Sex and breeding status affect prey composition of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja

Foraging behavior may show considerable variation among population classes—such as sex and breeding class—that can be consequence of the groups’ specific constraints and roles. In raptors, differential parental roles related to foraging have been the main explanation for males being smaller than fem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ornithology 2018, Vol.159 (1), p.141-150
Hauptverfasser: Miranda, Everton B. P., Campbell-Thompson, Edwin, Muela, Angel, Vargas, Félix Hernán
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150
container_issue 1
container_start_page 141
container_title Journal of ornithology
container_volume 159
creator Miranda, Everton B. P.
Campbell-Thompson, Edwin
Muela, Angel
Vargas, Félix Hernán
description Foraging behavior may show considerable variation among population classes—such as sex and breeding class—that can be consequence of the groups’ specific constraints and roles. In raptors, differential parental roles related to foraging have been the main explanation for males being smaller than females, as smaller males have been described to be more efficient foragers. During one phase of breeding, only males forage, requiring them to feed themselves, females and young. This is expected to induce changes in foraging behavior of breeders compared to non-breeders. By comparing prey taken by floaters and breeders of Harpy Eagles ( Harpia harpyja ), we describe some effects of breeding and sex on the diet. Here we show that diet traits differed between male and female floaters, and between floaters and breeders. Juvenile prey was three times more common in the diet of males than that of females. Sloths were more common prey among females than among males (53 vs. 37%). Males preyed four times more on terrestrial animals than did females, and showed a greater niche width than females (6.0 vs. 3.4). The prey of breeders was smaller than that of non-breeders (on average 3.64 vs. 4.24 kg). Non-breeders had a larger niche width than breeders. Our data provide support for the hypothesis of parental role differentiation as an explanation for reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10336-017-1482-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1988987489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1988987489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4e41fd01bb0c03ba19680da936bf0b85cd86857cc56682d3743f3f38510269643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA8-pMks0mRynVFooe1HPIZpO6pd1dky3Yb-_WVfAic5g_vPcGfoRcI9wiQHGXEDiXGWCRoVAs4ydkwlDzrGAgT39n1OycXKS0ARBC5DghTy_-k9qmomX0vqqbNU297feJ2hC862kX_YG6dte1qe7rtqFtoAsbuwOd2_XWp--ltvT9eNvYS3IW7Db5q58-JW8P89fZIls9Py5n96vMcZR9JrzAUAGWJTjgpUUtFVRWc1kGKFXuKiVVXjiXS6lYxQvBw1AqR2BSS8Gn5GbM7WL7sfepN5t2H5vhpUGtlFaFUHpQ4ahysU0p-mC6WO9sPBgEc8RmRmxmwGaO2AwfPGz0pEHbrH38k_yv6QsWRG6V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1988987489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex and breeding status affect prey composition of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Miranda, Everton B. P. ; Campbell-Thompson, Edwin ; Muela, Angel ; Vargas, Félix Hernán</creator><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Everton B. P. ; Campbell-Thompson, Edwin ; Muela, Angel ; Vargas, Félix Hernán</creatorcontrib><description>Foraging behavior may show considerable variation among population classes—such as sex and breeding class—that can be consequence of the groups’ specific constraints and roles. In raptors, differential parental roles related to foraging have been the main explanation for males being smaller than females, as smaller males have been described to be more efficient foragers. During one phase of breeding, only males forage, requiring them to feed themselves, females and young. This is expected to induce changes in foraging behavior of breeders compared to non-breeders. By comparing prey taken by floaters and breeders of Harpy Eagles ( Harpia harpyja ), we describe some effects of breeding and sex on the diet. Here we show that diet traits differed between male and female floaters, and between floaters and breeders. Juvenile prey was three times more common in the diet of males than that of females. Sloths were more common prey among females than among males (53 vs. 37%). Males preyed four times more on terrestrial animals than did females, and showed a greater niche width than females (6.0 vs. 3.4). The prey of breeders was smaller than that of non-breeders (on average 3.64 vs. 4.24 kg). Non-breeders had a larger niche width than breeders. Our data provide support for the hypothesis of parental role differentiation as an explanation for reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2193-7192</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2193-7206</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10336-017-1482-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accipitridae ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds of prey ; Breeding status ; Ecology ; Females ; Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management ; Foraging behavior ; Harpia harpyja ; Life Sciences ; Males ; Original Article ; Prey ; Sexual dimorphism ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of ornithology, 2018, Vol.159 (1), p.141-150</ispartof><rights>Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4e41fd01bb0c03ba19680da936bf0b85cd86857cc56682d3743f3f38510269643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4e41fd01bb0c03ba19680da936bf0b85cd86857cc56682d3743f3f38510269643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10336-017-1482-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10336-017-1482-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Everton B. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell-Thompson, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muela, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Félix Hernán</creatorcontrib><title>Sex and breeding status affect prey composition of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja</title><title>Journal of ornithology</title><addtitle>J Ornithol</addtitle><description>Foraging behavior may show considerable variation among population classes—such as sex and breeding class—that can be consequence of the groups’ specific constraints and roles. In raptors, differential parental roles related to foraging have been the main explanation for males being smaller than females, as smaller males have been described to be more efficient foragers. During one phase of breeding, only males forage, requiring them to feed themselves, females and young. This is expected to induce changes in foraging behavior of breeders compared to non-breeders. By comparing prey taken by floaters and breeders of Harpy Eagles ( Harpia harpyja ), we describe some effects of breeding and sex on the diet. Here we show that diet traits differed between male and female floaters, and between floaters and breeders. Juvenile prey was three times more common in the diet of males than that of females. Sloths were more common prey among females than among males (53 vs. 37%). Males preyed four times more on terrestrial animals than did females, and showed a greater niche width than females (6.0 vs. 3.4). The prey of breeders was smaller than that of non-breeders (on average 3.64 vs. 4.24 kg). Non-breeders had a larger niche width than breeders. Our data provide support for the hypothesis of parental role differentiation as an explanation for reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors.</description><subject>Accipitridae</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds of prey</subject><subject>Breeding status</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Harpia harpyja</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Sexual dimorphism</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>2193-7192</issn><issn>2193-7206</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA8-pMks0mRynVFooe1HPIZpO6pd1dky3Yb-_WVfAic5g_vPcGfoRcI9wiQHGXEDiXGWCRoVAs4ydkwlDzrGAgT39n1OycXKS0ARBC5DghTy_-k9qmomX0vqqbNU297feJ2hC862kX_YG6dte1qe7rtqFtoAsbuwOd2_XWp--ltvT9eNvYS3IW7Db5q58-JW8P89fZIls9Py5n96vMcZR9JrzAUAGWJTjgpUUtFVRWc1kGKFXuKiVVXjiXS6lYxQvBw1AqR2BSS8Gn5GbM7WL7sfepN5t2H5vhpUGtlFaFUHpQ4ahysU0p-mC6WO9sPBgEc8RmRmxmwGaO2AwfPGz0pEHbrH38k_yv6QsWRG6V</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Miranda, Everton B. P.</creator><creator>Campbell-Thompson, Edwin</creator><creator>Muela, Angel</creator><creator>Vargas, Félix Hernán</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Sex and breeding status affect prey composition of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja</title><author>Miranda, Everton B. P. ; Campbell-Thompson, Edwin ; Muela, Angel ; Vargas, Félix Hernán</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4e41fd01bb0c03ba19680da936bf0b85cd86857cc56682d3743f3f38510269643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accipitridae</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds of prey</topic><topic>Breeding status</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Harpia harpyja</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Sexual dimorphism</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miranda, Everton B. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell-Thompson, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muela, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Félix Hernán</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of ornithology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miranda, Everton B. P.</au><au>Campbell-Thompson, Edwin</au><au>Muela, Angel</au><au>Vargas, Félix Hernán</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex and breeding status affect prey composition of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ornithology</jtitle><stitle>J Ornithol</stitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>141-150</pages><issn>2193-7192</issn><eissn>2193-7206</eissn><abstract>Foraging behavior may show considerable variation among population classes—such as sex and breeding class—that can be consequence of the groups’ specific constraints and roles. In raptors, differential parental roles related to foraging have been the main explanation for males being smaller than females, as smaller males have been described to be more efficient foragers. During one phase of breeding, only males forage, requiring them to feed themselves, females and young. This is expected to induce changes in foraging behavior of breeders compared to non-breeders. By comparing prey taken by floaters and breeders of Harpy Eagles ( Harpia harpyja ), we describe some effects of breeding and sex on the diet. Here we show that diet traits differed between male and female floaters, and between floaters and breeders. Juvenile prey was three times more common in the diet of males than that of females. Sloths were more common prey among females than among males (53 vs. 37%). Males preyed four times more on terrestrial animals than did females, and showed a greater niche width than females (6.0 vs. 3.4). The prey of breeders was smaller than that of non-breeders (on average 3.64 vs. 4.24 kg). Non-breeders had a larger niche width than breeders. Our data provide support for the hypothesis of parental role differentiation as an explanation for reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10336-017-1482-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2193-7192
ispartof Journal of ornithology, 2018, Vol.159 (1), p.141-150
issn 2193-7192
2193-7206
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1988987489
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Accipitridae
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Birds of prey
Breeding status
Ecology
Females
Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management
Foraging behavior
Harpia harpyja
Life Sciences
Males
Original Article
Prey
Sexual dimorphism
Zoology
title Sex and breeding status affect prey composition of Harpy Eagles Harpia harpyja
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T08%3A53%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20and%20breeding%20status%20affect%20prey%20composition%20of%20Harpy%20Eagles%20Harpia%20harpyja&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ornithology&rft.au=Miranda,%20Everton%20B.%20P.&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=141-150&rft.issn=2193-7192&rft.eissn=2193-7206&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10336-017-1482-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1988987489%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1988987489&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true