EFFECTS OF ROUTINE ONE-STAGE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

4997 of 7354 pregnant women had no clinical indication for an elective ultrasound examination at 12 weeks' gestation. 2482 of these women were randomly selected for ultrasound screening at 15 weeks and the remainder received the same standard antenatal care without the scan. Labour was less oft...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 1988-09, Vol.332 (8611), p.585-588
Hauptverfasser: Waldenström, Urban, Nilsson, Staffan, Fall, Ole, Axelsson, Ove, Eklund, Gunnar, Lindeberg, Solveig, Sjödin, Ylva
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 588
container_issue 8611
container_start_page 585
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 332
creator Waldenström, Urban
Nilsson, Staffan
Fall, Ole
Axelsson, Ove
Eklund, Gunnar
Lindeberg, Solveig
Sjödin, Ylva
description 4997 of 7354 pregnant women had no clinical indication for an elective ultrasound examination at 12 weeks' gestation. 2482 of these women were randomly selected for ultrasound screening at 15 weeks and the remainder received the same standard antenatal care without the scan. Labour was less often induced among screened women both for all reasons (5·9% vs 9·1%, p < 0·0001) and for suspected post-term pregnancy (1·7% vs 3·7%, p < 0·0001). Earlier detection of twins had no effect on neonatal outcome. Among babies born to screened women, fewer were of birthweight < 2500g (59 vs 95, p = 0·005) and mean birthweight was 42g higher (p 0·008). For babies born to screened women who smoked it was 75g higher (p 0·012) and for those of non-smokers 26g (not significant). The reason for the differences in mean birthweight could be that screened women reduced smoking in response to watching their fetus on the scan.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90636-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198938322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673688906368</els_id><sourcerecordid>8738648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e3ebfada1d7f4b4bbf0a8fb8cb17f6af34c7e716003b98025082a9a04975084d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LwzAYx4MoOKcfQQie9FBNmrRNvUjp0lqoifQF9CAhbVPo0HW2m-C3t9vEq6fnf_i_8PwAuMToFiPs3uUIU2S5HnGvGbvxkUtcix2BGaYetRzqvRyD2Z_lFJyN4xIhRF3kzMAbjyIeFjmUEcxkWSSCQym4lRdBzGGZFlmQy1IsYB5mnItExDAR8DnjsQhE-HoPA5gFYiGfkpwvYChFkck0nWSRJUF6Dk5a_T6ai987B2XEi_DRSmWchEFq1Tb1N5Yhpmp1o3HjtbSiVdUizdqK1RX2Wle3hNae8bCLEKl8hmwHMVv7GlHfmyRtyBxcHXrXQ_-5NeNGLfvtsJomFfaZTxix7cnkHEz10I_jYFq1HroPPXwrjNQOpNqDVDtKijG1B6nYlHs45Mz0wVdnBjXWnVnVpukGU29U03f_NPwACENyVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198938322</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EFFECTS OF ROUTINE ONE-STAGE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Waldenström, Urban ; Nilsson, Staffan ; Fall, Ole ; Axelsson, Ove ; Eklund, Gunnar ; Lindeberg, Solveig ; Sjödin, Ylva</creator><creatorcontrib>Waldenström, Urban ; Nilsson, Staffan ; Fall, Ole ; Axelsson, Ove ; Eklund, Gunnar ; Lindeberg, Solveig ; Sjödin, Ylva</creatorcontrib><description>4997 of 7354 pregnant women had no clinical indication for an elective ultrasound examination at 12 weeks' gestation. 2482 of these women were randomly selected for ultrasound screening at 15 weeks and the remainder received the same standard antenatal care without the scan. Labour was less often induced among screened women both for all reasons (5·9% vs 9·1%, p &lt; 0·0001) and for suspected post-term pregnancy (1·7% vs 3·7%, p &lt; 0·0001). Earlier detection of twins had no effect on neonatal outcome. Among babies born to screened women, fewer were of birthweight &lt; 2500g (59 vs 95, p = 0·005) and mean birthweight was 42g higher (p 0·008). For babies born to screened women who smoked it was 75g higher (p 0·012) and for those of non-smokers 26g (not significant). The reason for the differences in mean birthweight could be that screened women reduced smoking in response to watching their fetus on the scan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90636-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Birth weight ; Medical imaging ; Medical research ; Pregnancy</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 1988-09, Vol.332 (8611), p.585-588</ispartof><rights>1988</rights><rights>Copyright Lancet Ltd. Sep 10, 1988</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e3ebfada1d7f4b4bbf0a8fb8cb17f6af34c7e716003b98025082a9a04975084d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e3ebfada1d7f4b4bbf0a8fb8cb17f6af34c7e716003b98025082a9a04975084d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673688906368$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waldenström, Urban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsson, Staffan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fall, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axelsson, Ove</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeberg, Solveig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjödin, Ylva</creatorcontrib><title>EFFECTS OF ROUTINE ONE-STAGE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>4997 of 7354 pregnant women had no clinical indication for an elective ultrasound examination at 12 weeks' gestation. 2482 of these women were randomly selected for ultrasound screening at 15 weeks and the remainder received the same standard antenatal care without the scan. Labour was less often induced among screened women both for all reasons (5·9% vs 9·1%, p &lt; 0·0001) and for suspected post-term pregnancy (1·7% vs 3·7%, p &lt; 0·0001). Earlier detection of twins had no effect on neonatal outcome. Among babies born to screened women, fewer were of birthweight &lt; 2500g (59 vs 95, p = 0·005) and mean birthweight was 42g higher (p 0·008). For babies born to screened women who smoked it was 75g higher (p 0·012) and for those of non-smokers 26g (not significant). The reason for the differences in mean birthweight could be that screened women reduced smoking in response to watching their fetus on the scan.</description><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LwzAYx4MoOKcfQQie9FBNmrRNvUjp0lqoifQF9CAhbVPo0HW2m-C3t9vEq6fnf_i_8PwAuMToFiPs3uUIU2S5HnGvGbvxkUtcix2BGaYetRzqvRyD2Z_lFJyN4xIhRF3kzMAbjyIeFjmUEcxkWSSCQym4lRdBzGGZFlmQy1IsYB5mnItExDAR8DnjsQhE-HoPA5gFYiGfkpwvYChFkck0nWSRJUF6Dk5a_T6ai987B2XEi_DRSmWchEFq1Tb1N5Yhpmp1o3HjtbSiVdUizdqK1RX2Wle3hNae8bCLEKl8hmwHMVv7GlHfmyRtyBxcHXrXQ_-5NeNGLfvtsJomFfaZTxix7cnkHEz10I_jYFq1HroPPXwrjNQOpNqDVDtKijG1B6nYlHs45Mz0wVdnBjXWnVnVpukGU29U03f_NPwACENyVw</recordid><startdate>19880910</startdate><enddate>19880910</enddate><creator>Waldenström, Urban</creator><creator>Nilsson, Staffan</creator><creator>Fall, Ole</creator><creator>Axelsson, Ove</creator><creator>Eklund, Gunnar</creator><creator>Lindeberg, Solveig</creator><creator>Sjödin, Ylva</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880910</creationdate><title>EFFECTS OF ROUTINE ONE-STAGE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL</title><author>Waldenström, Urban ; Nilsson, Staffan ; Fall, Ole ; Axelsson, Ove ; Eklund, Gunnar ; Lindeberg, Solveig ; Sjödin, Ylva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e3ebfada1d7f4b4bbf0a8fb8cb17f6af34c7e716003b98025082a9a04975084d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waldenström, Urban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsson, Staffan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fall, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axelsson, Ove</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeberg, Solveig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjödin, Ylva</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waldenström, Urban</au><au>Nilsson, Staffan</au><au>Fall, Ole</au><au>Axelsson, Ove</au><au>Eklund, Gunnar</au><au>Lindeberg, Solveig</au><au>Sjödin, Ylva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EFFECTS OF ROUTINE ONE-STAGE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>1988-09-10</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>332</volume><issue>8611</issue><spage>585</spage><epage>588</epage><pages>585-588</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>4997 of 7354 pregnant women had no clinical indication for an elective ultrasound examination at 12 weeks' gestation. 2482 of these women were randomly selected for ultrasound screening at 15 weeks and the remainder received the same standard antenatal care without the scan. Labour was less often induced among screened women both for all reasons (5·9% vs 9·1%, p &lt; 0·0001) and for suspected post-term pregnancy (1·7% vs 3·7%, p &lt; 0·0001). Earlier detection of twins had no effect on neonatal outcome. Among babies born to screened women, fewer were of birthweight &lt; 2500g (59 vs 95, p = 0·005) and mean birthweight was 42g higher (p 0·008). For babies born to screened women who smoked it was 75g higher (p 0·012) and for those of non-smokers 26g (not significant). The reason for the differences in mean birthweight could be that screened women reduced smoking in response to watching their fetus on the scan.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90636-8</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 1988-09, Vol.332 (8611), p.585-588
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_198938322
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Birth weight
Medical imaging
Medical research
Pregnancy
title EFFECTS OF ROUTINE ONE-STAGE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T14%3A25%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EFFECTS%20OF%20ROUTINE%20ONE-STAGE%20ULTRASOUND%20SCREENING%20IN%20PREGNANCY:%20A%20RANDOMISED%20CONTROLLED%20TRIAL&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Waldenstr%C3%B6m,%20Urban&rft.date=1988-09-10&rft.volume=332&rft.issue=8611&rft.spage=585&rft.epage=588&rft.pages=585-588&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90636-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E8738648%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198938322&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140673688906368&rfr_iscdi=true