Inventory investment, product cycles, and the imperfectly competitive firm
We consider a profit-maximizing, imperfectly competitive firm, with downward-sloping demand functions, that can produce multiple products at a single facility. We show that if the firm dedicates production to a single product, both dynamic production, which exploits inventory, and static production,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of production economics 1998-05, Vol.54 (3), p.267-276 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 276 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 267 |
container_title | International journal of production economics |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Jones, Philip C. Moses, Leon N. Zydiak, James L. |
description | We consider a profit-maximizing, imperfectly competitive firm, with downward-sloping demand functions, that can produce multiple products at a single facility. We show that if the firm dedicates production to a single product, both dynamic production, which exploits inventory, and static production, which does not, can be optimal. We also consider sharing the production facility by multiple products. We evaluate the efficiency of scheduling production using simple rotation cycle scheduling, and give a condition for guaranteeing optimality of this scheduling rule. We conclude by studying when dedicated production is preferred over shared production. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00002-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198956073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925527398000024</els_id><sourcerecordid>34129600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-9e6f0acb794060175e8d4fae26d287017259e7174d30f7663756e6a0f33f66bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1rGzEUFKWBuk5-QmEpPTSQbfSxklanEkKbJgRyaHMWsvYJy3g_KsmG_fd5sYOvEYykJ2beG0aEfGH0B6NMXf-lhstaci2-m_aS4uJ184EsWKtFraU2H8niRPlEPue8QY5mbbsgD_fDHoYyprmKeMulx-qqmtLY7Xyp_Oy3kK8qN3RVWUMV-wlSAF-2c-VHLEoscQ9ViKk_J2fBbTNcvJ1L8vz717_bP_Xj09397c1j7RvFSm1ABer8SpuGKsq0hLZrggOuOt5qfODSgGa66QQNWimhpQLlaBAiKLXqxJJ8PfZFk_93aNluxl0acKRlpjVSUS2QJI8kn8acEwQ7pdi7NFtG7Wtq9pCafY3EmtYeUrMN6h6OugQT-JMIAHAa-NHurXCywW1GMINS4SJCICYEV9pyrey69Njs25tTl73bhuQGH_OpKcfZFP9oSX4eaYCp7SMkm32EwUMXE0ZtuzG-4_oFLZOZig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198956073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inventory investment, product cycles, and the imperfectly competitive firm</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Jones, Philip C. ; Moses, Leon N. ; Zydiak, James L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Philip C. ; Moses, Leon N. ; Zydiak, James L.</creatorcontrib><description>We consider a profit-maximizing, imperfectly competitive firm, with downward-sloping demand functions, that can produce multiple products at a single facility. We show that if the firm dedicates production to a single product, both dynamic production, which exploits inventory, and static production, which does not, can be optimal. We also consider sharing the production facility by multiple products. We evaluate the efficiency of scheduling production using simple rotation cycle scheduling, and give a condition for guaranteeing optimality of this scheduling rule. We conclude by studying when dedicated production is preferred over shared production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7579</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00002-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPCEY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Competition ; Exact sciences and technology ; Imperfect competition ; Multiple products ; Operational research and scientific management ; Operational research. Management science ; Production scheduling ; Rotation cycle scheduling ; Scheduling, sequencing ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of production economics, 1998-05, Vol.54 (3), p.267-276</ispartof><rights>1998</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. May 18, 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-9e6f0acb794060175e8d4fae26d287017259e7174d30f7663756e6a0f33f66bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-9e6f0acb794060175e8d4fae26d287017259e7174d30f7663756e6a0f33f66bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00002-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,4010,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2273087$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeproeco/v_3a54_3ay_3a1998_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a267-276.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Philip C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moses, Leon N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zydiak, James L.</creatorcontrib><title>Inventory investment, product cycles, and the imperfectly competitive firm</title><title>International journal of production economics</title><description>We consider a profit-maximizing, imperfectly competitive firm, with downward-sloping demand functions, that can produce multiple products at a single facility. We show that if the firm dedicates production to a single product, both dynamic production, which exploits inventory, and static production, which does not, can be optimal. We also consider sharing the production facility by multiple products. We evaluate the efficiency of scheduling production using simple rotation cycle scheduling, and give a condition for guaranteeing optimality of this scheduling rule. We conclude by studying when dedicated production is preferred over shared production.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Imperfect competition</subject><subject>Multiple products</subject><subject>Operational research and scientific management</subject><subject>Operational research. Management science</subject><subject>Production scheduling</subject><subject>Rotation cycle scheduling</subject><subject>Scheduling, sequencing</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0925-5273</issn><issn>1873-7579</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1rGzEUFKWBuk5-QmEpPTSQbfSxklanEkKbJgRyaHMWsvYJy3g_KsmG_fd5sYOvEYykJ2beG0aEfGH0B6NMXf-lhstaci2-m_aS4uJ184EsWKtFraU2H8niRPlEPue8QY5mbbsgD_fDHoYyprmKeMulx-qqmtLY7Xyp_Oy3kK8qN3RVWUMV-wlSAF-2c-VHLEoscQ9ViKk_J2fBbTNcvJ1L8vz717_bP_Xj09397c1j7RvFSm1ABer8SpuGKsq0hLZrggOuOt5qfODSgGa66QQNWimhpQLlaBAiKLXqxJJ8PfZFk_93aNluxl0acKRlpjVSUS2QJI8kn8acEwQ7pdi7NFtG7Wtq9pCafY3EmtYeUrMN6h6OugQT-JMIAHAa-NHurXCywW1GMINS4SJCICYEV9pyrey69Njs25tTl73bhuQGH_OpKcfZFP9oSX4eaYCp7SMkm32EwUMXE0ZtuzG-4_oFLZOZig</recordid><startdate>19980518</startdate><enddate>19980518</enddate><creator>Jones, Philip C.</creator><creator>Moses, Leon N.</creator><creator>Zydiak, James L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980518</creationdate><title>Inventory investment, product cycles, and the imperfectly competitive firm</title><author>Jones, Philip C. ; Moses, Leon N. ; Zydiak, James L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-9e6f0acb794060175e8d4fae26d287017259e7174d30f7663756e6a0f33f66bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Imperfect competition</topic><topic>Multiple products</topic><topic>Operational research and scientific management</topic><topic>Operational research. Management science</topic><topic>Production scheduling</topic><topic>Rotation cycle scheduling</topic><topic>Scheduling, sequencing</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Philip C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moses, Leon N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zydiak, James L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of production economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Philip C.</au><au>Moses, Leon N.</au><au>Zydiak, James L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inventory investment, product cycles, and the imperfectly competitive firm</atitle><jtitle>International journal of production economics</jtitle><date>1998-05-18</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>276</epage><pages>267-276</pages><issn>0925-5273</issn><eissn>1873-7579</eissn><coden>IJPCEY</coden><abstract>We consider a profit-maximizing, imperfectly competitive firm, with downward-sloping demand functions, that can produce multiple products at a single facility. We show that if the firm dedicates production to a single product, both dynamic production, which exploits inventory, and static production, which does not, can be optimal. We also consider sharing the production facility by multiple products. We evaluate the efficiency of scheduling production using simple rotation cycle scheduling, and give a condition for guaranteeing optimality of this scheduling rule. We conclude by studying when dedicated production is preferred over shared production.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00002-4</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-5273 |
ispartof | International journal of production economics, 1998-05, Vol.54 (3), p.267-276 |
issn | 0925-5273 1873-7579 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_198956073 |
source | RePEc; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Applied sciences Competition Exact sciences and technology Imperfect competition Multiple products Operational research and scientific management Operational research. Management science Production scheduling Rotation cycle scheduling Scheduling, sequencing Studies |
title | Inventory investment, product cycles, and the imperfectly competitive firm |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T16%3A54%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inventory%20investment,%20product%20cycles,%20and%20the%20imperfectly%20competitive%20firm&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20production%20economics&rft.au=Jones,%20Philip%20C.&rft.date=1998-05-18&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=276&rft.pages=267-276&rft.issn=0925-5273&rft.eissn=1873-7579&rft.coden=IJPCEY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00002-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E34129600%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198956073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0925527398000024&rfr_iscdi=true |