Deconstructing the Effects of Flow on DOC, Nitrate, and Major Ion Interactions Using a High‐Frequency Aquatic Sensor Network

Streams provide a physical linkage between land and downstream river networks, delivering solutes derived from multiple catchment sources. We analyzed high‐frequency time series of stream solutes to characterize the timing and magnitude of major ion, nutrient, and organic matter transport over event...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2017-12, Vol.53 (12), p.10655-10673
Hauptverfasser: Koenig, L E, Shattuck, M D, Snyder, L E, Potter, J D, McDowell, W H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10673
container_issue 12
container_start_page 10655
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 53
creator Koenig, L E
Shattuck, M D
Snyder, L E
Potter, J D
McDowell, W H
description Streams provide a physical linkage between land and downstream river networks, delivering solutes derived from multiple catchment sources. We analyzed high‐frequency time series of stream solutes to characterize the timing and magnitude of major ion, nutrient, and organic matter transport over event, seasonal, and annual timescales as well as to assess whether nitrate ( ) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) transport are coupled in catchments, which would be expected if they are subject to similar biogeochemical controls throughout the watershed. Our data set includes in situ observations of , fluorescent dissolved organic matter (DOC proxy), and specific conductance spanning 2–4 years in 10 streams and rivers across New Hampshire, including observations of nearly 700 individual hydrologic events. We found a positive response of and DOC to flow in forested streams, but watershed development led to a negative relationship between and discharge, and thus a decoupling of the overall and DOC responses to flow. On event and seasonal timescales, and DOC consistently displayed different behaviors. For example, in several streams, FDOM yield was greatest during summer storms while yield was greatest during winter storms. Most streams had generalizable storm and DOC responses, but differences in the timing of and DOC transport suggest different catchment sources. Further, certain events, including rain‐on‐snow and summer storms following dry antecedent conditions, yielded disproportionate responses. High‐frequency data allow for increased understanding of the processes controlling solute variability and will help reveal their responses to changing climatic regimes. Concentration‐discharge relationships did not fully explain solute variation but sensor data may provide insight into other sources of temporal variability The timing of solute variability differed for nitrate and dissolved organic carbon on seasonal and event timescales, suggesting different catchment sources Most streams had generalizable nitrate, dissolved organic carbon, and major ion responses to stormflow that were modified by season and antecedent conditions
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2017WR020739
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1990282818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2985539673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-bbc45221fdd015bf6aa9a6cd921acdf804eca1cd05f53f34da8d05cf9223accd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctKAzEYhYMoWKs7HyDgxkVHc5lblqW2tlAteMHl8DeT6NQx0SRD6UZ8BJ_RJzFFF-LqP_B_53DgIHRMyRklhJ0zQouHG8JIwcUO6lGRpkkhCr6LeoSkPKFcFPvowPsVITTN8qKH3i-UtMYH18nQmEccnhQea61k8NhqPGntGluDLxajAb5ugoOgBhhMja9gZR2exd_MBOUg2mMOvvfbFMDT5vHp6-Nz4tRbp4zc4OFbB6GR-FYZH43XKqytez5Eexpar45-bx_dT8Z3o2kyX1zORsN5AjwrQrJcyjRjjOq6JjRb6hxAQC5rwSjIWpckVRKorEmmM655WkMZtdSCMQ5S1ryPTn9yX52NhXyoXhovVduCUbbzFRNllnGRFzyiJ__Qle2cie0qKgRhJStpGanBDyWd9d4pXb265gXcpqKk2o5R_R2DfwPTWn3y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1990282818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deconstructing the Effects of Flow on DOC, Nitrate, and Major Ion Interactions Using a High‐Frequency Aquatic Sensor Network</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Koenig, L E ; Shattuck, M D ; Snyder, L E ; Potter, J D ; McDowell, W H</creator><creatorcontrib>Koenig, L E ; Shattuck, M D ; Snyder, L E ; Potter, J D ; McDowell, W H</creatorcontrib><description>Streams provide a physical linkage between land and downstream river networks, delivering solutes derived from multiple catchment sources. We analyzed high‐frequency time series of stream solutes to characterize the timing and magnitude of major ion, nutrient, and organic matter transport over event, seasonal, and annual timescales as well as to assess whether nitrate ( ) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) transport are coupled in catchments, which would be expected if they are subject to similar biogeochemical controls throughout the watershed. Our data set includes in situ observations of , fluorescent dissolved organic matter (DOC proxy), and specific conductance spanning 2–4 years in 10 streams and rivers across New Hampshire, including observations of nearly 700 individual hydrologic events. We found a positive response of and DOC to flow in forested streams, but watershed development led to a negative relationship between and discharge, and thus a decoupling of the overall and DOC responses to flow. On event and seasonal timescales, and DOC consistently displayed different behaviors. For example, in several streams, FDOM yield was greatest during summer storms while yield was greatest during winter storms. Most streams had generalizable storm and DOC responses, but differences in the timing of and DOC transport suggest different catchment sources. Further, certain events, including rain‐on‐snow and summer storms following dry antecedent conditions, yielded disproportionate responses. High‐frequency data allow for increased understanding of the processes controlling solute variability and will help reveal their responses to changing climatic regimes. Concentration‐discharge relationships did not fully explain solute variation but sensor data may provide insight into other sources of temporal variability The timing of solute variability differed for nitrate and dissolved organic carbon on seasonal and event timescales, suggesting different catchment sources Most streams had generalizable nitrate, dissolved organic carbon, and major ion responses to stormflow that were modified by season and antecedent conditions</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2017WR020739</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biogeochemistry ; Carbon ; Catchment area ; Catchments ; Climate change ; Conductance ; data collection ; Decoupling ; Dissolved organic carbon ; Dissolved organic matter ; Fluorescence ; Hydrology ; Interactions ; Mineral nutrients ; New Hampshire ; Nitrates ; Nutrient transport ; Organic carbon ; Rain ; Resistance ; River networks ; Rivers ; Solutes ; Storms ; Streams ; Summer ; Summer storms ; time series analysis ; Transport processes ; water ; Watershed management ; watersheds ; Winter storms ; Yields</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2017-12, Vol.53 (12), p.10655-10673</ispartof><rights>2017. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-bbc45221fdd015bf6aa9a6cd921acdf804eca1cd05f53f34da8d05cf9223accd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-bbc45221fdd015bf6aa9a6cd921acdf804eca1cd05f53f34da8d05cf9223accd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7790-330X ; 0000-0002-7462-4858 ; 0000-0002-5865-685X ; 0000-0002-3757-138X ; 0000-0002-8739-9047</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koenig, L E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shattuck, M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, L E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDowell, W H</creatorcontrib><title>Deconstructing the Effects of Flow on DOC, Nitrate, and Major Ion Interactions Using a High‐Frequency Aquatic Sensor Network</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Streams provide a physical linkage between land and downstream river networks, delivering solutes derived from multiple catchment sources. We analyzed high‐frequency time series of stream solutes to characterize the timing and magnitude of major ion, nutrient, and organic matter transport over event, seasonal, and annual timescales as well as to assess whether nitrate ( ) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) transport are coupled in catchments, which would be expected if they are subject to similar biogeochemical controls throughout the watershed. Our data set includes in situ observations of , fluorescent dissolved organic matter (DOC proxy), and specific conductance spanning 2–4 years in 10 streams and rivers across New Hampshire, including observations of nearly 700 individual hydrologic events. We found a positive response of and DOC to flow in forested streams, but watershed development led to a negative relationship between and discharge, and thus a decoupling of the overall and DOC responses to flow. On event and seasonal timescales, and DOC consistently displayed different behaviors. For example, in several streams, FDOM yield was greatest during summer storms while yield was greatest during winter storms. Most streams had generalizable storm and DOC responses, but differences in the timing of and DOC transport suggest different catchment sources. Further, certain events, including rain‐on‐snow and summer storms following dry antecedent conditions, yielded disproportionate responses. High‐frequency data allow for increased understanding of the processes controlling solute variability and will help reveal their responses to changing climatic regimes. Concentration‐discharge relationships did not fully explain solute variation but sensor data may provide insight into other sources of temporal variability The timing of solute variability differed for nitrate and dissolved organic carbon on seasonal and event timescales, suggesting different catchment sources Most streams had generalizable nitrate, dissolved organic carbon, and major ion responses to stormflow that were modified by season and antecedent conditions</description><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Conductance</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Decoupling</subject><subject>Dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Dissolved organic matter</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Interactions</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>New Hampshire</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nutrient transport</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>River networks</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Solutes</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Summer storms</subject><subject>time series analysis</subject><subject>Transport processes</subject><subject>water</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><subject>Winter storms</subject><subject>Yields</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkctKAzEYhYMoWKs7HyDgxkVHc5lblqW2tlAteMHl8DeT6NQx0SRD6UZ8BJ_RJzFFF-LqP_B_53DgIHRMyRklhJ0zQouHG8JIwcUO6lGRpkkhCr6LeoSkPKFcFPvowPsVITTN8qKH3i-UtMYH18nQmEccnhQea61k8NhqPGntGluDLxajAb5ugoOgBhhMja9gZR2exd_MBOUg2mMOvvfbFMDT5vHp6-Nz4tRbp4zc4OFbB6GR-FYZH43XKqytez5Eexpar45-bx_dT8Z3o2kyX1zORsN5AjwrQrJcyjRjjOq6JjRb6hxAQC5rwSjIWpckVRKorEmmM655WkMZtdSCMQ5S1ryPTn9yX52NhXyoXhovVduCUbbzFRNllnGRFzyiJ__Qle2cie0qKgRhJStpGanBDyWd9d4pXb265gXcpqKk2o5R_R2DfwPTWn3y</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Koenig, L E</creator><creator>Shattuck, M D</creator><creator>Snyder, L E</creator><creator>Potter, J D</creator><creator>McDowell, W H</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7790-330X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7462-4858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5865-685X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3757-138X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8739-9047</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Deconstructing the Effects of Flow on DOC, Nitrate, and Major Ion Interactions Using a High‐Frequency Aquatic Sensor Network</title><author>Koenig, L E ; Shattuck, M D ; Snyder, L E ; Potter, J D ; McDowell, W H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a357t-bbc45221fdd015bf6aa9a6cd921acdf804eca1cd05f53f34da8d05cf9223accd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Conductance</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Decoupling</topic><topic>Dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Dissolved organic matter</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Interactions</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>New Hampshire</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nutrient transport</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>River networks</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Solutes</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Summer storms</topic><topic>time series analysis</topic><topic>Transport processes</topic><topic>water</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><topic>Winter storms</topic><topic>Yields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koenig, L E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shattuck, M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, L E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDowell, W H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koenig, L E</au><au>Shattuck, M D</au><au>Snyder, L E</au><au>Potter, J D</au><au>McDowell, W H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deconstructing the Effects of Flow on DOC, Nitrate, and Major Ion Interactions Using a High‐Frequency Aquatic Sensor Network</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>10655</spage><epage>10673</epage><pages>10655-10673</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Streams provide a physical linkage between land and downstream river networks, delivering solutes derived from multiple catchment sources. We analyzed high‐frequency time series of stream solutes to characterize the timing and magnitude of major ion, nutrient, and organic matter transport over event, seasonal, and annual timescales as well as to assess whether nitrate ( ) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) transport are coupled in catchments, which would be expected if they are subject to similar biogeochemical controls throughout the watershed. Our data set includes in situ observations of , fluorescent dissolved organic matter (DOC proxy), and specific conductance spanning 2–4 years in 10 streams and rivers across New Hampshire, including observations of nearly 700 individual hydrologic events. We found a positive response of and DOC to flow in forested streams, but watershed development led to a negative relationship between and discharge, and thus a decoupling of the overall and DOC responses to flow. On event and seasonal timescales, and DOC consistently displayed different behaviors. For example, in several streams, FDOM yield was greatest during summer storms while yield was greatest during winter storms. Most streams had generalizable storm and DOC responses, but differences in the timing of and DOC transport suggest different catchment sources. Further, certain events, including rain‐on‐snow and summer storms following dry antecedent conditions, yielded disproportionate responses. High‐frequency data allow for increased understanding of the processes controlling solute variability and will help reveal their responses to changing climatic regimes. Concentration‐discharge relationships did not fully explain solute variation but sensor data may provide insight into other sources of temporal variability The timing of solute variability differed for nitrate and dissolved organic carbon on seasonal and event timescales, suggesting different catchment sources Most streams had generalizable nitrate, dissolved organic carbon, and major ion responses to stormflow that were modified by season and antecedent conditions</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/2017WR020739</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7790-330X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7462-4858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5865-685X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3757-138X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8739-9047</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2017-12, Vol.53 (12), p.10655-10673
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1990282818
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Biogeochemistry
Carbon
Catchment area
Catchments
Climate change
Conductance
data collection
Decoupling
Dissolved organic carbon
Dissolved organic matter
Fluorescence
Hydrology
Interactions
Mineral nutrients
New Hampshire
Nitrates
Nutrient transport
Organic carbon
Rain
Resistance
River networks
Rivers
Solutes
Storms
Streams
Summer
Summer storms
time series analysis
Transport processes
water
Watershed management
watersheds
Winter storms
Yields
title Deconstructing the Effects of Flow on DOC, Nitrate, and Major Ion Interactions Using a High‐Frequency Aquatic Sensor Network
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A21%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deconstructing%20the%20Effects%20of%20Flow%20on%20DOC,%20Nitrate,%20and%20Major%20Ion%20Interactions%20Using%20a%20High%E2%80%90Frequency%20Aquatic%20Sensor%20Network&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Koenig,%20L%20E&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=10655&rft.epage=10673&rft.pages=10655-10673&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2017WR020739&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2985539673%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1990282818&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true