Inventory investment, product cycles, and the imperfectly competitive firm

We consider a profit-maximizing, imperfectly competitive firm, with downward-sloping demand functions, that can produce multiple products at a single facility. We show that if the firm dedicates production to a single product, both dynamic production, which exploits inventory, and static production,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of production economics 1998-05, Vol.54 (3), p.267-276
Hauptverfasser: Jones, Philip C., Moses, Leon N., Zydiak, James L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 276
container_issue 3
container_start_page 267
container_title International journal of production economics
container_volume 54
creator Jones, Philip C.
Moses, Leon N.
Zydiak, James L.
description We consider a profit-maximizing, imperfectly competitive firm, with downward-sloping demand functions, that can produce multiple products at a single facility. We show that if the firm dedicates production to a single product, both dynamic production, which exploits inventory, and static production, which does not, can be optimal. We also consider sharing the production facility by multiple products. We evaluate the efficiency of scheduling production using simple rotation cycle scheduling, and give a condition for guaranteeing optimality of this scheduling rule. We conclude by studying when dedicated production is preferred over shared production.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00002-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198956073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925527398000024</els_id><sourcerecordid>34129600</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-9e6f0acb794060175e8d4fae26d287017259e7174d30f7663756e6a0f33f66bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1rGzEUFKWBuk5-QmEpPTSQbfSxklanEkKbJgRyaHMWsvYJy3g_KsmG_fd5sYOvEYykJ2beG0aEfGH0B6NMXf-lhstaci2-m_aS4uJ184EsWKtFraU2H8niRPlEPue8QY5mbbsgD_fDHoYyprmKeMulx-qqmtLY7Xyp_Oy3kK8qN3RVWUMV-wlSAF-2c-VHLEoscQ9ViKk_J2fBbTNcvJ1L8vz717_bP_Xj09397c1j7RvFSm1ABer8SpuGKsq0hLZrggOuOt5qfODSgGa66QQNWimhpQLlaBAiKLXqxJJ8PfZFk_93aNluxl0acKRlpjVSUS2QJI8kn8acEwQ7pdi7NFtG7Wtq9pCafY3EmtYeUrMN6h6OugQT-JMIAHAa-NHurXCywW1GMINS4SJCICYEV9pyrey69Njs25tTl73bhuQGH_OpKcfZFP9oSX4eaYCp7SMkm32EwUMXE0ZtuzG-4_oFLZOZig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198956073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inventory investment, product cycles, and the imperfectly competitive firm</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Jones, Philip C. ; Moses, Leon N. ; Zydiak, James L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Philip C. ; Moses, Leon N. ; Zydiak, James L.</creatorcontrib><description>We consider a profit-maximizing, imperfectly competitive firm, with downward-sloping demand functions, that can produce multiple products at a single facility. We show that if the firm dedicates production to a single product, both dynamic production, which exploits inventory, and static production, which does not, can be optimal. We also consider sharing the production facility by multiple products. We evaluate the efficiency of scheduling production using simple rotation cycle scheduling, and give a condition for guaranteeing optimality of this scheduling rule. We conclude by studying when dedicated production is preferred over shared production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7579</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00002-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPCEY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Competition ; Exact sciences and technology ; Imperfect competition ; Multiple products ; Operational research and scientific management ; Operational research. Management science ; Production scheduling ; Rotation cycle scheduling ; Scheduling, sequencing ; Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of production economics, 1998-05, Vol.54 (3), p.267-276</ispartof><rights>1998</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. May 18, 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-9e6f0acb794060175e8d4fae26d287017259e7174d30f7663756e6a0f33f66bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-9e6f0acb794060175e8d4fae26d287017259e7174d30f7663756e6a0f33f66bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00002-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,4010,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2273087$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeproeco/v_3a54_3ay_3a1998_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a267-276.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Philip C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moses, Leon N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zydiak, James L.</creatorcontrib><title>Inventory investment, product cycles, and the imperfectly competitive firm</title><title>International journal of production economics</title><description>We consider a profit-maximizing, imperfectly competitive firm, with downward-sloping demand functions, that can produce multiple products at a single facility. We show that if the firm dedicates production to a single product, both dynamic production, which exploits inventory, and static production, which does not, can be optimal. We also consider sharing the production facility by multiple products. We evaluate the efficiency of scheduling production using simple rotation cycle scheduling, and give a condition for guaranteeing optimality of this scheduling rule. We conclude by studying when dedicated production is preferred over shared production.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Imperfect competition</subject><subject>Multiple products</subject><subject>Operational research and scientific management</subject><subject>Operational research. Management science</subject><subject>Production scheduling</subject><subject>Rotation cycle scheduling</subject><subject>Scheduling, sequencing</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0925-5273</issn><issn>1873-7579</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1rGzEUFKWBuk5-QmEpPTSQbfSxklanEkKbJgRyaHMWsvYJy3g_KsmG_fd5sYOvEYykJ2beG0aEfGH0B6NMXf-lhstaci2-m_aS4uJ184EsWKtFraU2H8niRPlEPue8QY5mbbsgD_fDHoYyprmKeMulx-qqmtLY7Xyp_Oy3kK8qN3RVWUMV-wlSAF-2c-VHLEoscQ9ViKk_J2fBbTNcvJ1L8vz717_bP_Xj09397c1j7RvFSm1ABer8SpuGKsq0hLZrggOuOt5qfODSgGa66QQNWimhpQLlaBAiKLXqxJJ8PfZFk_93aNluxl0acKRlpjVSUS2QJI8kn8acEwQ7pdi7NFtG7Wtq9pCafY3EmtYeUrMN6h6OugQT-JMIAHAa-NHurXCywW1GMINS4SJCICYEV9pyrey69Njs25tTl73bhuQGH_OpKcfZFP9oSX4eaYCp7SMkm32EwUMXE0ZtuzG-4_oFLZOZig</recordid><startdate>19980518</startdate><enddate>19980518</enddate><creator>Jones, Philip C.</creator><creator>Moses, Leon N.</creator><creator>Zydiak, James L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980518</creationdate><title>Inventory investment, product cycles, and the imperfectly competitive firm</title><author>Jones, Philip C. ; Moses, Leon N. ; Zydiak, James L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-9e6f0acb794060175e8d4fae26d287017259e7174d30f7663756e6a0f33f66bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Imperfect competition</topic><topic>Multiple products</topic><topic>Operational research and scientific management</topic><topic>Operational research. Management science</topic><topic>Production scheduling</topic><topic>Rotation cycle scheduling</topic><topic>Scheduling, sequencing</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Philip C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moses, Leon N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zydiak, James L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of production economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Philip C.</au><au>Moses, Leon N.</au><au>Zydiak, James L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inventory investment, product cycles, and the imperfectly competitive firm</atitle><jtitle>International journal of production economics</jtitle><date>1998-05-18</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>276</epage><pages>267-276</pages><issn>0925-5273</issn><eissn>1873-7579</eissn><coden>IJPCEY</coden><abstract>We consider a profit-maximizing, imperfectly competitive firm, with downward-sloping demand functions, that can produce multiple products at a single facility. We show that if the firm dedicates production to a single product, both dynamic production, which exploits inventory, and static production, which does not, can be optimal. We also consider sharing the production facility by multiple products. We evaluate the efficiency of scheduling production using simple rotation cycle scheduling, and give a condition for guaranteeing optimality of this scheduling rule. We conclude by studying when dedicated production is preferred over shared production.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00002-4</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-5273
ispartof International journal of production economics, 1998-05, Vol.54 (3), p.267-276
issn 0925-5273
1873-7579
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_198956073
source RePEc; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Applied sciences
Competition
Exact sciences and technology
Imperfect competition
Multiple products
Operational research and scientific management
Operational research. Management science
Production scheduling
Rotation cycle scheduling
Scheduling, sequencing
Studies
title Inventory investment, product cycles, and the imperfectly competitive firm
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T16%3A54%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inventory%20investment,%20product%20cycles,%20and%20the%20imperfectly%20competitive%20firm&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20production%20economics&rft.au=Jones,%20Philip%20C.&rft.date=1998-05-18&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=276&rft.pages=267-276&rft.issn=0925-5273&rft.eissn=1873-7579&rft.coden=IJPCEY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00002-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E34129600%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198956073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0925527398000024&rfr_iscdi=true