Life after death row: Preventing wrongful capital convictions and restoring innocence after exoneration

In Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court overturned its ruling in Furman v. Georgia and held that the death penalty, as administered by the states, was not per se "cruel and unusual punishment" in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Yet errors continue to occur at an alarming rate in the capi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vanderbilt law review 2003-05, Vol.56 (4), p.1179
1. Verfasser: Jean Coleman Blackerby
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1179
container_title Vanderbilt law review
container_volume 56
creator Jean Coleman Blackerby
description In Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court overturned its ruling in Furman v. Georgia and held that the death penalty, as administered by the states, was not per se "cruel and unusual punishment" in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Yet errors continue to occur at an alarming rate in the capital punishment system - over one hundred death row inmates have been released pursuant to evidence of actual innocence since 1973. This Note examines the necessity of a dual approach to the problem of wrongful capital convictions: implementing systemic changes to prevent mistaken convictions and improving available remedies for those who have been wrongfully convicted and rightly released. Preventing future wrongful convictions in the United States requires confronting the problem from both sides. In keeping with the dual functions of the American criminal justice system - protecting the innocent and convicting the guilty - a comprehensive plan of reform must be both preventive and compensatory. Only by working both to decrease the risk of executing the innocent and to restore to innocence those who were wrongfully convicted will the judicial system regain its legitimacy.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198936165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>444059771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p180t-6e6ac6f55095c89ce5deec56cf79ec113ee669f6139431cc6e3f1759ff279d583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1jk1LxDAURYMoWEf_Q3BfSJpJmudOBr-goAtdD-H1pWYYkpqmM_58O6irexeHc-8ZqySsmxqsNeesEmLpjVbqkl1N004IIVXTVmzogifufKHMe3Llk-d0vONvmQ4US4gDP-YUBz_vOboxFLdkioeAJaQ4cRd7nmkqKZ_QEGNCivgvpO8UKbsTes0uvNtPdPOXK_bx-PC-ea6716eXzX1Xj9KKUhsyDo3XWoBGC0i6J0Jt0LdAKKUiMga8kQrWSiIaUl62GrxvWui1VSt2--sdc_qal2fbXZpzXCa3EiwoI41WPyzyVdc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198936165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life after death row: Preventing wrongful capital convictions and restoring innocence after exoneration</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Jean Coleman Blackerby</creator><creatorcontrib>Jean Coleman Blackerby</creatorcontrib><description>In Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court overturned its ruling in Furman v. Georgia and held that the death penalty, as administered by the states, was not per se "cruel and unusual punishment" in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Yet errors continue to occur at an alarming rate in the capital punishment system - over one hundred death row inmates have been released pursuant to evidence of actual innocence since 1973. This Note examines the necessity of a dual approach to the problem of wrongful capital convictions: implementing systemic changes to prevent mistaken convictions and improving available remedies for those who have been wrongfully convicted and rightly released. Preventing future wrongful convictions in the United States requires confronting the problem from both sides. In keeping with the dual functions of the American criminal justice system - protecting the innocent and convicting the guilty - a comprehensive plan of reform must be both preventive and compensatory. Only by working both to decrease the risk of executing the innocent and to restore to innocence those who were wrongfully convicted will the judicial system regain its legitimacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-2533</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-9886</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VLRED2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: Vanderbilt Law Review</publisher><subject>Capital punishment ; Confessions ; DNA fingerprints ; Errors ; Evidence ; Forensic sciences ; Genetic testing ; Legal reform ; Prisoners ; Supreme Court decisions ; Trials</subject><ispartof>Vanderbilt law review, 2003-05, Vol.56 (4), p.1179</ispartof><rights>Copyright Vanderbilt Law Review May 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jean Coleman Blackerby</creatorcontrib><title>Life after death row: Preventing wrongful capital convictions and restoring innocence after exoneration</title><title>Vanderbilt law review</title><description>In Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court overturned its ruling in Furman v. Georgia and held that the death penalty, as administered by the states, was not per se "cruel and unusual punishment" in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Yet errors continue to occur at an alarming rate in the capital punishment system - over one hundred death row inmates have been released pursuant to evidence of actual innocence since 1973. This Note examines the necessity of a dual approach to the problem of wrongful capital convictions: implementing systemic changes to prevent mistaken convictions and improving available remedies for those who have been wrongfully convicted and rightly released. Preventing future wrongful convictions in the United States requires confronting the problem from both sides. In keeping with the dual functions of the American criminal justice system - protecting the innocent and convicting the guilty - a comprehensive plan of reform must be both preventive and compensatory. Only by working both to decrease the risk of executing the innocent and to restore to innocence those who were wrongfully convicted will the judicial system regain its legitimacy.</description><subject>Capital punishment</subject><subject>Confessions</subject><subject>DNA fingerprints</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Legal reform</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>0042-2533</issn><issn>1942-9886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo1jk1LxDAURYMoWEf_Q3BfSJpJmudOBr-goAtdD-H1pWYYkpqmM_58O6irexeHc-8ZqySsmxqsNeesEmLpjVbqkl1N004IIVXTVmzogifufKHMe3Llk-d0vONvmQ4US4gDP-YUBz_vOboxFLdkioeAJaQ4cRd7nmkqKZ_QEGNCivgvpO8UKbsTes0uvNtPdPOXK_bx-PC-ea6716eXzX1Xj9KKUhsyDo3XWoBGC0i6J0Jt0LdAKKUiMga8kQrWSiIaUl62GrxvWui1VSt2--sdc_qal2fbXZpzXCa3EiwoI41WPyzyVdc</recordid><startdate>20030501</startdate><enddate>20030501</enddate><creator>Jean Coleman Blackerby</creator><general>Vanderbilt Law Review</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030501</creationdate><title>Life after death row: Preventing wrongful capital convictions and restoring innocence after exoneration</title><author>Jean Coleman Blackerby</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p180t-6e6ac6f55095c89ce5deec56cf79ec113ee669f6139431cc6e3f1759ff279d583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Capital punishment</topic><topic>Confessions</topic><topic>DNA fingerprints</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Legal reform</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jean Coleman Blackerby</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Vanderbilt law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jean Coleman Blackerby</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life after death row: Preventing wrongful capital convictions and restoring innocence after exoneration</atitle><jtitle>Vanderbilt law review</jtitle><date>2003-05-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1179</spage><pages>1179-</pages><issn>0042-2533</issn><eissn>1942-9886</eissn><coden>VLRED2</coden><abstract>In Gregg v. Georgia, the Supreme Court overturned its ruling in Furman v. Georgia and held that the death penalty, as administered by the states, was not per se "cruel and unusual punishment" in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Yet errors continue to occur at an alarming rate in the capital punishment system - over one hundred death row inmates have been released pursuant to evidence of actual innocence since 1973. This Note examines the necessity of a dual approach to the problem of wrongful capital convictions: implementing systemic changes to prevent mistaken convictions and improving available remedies for those who have been wrongfully convicted and rightly released. Preventing future wrongful convictions in the United States requires confronting the problem from both sides. In keeping with the dual functions of the American criminal justice system - protecting the innocent and convicting the guilty - a comprehensive plan of reform must be both preventive and compensatory. Only by working both to decrease the risk of executing the innocent and to restore to innocence those who were wrongfully convicted will the judicial system regain its legitimacy.</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>Vanderbilt Law Review</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-2533
ispartof Vanderbilt law review, 2003-05, Vol.56 (4), p.1179
issn 0042-2533
1942-9886
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_198936165
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Capital punishment
Confessions
DNA fingerprints
Errors
Evidence
Forensic sciences
Genetic testing
Legal reform
Prisoners
Supreme Court decisions
Trials
title Life after death row: Preventing wrongful capital convictions and restoring innocence after exoneration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A06%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life%20after%20death%20row:%20Preventing%20wrongful%20capital%20convictions%20and%20restoring%20innocence%20after%20exoneration&rft.jtitle=Vanderbilt%20law%20review&rft.au=Jean%20Coleman%20Blackerby&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1179&rft.pages=1179-&rft.issn=0042-2533&rft.eissn=1942-9886&rft.coden=VLRED2&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E444059771%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198936165&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true