Emergence Dynamics of Kochia (Kochia scoparia) Populations from the U.S. Great Plains: A Multi-Site-Year Study

Evolution of kochia biotypes resistant to multiple herbicide sites of action is an increasing concern for growers across the U.S. Great Plains. This necessitates the development of integrated strategies for kochia control in this region based on improved forecasting of periodicity and patterns of ko...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed science 2018-01, Vol.66 (1), p.25-35
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, Vipan, Jha, Prashant, Dille, J. Anita, Stahlman, Phillip W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 35
container_issue 1
container_start_page 25
container_title Weed science
container_volume 66
creator Kumar, Vipan
Jha, Prashant
Dille, J. Anita
Stahlman, Phillip W
description Evolution of kochia biotypes resistant to multiple herbicide sites of action is an increasing concern for growers across the U.S. Great Plains. This necessitates the development of integrated strategies for kochia control in this region based on improved forecasting of periodicity and patterns of kochia emergence in the field. Field experiments were conducted near Huntley, MT, in 2013 and 2014, and in Manhattan and Hays, KS, in 2013 to characterize the timing and pattern of emergence of several kochia populations collected from the U.S. Great Plains' states. The more rapid accumulation of growing degree days (GDD) resulted in a shorter emergence duration (E90-E10) in 2014 compared with 2013 in Montana. Kochia populations exhibited an extended emergence period (early April through mid-July). Among all kochia populations, in 2013, Kansas-Garden City (KS-GC), Kansas-Manhattan (KS-MN), Oklahoma (OK), and Montana (MT) populations began to emerge earlier, with a minimum of 151 cumulative GDD to achieve 10% cumulative emergence (E10 values) in Montana. The New Mexico-Los Lunas (NM-LL) population exhibited a delayed onset but a rapid emergence rate, while the North Dakota (ND) and Kansas-Colby (KS-CB) populations emerged over a longer duration (E90-E10 of 556 and 547 GDD, respectively) in 2013 in Montana. In 2013 at the two locations in Kansas, kochia populations exhibited a similar emergence pattern, with no differences in the time to initiate germination (E10), rate of emergence (parameter b), or duration of emergence (E90-E10). At Hays, KS, the GDD for E50 and E90 were less for ND compared with KS-MN and KS-GC local populations. In 2014 the KS-MN kochia population exhibited an early (ED10 value of 215 GDD) but a more gradual emergence pattern (E90-E10 = 526 GDD) in Montana. In contrast, OK and New Mexico-Las Cruces (NM-LC) populations had an early and a more rapid emergence pattern (E90-E10 = 153 and 154 GDD, respectively). Kochia in Montana exhibited two to four emergence peaks. This differential emergence pattern of kochia populations reflects the occurrence of different emergence “biotypes” and emphasizes the need to adopt more location-specific and diversified weed control tactics to manage kochia seedbanks. Nomenclature: Kochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/wsc.2017.55
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1989500238</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_wsc_2017_55</cupid><jstor_id>26505826</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26505826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b355t-c4bf6d8aaf6cd7d3f95bbdcca73bf5348eea747e82afa4e74f9ef2967029ce8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9L7DAUhYMoOE9duRYCb_NEWpO0aVp34m9UFEYXrspteqMZps2YpMj891ZmeLgQV-fC_TgHPkL2OUs54-r4I-hUjEcq5QaZcClZIpSsNsmEsTxLuMrlNvkTwowxXgheTUh_0aF_xV4jPV_20FkdqDP01uk3C_TfOoN2C_AWDumjWwxziNb1gRrvOhrfkD6n05ReeYRIH-dg-3BCT-n9MI82mdqIyQuCp9M4tMtdsmVgHnBvnTvk-fLi6ew6uXu4ujk7vUuaTMqY6LwxRVsCmEK3qs1MJZum1RpU1hiZ5SUiqFxhKcBAjio3FRpRFYqJSmOpsx3yd9W78O59wBDrmRt8P07WvCoryZjIypE6WlHauxA8mnrhbQd-WXNWfwmtR6H1l9BaypE-WNGzEJ3_j4pCMlmKYvwn6zboGm_bV_w2-mPf4YpvrHM9_rr9CbsUj2s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989500238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emergence Dynamics of Kochia (Kochia scoparia) Populations from the U.S. Great Plains: A Multi-Site-Year Study</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Kumar, Vipan ; Jha, Prashant ; Dille, J. Anita ; Stahlman, Phillip W</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Vipan ; Jha, Prashant ; Dille, J. Anita ; Stahlman, Phillip W</creatorcontrib><description>Evolution of kochia biotypes resistant to multiple herbicide sites of action is an increasing concern for growers across the U.S. Great Plains. This necessitates the development of integrated strategies for kochia control in this region based on improved forecasting of periodicity and patterns of kochia emergence in the field. Field experiments were conducted near Huntley, MT, in 2013 and 2014, and in Manhattan and Hays, KS, in 2013 to characterize the timing and pattern of emergence of several kochia populations collected from the U.S. Great Plains' states. The more rapid accumulation of growing degree days (GDD) resulted in a shorter emergence duration (E90-E10) in 2014 compared with 2013 in Montana. Kochia populations exhibited an extended emergence period (early April through mid-July). Among all kochia populations, in 2013, Kansas-Garden City (KS-GC), Kansas-Manhattan (KS-MN), Oklahoma (OK), and Montana (MT) populations began to emerge earlier, with a minimum of 151 cumulative GDD to achieve 10% cumulative emergence (E10 values) in Montana. The New Mexico-Los Lunas (NM-LL) population exhibited a delayed onset but a rapid emergence rate, while the North Dakota (ND) and Kansas-Colby (KS-CB) populations emerged over a longer duration (E90-E10 of 556 and 547 GDD, respectively) in 2013 in Montana. In 2013 at the two locations in Kansas, kochia populations exhibited a similar emergence pattern, with no differences in the time to initiate germination (E10), rate of emergence (parameter b), or duration of emergence (E90-E10). At Hays, KS, the GDD for E50 and E90 were less for ND compared with KS-MN and KS-GC local populations. In 2014 the KS-MN kochia population exhibited an early (ED10 value of 215 GDD) but a more gradual emergence pattern (E90-E10 = 526 GDD) in Montana. In contrast, OK and New Mexico-Las Cruces (NM-LC) populations had an early and a more rapid emergence pattern (E90-E10 = 153 and 154 GDD, respectively). Kochia in Montana exhibited two to four emergence peaks. This differential emergence pattern of kochia populations reflects the occurrence of different emergence “biotypes” and emphasizes the need to adopt more location-specific and diversified weed control tactics to manage kochia seedbanks. Nomenclature: Kochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wsc.2017.55</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Biotypes ; Crops ; Emergence ; Emergence pattern ; emergence periodicity ; Field tests ; Genetic diversity ; Germination ; growing degree days ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; integrated weed management ; Kochia scoparia ; Local population ; Periodicity ; Populations ; Seed banks ; Seeds ; Tactics ; WEED BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY ; Weed control ; weed seedbank ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 2018-01, Vol.66 (1), p.25-35</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Jan/Feb 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b355t-c4bf6d8aaf6cd7d3f95bbdcca73bf5348eea747e82afa4e74f9ef2967029ce8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b355t-c4bf6d8aaf6cd7d3f95bbdcca73bf5348eea747e82afa4e74f9ef2967029ce8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26505826$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0043174517000558/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Vipan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Prashant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dille, J. Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahlman, Phillip W</creatorcontrib><title>Emergence Dynamics of Kochia (Kochia scoparia) Populations from the U.S. Great Plains: A Multi-Site-Year Study</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed Sci</addtitle><description>Evolution of kochia biotypes resistant to multiple herbicide sites of action is an increasing concern for growers across the U.S. Great Plains. This necessitates the development of integrated strategies for kochia control in this region based on improved forecasting of periodicity and patterns of kochia emergence in the field. Field experiments were conducted near Huntley, MT, in 2013 and 2014, and in Manhattan and Hays, KS, in 2013 to characterize the timing and pattern of emergence of several kochia populations collected from the U.S. Great Plains' states. The more rapid accumulation of growing degree days (GDD) resulted in a shorter emergence duration (E90-E10) in 2014 compared with 2013 in Montana. Kochia populations exhibited an extended emergence period (early April through mid-July). Among all kochia populations, in 2013, Kansas-Garden City (KS-GC), Kansas-Manhattan (KS-MN), Oklahoma (OK), and Montana (MT) populations began to emerge earlier, with a minimum of 151 cumulative GDD to achieve 10% cumulative emergence (E10 values) in Montana. The New Mexico-Los Lunas (NM-LL) population exhibited a delayed onset but a rapid emergence rate, while the North Dakota (ND) and Kansas-Colby (KS-CB) populations emerged over a longer duration (E90-E10 of 556 and 547 GDD, respectively) in 2013 in Montana. In 2013 at the two locations in Kansas, kochia populations exhibited a similar emergence pattern, with no differences in the time to initiate germination (E10), rate of emergence (parameter b), or duration of emergence (E90-E10). At Hays, KS, the GDD for E50 and E90 were less for ND compared with KS-MN and KS-GC local populations. In 2014 the KS-MN kochia population exhibited an early (ED10 value of 215 GDD) but a more gradual emergence pattern (E90-E10 = 526 GDD) in Montana. In contrast, OK and New Mexico-Las Cruces (NM-LC) populations had an early and a more rapid emergence pattern (E90-E10 = 153 and 154 GDD, respectively). Kochia in Montana exhibited two to four emergence peaks. This differential emergence pattern of kochia populations reflects the occurrence of different emergence “biotypes” and emphasizes the need to adopt more location-specific and diversified weed control tactics to manage kochia seedbanks. Nomenclature: Kochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.</description><subject>Biotypes</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Emergence</subject><subject>Emergence pattern</subject><subject>emergence periodicity</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Germination</subject><subject>growing degree days</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>integrated weed management</subject><subject>Kochia scoparia</subject><subject>Local population</subject><subject>Periodicity</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Seed banks</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Tactics</subject><subject>WEED BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>weed seedbank</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9L7DAUhYMoOE9duRYCb_NEWpO0aVp34m9UFEYXrspteqMZps2YpMj891ZmeLgQV-fC_TgHPkL2OUs54-r4I-hUjEcq5QaZcClZIpSsNsmEsTxLuMrlNvkTwowxXgheTUh_0aF_xV4jPV_20FkdqDP01uk3C_TfOoN2C_AWDumjWwxziNb1gRrvOhrfkD6n05ReeYRIH-dg-3BCT-n9MI82mdqIyQuCp9M4tMtdsmVgHnBvnTvk-fLi6ew6uXu4ujk7vUuaTMqY6LwxRVsCmEK3qs1MJZum1RpU1hiZ5SUiqFxhKcBAjio3FRpRFYqJSmOpsx3yd9W78O59wBDrmRt8P07WvCoryZjIypE6WlHauxA8mnrhbQd-WXNWfwmtR6H1l9BaypE-WNGzEJ3_j4pCMlmKYvwn6zboGm_bV_w2-mPf4YpvrHM9_rr9CbsUj2s</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Kumar, Vipan</creator><creator>Jha, Prashant</creator><creator>Dille, J. Anita</creator><creator>Stahlman, Phillip W</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Emergence Dynamics of Kochia (Kochia scoparia) Populations from the U.S. Great Plains: A Multi-Site-Year Study</title><author>Kumar, Vipan ; Jha, Prashant ; Dille, J. Anita ; Stahlman, Phillip W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b355t-c4bf6d8aaf6cd7d3f95bbdcca73bf5348eea747e82afa4e74f9ef2967029ce8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biotypes</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Emergence</topic><topic>Emergence pattern</topic><topic>emergence periodicity</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Germination</topic><topic>growing degree days</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>integrated weed management</topic><topic>Kochia scoparia</topic><topic>Local population</topic><topic>Periodicity</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Seed banks</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Tactics</topic><topic>WEED BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>weed seedbank</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Vipan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jha, Prashant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dille, J. Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahlman, Phillip W</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, Vipan</au><au>Jha, Prashant</au><au>Dille, J. Anita</au><au>Stahlman, Phillip W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emergence Dynamics of Kochia (Kochia scoparia) Populations from the U.S. Great Plains: A Multi-Site-Year Study</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed Sci</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>25-35</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>Evolution of kochia biotypes resistant to multiple herbicide sites of action is an increasing concern for growers across the U.S. Great Plains. This necessitates the development of integrated strategies for kochia control in this region based on improved forecasting of periodicity and patterns of kochia emergence in the field. Field experiments were conducted near Huntley, MT, in 2013 and 2014, and in Manhattan and Hays, KS, in 2013 to characterize the timing and pattern of emergence of several kochia populations collected from the U.S. Great Plains' states. The more rapid accumulation of growing degree days (GDD) resulted in a shorter emergence duration (E90-E10) in 2014 compared with 2013 in Montana. Kochia populations exhibited an extended emergence period (early April through mid-July). Among all kochia populations, in 2013, Kansas-Garden City (KS-GC), Kansas-Manhattan (KS-MN), Oklahoma (OK), and Montana (MT) populations began to emerge earlier, with a minimum of 151 cumulative GDD to achieve 10% cumulative emergence (E10 values) in Montana. The New Mexico-Los Lunas (NM-LL) population exhibited a delayed onset but a rapid emergence rate, while the North Dakota (ND) and Kansas-Colby (KS-CB) populations emerged over a longer duration (E90-E10 of 556 and 547 GDD, respectively) in 2013 in Montana. In 2013 at the two locations in Kansas, kochia populations exhibited a similar emergence pattern, with no differences in the time to initiate germination (E10), rate of emergence (parameter b), or duration of emergence (E90-E10). At Hays, KS, the GDD for E50 and E90 were less for ND compared with KS-MN and KS-GC local populations. In 2014 the KS-MN kochia population exhibited an early (ED10 value of 215 GDD) but a more gradual emergence pattern (E90-E10 = 526 GDD) in Montana. In contrast, OK and New Mexico-Las Cruces (NM-LC) populations had an early and a more rapid emergence pattern (E90-E10 = 153 and 154 GDD, respectively). Kochia in Montana exhibited two to four emergence peaks. This differential emergence pattern of kochia populations reflects the occurrence of different emergence “biotypes” and emphasizes the need to adopt more location-specific and diversified weed control tactics to manage kochia seedbanks. Nomenclature: Kochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wsc.2017.55</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1745
ispartof Weed science, 2018-01, Vol.66 (1), p.25-35
issn 0043-1745
1550-2759
1550-2759
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1989500238
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Biotypes
Crops
Emergence
Emergence pattern
emergence periodicity
Field tests
Genetic diversity
Germination
growing degree days
Herbicide resistance
Herbicides
integrated weed management
Kochia scoparia
Local population
Periodicity
Populations
Seed banks
Seeds
Tactics
WEED BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY
Weed control
weed seedbank
Weeds
title Emergence Dynamics of Kochia (Kochia scoparia) Populations from the U.S. Great Plains: A Multi-Site-Year Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T02%3A16%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emergence%20Dynamics%20of%20Kochia%20(Kochia%20scoparia)%20Populations%20from%20the%20U.S.%20Great%20Plains:%20A%20Multi-Site-Year%20Study&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Kumar,%20Vipan&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=25-35&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wsc.2017.55&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26505826%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989500238&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_wsc_2017_55&rft_jstor_id=26505826&rfr_iscdi=true