Sex and breeding status affect prey composition of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja
Foraging behavior may show considerable variation among population classes—such as sex and breeding class—that can be consequence of the groups’ specific constraints and roles. In raptors, differential parental roles related to foraging have been the main explanation for males being smaller than fem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of ornithology 2018, Vol.159 (1), p.141-150 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 150 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | Journal of ornithology |
container_volume | 159 |
creator | Miranda, Everton B. P. Campbell-Thompson, Edwin Muela, Angel Vargas, Félix Hernán |
description | Foraging behavior may show considerable variation among population classes—such as sex and breeding class—that can be consequence of the groups’ specific constraints and roles. In raptors, differential parental roles related to foraging have been the main explanation for males being smaller than females, as smaller males have been described to be more efficient foragers. During one phase of breeding, only males forage, requiring them to feed themselves, females and young. This is expected to induce changes in foraging behavior of breeders compared to non-breeders. By comparing prey taken by floaters and breeders of Harpy Eagles (
Harpia harpyja
), we describe some effects of breeding and sex on the diet. Here we show that diet traits differed between male and female floaters, and between floaters and breeders. Juvenile prey was three times more common in the diet of males than that of females. Sloths were more common prey among females than among males (53 vs. 37%). Males preyed four times more on terrestrial animals than did females, and showed a greater niche width than females (6.0 vs. 3.4). The prey of breeders was smaller than that of non-breeders (on average 3.64 vs. 4.24 kg). Non-breeders had a larger niche width than breeders. Our data provide support for the hypothesis of parental role differentiation as an explanation for reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10336-017-1482-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1988987489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1988987489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4e41fd01bb0c03ba19680da936bf0b85cd86857cc56682d3743f3f38510269643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA8-pMks0mRynVFooe1HPIZpO6pd1dky3Yb-_WVfAic5g_vPcGfoRcI9wiQHGXEDiXGWCRoVAs4ydkwlDzrGAgT39n1OycXKS0ARBC5DghTy_-k9qmomX0vqqbNU297feJ2hC862kX_YG6dte1qe7rtqFtoAsbuwOd2_XWp--ltvT9eNvYS3IW7Db5q58-JW8P89fZIls9Py5n96vMcZR9JrzAUAGWJTjgpUUtFVRWc1kGKFXuKiVVXjiXS6lYxQvBw1AqR2BSS8Gn5GbM7WL7sfepN5t2H5vhpUGtlFaFUHpQ4ahysU0p-mC6WO9sPBgEc8RmRmxmwGaO2AwfPGz0pEHbrH38k_yv6QsWRG6V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1988987489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex and breeding status affect prey composition of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Miranda, Everton B. P. ; Campbell-Thompson, Edwin ; Muela, Angel ; Vargas, Félix Hernán</creator><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Everton B. P. ; Campbell-Thompson, Edwin ; Muela, Angel ; Vargas, Félix Hernán</creatorcontrib><description>Foraging behavior may show considerable variation among population classes—such as sex and breeding class—that can be consequence of the groups’ specific constraints and roles. In raptors, differential parental roles related to foraging have been the main explanation for males being smaller than females, as smaller males have been described to be more efficient foragers. During one phase of breeding, only males forage, requiring them to feed themselves, females and young. This is expected to induce changes in foraging behavior of breeders compared to non-breeders. By comparing prey taken by floaters and breeders of Harpy Eagles (
Harpia harpyja
), we describe some effects of breeding and sex on the diet. Here we show that diet traits differed between male and female floaters, and between floaters and breeders. Juvenile prey was three times more common in the diet of males than that of females. Sloths were more common prey among females than among males (53 vs. 37%). Males preyed four times more on terrestrial animals than did females, and showed a greater niche width than females (6.0 vs. 3.4). The prey of breeders was smaller than that of non-breeders (on average 3.64 vs. 4.24 kg). Non-breeders had a larger niche width than breeders. Our data provide support for the hypothesis of parental role differentiation as an explanation for reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2193-7192</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2193-7206</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10336-017-1482-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accipitridae ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds of prey ; Breeding status ; Ecology ; Females ; Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management ; Foraging behavior ; Harpia harpyja ; Life Sciences ; Males ; Original Article ; Prey ; Sexual dimorphism ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of ornithology, 2018, Vol.159 (1), p.141-150</ispartof><rights>Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4e41fd01bb0c03ba19680da936bf0b85cd86857cc56682d3743f3f38510269643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4e41fd01bb0c03ba19680da936bf0b85cd86857cc56682d3743f3f38510269643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10336-017-1482-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10336-017-1482-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Everton B. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell-Thompson, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muela, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Félix Hernán</creatorcontrib><title>Sex and breeding status affect prey composition of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja</title><title>Journal of ornithology</title><addtitle>J Ornithol</addtitle><description>Foraging behavior may show considerable variation among population classes—such as sex and breeding class—that can be consequence of the groups’ specific constraints and roles. In raptors, differential parental roles related to foraging have been the main explanation for males being smaller than females, as smaller males have been described to be more efficient foragers. During one phase of breeding, only males forage, requiring them to feed themselves, females and young. This is expected to induce changes in foraging behavior of breeders compared to non-breeders. By comparing prey taken by floaters and breeders of Harpy Eagles (
Harpia harpyja
), we describe some effects of breeding and sex on the diet. Here we show that diet traits differed between male and female floaters, and between floaters and breeders. Juvenile prey was three times more common in the diet of males than that of females. Sloths were more common prey among females than among males (53 vs. 37%). Males preyed four times more on terrestrial animals than did females, and showed a greater niche width than females (6.0 vs. 3.4). The prey of breeders was smaller than that of non-breeders (on average 3.64 vs. 4.24 kg). Non-breeders had a larger niche width than breeders. Our data provide support for the hypothesis of parental role differentiation as an explanation for reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors.</description><subject>Accipitridae</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds of prey</subject><subject>Breeding status</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Harpia harpyja</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Sexual dimorphism</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>2193-7192</issn><issn>2193-7206</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA8-pMks0mRynVFooe1HPIZpO6pd1dky3Yb-_WVfAic5g_vPcGfoRcI9wiQHGXEDiXGWCRoVAs4ydkwlDzrGAgT39n1OycXKS0ARBC5DghTy_-k9qmomX0vqqbNU297feJ2hC862kX_YG6dte1qe7rtqFtoAsbuwOd2_XWp--ltvT9eNvYS3IW7Db5q58-JW8P89fZIls9Py5n96vMcZR9JrzAUAGWJTjgpUUtFVRWc1kGKFXuKiVVXjiXS6lYxQvBw1AqR2BSS8Gn5GbM7WL7sfepN5t2H5vhpUGtlFaFUHpQ4ahysU0p-mC6WO9sPBgEc8RmRmxmwGaO2AwfPGz0pEHbrH38k_yv6QsWRG6V</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Miranda, Everton B. P.</creator><creator>Campbell-Thompson, Edwin</creator><creator>Muela, Angel</creator><creator>Vargas, Félix Hernán</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Sex and breeding status affect prey composition of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja</title><author>Miranda, Everton B. P. ; Campbell-Thompson, Edwin ; Muela, Angel ; Vargas, Félix Hernán</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4e41fd01bb0c03ba19680da936bf0b85cd86857cc56682d3743f3f38510269643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accipitridae</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds of prey</topic><topic>Breeding status</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Harpia harpyja</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Sexual dimorphism</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Everton B. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell-Thompson, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muela, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Félix Hernán</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of ornithology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miranda, Everton B. P.</au><au>Campbell-Thompson, Edwin</au><au>Muela, Angel</au><au>Vargas, Félix Hernán</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex and breeding status affect prey composition of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ornithology</jtitle><stitle>J Ornithol</stitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>141-150</pages><issn>2193-7192</issn><eissn>2193-7206</eissn><abstract>Foraging behavior may show considerable variation among population classes—such as sex and breeding class—that can be consequence of the groups’ specific constraints and roles. In raptors, differential parental roles related to foraging have been the main explanation for males being smaller than females, as smaller males have been described to be more efficient foragers. During one phase of breeding, only males forage, requiring them to feed themselves, females and young. This is expected to induce changes in foraging behavior of breeders compared to non-breeders. By comparing prey taken by floaters and breeders of Harpy Eagles (
Harpia harpyja
), we describe some effects of breeding and sex on the diet. Here we show that diet traits differed between male and female floaters, and between floaters and breeders. Juvenile prey was three times more common in the diet of males than that of females. Sloths were more common prey among females than among males (53 vs. 37%). Males preyed four times more on terrestrial animals than did females, and showed a greater niche width than females (6.0 vs. 3.4). The prey of breeders was smaller than that of non-breeders (on average 3.64 vs. 4.24 kg). Non-breeders had a larger niche width than breeders. Our data provide support for the hypothesis of parental role differentiation as an explanation for reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10336-017-1482-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2193-7192 |
ispartof | Journal of ornithology, 2018, Vol.159 (1), p.141-150 |
issn | 2193-7192 2193-7206 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1988987489 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Accipitridae Biomedical and Life Sciences Birds of prey Breeding status Ecology Females Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management Foraging behavior Harpia harpyja Life Sciences Males Original Article Prey Sexual dimorphism Zoology |
title | Sex and breeding status affect prey composition of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T08%3A53%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20and%20breeding%20status%20affect%20prey%20composition%20of%20Harpy%20Eagles%20Harpia%20harpyja&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ornithology&rft.au=Miranda,%20Everton%20B.%20P.&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=141-150&rft.issn=2193-7192&rft.eissn=2193-7206&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10336-017-1482-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1988987489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1988987489&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |