication caused by iliac artery occlusive
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09508-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_199048570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673697095081</els_id><sourcerecordid>28866585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-27e8c737797003b51d01e2bb01a679c94d480285209d15cfb583f78b57764fd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU2LFDEQDaLguPoThCAe9NBa6U46nZPI4hcsCH6At5BOqjVLT6dNZWbZn-M_NbMzzMWDpyqo915VvcfYUwGvBIj-9VcQEpped_0Lo1-CUTA04h7bCKllo6T-cZ9tzpCH7BHRNQDIHtSG_fnilpC2kTBwn7ary5HSwtPE1xy3Lt9yKrgUvs7O4_bQ7THTjs5jt_yMqU6p3PIpzXO6qUpjpeGMvsQ9_iMQF766EmtL_CaWXzzO0fnG5YJVL3k_7-jAC_UoR_iYPZjcTPjkVC_Y9_fvvl1-bK4-f_h0-faq8VJAaVqNg9ed1kYDdKMSAQS24wjC9dp4I4McoB1UCyYI5adRDd2kh1Fp3csptN0Fe3bUXXP6vUMq9jrt8lJXWmEMyEFpqCB1BPmciDJO9uSDFWAPYdi7MOzBaWu0vQvDisp7fhJ35N08Zbf4SGdy20KnZF9hb44wrI_uI2ZLvhrlMcRc3bQhxf8s-gv1LKIB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199048570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomised comparison of primary stent placement versus primary angioplasty followed by selective stent placement in patients with iliac-artery occlusive disease</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Tetteroo, Eric ; van der Graaf, Yolanda ; Bosch, Johanna L ; D van Engelen, Andries ; Hunink, Maria GM ; Eikelboom, Bert C ; Mali, Willem P Th M</creator><creatorcontrib>Tetteroo, Eric ; van der Graaf, Yolanda ; Bosch, Johanna L ; D van Engelen, Andries ; Hunink, Maria GM ; Eikelboom, Bert C ; Mali, Willem P Th M ; for the Dutch lliac Stent Trial Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is a safe, simple, and successful treatment for intermittent claudication caused by iliac-artery occlusive disease. Primary stent placement has been proposed as more effective than PTA. We compared the technical results and clinical outcomes of two treatment strategies—primary placement of a stent across the stenotic segment of the iliac artery, or primary PTA followed by selective stent placement when haemodynamic results were inadequate. We randomly assigned 279 patients with intermittent claudication, recruited from departments of vascular surgery, either to direct stent placement (group I, n=143) or primary angioplasty (group II, n=136), with subsequent stent placement in case of a residual mean pressure gradient greater than 10 mm Hg across the treated site. The main inclusion criterion was intermittent claudication on the basis of iliac-artery stenosis of more than 50%, proven by angiography. All patients had a clinical assesment before intervention and at 3, 12, and 24 months. Clinical success was defined as improvement of at least one clinical category. Secondary endpoints were initial technical results, procedural complications, cumulative patency as assessed by duplex ultrasonography, and quality of life. In group II, selective stent placement was done in 59 (43%) of the 136 patients. The mean follow-up was 9-3 months (range 3–24). Initial haemodynamic success and complication rates were 119 (81%) of 149 limbs and 6 (4%) of 143 limbs (group I) versus 103 (82%) of 126 limbs and 10 (7%) of 136 limbs (group II), respectively. Clinical success rates at 2 years were 29 (78%) of 37 patients and 26 (77%) of 34 patients in groups I and II, respectively (p=0-6); however, 43% and 35% of the patients, respectively, still had symptoms. Quality of life improved significantly after intervention (p &lt; 0-05) but we found no difference between the groups during follow-up. 2-year cumulative patency rates were similar at 71% versus 70% (p=0-2), respectively, as were reintervention rates at 7% versus 4%, respectively (95% Cl -2% to 9%). There were no substantial differences in technical results and clinical outcomes of the two treatment strategies both at short-term and long-term follow-up. Since angioplasty followed by selective stent placement is less expensive than direct placement of a stent, the former seems to be the treatment of choice for lifestyle-limiting intermittent claudication caused by iliac artery occlusive disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09508-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Blood and lymphatic vessels ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Cardiovascular disease ; Comparative studies ; Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous ; Medical procedures ; Medical sciences ; Quality of life</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 1998-04, Vol.351 (9110), p.1153-1159</ispartof><rights>1998 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lancet Ltd. Apr 18, 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-27e8c737797003b51d01e2bb01a679c94d480285209d15cfb583f78b57764fd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-27e8c737797003b51d01e2bb01a679c94d480285209d15cfb583f78b57764fd23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/199048570?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2203546$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tetteroo, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Graaf, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch, Johanna L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D van Engelen, Andries</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunink, Maria GM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eikelboom, Bert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mali, Willem P Th M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the Dutch lliac Stent Trial Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Randomised comparison of primary stent placement versus primary angioplasty followed by selective stent placement in patients with iliac-artery occlusive disease</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is a safe, simple, and successful treatment for intermittent claudication caused by iliac-artery occlusive disease. Primary stent placement has been proposed as more effective than PTA. We compared the technical results and clinical outcomes of two treatment strategies—primary placement of a stent across the stenotic segment of the iliac artery, or primary PTA followed by selective stent placement when haemodynamic results were inadequate. We randomly assigned 279 patients with intermittent claudication, recruited from departments of vascular surgery, either to direct stent placement (group I, n=143) or primary angioplasty (group II, n=136), with subsequent stent placement in case of a residual mean pressure gradient greater than 10 mm Hg across the treated site. The main inclusion criterion was intermittent claudication on the basis of iliac-artery stenosis of more than 50%, proven by angiography. All patients had a clinical assesment before intervention and at 3, 12, and 24 months. Clinical success was defined as improvement of at least one clinical category. Secondary endpoints were initial technical results, procedural complications, cumulative patency as assessed by duplex ultrasonography, and quality of life. In group II, selective stent placement was done in 59 (43%) of the 136 patients. The mean follow-up was 9-3 months (range 3–24). Initial haemodynamic success and complication rates were 119 (81%) of 149 limbs and 6 (4%) of 143 limbs (group I) versus 103 (82%) of 126 limbs and 10 (7%) of 136 limbs (group II), respectively. Clinical success rates at 2 years were 29 (78%) of 37 patients and 26 (77%) of 34 patients in groups I and II, respectively (p=0-6); however, 43% and 35% of the patients, respectively, still had symptoms. Quality of life improved significantly after intervention (p &lt; 0-05) but we found no difference between the groups during follow-up. 2-year cumulative patency rates were similar at 71% versus 70% (p=0-2), respectively, as were reintervention rates at 7% versus 4%, respectively (95% Cl -2% to 9%). There were no substantial differences in technical results and clinical outcomes of the two treatment strategies both at short-term and long-term follow-up. Since angioplasty followed by selective stent placement is less expensive than direct placement of a stent, the former seems to be the treatment of choice for lifestyle-limiting intermittent claudication caused by iliac artery occlusive disease.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood and lymphatic vessels</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Medical procedures</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU2LFDEQDaLguPoThCAe9NBa6U46nZPI4hcsCH6At5BOqjVLT6dNZWbZn-M_NbMzzMWDpyqo915VvcfYUwGvBIj-9VcQEpped_0Lo1-CUTA04h7bCKllo6T-cZ9tzpCH7BHRNQDIHtSG_fnilpC2kTBwn7ary5HSwtPE1xy3Lt9yKrgUvs7O4_bQ7THTjs5jt_yMqU6p3PIpzXO6qUpjpeGMvsQ9_iMQF766EmtL_CaWXzzO0fnG5YJVL3k_7-jAC_UoR_iYPZjcTPjkVC_Y9_fvvl1-bK4-f_h0-faq8VJAaVqNg9ed1kYDdKMSAQS24wjC9dp4I4McoB1UCyYI5adRDd2kh1Fp3csptN0Fe3bUXXP6vUMq9jrt8lJXWmEMyEFpqCB1BPmciDJO9uSDFWAPYdi7MOzBaWu0vQvDisp7fhJ35N08Zbf4SGdy20KnZF9hb44wrI_uI2ZLvhrlMcRc3bQhxf8s-gv1LKIB</recordid><startdate>19980418</startdate><enddate>19980418</enddate><creator>Tetteroo, Eric</creator><creator>van der Graaf, Yolanda</creator><creator>Bosch, Johanna L</creator><creator>D van Engelen, Andries</creator><creator>Hunink, Maria GM</creator><creator>Eikelboom, Bert C</creator><creator>Mali, Willem P Th M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Lancet</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980418</creationdate><title>Randomised comparison of primary stent placement versus primary angioplasty followed by selective stent placement in patients with iliac-artery occlusive disease</title><author>Tetteroo, Eric ; van der Graaf, Yolanda ; Bosch, Johanna L ; D van Engelen, Andries ; Hunink, Maria GM ; Eikelboom, Bert C ; Mali, Willem P Th M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-27e8c737797003b51d01e2bb01a679c94d480285209d15cfb583f78b57764fd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood and lymphatic vessels</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Medical procedures</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tetteroo, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Graaf, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch, Johanna L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D van Engelen, Andries</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunink, Maria GM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eikelboom, Bert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mali, Willem P Th M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the Dutch lliac Stent Trial Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tetteroo, Eric</au><au>van der Graaf, Yolanda</au><au>Bosch, Johanna L</au><au>D van Engelen, Andries</au><au>Hunink, Maria GM</au><au>Eikelboom, Bert C</au><au>Mali, Willem P Th M</au><aucorp>for the Dutch lliac Stent Trial Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomised comparison of primary stent placement versus primary angioplasty followed by selective stent placement in patients with iliac-artery occlusive disease</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>1998-04-18</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>351</volume><issue>9110</issue><spage>1153</spage><epage>1159</epage><pages>1153-1159</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is a safe, simple, and successful treatment for intermittent claudication caused by iliac-artery occlusive disease. Primary stent placement has been proposed as more effective than PTA. We compared the technical results and clinical outcomes of two treatment strategies—primary placement of a stent across the stenotic segment of the iliac artery, or primary PTA followed by selective stent placement when haemodynamic results were inadequate. We randomly assigned 279 patients with intermittent claudication, recruited from departments of vascular surgery, either to direct stent placement (group I, n=143) or primary angioplasty (group II, n=136), with subsequent stent placement in case of a residual mean pressure gradient greater than 10 mm Hg across the treated site. The main inclusion criterion was intermittent claudication on the basis of iliac-artery stenosis of more than 50%, proven by angiography. All patients had a clinical assesment before intervention and at 3, 12, and 24 months. Clinical success was defined as improvement of at least one clinical category. Secondary endpoints were initial technical results, procedural complications, cumulative patency as assessed by duplex ultrasonography, and quality of life. In group II, selective stent placement was done in 59 (43%) of the 136 patients. The mean follow-up was 9-3 months (range 3–24). Initial haemodynamic success and complication rates were 119 (81%) of 149 limbs and 6 (4%) of 143 limbs (group I) versus 103 (82%) of 126 limbs and 10 (7%) of 136 limbs (group II), respectively. Clinical success rates at 2 years were 29 (78%) of 37 patients and 26 (77%) of 34 patients in groups I and II, respectively (p=0-6); however, 43% and 35% of the patients, respectively, still had symptoms. Quality of life improved significantly after intervention (p &lt; 0-05) but we found no difference between the groups during follow-up. 2-year cumulative patency rates were similar at 71% versus 70% (p=0-2), respectively, as were reintervention rates at 7% versus 4%, respectively (95% Cl -2% to 9%). There were no substantial differences in technical results and clinical outcomes of the two treatment strategies both at short-term and long-term follow-up. Since angioplasty followed by selective stent placement is less expensive than direct placement of a stent, the former seems to be the treatment of choice for lifestyle-limiting intermittent claudication caused by iliac artery occlusive disease.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09508-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 1998-04, Vol.351 (9110), p.1153-1159
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_199048570
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Blood and lymphatic vessels
Cardiology. Vascular system
Cardiovascular disease
Comparative studies
Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous
Medical procedures
Medical sciences
Quality of life
title Randomised comparison of primary stent placement versus primary angioplasty followed by selective stent placement in patients with iliac-artery occlusive disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T03%3A52%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomised%20comparison%20of%20primary%20stent%20placement%20versus%20primary%20angioplasty%20followed%20by%20selective%20stent%20placement%20in%20patients%20with%20iliac-artery%20occlusive%20disease&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Tetteroo,%20Eric&rft.aucorp=for%20the%20Dutch%20lliac%20Stent%20Trial%20Study%20Group&rft.date=1998-04-18&rft.volume=351&rft.issue=9110&rft.spage=1153&rft.epage=1159&rft.pages=1153-1159&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09508-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28866585%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199048570&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140673697095081&rfr_iscdi=true