EFFECTS OF ROUTINE ONE-STAGE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
4997 of 7354 pregnant women had no clinical indication for an elective ultrasound examination at 12 weeks' gestation. 2482 of these women were randomly selected for ultrasound screening at 15 weeks and the remainder received the same standard antenatal care without the scan. Labour was less oft...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 1988-09, Vol.332 (8611), p.585-588 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 588 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8611 |
container_start_page | 585 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 332 |
creator | Waldenström, Urban Nilsson, Staffan Fall, Ole Axelsson, Ove Eklund, Gunnar Lindeberg, Solveig Sjödin, Ylva |
description | 4997 of 7354 pregnant women had no clinical indication for an elective ultrasound examination at 12 weeks' gestation. 2482 of these women were randomly selected for ultrasound screening at 15 weeks and the remainder received the same standard antenatal care without the scan. Labour was less often induced among screened women both for all reasons (5·9% vs 9·1%, p < 0·0001) and for suspected post-term pregnancy (1·7% vs 3·7%, p < 0·0001). Earlier detection of twins had no effect on neonatal outcome. Among babies born to screened women, fewer were of birthweight < 2500g (59 vs 95, p = 0·005) and mean birthweight was 42g higher (p 0·008). For babies born to screened women who smoked it was 75g higher (p 0·012) and for those of non-smokers 26g (not significant). The reason for the differences in mean birthweight could be that screened women reduced smoking in response to watching their fetus on the scan. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90636-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198938322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673688906368</els_id><sourcerecordid>8738648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e3ebfada1d7f4b4bbf0a8fb8cb17f6af34c7e716003b98025082a9a04975084d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LwzAYx4MoOKcfQQie9FBNmrRNvUjp0lqoifQF9CAhbVPo0HW2m-C3t9vEq6fnf_i_8PwAuMToFiPs3uUIU2S5HnGvGbvxkUtcix2BGaYetRzqvRyD2Z_lFJyN4xIhRF3kzMAbjyIeFjmUEcxkWSSCQym4lRdBzGGZFlmQy1IsYB5mnItExDAR8DnjsQhE-HoPA5gFYiGfkpwvYChFkck0nWSRJUF6Dk5a_T6ai987B2XEi_DRSmWchEFq1Tb1N5Yhpmp1o3HjtbSiVdUizdqK1RX2Wle3hNae8bCLEKl8hmwHMVv7GlHfmyRtyBxcHXrXQ_-5NeNGLfvtsJomFfaZTxix7cnkHEz10I_jYFq1HroPPXwrjNQOpNqDVDtKijG1B6nYlHs45Mz0wVdnBjXWnVnVpukGU29U03f_NPwACENyVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198938322</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EFFECTS OF ROUTINE ONE-STAGE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Waldenström, Urban ; Nilsson, Staffan ; Fall, Ole ; Axelsson, Ove ; Eklund, Gunnar ; Lindeberg, Solveig ; Sjödin, Ylva</creator><creatorcontrib>Waldenström, Urban ; Nilsson, Staffan ; Fall, Ole ; Axelsson, Ove ; Eklund, Gunnar ; Lindeberg, Solveig ; Sjödin, Ylva</creatorcontrib><description>4997 of 7354 pregnant women had no clinical indication for an elective ultrasound examination at 12 weeks' gestation. 2482 of these women were randomly selected for ultrasound screening at 15 weeks and the remainder received the same standard antenatal care without the scan. Labour was less often induced among screened women both for all reasons (5·9% vs 9·1%, p < 0·0001) and for suspected post-term pregnancy (1·7% vs 3·7%, p < 0·0001). Earlier detection of twins had no effect on neonatal outcome. Among babies born to screened women, fewer were of birthweight < 2500g (59 vs 95, p = 0·005) and mean birthweight was 42g higher (p 0·008). For babies born to screened women who smoked it was 75g higher (p 0·012) and for those of non-smokers 26g (not significant). The reason for the differences in mean birthweight could be that screened women reduced smoking in response to watching their fetus on the scan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90636-8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Birth weight ; Medical imaging ; Medical research ; Pregnancy</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 1988-09, Vol.332 (8611), p.585-588</ispartof><rights>1988</rights><rights>Copyright Lancet Ltd. Sep 10, 1988</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e3ebfada1d7f4b4bbf0a8fb8cb17f6af34c7e716003b98025082a9a04975084d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e3ebfada1d7f4b4bbf0a8fb8cb17f6af34c7e716003b98025082a9a04975084d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673688906368$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waldenström, Urban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsson, Staffan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fall, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axelsson, Ove</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeberg, Solveig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjödin, Ylva</creatorcontrib><title>EFFECTS OF ROUTINE ONE-STAGE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>4997 of 7354 pregnant women had no clinical indication for an elective ultrasound examination at 12 weeks' gestation. 2482 of these women were randomly selected for ultrasound screening at 15 weeks and the remainder received the same standard antenatal care without the scan. Labour was less often induced among screened women both for all reasons (5·9% vs 9·1%, p < 0·0001) and for suspected post-term pregnancy (1·7% vs 3·7%, p < 0·0001). Earlier detection of twins had no effect on neonatal outcome. Among babies born to screened women, fewer were of birthweight < 2500g (59 vs 95, p = 0·005) and mean birthweight was 42g higher (p 0·008). For babies born to screened women who smoked it was 75g higher (p 0·012) and for those of non-smokers 26g (not significant). The reason for the differences in mean birthweight could be that screened women reduced smoking in response to watching their fetus on the scan.</description><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LwzAYx4MoOKcfQQie9FBNmrRNvUjp0lqoifQF9CAhbVPo0HW2m-C3t9vEq6fnf_i_8PwAuMToFiPs3uUIU2S5HnGvGbvxkUtcix2BGaYetRzqvRyD2Z_lFJyN4xIhRF3kzMAbjyIeFjmUEcxkWSSCQym4lRdBzGGZFlmQy1IsYB5mnItExDAR8DnjsQhE-HoPA5gFYiGfkpwvYChFkck0nWSRJUF6Dk5a_T6ai987B2XEi_DRSmWchEFq1Tb1N5Yhpmp1o3HjtbSiVdUizdqK1RX2Wle3hNae8bCLEKl8hmwHMVv7GlHfmyRtyBxcHXrXQ_-5NeNGLfvtsJomFfaZTxix7cnkHEz10I_jYFq1HroPPXwrjNQOpNqDVDtKijG1B6nYlHs45Mz0wVdnBjXWnVnVpukGU29U03f_NPwACENyVw</recordid><startdate>19880910</startdate><enddate>19880910</enddate><creator>Waldenström, Urban</creator><creator>Nilsson, Staffan</creator><creator>Fall, Ole</creator><creator>Axelsson, Ove</creator><creator>Eklund, Gunnar</creator><creator>Lindeberg, Solveig</creator><creator>Sjödin, Ylva</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880910</creationdate><title>EFFECTS OF ROUTINE ONE-STAGE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL</title><author>Waldenström, Urban ; Nilsson, Staffan ; Fall, Ole ; Axelsson, Ove ; Eklund, Gunnar ; Lindeberg, Solveig ; Sjödin, Ylva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-e3ebfada1d7f4b4bbf0a8fb8cb17f6af34c7e716003b98025082a9a04975084d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waldenström, Urban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nilsson, Staffan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fall, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axelsson, Ove</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Gunnar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindeberg, Solveig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjödin, Ylva</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waldenström, Urban</au><au>Nilsson, Staffan</au><au>Fall, Ole</au><au>Axelsson, Ove</au><au>Eklund, Gunnar</au><au>Lindeberg, Solveig</au><au>Sjödin, Ylva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EFFECTS OF ROUTINE ONE-STAGE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>1988-09-10</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>332</volume><issue>8611</issue><spage>585</spage><epage>588</epage><pages>585-588</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>4997 of 7354 pregnant women had no clinical indication for an elective ultrasound examination at 12 weeks' gestation. 2482 of these women were randomly selected for ultrasound screening at 15 weeks and the remainder received the same standard antenatal care without the scan. Labour was less often induced among screened women both for all reasons (5·9% vs 9·1%, p < 0·0001) and for suspected post-term pregnancy (1·7% vs 3·7%, p < 0·0001). Earlier detection of twins had no effect on neonatal outcome. Among babies born to screened women, fewer were of birthweight < 2500g (59 vs 95, p = 0·005) and mean birthweight was 42g higher (p 0·008). For babies born to screened women who smoked it was 75g higher (p 0·012) and for those of non-smokers 26g (not significant). The reason for the differences in mean birthweight could be that screened women reduced smoking in response to watching their fetus on the scan.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90636-8</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 1988-09, Vol.332 (8611), p.585-588 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_198938322 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Birth weight Medical imaging Medical research Pregnancy |
title | EFFECTS OF ROUTINE ONE-STAGE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T14%3A25%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EFFECTS%20OF%20ROUTINE%20ONE-STAGE%20ULTRASOUND%20SCREENING%20IN%20PREGNANCY:%20A%20RANDOMISED%20CONTROLLED%20TRIAL&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Waldenstr%C3%B6m,%20Urban&rft.date=1988-09-10&rft.volume=332&rft.issue=8611&rft.spage=585&rft.epage=588&rft.pages=585-588&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90636-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E8738648%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198938322&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0140673688906368&rfr_iscdi=true |