Montana: Budgeting and Policy in the Treasure State

The 65th Montana Legislature ended its constitutionally mandated 90-day biennium session with a $10.3 billion, two-year all funds budget in late April 2017. The Republican-controlled legislature returned to its contentious tradition. There were several "big issues," but due to budget short...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:California journal of politics and policy 2017-12, Vol.9 (4), p.1-14
Hauptverfasser: Greene, Jeffrey, Barsky, Christina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1
container_title California journal of politics and policy
container_volume 9
creator Greene, Jeffrey
Barsky, Christina
description The 65th Montana Legislature ended its constitutionally mandated 90-day biennium session with a $10.3 billion, two-year all funds budget in late April 2017. The Republican-controlled legislature returned to its contentious tradition. There were several "big issues," but due to budget shortfalls, few policy issues were resolved. Infrastructure bills generally failed although the first gas tax in decades passed to help with infrastructure. Campaign finance (raising the spending limits) was an issue, which seems to be a tradition in the state (Grant 2017). Montana's colleges and universities took significant cuts in their budgets, and tuition increased roughly 13 percent. Except for K-12 programs, most state agencies' budgets were cut. Overall, it was a grim legislative session that produced very few results and resolved few problems. The balanced budget lasted less than two months when revenue projections turned out to be wrong and the governor had to use his authority to further cut expenses, which included layoffs and additional cuts to state agencies and services. The governor has limitations on how much he or she can cut, which led observers to suggest that a special session may be needed to fix the budget. Due to a historic fire season, the state's firefighting budget was drained, and the state's fragile economy was adversely affected. Tourists either left early or cancelled their plans due to the fires and smoke. Overall, there were not many winners in this legislative session. It was a session marked by lack of funds and budget across most agencies. Unfortunately, as the fall season began, the state budget appeared to be in shambles only months after the session adjourned.
doi_str_mv 10.5070/P2CJPP9437344
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1989190372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989190372</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1054-751eba6b431d57baeef148a3b1f6c29725b98b4b2b5da886b76863729d151b983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkD1PwzAQhi0EEqUwsltiDvjibzaI-FQRkSizZSdOSVWcYjtD_z1BZYDp3tP76E56EDoHcsmJJFd1WT3XtWZUUsYO0Aw0Y8W0kcM_-RidpLQmRHAl2QzRlyFkG-w1vh3blc99WGEbWlwPm77Z4T7g_OHxMnqbxujxW7bZn6Kjzm6SP_udc_R-f7esHovF68NTdbMoGiCcFZKDd1Y4RqHl0lnvO2DKUgedaEotS-60csyVjrdWKeGkUILKUrfAYaroHF3s727j8DX6lM16GGOYXhrQSoMmEz1RxZ5q4pBS9J3Zxv7Txp0BYn68mH9e6Dci_VM-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989190372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Montana: Budgeting and Policy in the Treasure State</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Columbia International Affairs Online Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Greene, Jeffrey ; Barsky, Christina</creator><creatorcontrib>Greene, Jeffrey ; Barsky, Christina</creatorcontrib><description>The 65th Montana Legislature ended its constitutionally mandated 90-day biennium session with a $10.3 billion, two-year all funds budget in late April 2017. The Republican-controlled legislature returned to its contentious tradition. There were several "big issues," but due to budget shortfalls, few policy issues were resolved. Infrastructure bills generally failed although the first gas tax in decades passed to help with infrastructure. Campaign finance (raising the spending limits) was an issue, which seems to be a tradition in the state (Grant 2017). Montana's colleges and universities took significant cuts in their budgets, and tuition increased roughly 13 percent. Except for K-12 programs, most state agencies' budgets were cut. Overall, it was a grim legislative session that produced very few results and resolved few problems. The balanced budget lasted less than two months when revenue projections turned out to be wrong and the governor had to use his authority to further cut expenses, which included layoffs and additional cuts to state agencies and services. The governor has limitations on how much he or she can cut, which led observers to suggest that a special session may be needed to fix the budget. Due to a historic fire season, the state's firefighting budget was drained, and the state's fragile economy was adversely affected. Tourists either left early or cancelled their plans due to the fires and smoke. Overall, there were not many winners in this legislative session. It was a session marked by lack of funds and budget across most agencies. Unfortunately, as the fall season began, the state budget appeared to be in shambles only months after the session adjourned.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-4370</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2194-6132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-4370</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5070/P2CJPP9437344</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies, UC Berkeley</publisher><subject>Bills ; Budgeting ; Budgets ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Costs ; Expenditures ; Financial support ; Fire fighting ; Fund raising ; Funds ; Government agencies ; Infrastructure ; Policy analysis ; Political campaigns ; Political finance ; Revenue ; Services ; Smoke ; State budgets ; Taxation ; Tuition</subject><ispartof>California journal of politics and policy, 2017-12, Vol.9 (4), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of Governmental Studies, UC Berkeley 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12843,27864,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greene, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsky, Christina</creatorcontrib><title>Montana: Budgeting and Policy in the Treasure State</title><title>California journal of politics and policy</title><description>The 65th Montana Legislature ended its constitutionally mandated 90-day biennium session with a $10.3 billion, two-year all funds budget in late April 2017. The Republican-controlled legislature returned to its contentious tradition. There were several "big issues," but due to budget shortfalls, few policy issues were resolved. Infrastructure bills generally failed although the first gas tax in decades passed to help with infrastructure. Campaign finance (raising the spending limits) was an issue, which seems to be a tradition in the state (Grant 2017). Montana's colleges and universities took significant cuts in their budgets, and tuition increased roughly 13 percent. Except for K-12 programs, most state agencies' budgets were cut. Overall, it was a grim legislative session that produced very few results and resolved few problems. The balanced budget lasted less than two months when revenue projections turned out to be wrong and the governor had to use his authority to further cut expenses, which included layoffs and additional cuts to state agencies and services. The governor has limitations on how much he or she can cut, which led observers to suggest that a special session may be needed to fix the budget. Due to a historic fire season, the state's firefighting budget was drained, and the state's fragile economy was adversely affected. Tourists either left early or cancelled their plans due to the fires and smoke. Overall, there were not many winners in this legislative session. It was a session marked by lack of funds and budget across most agencies. Unfortunately, as the fall season began, the state budget appeared to be in shambles only months after the session adjourned.</description><subject>Bills</subject><subject>Budgeting</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Financial support</subject><subject>Fire fighting</subject><subject>Fund raising</subject><subject>Funds</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Political finance</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Smoke</subject><subject>State budgets</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Tuition</subject><issn>1944-4370</issn><issn>2194-6132</issn><issn>1944-4370</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkD1PwzAQhi0EEqUwsltiDvjibzaI-FQRkSizZSdOSVWcYjtD_z1BZYDp3tP76E56EDoHcsmJJFd1WT3XtWZUUsYO0Aw0Y8W0kcM_-RidpLQmRHAl2QzRlyFkG-w1vh3blc99WGEbWlwPm77Z4T7g_OHxMnqbxujxW7bZn6Kjzm6SP_udc_R-f7esHovF68NTdbMoGiCcFZKDd1Y4RqHl0lnvO2DKUgedaEotS-60csyVjrdWKeGkUILKUrfAYaroHF3s727j8DX6lM16GGOYXhrQSoMmEz1RxZ5q4pBS9J3Zxv7Txp0BYn68mH9e6Dci_VM-</recordid><startdate>20171219</startdate><enddate>20171219</enddate><creator>Greene, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Barsky, Christina</creator><general>Institute of Governmental Studies, UC Berkeley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171219</creationdate><title>Montana: Budgeting and Policy in the Treasure State</title><author>Greene, Jeffrey ; Barsky, Christina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1054-751eba6b431d57baeef148a3b1f6c29725b98b4b2b5da886b76863729d151b983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bills</topic><topic>Budgeting</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Financial support</topic><topic>Fire fighting</topic><topic>Fund raising</topic><topic>Funds</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Political finance</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Smoke</topic><topic>State budgets</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Tuition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greene, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsky, Christina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>California journal of politics and policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greene, Jeffrey</au><au>Barsky, Christina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Montana: Budgeting and Policy in the Treasure State</atitle><jtitle>California journal of politics and policy</jtitle><date>2017-12-19</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>1944-4370</issn><issn>2194-6132</issn><eissn>1944-4370</eissn><abstract>The 65th Montana Legislature ended its constitutionally mandated 90-day biennium session with a $10.3 billion, two-year all funds budget in late April 2017. The Republican-controlled legislature returned to its contentious tradition. There were several "big issues," but due to budget shortfalls, few policy issues were resolved. Infrastructure bills generally failed although the first gas tax in decades passed to help with infrastructure. Campaign finance (raising the spending limits) was an issue, which seems to be a tradition in the state (Grant 2017). Montana's colleges and universities took significant cuts in their budgets, and tuition increased roughly 13 percent. Except for K-12 programs, most state agencies' budgets were cut. Overall, it was a grim legislative session that produced very few results and resolved few problems. The balanced budget lasted less than two months when revenue projections turned out to be wrong and the governor had to use his authority to further cut expenses, which included layoffs and additional cuts to state agencies and services. The governor has limitations on how much he or she can cut, which led observers to suggest that a special session may be needed to fix the budget. Due to a historic fire season, the state's firefighting budget was drained, and the state's fragile economy was adversely affected. Tourists either left early or cancelled their plans due to the fires and smoke. Overall, there were not many winners in this legislative session. It was a session marked by lack of funds and budget across most agencies. Unfortunately, as the fall season began, the state budget appeared to be in shambles only months after the session adjourned.</abstract><cop>Berkeley</cop><pub>Institute of Governmental Studies, UC Berkeley</pub><doi>10.5070/P2CJPP9437344</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1944-4370
ispartof California journal of politics and policy, 2017-12, Vol.9 (4), p.1-14
issn 1944-4370
2194-6132
1944-4370
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1989190372
source PAIS Index; Columbia International Affairs Online Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Bills
Budgeting
Budgets
Colleges & universities
Costs
Expenditures
Financial support
Fire fighting
Fund raising
Funds
Government agencies
Infrastructure
Policy analysis
Political campaigns
Political finance
Revenue
Services
Smoke
State budgets
Taxation
Tuition
title Montana: Budgeting and Policy in the Treasure State
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T10%3A49%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Montana:%20Budgeting%20and%20Policy%20in%20the%20Treasure%20State&rft.jtitle=California%20journal%20of%20politics%20and%20policy&rft.au=Greene,%20Jeffrey&rft.date=2017-12-19&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=1944-4370&rft.eissn=1944-4370&rft_id=info:doi/10.5070/P2CJPP9437344&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989190372%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989190372&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true